All aligns to self interest, but what aligns our currently accepted definition of self?

in response to the themes in:

https://sebastienpowell.substack.com/p/checkpoint-charlie

 

 All aligns to self interest, but what aligns our currently accepted definition of self, from which our perceptions of other and world is derived?
A mis taken self image must result in conflicted self interests that then mask to unify off as a self presentation set against externalised conflicts - ie projected to scapegoat or blame as justifiction for attack. Accepting false premise, following false profits, to go forth and multiply conflict and debt running toxic, as a negatively polarised sense of survival set in distancing, masking and attack while asserting virtue or moral necessity. Such a mindset runs contagion by reaction in minds already invested as stakeholders to fear set as control over life seen through dead eyes.
The world we perceive & respond is not primary, independent or creative cause to the true nature of a living Universe regardless our capacity to distance, mask and attack our own source and nature in the lockstepping agreement to lockdown to the body in a world of bodies set in conflict, struggle, sickness and death.
When fear is given power to 'create' in our mind, as our power of protection, its thinking is taken as our own. The fundamental poison or contagion is fear, but pretending it is not already active as conditioned, internalised and normalised habit is simply further self-deceit - such as to make cover story for masking over active harms to push conflicts out of awareness by diversion and dissociation.  While fear of fear simply feeds or inflames the dispossession of our true awareness and right mind. So undoing errors set in protective deceits is needful from wherever we currently align integrity of being, but the pattern of such is systemic to all such instances, and so it the root error from which all proceeds.
For many reading here, the covid op reveals the capacity of the collective mind to set itself in an active and protected unreality by reaction to false evidence appearing real. This principle is not limited to covid or any facet of its mutating narrative identities running covert or hidden as masked agenda, dark op or manipulative evil mind.
So WHO told us we were naked? - in the sense of defenceless, susceptible, threatened, attacked, deceived, and set in self-doubt, division, and driven to act out in the shape of our fears?
Questioning our reactions, our  interpretive perceptions, the underlying beliefs and our acquired conditioning or masking survival strategy set to limit and control the life we could not cope with or be equal to in our past, is a decision to open, align and restore our true presence now, as a grounded reference point - without which we are lost in the negative results of our own fear - and perhaps we no longer wish to hide this from ourselves or each other in social masking evasions that distort our relational communications and appreciations of shared worth and value - that is known by living rather than set by social credits to offset guilt-narratives, as 'permission to live' under fear.