Masking loveless agenda in a mask of virtue set against evils

This comment came up in context of levels of particulates being set as regulatory controls, ostensibly for public health.

The corporately captured use of public health regs for 'social engineering' sets arbitrary biomarkers as parameters by which it determines risk levels, so as to authorise or mandate controls.  This is very evident to anyone able to ask questions, but not at all to those who are effectively controlled by 'experts say'. That there are harmful and toxic pollutions resulting from industrial processes, chemicals and commonly used materials is kept from any real accountability by the promotion of cover stories set as political or medical narratives of virtue and necessity, such as to assign 'infectious disease' as the big scare that takes funding and attention away from unchecked toxic exposures. So note the particulate has no concern at all for composition ie known toxic nanoparticles. Also bio-insecurity is propagandised to induce fearful susceptibility without awareness of the body, and natures means of protection, resilience, and elimination - such as to cancel or mitigate otherwise toxic burdens. That those in positions of wealth and influence should decide to use their means to engineer a 'better world' is hardly a conspiracy, but that the decisions as to what such a world shall be and how it is to be brought about is not via any process of discussion and consent, but principally via mind or narrative controls that set an evil, against which we are induced to act, to sacrifice as social virtue, or be cancelled, excluded or denied lawful freedoms.
The nature of masking loveless agenda in a mask of virtue is to make it difficult to question or criticise without immediately being labelled and outcast as not to be heard but ignored, ridiculed or persecuted.
The nature of choices is always a trading of costs risks and benefits. But the hidden costs are not obvious when the choices are framed in the terms of the sales pitch for a binding contract of exchange. The simplest way to see our predicament is a corporate capture of not only its regulators, but of all social institutions of influence - as 'lock-stepped' into regulatory capture.
Principally via a financial or banking controls that can fund or choke the careers or directions of significant movers, movements or events so as to effectively milk the Many from insider advantage that remodels the law to protect and extend its controls from check, limit or loss. The defence against deceit is not an education as such, as covid reveals, we can be trained not to see or question and be highly educated. It's really a matter of integrity of being, of relationship and communication. A false sense of safety will believe it is safe in being 'virtuous' and so will not want to even look at deceits running in the open.
Nanoparticles are the spearhead of new biological and industrial applications that are largely unregulated, unchecked and tested on the public. But they are also inherently part of biological function. When science discovers - marketising and weaponising take insider pickings. True benefit cant be allowed to upset the gravy train.
But a solid and radiant stove in our house is more than 'heating'!
I can imagine regs for seasoning wood for sale being drafted such as to 'consolidate' the market under corporate control, as well as regs to discourage or frighten off use - ie emission requirements requiring expensive services and random checks and fines.