Whistle blowing - aligned in true witness

I looked up Ben Goldacre - after a reference to him - and after reading the home page and current article - dropped into a 'random' article on whistleblowers. 

Peep peep.
by Ben Goldacre in bad science, big pharma, whistleblower

My comment:

In a focus of willingness for truth - we create a correction society. (an error correction culture)

In a focus in guilt and blame we have a fear of penalty - and the power struggle to evade, deflect or mitigate it.

Love of truth is characterized by intolerance for self-betrayal.

Fear of true exposure demands masking deceit or persona - that seeks to manipulate or acquire mutual reinforcements as defence against losing face - validity and all that is associated with it.

Fear and blame establish value systems or 'social realities' of exclusion and privilege as part of enforcing compliance as a tacit or contextual conditioning.

These observations are at the root of the human conditioning - which is self-perpetuating or "history repeats itself".

Love of truth is an inner alignment with a felt resonance or quality of coherent being. Truth is its own reward - if accepted as the true foundation for all else.

To have the forms of success or achievement and know its fakery - is sacrifice to the assertion and defence of a lie by which to not know what you know. This calls on ingenious complexity to hide, disguise or falsely attribute - in place of creative freedom of shared discovery.

I have to live with myself as I accept myself to be.
I do not have to give attention and allegiance to a blaming and guilted thinking, that deprives and denies a true sense of connected being. Correction - in an individual sense, is being presently connected and in communication with what is here - in place of dissociated overlay of complex obfusactions.

We operate through personality constructs that are part of learning, adapting and manipulating our world. Bringing this to light not as a sin or a psychological pathology - but as a call for correction - in all involved - is also releasing the power-deceits of scapegoating or invalidating others to seem to be righteous or superior.
Fake reality is all the rage! - but in that wordplay is a serious note - for the suppression and denial of our natural feeling being under the stamp of an unnatural illegitimacy should and does generate terror and rage - where the call for correction is persistently ignored and engineered out of consciousness - leaving nowhere to be. painted into a corner, trapped in thought made flesh by fear-driven belief.

Throwing off or releasing what has no true belonging within us needs a clear accounting - including the willingness to challenge our trojan horse assumptions - for there is the 'best' hiding place - where none think to look because they 'already know' or dare not to look because investment in the model is the power of the day, and the requirements for inclusion and support.

While Reason is synonymous with Sanity - self-justifying rationality can serve insane premises - and generally does.
Discernment is a heart and mind as one. The divorce of heart and mind is a fake emotionality AND a fake rationality. So when I notice that operating in myself - I do not choose to use it as a basis for actions or decisions - to listen , feel and in simple desire be curious for the true or corrected and connected communication or perception - that can take a good step now.
So if fears obstruct the communication or act of true witness - leave blame aside and be curious as to the true nature of the beliefs and assumptions that embody this particular reflection of experience. Keep a channel open for new perspective and insight from which one good step grows another. Wholeness of being is a good of a different order than that assigned to fantasy ideals, or by war against evils that 'attack' or react against the assertion of such. We do not escape symptoms by hiding them in false causes but by uncovering the true - and being a witness or embodiment of its qualities in your relations.

Recognition of true worth grows a culture of worth - even if the outer forms and appearances of disease persist. There is an inner freedom that cannot be described or compared. Whatever else - this is to be in life and truly know it.

Reclaiming Soverignty of Being

What is Needed is a Progressive Vision of National Sovereignty
an article by Thomas Fazi, via Green European Journal
reposted in OffGuardian where I commented :

 Vaska said:
Most of the European Left seems to have fully adopted and internalized the globalist perspective, so much so that I don’t think there’s a genuine Left left in Europe at all.

Could 'globalist' be replaced by 'technocratic' - which postures as a pseudo scientific 'expertise.
That applied science of technological development effectively 'shrank' our world to one of instant communications, and networks of transportation is the primary enabler of financial and corporate power as a globalism OVER people rather than a global diversity among people.

The undermining of sovereignty of being is the 'alien will' of a wish to be outside, apart from and have dominion over. It is a self-specialness that is necessarily insulted by a life and a world that does not support it. It is the framing of everything in terms that rationalize in order to capture and direct a false identity. For sovereignty in truth is the free and whole will - that cannot have any meaning apart from and over its relations that are one within its being.

The alternate to truth is shifting and warring illusion - where invested identities struggle for light of acceptance and support - as much as to align in judgements of allegiance or rejection. The 'oppositional will' becomes thus negatively defined in what it is not, and by what it fears or is against. There is no free will under tyrannous dictate - but such dictate asserts coercion to be its protection and just vengeance to enshrine hate in the clothing of power and justice.

The idea of consensual dialogue is an idea of willingness - for it it were coercive it would no longer be dialogue but coercion masking as dialogue such as to frame and limit communication in terms of an imposition upon.

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction holds true in any action of push or pull upon another - but not of the act of the shift of the whole to adopt a new perspective. So the result of coercive framing or deceit, is an entanglement in fragmented complexities that 'demand' or call forth the necessity of power over feared or perceived chaos.

The more control is asserted, the more chaos of suppressed communication - not recognized AS communication in the form of symptoms needing to be addressed as genuine calls to listen and re-align true. Instead the symptoms are framed as 'causal' or redefined as the nature of reality in terms that support war-economy and sickness farming at expense of the freedom to feel and know and align in the true of the life that moves you. And it is freedom because it is accepted as an integrative recognition and not the frame of guilt and compulsion - however so well disguised.

Regardless how, who and why, the playout or unfolding of the ideas that we accept true and live from unfolds lawfully - in terms of consciousness - but the idea of the subjugation and replacement of consciousness by an alien 'will' (the wish to be other than you are) gives up its true power to an idea of sacrifice or rejection of life in order to get 'more' for itself at expense of others and the whole. Or to 'get even' - or war with - a sense of rejection and denial inherent to engaging in coercion and deceit upon self, other or world - that are really one life fragmented to an incoherence and defended against awareness.

So is the natural desire for our true will being subverted by appeals to an 'old identity' - for the deceit is one up on our recollection when operating as our defences - and is adept at re-framing on the fly so as to preserve narrative continuity regardless of false exposure - while it is wanted as protection and aligned with as power.

I recently heard the phrase 'there is more politics in medicine than there is in politics'. I sense that many here see that politics has been framed in ways that operate a sideshow and mainstream programming device to the actual politic of stamping an organisational conformity and compliance on the face of humanity robbed of (or induced to exchange) its Soul or true feeling awareness of being.

True dialog and being together has a listening or receptive that correlates with 'listening within' rather than acting out a scripted identity triggered by self-inflated gratifications or fearful associations. Yet the latter operates the mind to deny a voice be heard, or a stirring of recognition be allowed, felt and aligned in. Reclaiming our mind - has to pause and desist using the 'old' or accepted thinking, long enough to feel it - discern it - rather than be driven by feelings it encapsulates (which includes the suppression of emotion as it does the manipulations of it).

Without the stirring within - and its acceptance and aligning in - there is nothing but the mechanical playing out of loveless ideas - whose instant of seeming allure fades to reveal a caged hopelessness the guilt of which then hides in some false framed diversion.

The true need - as with all truth - is already moving to its recognition and acceptance and alignment. Any attempt to push or pull from a personal sense of power - is the cage of a personal sense of power - and that is NOT sovereignty of being - but usurpation of a function we don't have and cannot enact.

I write to the stirring within - and not to the development of a personal sense of power to frame and direct life in concept. The territory of our living is not the mapping of models by which to assert power over, but the uncovering of shared purpose in fulfilment of need - which positively defined is unfoldment of true desire as fulfilment of desire. The movement of our being is felt desire that aligns as a focus of attention and intention. The model is a rigid and fixed image and concept that CANNOT relate and respond - except its conditioned reaction dictates to allow.

Sovereignty is not applicable to a collective when the individuals sacrifice to it. But is where we bring our wholeness freely to our relationships and therefore they are holy or whole in the sense of being a true context rather than something to exploit, use, get from or escape and defend against. What is wholeness of being but nothing added and nothing taken away. Come as you are and meet in like kind. But always listening or noticing within for the substitutions of mind.
I used to think I was who I thought I was. In relational honesty I discover myself anew - and yet recognizably so.

Progress must never invalidate any of the steps by which it unfolds a fuller and fresh appreciation of being - or else it embodies the very invalidations it presumes to stand upon in 'victory over'. How could we love or equally embrace all that we are except as the unfolding of an integrative blending of perspective - in place of a segregative of self-specialness that must reject to seem to have existence?

Identity is the point of a phishing ruse - don't accept what is not true of you - but bring curiosity and willingness to what isn't - but yet persists in being enacted or chosen. Instead of one or another form of guilt and deflection. This is the same as saying feel the fears that say 'Stop!' and listen for yourself to see if you want to proceed or to pause and look around. We cannot coerce fear into shape, and have to work with what we actually hold belief for - while growing in the capacity to feel and know our true relational being - to live on purpose and know our purpose as our living. Freewillingly in love of true intimacy of being - instead of sacrificially to get validation for a sense of lack seeking outside itself.

How does any of this translate into our living together or dying apart? However you are truly moved to live. But that is the sticking point because the new wine cannot fit the old paradigm - which insists on defining what and how in terms of an already invalidation of being. I don't know HOW I write or think or feel - it is both a spontaneity and a wholeness. The masking off of a control mentality is killing the life it depends on to pass off as, in order to seem to be real. Yet we do this to ourselves, largely unmindfully - most all the time as we re-enact time to be.

Sovereign being is the heart of wholeness. Imposture is a partiality of a hollowness. The symbol of the sovereign will has been stamped in false currency such as to not know who you really are or what you really want - for all is framed and set in conflicted self and world that we want to escape or prevail over.

Corporate cartel monopoly power is a face-ism over hates and fears kept in the dark - but active beneath the face of regulated protections and services. But a living body is not a corps - so much as a cooperation of all its parts. This is a truth to uncover - even in the play of conflicted and contradictory self-idea.

The Iron Cage of Hopelessness

Escaping the Iron Cage of Hopelessness
By Edward Curtin


- - -


When 'narrative control' can be recognized as operating 'fake news', it becomes possible to see that the model is fundamentally wrong - and grievously so. Our mind-model taken 'as if' reality can be held to 'as true' only as an act of perpetual war of assertion against truth - excepting filtered distortions that support our identified and believed investment - or such 'truths' as suit us.

In science we say we 'model' reality and theoretically know the difference between them, but investments of energy and attention in identity will not yield to truth and so instead operates the identity in conflict - as if victory over truth is the power to determine it. But all forms of mind-control are variations on the idea of limitation and diminished awareness in which a lie may be bolstered or supported by the sacrifice of life, consciousness and joy in freedom of being. False 'meanings' adulterate, corrupt and usurp inherent Meaning that is our nature and joy to live, give and share in - AS our living - and not as added or painted over 'dead' or fixed self-concept in substitution for life.

That we find ourselves 'painted into a corner' is the work of our own thought - which is given power by being acted from as if true and shared or accepted in mutual currency. In this way we 'create' our reality-experience - but almost completely unconsciously - as a result of limiting and masking off areas of consciousness associated with terror and rage, heartbreak and shame. The narratives of justifications for a gullibility of blind conformity agreements, or the cynicism of an active hatred in refusal to look, mask in seeming scepticism - but without any actual willingness to change our mind - but more to adjust and develop our persona.

Allegiance to the false is the only means by which to persist unaware of true. But while grievance and self-specialness paint the iron cage of hopeless and meaningless futility, a mind suffers as being done unto without any sense of what - at a deeper level - it seeks to 'do' to life in the very structuring of identity in image, in personae and in masked consciousness made out to be reality - period. That is - it is a brief period ending at a full stop. This is an accurate account of a wish held to be true and lived as such. It's inevitable yielding to true is no consequence of sin - but recognition of error as error and true as true. In this is no co-fusion between what has no existence and what has no opposite.

Identity itself is 'deconstructing' in light of exposure and 'reality' is not what it had so solidly seemed. Where we receive identity FROM is a matter of focus in desire and intention. The development of a capacity to hold an automatic or habitual focus in the false and assert it at expense of true is the 'mind, world and abilities' that seem both protector and self - and yet ARE the destructive and divisive thinking that paints the cage of a power it WANTS true and then suffers subjection to.

That which has been designated 'unconscious' rises to conscious awareness - and as the reliving of ancient hatreds - with all the triggered reaction given power to 'run as protection and survival' - in our name. But dissociated entanglements of recycled-conditioning operate the false matrix of a masked reality - where a mind of guilt and pain usurp a simple and honest curiosity. The power built upon hiding and wielding guilt and fear is the seeming power to hold back Life and Truth as if to be a creator in our own right - rather than co-creators in Light.

The former is always a state of conflicted self - no matter how forcefully asserted - and costs the feeling of the awareness of being - of connected presence that is always felt in being yourself - and drowned in the dissonance of the persistence in trying to be (or escape!) something you are not. If something 'rings true' it is no mere emotion-backed mental gratification - but a felt alignment.

The intent to discard Consciousness is not an actuality so much as a wish not to know - as if thereby to 'escape' - but the idea of limitation is made of this - as is the idea of lack from the a tempt to be 'more' in self inflation.

Despair calls on death (and war) to release it - where hope of change allows the idea of changing a mind given to recycling futility. To do only what aligns and resonates true of you, is not a mental exercise - but a desisting of mental engagement in yielding to the true of noticing the mind-in-act.

A negatively predicated identity is set in seeking to avoid what it does NOT want as a seeming positive spin of fear and lack of worth or power. A positively integrating attention is attending wholly in what it DOES want - as a FELT quality of connectedness being lived now.

The mind of the deceiver is not 'THEM' but will operate as such while you want it there. There is nothing new here in that whether we choose to believe untruth is itself hidden from us in the act of doing so. Therefore rewaking to make a different choice is against the force of all that has been learned before - yet not as a forceful opposition of assertive entanglement. ONLY the FELT quality of true connected presence (in whatever forms) will know again or re-cognize the true nature of the choice to align in the true of who you are. But the wretchedness of the pain of the loss of such can and will provide a means to release allegiance to the false.

When false is associated with self-betrayal rather than evil seen in others - the call to vengeance fades to a basis for the desire for truth to grow within us - as a result of yielding the seeming power to usurp our own Source and Nature of being. The 'mind' cannot 'do' this. That is our 'salvation' for only the wish and belief that it can, keeps us chained to its fear and guilt-driven dictate.

The attempt to escape MADE the error real to us. Reliving 'trauma' within a fresh and connected willingness IS releasing it. One doesn't 'DO' something TO it to change it. All the king's horses and all the king's men CANNOT put Humpty together again - but sure as hell will institute death and taxes as the dictate for sacrifice to an idol of power. Did he Fall? Was he pushed? Is it the father of all false flags? How much do we WANT our grievances  and the power in identity they seem to give? How willing are we to overlook and discard a Felt-connecting presence NOW? These two are the same in different form. Some forms of pain seem more 'real' or 'true' than others - and give rise to struggle to get a better place in the cage or make the cage a better place. Freedom is Firstly in being - and naturally extends when accepted there. One cannot escape guilt made real - no matter where it is projected, dumped or redefined as our 'nature' or as  'a viral meme of self-genesis. Guilt is the 'escape' from love's awareness now in the belief you created your own being and have the power to do so.

Steer into the skid - while feeling for true connected traction. We never had the control we took as if our own - and so we never lost it. Phishing cannot 'lose' what it seemed 'nearly' to catch.

Healthy brain function

Green Med Info offers depth of information but also magazine trivia - this page on 7 ways to keep your brain young prompted an extra 'tidbit' of possibly useful information - along with comment on the foundations of health - which cannot be apart from life or being as a mere system of mechanical relations however subtle and complex those relations.
- - -



As a piecemeal factoid snippet, Vit K2 (mk7) is found to remove calcium from soft tissue deposits - arteries and brain included - and move it to where it belongs. So not being deficient in K2 may be a significant factor.
- - -
meta-commentary:
Synergies of effects can operate positively or negatively - and simply adding 'good' things wont in itself set a good foundation. A true foundation is where we live FROM.

if we are seeking 'health' as an evasion of fearful consequence - then we bring those fears with us in the very acts that seem positive. The call to wholeness is the call to joy and health is not an evasion or absence of symptoms - but rather a freedom from being negatively defined by conflicted self OR its symptoms. Focussing in what we don't want - as if a positive act is the nature of 'mind-capture'.

And focusing exclusively in the physically framed sense of life, deprives even our physical brain of its wholeness-as part-of a greater communication and sharing in Life. And so seem to be a brain, enclosed in a body, condemned in time to suffer and die and so understandably dissociating from such 'reality' in seeking to set a narrative over it.

In its chronic or persistent activation, fear operates 'mind-capture' by its fight/flight response. All else is suppressed by the sympathetic nervous response - but the balancing and restoring of a greater embrace works to protect even amidst such stress. Chronic fear works against this embrace or rebalancing, and blocks healing - so as to make stress a negative addiction rather than a positive catalyst to the need of a greater embrace.

In life a flexible mind can serve a relational integrity - where a rigidity breaks down and separates off. This fact has reflections in our biology.

Chemtrails blocking the light

Below is my comment into one commentary video among many upon the geo-engineering operating for decades now, without public accountability or oversight and for reasons undisclosed.

In reply to H. Vlad - who said:

This is the way of choosing. Thru out history there was a series of
puzzles that demanded attention because of results that changed (in
worst, most cases) the perception of reality, of life as we see it. We
as participants in this all around show that we call life, are
challenged to take a stance and make a CHOICE, utterly based, in
principle, to our convictions, our desires.

Yes - that's where I feel to be with regard to perceiving an 'insane' world. Step back and feel what the real choice is - rather than be conformed in false framing. If I write now on the theme of this - it is to (your) willingness to alight in it - and not as a personal response or expectation.

Giving power to hate, fear and death, is subjection and torment of such experience. The mind cannot think outside its conditioning but from a new choice, rises a new mind. The choice to hate and fear a negative... becomes the negative operating in mask or disguise. The choice to not align in, support or give focus of energy and attention in reaction is a 'releasing the mind' in which the true movement of an Original Nature aligns a choice I cannot make alone - for the 'alone-ness' IS the mind of the choice to give power to a wish - and believe it guilty of killing true - which in a sense it does while operating as the foundation of the mind.

The 'survival' (fear and war) script becomes an awakening script. Firstly to the exposure of the insanity as insane. A choice to hate and resist evil - unrecognized as choice - locks the mind into forcing its version of 'sanity' on top of perceived chaos under the guilt of fear - and the fear of guilt's penalty. From the point of the Projection called the Fall - this is where we 'came in' or were 'entranced' and so this is where NOT justifying re-investment in hate as word, thought and deed - puts the 'mind behind'. (releases a trapped or looped attention). And opens to all things new. This cannot be put into old paradigm concept without subverting the forms of new insight to the same old deceit.

This opening or disclosure may be imagined or surmised to occur in any case with physical death - but opening a House of Many Mansions while yet in the focus of physical sense is a collective shift - in a choiceless choice - for when the nature of what SEEMS choice is starkly illuminated, no 'mind' of 'choose-between' sits on its illusory fence. But the nature of the 'mind' of 'choose-between' is to know not what it does. Or in modern terms - unconscious of the nature and habit of its choices - in a world that seems to just 'happen' and to which reaction is already preloaded to be triggered.

To love in hell is a self-contradiction - just as is 'war in Heaven'. To be the willingness of love in hell is any instant of the release of the mind of self-hatred to the simple and native desire for truth.

If God so loved his Son that He gave him the world healed and anew - then to shift to the point of recognition of such calls for an alignment in like qualities - as the choices by which we accept a true Source and Authoring rather than assert an oppositional independence that only seems power by the hidden hate of a false self seeking.

The psyop of fear is at root the call to fear in denial. It calls for allegiance in sacrifice of wholeness to a reversal f Creation - under the guise of power and protection for a fragmented and dissociated sense of self.

The idea that humans do only what is in their own interest needs also to allow their accepted self-definition frames their perceptions and reactions. Self-hate is more than capable of operating a vengeance upon all that lives under an illusion of being a power above a hated life. For it supports not our self-specialness in 'wish' no matter how forcefully or how pathetically we play that out - and so a sense of betrayal is projected by the wish that is actually embodied in the choice of a wish over true willing. Knowing not what we do.

To raise the illusion of power, one must kill the truth and keep it so. But to the belief in such power does love seem total sacrifice - because the true power of life is not felt within such belief - being already the doing of the thing it fears.

This is a morning meditation. The sun here where I write is bright and today is at hand to be lived - one way or another. The feeling of being and the recognition of love's honesty is not demanding special forms and conditions to be itself, but rather a willingness of 'not knowing' into which the prompts and inspirations of the ordinary moment - become the felt movement of a flow of being. And yes - this will encounter 'unwillingness' or 'resistance' that can frame me in reaction or be released in discernment.

Why do I have a mind that can block the light - and cast all in its own shadow? When its victory is my defeat also?
Because I give it attention and allegiance and prominence in place of a true appreciation.
How might we wake to the nature and the act of what we do - beneath the mask of the world, but by meeting our Reflection at every turn? Are we damned thereby? Or released while the cock crows dawning by the grace of noticing.

If there seems a harvest of fear, is there also not a harvest of willingness for love? - through which love's recognition wordlessly extends - unblocked and truly alive?

The archetype of sacrifice to the god of terror

Comment into:

Scientific Safety of Vaccine Safety Research


In mythic terms, the people are coerced and compelled to sacrifice their vitality (their young) to the 'god' or 'terror' upon whose appeasement our 'protection' depends.
This story - and variations of it - are a deep archetype upon which the perceived world operates.

For we are coerced and compelled by 'conditions and conditioning' to sacrifice a natural feeling wholeness of being, for a mask of protection by which to participate , adapt and survive the human experience. The terrors or trauma of conflict that the masking covers are both the fear and the hatred of the fear, that demand a sense of power over life - where life itself is feared and assigned the projection of our own conflicting intent.

The division of mind to define, predict and control is itself ruling out wholeness - and seeking to interject a censor or control upon the flow of information - or the meeting of true need.
A tyrannous mind is a tyrannized mind that knows not what it does - and justifies itself in hate and fear of its own unrecognised reflection. It accuses those who do choose not to assault and sicken children of 'killing children' while doing exactly the thing they say they hate, under the banner of righteous necessity - that brooks no chink of light for revision, discussion, investigation or debate - and so takes on the qualities of an 'evil' mandate behind a mask. This triggers a polarisation of defiance against an un-owned hate. For to pharmaceutically assault babies and children (and adults) under the guise of a theory asserted as medical fact - as if the 'science is settled' - is State or indeed corporately owned state power.

Clinging to a dying model or image of self and world-reality is calling suffering and death by wilful ignorance. The attempt to control leads to a more and more out of control 'reality-experience' of narrative framing - pumping up the pharma, military-industrial and 'intelligence' structure like a cancerous tumour - sucking all the vitality from the whole to the priesthoods of 'control'.

While 'they' have our allegiance and support - as power and protection of our sense of self in life - they USE it to lose the patient while 'killing' the disease.

Pre-emptive attack is becoming the normal. The array of 'power and protection' against what is imagined, feared or subliminally programmed to happen.

I cant engage in reasoned discussion with the intent to only adopt the FORM of communication as  weapon against it. That mind is closed by design. But where any willingness arises - let it find a willingness in me to join with.

The 'evil' is set up to be un-challengable in direct terms - for it is foundational to the way we have learned/been trained to think - in place of a qualitatively transcendent nature that has been denied a structural voice. This is the work of an active willingness for wholeness of being - health and sanity - regardless the forms it takes.

Using the form of things to mask hidden intent is what we take to be a private mind. Identifying behind a 'fig-leafed' obfuscation pays the price, while clever accounting 'outsources' and redefines so as to displace pain and loss to 'other' or not self.

No one is blinded by science - but the wish NOT to see finds a match in forms of scientism. There is nothing about ANY human endeavour that is not ruled by the same - generally unconscious - archetypes.

Love of truth cannot abandon Reason and Science - but only release the confusion of masking forms to a renewal of a love of truth and the truth of love - which has NO place in the mind of wilful conflict and confusion.

If there is a first-born to give up in favour of a true foundation - it is our private separative and unloving thoughts - by which we rule out love in a sense of limited sacrifice as the mind of 'what do I get out of this?'

Well you get a sense of disconnection under an illusion of power that draws ever more of you to forget what Connection is and defend against it to protect a false investment.

If this is 'too long' I would post a thumbnail and link to the rest. But it arose in context of relationship at this timing - in this opening of communication - and so comes to this meeting of attention in such terms as it has found.

Law, loss, chaos, shame and lies

Comments into this page into the theme of (international) law and lies.

In reply to Stern Daler who said

... But what is the use when it does not protect the weaker. IMHO Law is to protect the weaker not the stronger.

The redistribution of force or indeed an underlying judgement of guilt, invalidation and penalty, can lead to 'weakness' being given power - while the Law ITSELF holds that power. The idea of law is fundamental - and lawyers, like priests, can subvert and usurp just as can the iron fist that says "Because _I_ say so!" and uses terror and deceit to push out any rival 'god' and prevail over or hold in check that which cannot be eradicated dominated or subverted. Weaponized 'law' is the lie and the father of the lie - for it serves vengeance and self-specialness regardless the mask of 'fairness' distorted to use forms of 'accepted truths' only as such agenda can exploit.

The idea of law has two facets - and one is of limiting loss or chaos and disorder - but according to WHOSE plan or set of definitions? The other is of a just and equal meeting of needs in a wholeness of being - and within the self-conflicted, there is no felt relation or recognition OF wholeness of being - but only a sense of the loss of such at another's hand - and the inability to resume or regain such a life until vengeance serves justice.

We have in these times a complex entanglement in 'power struggles' that are also identity conflict, managed under the definitions and terms by which we identify ourselves and our reality. Power resides in the capacity to recognize truly - for deceits - knowing or unknowing, breed conflicted and entangled outcomes - regardless any temporary seeming advantage to one over another. The narrative reality is a masking reality - indeed a kind of 'augmented' reality experience - and cares not what system of governance (identity) you think you have as long as it has this central currency control.

Law seems to be asserted and imposed upon us in many ways extremely unfairly, and to be often toothless in will or capacity to protect against violation as a result of its own corruption. I see 'power' put outside ourselves whether in grievance at being unfairly treated or in supplication to a power of vengeance brought 'on side' or co-opted to force into balance by equal and opposite reaction.

I often am reminded of the saying to give unto God what is due unto God and to give unto Caesar what is due unto Caesar. Many cannot begin to feel into this because their identification forbids it. But the Law of our unfoldment of being is not narrative control - where worldly power is the 'jealous god syndrome' whether masked in the FORMS of religion, medicine, science, or political or philosophic discourse.

So the FORMS of things that symbolize truths beyond objective definition - are used to mask and protect a lie of self-specialness whose first consciousness is of being victim to abandonment or violation - upon which it build dissociated identities of entangled special 'loves' and corresponding hatreds.

I see the highest potentials of our healing in genuine communication - but mark that our conceptual currencies of thought have been built to DENY and defend AGAINST this - and that reclaiming a true communication within and among us is counter to millennia of conditioning. However, it rises from a point of recognition that is outside the 'box' of fear-controlled survival dictates - and grows a capacity of noticing and discernment that fear forbids - even while seeming to operate as protector. The idea of Law is of yielding to true - and this is not coercive upon anyone - but must be seen as such by any coercive attempt - for we see in terms of our own undercurrent beliefs.

Truth is not 'determined' so much as uncovered by a willingness for it. Identity politics - on any level - operates assertion over truth that distorts and filters only to allow what that identity allows. Because the manipulative intent of such 'identity' is becoming more openly visible, we may recognize the pattern at work in all - rather than exclusively fixated in target-others. The recognition of the deceiver - as I use this term - is of its futility and meaninglessness of persisting in. But the targeting of hate in the other, overlooks the hook within the bait - and willingly recycles a persistence in what can only deprive and deny a true inheritance of being in exchange for a false. Entrance the matrix of a 'managed reality' here - or put it behind in a fresh willingness for true alignment.

The outer can only reflect the inner and the denial or evasion of the inner can only play out as tyrannous denials of our right to be in external terms. I find hatred for the murder and enslavement of my fellow beings - and yet that toxic wish for the power to STOP it, has a correspondence in my own 'narrative control' identity.

Perhaps no one releases vengeance until its false god really hits home. Self-hatred - denied - mounts ever more actively us the undercurrent of a masking reality - and now that mask itself breaks down and 'chaos' breaks in everywhere against a futile and utterly corrupted attempt to 'control' it. These are one and the same.
Loss of control is really loss of communication - and the false world that arose like a fig leaf over such a shame is predicated upon terror that re-enacts  the breakdown OF communication in terms that set the compulsion to regain it.

If a choice is between lies - what choice is that but power struggle under rule of deceit?
But the nature of the mind of deceit to hide from shame of exposure and undoing is to 'know not what it does' by investing forcefully in a narrative dissociations taken as real. Who believes that the deceits of the 'Enemy' must be studied, acquired and used against them - is already the thing they say they hate. For the 'goal' is set to justify any means - but a goal set by terror is aligning everything negatively - as is becoming apparent even in 'mainstreamed-mind'.


In reply to CF's commenting:

The monstrosity that is the MSM, truly boggles the mind. How can they live with themselves? All these lies, false accusations and bullsh*t against Russia and Assad and for what? Money? Have they no shame? I guess not or else the would not be the MSM.

If it is seen as a weapon – no more, no less, then it serves that purpose in those who use it.
The capacity to lie with conviction is – in my opinion – the worship of the lie AS power over truth. Thus "Truth is Dead. Never Existed and is thus only what power dictates".
Power corrupts because everything is redefined in its terms and to serve its ends.
Money is also weaponised and is not an end in itself.
Bear in mind that the brutal suppression of others by conquest and enslavement is nothing new. It has not suddenly started happening – but the illusions that have covered over its acting out are disintegrating.

Heart Dis-ease

An article on Natural News on 'heart disease - a different perspective' brought my informational response but then a deeper reflection of 'what lies beneath'.
I felt to put the whole response here and link from the article

- - -

I expected information from Knut Sroka http://heartattacknew.com/
I feel this is worthy information. I discovered via Dr Thomas Cowan - who has an interview with Dr Mercola.

NOTE also Vit K2 removes calcium from arteries and soft tissue to bones etc - so VK2 deficiency is something to remedy as part of the false food fallout.


My own 'take' is that terror, rage and heartbreak are lidded or covered over by a system of suppression we call consciousness - but which in a sense is an anti-consciousness of 'mind' as control over the true spontaneity of being. A spontaneity that is not control, but is Creation Itself.

While humanity may be seen as a fragmentation of dissociated trauma-reaction operating an attempt to force 'reality' into shape - and doing so in the same patterning that forced or induced fragmentation as the 'split of(f) mind' - we may also be seen as the growing willingness for acceptance and unfoldment of true appreciation rather than persist the patterns of reactive identity.

You don't need a doctor to see that un-held and unhealed psychic-emotional stress can kill you, as well as patterning our biology and relational identity to exactly replicate war on Self in false flagged disguise. Fear-defined self can only result in fearful outcomes - regardless the attraction to forms of war that seem to offer power and protection of status, privilege and lording it over others.

The war on Self is defence of a wish in place of true willing. An image of self in place of truly felt relation. A concept of truth in substitution for wholeness of being - that attacks the 'other' for what itself (blindly) does - AS the basis for operating a private agenda under a sense of sanctified or justified grievance.

The healing or re-wakening of the wholeness of being cant really be taken out of our relational context of reactive triggered conditioning. Living the willingness for healing meets the 'territory' that otherwise is associated with a negative and abhorrent sense of self/other. The movement of being is an Innate Innocence of being - and yet is framed with associations that effectively demonize with projected and denied hate and fear. So when our life Speaks or Stirs within us - we may not have the preparedness and willingness to accept and flow with or yield to our truth - which is nothing to do with the assertion of 'mind', but is the welcome to true hearted being rather than its control or suppression.

Opening to self-honesty is both to joy in being - and to the conditioned reactive hate and fear that are by design, 'unconscious' or dissociated in their re-enacting a false and forced sense of self power and protection. But the latter become the basis of a deeper or more integrated recognition and hence a greater joy in being.

Seeking to resolve psychic-emotional conflict out in the 'physicalized' world is the persistence of a displacement and dissociation that defines physical reflection as an Otherness of threat, treachery, abandonment and disappointment. And while this belief is itself too fearful to bring to curiosity, we have to accommodate to its 'reality'. It isn't just that fear hidden in guilt kills - but that it can be so painful as to seek death as escape or so enraging as to yield to hateful defiance of refusal to feel or own or know - anything hate rules out. But hate is a hurt love however it presents, and love is true freedom of being; given and received - so hurt is a covering over the heart that refuses the embrace of that which heals it when it directs blame in guilt.

True self-forgiveness opens to Presence now - that no image or concept can define, predict, or control. Nor within the movement of being the true of You - is there such a call to separate from Experience as if to lord it or hide in fear and subjection. But none can release that which they know not they do - so owning the mistake as mistake is the moment of its release as if true. Truth 'enters' freely to welcome as insight of expanded perspective in which re-integration of a shifted sense of self and reality acts in greater alignment or congruency of being.

Galactic Intimacy - unrecognized and rejected

Elon Musk: "If there are super intelligent aliens, they're probably already observing us"


To the article and commenting: (Not into the framing of 'alien intelligence but to the estrangement from our own):



Consider, the world you perceive is the the world you believe. The mind of fragmentation, conflict and dissociated attempts to redefine reality in narrative domination - is itself fragmented, conflicted dissociation from Coherence of being. This is the 'Fall' or the Separation.

Within the belief that such conflict can be won and that such victory is meaningful... is no remembrance of unified purpose. A state of Forgetting.

The labelling of evil as 'psychopathic' is another term for projected excommunication.

All relations and communications embody vibrational correspondences of thought at some level that may not be conscious, for the surface consciousness limits by design - so as to operate above the dark of unwatched and unowned unconscious.

The world you meet - the qualities you meet or draw forth in others - and they in you are not fixed, external physical entities - but so has the mind trained itself to perceive and believe.

Victim-hood is part of the tool-set for tricking the mind to believe itself split off and escaped from unwanted consciousness. It projects the cause externally (away) and WANTS it there with all the force of its intent to escape, amidst the reflection of such force as trauma of conflict - regardless of shifting roles - that becomes a self-perpetuating negative loop.

Beliefs that are professed to -  that are not free of need for validation - are seeking reinforcement. Which is the belief in lack, frailty and weakness - for wholeness is not self-conflicted doubt, seeking ascendency.

Realities ARE beliefs unrecognized. Operating at a level the surface mind was made to hide - because it is the unfolding of the belief in act.
Negative - and I mean divisive, segregative and conflicting self-definition - may cast itself in an apparently positive spin. Hence the wish of a 'positive' is a hidden or unfaced and un-owned negative. To will - that is to truly desire - a positive - or integrative, expanding and embracing perspective -  embraces the negative experience as part of uncovering its own correspondence or 'entanglement' within it. Releasing false self, releasing judgement of another - these are the same but seem not in a world of believing they are different. You cannot follow or recognize this thought this in the wish and belief you are 'different' - you can only receive the recognition in a 'sameness'. Attempts to fit or force the Living into the framework of conflicted thinking persists the sacrifice of Life to dead concept, image and symbol - for you are none of these - and never could be.

Re-integrating a conflicted consciousness is through a willingness - yet from the point of view of an attempt to conquer or possess and control Life, it may seem a violation, insult and ultimate defeat - AS IF at the hand of another. You can align in true will now, or defer to delay - but a false will cannot but make dissonant. This dissonance has been made the call to guilt. But it is simply a Call to wake - and realign in joy - for such is a unified wholeness of being.

The Plane you resonate and focus in - in any given moment of acceptance - is your 'chosen' reality experience. This 'choice' is not truly choice so much as freedom of being you. But the choice to be something else has made 'freedom' of slavery that fears true freedom as if it were slavery. So what you want, what you desire and prefer, is operating either from a heartfelt honesty - or a routine of sub-conscious responses of attempt to escape a self - and world - defined in conflict and fear of loss.

Insofar as 'evils' mark the way you say you DO NOT want - use them as waymarkers for thinking you now choose not to give allegiance and support to. Remember Jesus said 'resist ye not evil' - and know that what you resist, persists. If an evil persists in your reality-experience, then it is serving some meaning or function for you. Let this stir curiosity instead of blame.

Your worthiness for love's awareness and embrace requires no one else to be damned or demonized to be all that you are. What then of blind, hate, malice, envy, vengeance then? Attend the cause to let  the causeless be revealed.

In the nature of mind or consciousness - truly - giving and receiving are one; As you give so shall you receive - for nothing can prevail against your will. In giving false witness - you receive it, and in treating life as slave or lab-rat, so do you find yourself subjected regardless the mind-spin of being the right to power. True relationship has to yield assertion, to truly receive. Are you in any degree willing for an intimacy of being the mind cannot interject, much less control? If so - then you are such an awareness unfolding - and if not yet - then you insist on seeing and interpreting Life in terms OF an interjecting control, in conflict, fear, struggle and destruction. THAT is where we came IN. But now are you in some willingness of new eyes to see?

If you could go back in time to where it 'all went haywire' and make a different choice... well here you are - and the choice is already made FOR your acceptance. Self hate or rejection makes non Sense. But making is not true Creation so much as an anti-Creation in wish, given allegiant identity.

Is it bad for you?

The dietary video this was written to is without merit but the comment has a general message:


When fear tells you what to do - and what not to do - you no longer need a mind of your own or a heart to discern true - for you can now spout from - or hide behind - a presumed 'authority'.

When diversions keep your attention locked in what doesn't matter - and assigns it undue importance - you get a world where everything is backwards!


Balance from within is your living responsibility - where trying to force balance from without... is false - and futile.

Not blame but a true ability of response within the gift of being.

Taking some bits of some information that has some merit in some circumstances as if it is a conclusive knowledge is dressing up in play clothes. The desire to me more than you are is the fear you are less - and the release of such fear allows the more of what you truly are to embody. Having learned to seem to be what you are not, makes a situation of the need to re-learn or re-cognize who you are.

The biology is very complex synergy - just as the life-denying 'control mentality' sets up negative synergies. We are still uncovering radical new perspectives that cast all we THOUGHT we knew in a different light. So keep some brackets around ideas that resonate true with you so that there is room for expansion and change.

Confusion is a useful tool for the need to evade clarity - when clarity is confused with a fearful exposure. Clickbait keeps you clickin like a chicken licken - so do what you do and choose as you choose - from a truly connected place in yourself. If you don't know what that is - you are lost in a thinking-matrix as if to protect from feelings you buried back when.

Let anyone and everything 'tell' whatever they like. You are the quality of recognition as to what is truly resonant to you. Why trade your life in for a fear-minded sense of self-inflation?

Energy and joy are more than related. If you have to force yourself to perform or fear that you wont or cant - get down more honestly with what you really want. The mind can make symbols for connected being and seek to act them out - but then find no connection there either. Start from where you want to arrive in a more expanded appreciation - like gratitude - for example.

Living without Free Will?

 Living Without Free Will ; Susan Blackmore

at the Science and non-duality conference. What does she think she is doing?



The usurping of the will by a split mind operates an illusion of freedom to choose between - as if independent from. This sense of self is the so called waking conscious mind - which is largely defined and predicated upon what it is unconscious of.

Clearly actions arise from a formulation of reality and a triggering of past conditioning that runs as a subconscious routine with unconscious elements. In fact the action of keeping unconscious what is not acceptable operates as the primary defence OF a masked presentation of self that is hardly 'in control' - and is yet invested with the need and obligation for control and compliance within its accepted reality - because it is disconnected from true willing by design. True feelings, true desires are not generally felt safe to embody in a world of judgement, blame and rejection.

But the word 'accept' is where choice truly exists - for in choosing to accept a masking off or dissociation of self for whatever reasons in early life, one now has the freedom to own that choice as a choice and change it for another. So if finding social acceptance and validation from others has driven your behaviours - you can notice this as  pattern of dissonance if indeed it is not really living the life that moves you (free will) but conforming to beliefs and ideas that do not (or no longer) serve you. So you are free to refuse to accept what you recognize is not You and costs you the fuller experience of your living - as the more aligned focus in who you do recognize yourself to be. But you are not free to become what you are not, though you may be free to attempt it - and defend the attempt - while it yet seems meaningful to you to do so. But freedom to submit to a compulsive or tyrannical substitute will is hardly a conscious appreciation of freedom!

Until thought itself is observed in act - there is only the term 'conscious thoughts' assigned meanings within a currency of thinking that operates the blocking of free awareness.
So what exactly is meant by free and by will? The mind in its act of defining, predicting and controlling outcomes is a conditioned reaction despite assigning itself to the pinnacle of evolution. It operates blind to the reality of who you truly are or who anyone or anything truly is - and cannot but be so while employed for the purpose of control.
Free will in its true sense is an allowing and balancing within a whole of which the mind in judgement cannot know.

The story of Jesus is of the yielding of a false sense of will for the alignment in the true. He called it the Father's Will - for it is of the whole for the whole - through the particular needs - that may not be what social mores dictate or expect. For true needs are denied by society predicated upon evading the fearful and diverting from the knowledge of the evasion in surface gratifications and observances.
Always your experience is the result of definitions you have accepted true of you in any particular situation. If you get this - your acceptance of your own recognition is your freedom to be curious as to exactly what core beliefs and definitions are playing into or setting up experience or patterns of relationship you say you don't want.

Your natural desire is 'prayer' in that it aligns and attracts to you the pathways that bring fulfilment. It doesn't need words or belief in a religious set of ideas - but being truly acknowledged consciously is no longer hiding or downplaying something that moves you.
The moment of suddenly noticing yourself in act - at the level of belief or definition can come in any kind of way and in different timings - but it is the awakening or stirring at a level the surface mind generally denies you - until you more persistently and consistently choose to release the illusion of control that fear triggers the need of - and embrace what you will freely. Even such an honesty aligns choices from otherwise drifting in self-negative habits - no matter how well camouflaged in apparently positive forms.

Life does not call for interference from the surface consciousness to unfold lawfully - in terms of being true to its foundation. It is the loss of the awareness of true foundation that set a mind scurrying for fig-leaf thinking in which to seem to be self-existing and self-determining. Uncovering this is an illusion is not another basis upon which to make a more subtle fig-leaved model of reality. The subjective experience of void, is a restoring of a true Unconscious - that is the wellspring of Life and not a well full of corpses with a heavy lid over it. Graphic metaphors, but terror operates the loss and denial or usurping of Will. And the only 'life' it permits is the sacrifice of your Sovereign will for a set of rules that become you. Or rather operate a placeholder where your true presence would be - were you to accept who you are - and live as if it is indeed true.


PS: God Gave You (created You) Free Will - so you are stuck with it eternally - whether you align in it for joy or determine to prove you have none or have a corrupt and evil will, or anything else your focus in thought and feeling of being generates. The subset of freedom regarding true and false - which is masked in the idea of good and evil, is simply that Reality, God or your being is NOT coercive upon you. But in coercing the will - you will generate dissonance that you may interpret as guilt and punishment - and seek to mitigate or out-source.One way of offloading guilt is to go around 'correcting' or undermining others - so as to be the one - or aligned in the power to deconstruct others and tell them what is true. But destroying is not creating - no matter how much gratification ones derives from the will to sacrifice others.

Hanniffy Dinn said to the video:

They don't get it. Your soul is in a higher dimension, your brain is quantum biology. It's just a receiver.

But they get what they are free to choose to tune into - just as you are in your experience. So Perhaps they are also serving your deepening recognition of how your consciousness focuses and 'tunes in'.

Consciousness, space time, and reality

The Death of SpaceTime & Birth of Conscious Agents; Donald Hoffman

I didn't resonate to the push of the presentation linked above but offered a perspective to the theme:
(and joined some of the comments down the page).


The desire to blank out Creator - is the wish to spin your own. Creator and Creation are not two - but the wish to spin a different Theo-ry is the 'survival to propagate' urge - that Act-ively blanks truth by the play of apparently conflicting truths. The development of abilities of such a masked and masking 'reality' experience can be ascribed to an 'evolutionary narrative' or any other continuity narrative. But the obscuring of Creator is For-getting that loses the Soul of true Feeling Awareness for the mind of a sense of dissociated definition, prediction and control. This re-definition of a Living Inheritance as a private possession operates a focus within scarcity, struggle and loss. Time winds up to Now - when no more time can be interposed between Who you are and what a conditioned sense thinks to be. Creator is - and nothing Else is, but the capacity to know and appreciate Existence is given to that which is created to receive and share it.

So regardless the mapping of definitions of any local 'reality' the only Thing Going On is Always no more and no less than Infinity represented in finite terms. Look for the edges or boundaries to your experience and see there are none. Where are you not? The personality construct is a tool of instrumental focus of an 'Upstream' purpose that cannot be more than partially and therefore falsely defined in downstream terms - but can operate its true function through the synchronicity of such function - for wholeness of being is not a goal or a theory or a composite of fragmented and dissociated parts. It is simply Given to the quality of true receipt.

The sense of the lack-desire of the power to give (create) develops the mind (of) for Getting. As a usurping of power under another Name and Nature - that of the image and symbol of self. But this unfolding of experience in time - as continuity in time, for the split off (disociated) 'consciousness' of a surface waking focus, actually folds up to a recognition of the powerlessness (omega) that was and ever is its foundation AS a split-minded reality in which a partiality seems separate from its Whole - and active upon it as the idea of power - and the subjection no less to such power.

The recognition of error is is undoing in terms of passing off as true. Your self never was what thought took to be - no matter how many millennia of conditioned impressions generated its 'survival' AS You. The tools and abilities of developed consciousness may be associated with a fear -based and indeed gratification-based urge - but the re-Awakening (to) Creator as a quality of synchronous or timeless alignment, replaces the imaged thought-based purpose of 'me over and against the reality of Other' with the original Function revealed - rather than masked.

To ask what the meaning of life is is to demonstrate a dissociation from its unfolding fulfilment. That true meaning can be covered over with a shifting fragmentation of conflicted 'meanings' given identification and allegiance - and defended as one's self is evident - as is the transitory and hollow nature of such gratification. yet there is an alloy in our seeming love-hate world in that the false takes image or forms of true by which to pass off as if true. And so even in a life of struggle and suffering - intimations of the true of being rise and share as the function of Life fulfilled - regardless whether the egoic personality recognizes and appreciates this YET.

Timelessness is an inherent Quality of being and time and space are rendering of Now through a lens of a passed-mind made and held in secret - by which to act out its 'personae' as the drama of a sense of lack and loss - defended and presented in terms of power to persist and prevail over the 'other' that has been false-flagged as the cause of loss, of denial of deprivation. Reading the signs of the times as one's own reflection is not the persistence of a self invalidation seeking validation - but the feedback by which to re-integrate from a fragmented of split off sense of self to an integrative quality of being - that is already 'awaiting' recognition and acceptance, while the drama of a self at war with itself delays such re-Membering through the 'creation' of distance between - of space and of time.

I write this as a sketch from which resonance may stir. Truth is never the result of a contest - but narrative control is the assertion OF continuity in continuity in space and time. Continuity of Joy is of an Upstream discernment. The willingness to align in joy is not outer-defined but truly felt and truly embodying the unique signature vibration that is recognizably and intimately verifiably You. Simply being who you are is the unselfconsciously receiving and giving - of That You are. They are not two. The interjection of the mind does not come between - unless you want to believe it has and live that in place of true, as a temporary distortion. The capacity to NOT notice and indeed NOT know what Is, what You are, and all that is - is a highly developed tool. The purpose that set it up becomes redundant - but all tools and abilities can be re-purposed. Use time to re-waken awareness of the Eternal - instead of making 'processes' for a tomorrow that never comes. Different constructs and tools will arise as a result of true desire - but aligned to the resonance with joy-lived - rather than image-protected. The purpose of Communication makes Everything a language of being. Power is yielded to its true Source - from which it could never really leave or be taken - for there is no lack or loss in Creator/Creation. The acceptance of this is the willingness to give what you believed you lacked or were denied and deprived of. Feel the insult and the reversal of thought that this represents - and also the inability of the ego-sense to give anything BUT limitation - for it 'gives' but to get.

Creator is of an intimacy that none can come between - the generation of experience within the Infinite is not 'sin' but the persistence in a-tempt to prevail over true desire in false mind - generates the belief in 'sin' as it foundation in a 'justified' sense of power in opposition to a feared true.

- - -

Adur Alkain wrote (to the main article):

Very interesting! But if spacetime is not fundamental, "fitness" can't be fundamental either. I think the new theory should get rid of utitilarian notions like fitness (which as Hoffman explains is a very complicated function of the state of the world and the organism, etc., which again shows it's not fundamental) and adopt some more abstract notion like creativity. All spiritual teachings I know say that creativity is a fundamental dimension of reality, probably as fundamental as consciousness itself. To explain that we all seem to have similar perceptions of the world we don't need to resort to evolutionary explanations (we are similar organisms, the product of  a long evolution, etc.), but realize that on some (mostly unconscious) level we all share one same awareness or consciousness.

Mr Reply to Adur Alkain:

Fit for purpose - allows a fitting in with a wholeness - even when expressing in appearances of conflicting or competing parts. The usurping of a true whole-part recognition is the idea of separate powers in a separate 'world'. The Creative can be 'sacrificed' to mythology - but only while the focus in such a role is fed or supported by a sense of purpose accepted meaningful.

The purpose in establishing such an experience is having the experience for what it yields. But when that purpose itself yields to true creative being - the definitions that frame an UN-fitting and un-fit reality rise to be re-evaluated in terms of resonance and relevance to the true of you. Nothing (no one) else can fit your part BUT you.

But I agree. taking parts of the new wine perspective and yet stuffing them into old paradigm bottles is a way to make more time - or delay recognition and appreciation for being - in sacrifice to some idea of a future becoming - set by a past conditioning. Creative is being. But patterns of conditioned response operate the same 'choice' as if a freedom to choose apart from and without the Creator-Nature of all being.

Love wists where it will - but it is not random - though of course our reality experience includes experience of what seems random within a limited framework. Unconsciousness is in fact the shadow of what is assigned and accepted to consciousness. Stuffing reality 'out of mind' is a clever way to seem to create a separate mind. Clever because it is not a true creation that extends shared Conscious Reality - but rather a derivative of a conflicted or contradictory idea.

The persistence and propagation of idea given focus is natural enough - and yet the compulsive dictate of fear and its derivatives is not the true movement of support for being. Until yielded to the Creative, mind usurps everything. That was its job description when we thought to climb into the movie frame.

Investment in (or suppression of) outcomes via force, rather than unfolding of being through communication (on all levels and dimensionalities of being). The latter remains true while the former seems to 'run the show' - but seeming requires force to pass off as true - and thus all that would not 'fit' is suppressed, inhibited, denied and blanked to 'unconsciousness'. Forced reality is a private protection racket - that seems to share by enforcing compliance.

In a sense everything experiencable is a 'reality' but not everything resonates relevant to who you are being the movement or focus of Now - and so accepting all of who you are will release some of what you thought true and accept the embrace of much that such a false sense denied (rendered unconscious). This is experienced as a shift of perspective from time to timeless and the conscious appreciation and gratitude for the sharing by which experience itself is beheld - or co-created.

The 'floor disappears out from under' and yet a deeper quality of balance is uncovered within the flow of the whole. So as the extension of a true recognition and appreciation of reality - we are not asserting and projecting the idea of conflict and then receiving its reflection AS our world.

R Littlefield wrote (to the main article):

I tried to listen with an open mind.  Sorry, this guy's god is evolution.  Little does he know that if there is no God then it does not mean evolution happened. In fact the evidence is against it. The evidence is for punctuated equilibrium.

In Reply :

It really depends on where you are looking from. A mess of a fragmented mind 'sees' a mess of random stuff OUT THERE to maintain a semblance of inner equilibrium - as the assertion of its definition of 'reality'. But consider, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Consider that 'garbage in; garbage out, is also an example of equilibrium. What you give out is what you get back - as ye sow so shall ye reap. Of course anyone CAN experience reality in whatever way their model, beliefs and definitions dictate - which may be more or less coherent - but does incoherence change your mind? Perhaps - but not while projecting mind OUT THERE ad disowning it.


Messi The King wrote (to the main article):

space cant die. it isnt a thing to die..space is pure vaccum. time cannot die either. time didnt born to die. time is real tho.

My reply to Messi:

It is the belief in space-time as fixed and fundamental that 'dies'. While something receives focus of acceptence as true for you - it 'lives' in you because You are Life - and give it to everything in your experience - (just as it gives you).

Gregory Baillie wrote (to the main article):

Unconvincing. It's brilliance is the avalanche of seemingly related but interesting conceptualizations in the delivery. Just more convoluted abstraction dressed up as brilliance. Another theory. If I don't duck the cricket ball in time I might sustain a fractured skull . If I duck the ball in time I will not sustain a fractured skull. For all intents and purposes in this part of the spectrum of reality, there is a ball to duck.The rest is just clever conversation.

In Reply to Gregory Baillie:

IF you duck and IF your don't - is another theory... ?

You are ducked out of what is NOT meeting your awareness now and you ARE meeting what is. Always. How you choose to interpret and relate to what is - is not a theory - in its results - so know by your fruits - that is check the feedback as feedback - rather than manipulate the feedback as if IT is the cause and not a symptom.

I was once hit by a cricket ball smack in the forehead - did a backward somersault - which I had never done before or since. I noticed a 'stage' to play in a microsecond - without any hesitation or thought of injury - is that weird - that's how I recall it (50 years back now - and no injury).

The word misalignment is just a term for the alignment of something unintended, unexpected or unwanted - but it arrives perfectly on time. But I don't argue with you - there is no need to be convinced by anyone's show.

I don't resonate with the vid overall. That's all I need to know - and move on to what does. Trying to THINK or define reality is an absurd arrogance - but a willingness to share - really - can join in ideas that reflect inner recognition.

Scot Turley Sayeth to the main article:

Conscious agents cannot be something separate from the external reality. They must be part of it in order for evolution to work. Evolution is a causal process, so how can evolution be real, while causality is not?

In Reply to Scot Turly:

Are 'conscious agents' that resonant facet of an apparently 'external reality' that is synchronous with Who/What you truly are - regardless the temporary limit of a focus associated with your 'internal reality'?

Another way of putting this in A Course In Miracles terms is "The Holy Spirit uses everything in your mind (experience of reality - and therefore your world) to teach you about your mind. For a mind operating its conditioned belief is unable to see or change its programming until something reflects THAT reality is NOT what you think - but that what you think MAKES your perception of it and sets the terms of your response.

If the programming was an attempt to GET free of a feared or hated reality - then EVERYTHING following on from this is operating a negatively defined sense of self, life and freedom.

Everything is BACKWARDS; everything is upside down! Doctors destroy health, Lawyers destroy justice, Universities destroy knowledge, Governments destroy freedom, Major media destroys information, And religions destroy spirituality". (Michael Ellner).

Everyone can blame everyone else - but that heals nothing and only persists the same old same old.

What are 'unconscious agents' but your own projected denials - be they fear, rage or shame - that operate as 'black ops' in your name, with your energy under the ruse of power and protection.

Embracing your 'shadow' is owning what is yours - so as to let it align in who you NOW accept and choose yourself to be. For I am not who I once believed I was - and thus open choices my mind ruled out - or hid.

Scot Turley replied to me:

Seems that you are very sure of yourself. You've got the whole world pinned down. But how can anyone else know that any of what you said is true? They cannot. That is the difference between that type of thinking, and the scientific world view. The later can be independently verified. Many people use that phrase "what we really are." Yet, they cannot provide any explanation of what that is, and how it operates, or any way they we can test the hypothesis. Maybe we are all are exactly what we appear to be, an accidental chemical process, occurring on a tiny little rock, in a vast, empty, and meaningless universe. The only reason that this explanation is not completely accepted by the general public is because the majority of people are uncomfortable with the idea that their entire existence can be reduced to a couple pounds of fragile transitory gelatinous tissue.

 To Scot I replied:

If equating the true of your existence with "a couple pounds of fragile transitory gelatinous tissue." works for you - why not go for it and have your experience that-a-ways? If you limit your self to body - then mind is not creative and feeling is not felt - for everything is sacrificed to the model or idol - of your accepted belief - regardless how many measure your body and proclaim the truth.
When a model requires sacrifice of life to protect the model - it is no longer serving life-function - but an anti-life or destructive function.

The positing of existence upon any kind of thinking is an absence of the feeling of existence. Feeling Existence is not an emotional state - but a Quantum state. The mental programming associated with the physical personality runs as an overlay or virtual reality upon the Totality - and is completely divorced from awareness of its actual underpinnings unless and until a resonance of 'contact' occurs - in which the stirrings of being - (for which there is no basis on mind to understand or relate to) - grows a channel of communication through the reconfiguring of the personality. It doesn't matter what narrative form this takes so much as that it serves purpose of opening to the movement of one's being. This communication is not acceptable to those whose sense of self, security and identity lies in their being private, independent of autonomous - all of which are illusions - for in every thought or act the Whole Universe participates - at every level - because ONLY in thought is there a sense of separation - and that thought is 'safe' in the idea of frailty, littleness and death - for all these things 'prove' its temporary limited existence - as separated off from a Totality that is denied to a surface awareness BY the very nature of the personality structure - for that is the 'ticket' into the focus of an 'incarnation' or human lifetime.

Equilibrium is always the Nature of Existence - but the awareness and recognition of that is by definition excluded by a partiality accorded exclusivity. You don't appear to me to be an accidental chemical process - but a communication of an energetic in which I open and share in. Communication includes quantum entanglement - and our verbal-mental is no more determining of the quality of that communication than are genes to the instantaneous communications through the DNA of every part to every part within the whole - at once - billions of times per second...

The thing about looking at the mechanism - is that at first it reveals the Mind of Creator, then it reveals the mechanism running innately - with no external Creator, then it reveals the Creator has NOTHING external to it - in any instant - ever! The fear of Totality is a fragmented incoherence - like a jamming signal to fully open knowing. I don't ask or expect you or anyone to believe anything I say, but I invite you to consider expanding your definitions instead of locking down in them as if they save you from your worst fears. They embody those fears and persist them - until these become truly conscious - which cannot occur while the mind operates the attempt to separate or dissociate from them and overcome or resolve them 'externally' - which cannot work - because the cause is not external reflection, but the inner conception. As a man thinketh in his heart - so is he. The surface mind masks the heart and substitutes for it - until it runs out of ability to make more 'time'. Our true thought is hidden from us - in the main - by a cover story.

The 'public' are generally armoured and conditioned to a conformity whereby not to attract pain asociated with rage and terror. So a world of mutually reinforcing 'forms' masks as reality and is sacrificed to as true. Research where society (corporate cartel monopoly) supports you and don't go in the directions that expose or challenge the model they are invested in (and too big to fail) - or you will be persecuted or blanked off and denied for the truth - as always.

I have the whole world opened up - not pinned down - but only join in this as a free willingness - and never by coercion, deceit or persuasive manipulation. You can recognize 'who you really are' by the total absence of coercion, deceit or persuasive manipulation. Everyone has the capacity to feel this. But the 'world' we learned and adapted to, is not one of unconditional recognition and acceptance - but of blind masked presentation - to survive and to bear surviving. Who wants to re-view 'separation trauma' that society operates to conceal? Yet the underlying script operates regardless the forms of evasion. Fears operate humanity - even through the very attempts to make sure it wont happen again. It's in our template as a conflicted sense of self and existence. Hiding from this does not resolve anything - but hiding so well as to forget - and defending the forgetting as survival - is the belief we are alone and the exchange of an intimately relational Creation for stuff and others to exploit, use up and gratify a passing sense of self-inflation upon.

Open-minded Skeptic sayeth to the main article:

Space-time, it's been good to know ya. But you are no longer fundamental. Get used to it.

In reply to Open-minded Skeptic:

Welcome to Time-space. NOW opens to Joy Synchronicity instead of sausage-moments joined together by fear-narrative. The fundamental nature of reality is that you can never get used to it - because it is Always New. Clearly Ideas unfold their own inner quality to experience - and hold all the time they need.