Scientific Safety of Vaccine Safety Research
In mythic terms, the people are coerced and compelled to sacrifice their vitality (their young) to the 'god' or 'terror' upon whose appeasement our 'protection' depends.
This story - and variations of it - are a deep archetype upon which the perceived world operates.
For we are coerced and compelled by 'conditions and conditioning' to sacrifice a natural feeling wholeness of being, for a mask of protection by which to participate , adapt and survive the human experience. The terrors or trauma of conflict that the masking covers are both the fear and the hatred of the fear, that demand a sense of power over life - where life itself is feared and assigned the projection of our own conflicting intent.
The division of mind to define, predict and control is itself ruling out wholeness - and seeking to interject a censor or control upon the flow of information - or the meeting of true need.
A tyrannous mind is a tyrannized mind that knows not what it does - and justifies itself in hate and fear of its own unrecognised reflection. It accuses those who do choose not to assault and sicken children of 'killing children' while doing exactly the thing they say they hate, under the banner of righteous necessity - that brooks no chink of light for revision, discussion, investigation or debate - and so takes on the qualities of an 'evil' mandate behind a mask. This triggers a polarisation of defiance against an un-owned hate. For to pharmaceutically assault babies and children (and adults) under the guise of a theory asserted as medical fact - as if the 'science is settled' - is State or indeed corporately owned state power.
Clinging to a dying model or image of self and world-reality is calling suffering and death by wilful ignorance. The attempt to control leads to a more and more out of control 'reality-experience' of narrative framing - pumping up the pharma, military-industrial and 'intelligence' structure like a cancerous tumour - sucking all the vitality from the whole to the priesthoods of 'control'.
While 'they' have our allegiance and support - as power and protection of our sense of self in life - they USE it to lose the patient while 'killing' the disease.
Pre-emptive attack is becoming the normal. The array of 'power and protection' against what is imagined, feared or subliminally programmed to happen.
I cant engage in reasoned discussion with the intent to only adopt the FORM of communication as weapon against it. That mind is closed by design. But where any willingness arises - let it find a willingness in me to join with.
The 'evil' is set up to be un-challengable in direct terms - for it is foundational to the way we have learned/been trained to think - in place of a qualitatively transcendent nature that has been denied a structural voice. This is the work of an active willingness for wholeness of being - health and sanity - regardless the forms it takes.
Using the form of things to mask hidden intent is what we take to be a private mind. Identifying behind a 'fig-leafed' obfuscation pays the price, while clever accounting 'outsources' and redefines so as to displace pain and loss to 'other' or not self.
No one is blinded by science - but the wish NOT to see finds a match in forms of scientism. There is nothing about ANY human endeavour that is not ruled by the same - generally unconscious - archetypes.
Love of truth cannot abandon Reason and Science - but only release the confusion of masking forms to a renewal of a love of truth and the truth of love - which has NO place in the mind of wilful conflict and confusion.
If there is a first-born to give up in favour of a true foundation - it is our private separative and unloving thoughts - by which we rule out love in a sense of limited sacrifice as the mind of 'what do I get out of this?'
Well you get a sense of disconnection under an illusion of power that draws ever more of you to forget what Connection is and defend against it to protect a false investment.
If this is 'too long' I would post a thumbnail and link to the rest. But it arose in context of relationship at this timing - in this opening of communication - and so comes to this meeting of attention in such terms as it has found.