Sunday, 2 April 2017

Are wars what they seem? - ACIM - Hidden hate

Does this 'ruling power class' actually fight among its own - or does it enact a sacrificial blood-letting upon which to engorge and gratify a sense of power over life? The very idea of power - as we generally use it, corrupts.

Is it meaningful to regard corporate or national 'powers' or their apparent leaders as discrete entities?
Are they puppet masters or themselves puppet to ideas they know not of?

Do we in turn align in a similar posture of 'someone else must pay' so that not to lose our face.
Do we hate the hidden hate and fear that our masking, faces away from, so as to seem or pass off without exposure?
Is the human story of discovery, possession and control, a cover story over a great human evasion - the fact of which is the last thing we would notice?

To what degree is an autonomous sense of freedom and independence (from such exposure) an automaton or golem, driven by a willingness to sacrifice for power in blame, rejection and denial?
Does the acceptance and enacting of a false mind or usurping narrative identity, align us in support of the very thing we say we hate? As in the metaphor of the 'Matrix' where what seems a 'life' is part of a battery system of support for that which feeds illusions in return for life-energy?

I cannot go 'deeper' in anyone else's perspective. I can only look within and be listen or feel there. Intimacy is associated with the despoiling, loss and betrayal of love and life. But an actual intimacy is none of these things.
The generation of conflict keeps us 'safe' from knowing anything true. But 'someone must pay'.

- - -

 Are wars what they seem - a struggle between powers? Or are they the mind's power to assert a conflicted state upon the power of life, so as to sow division and confusion by which to exploit and manipulate fragmented and polarised minds, unlike and other?
Is not much of the trouble abroad a means to divert from and persist in trouble at home?
And the trouble at home presented as provocation by which to be baited into intended and directed reaction?

The 'US' is being used - as most else is being used - by the purpose of deceit or self-illusion.
Deceit frames and suggests illusion as true. But our investment in the illusion of power demands sacrifice of true in allegiance to its god - as our 'self'. False-framed reality is increasing obvious as a narrative that 'controls' the setting and range of choices available. To react within the framing is to have taken the bait and chosen to play out the role accorded by unconscious urges through which manipulators work.

This next para from my daily reading of a work I find a greater sense of communication than words:
"How does one overcome illusions? Surely not by force or anger. Nor by OPPOSING them in ANY way. Merely by letting reason tell you that they CONTRADICT reality. They GO AGAINST what must be true. The opposition comes from THEM, and NOT reality. Reality opposes nothing. What merely is, NEEDS no defense, and offers none. Only illusions need defense, BECAUSE OF WEAKNESS. And how CAN it be difficult to walk the way of truth, when only WEAKNESS interferes? YOU are the strong ones in this seeming conflict. And you need NO defense. Everything that needs defense YOU DO NOT WANT. For anything that needs defense will WEAKEN you." (ACIM)

Sovereignty of will, (freedom in being) is usurped by the attempt to empower a separate mind as a body over other bodies and over its world. What is a separate mind? Secret or masked intent and agenda that SEEMS to relate and communicate while actually operating to obfuscate and disrupt communication so as to redefine reality in its own image and terms. If this program should pause even a moment - the true will rises as the recognition one does not want it, and this truth accepted, releases allegiance and resort to it for self.

Does a war-based mind seek war? Always and in all ways. Rule out division instead of the tempt to rule out from it. The war-minded cannot turn this around. Our mind-set has to be re-evaluated from a perspective beyond its own framing. This is the choice we do not know we are making... until such perspective finds our mind un-clothed - despite all presentations to the contrary.

The wish for war is the refusal to open to a true relational communication. The wish that overrides true desire is the father of the lie. What else but war can come of forcing against your own will as the wish for power over life - in place of living within the power of life? No one wants to lose this power - and so no one sees the true cost of pain and loss that its allegiance demands. For such exposure is denied by 'seeing' the fault in others and war must force them to comply or deny them life.

- - -
David S asked me - in two separate posts on this page: what is ACIM?
# 1. A Course in Miracles. ACIM. A tool is not more or less than the purpose for which it is used. While the active purpose is a desire for true sanity of coherence and congruity, of being, then not only will everything in our mind and world be fitted to such purpose - but we attract into our life, things, relationships, events, thoughts and teachings that resonate with our desire. ACIM is an example of such for me - but there are as many forms of the Universal Course as there are individuals to recognize and accept truth because it is true.
Inspirations can serve as a tuning fork by which to recognize and release the dissonant - rather than persist in the struggle of seeking to make true as if to gain validation from struggle.
A Course in Miracles is released from copyright and can be freely accessed online or purchased in print. Resonance and relevance to who we truly feel ourselves to be is no necessarily the linear development of a set identity.

#2. I answered somewhat in another post reply to you. What it is intended to be and what it is used for may be at variance - that is the freedom to accept or delay. But in terms of the world A Course in Miracles is a Text, a Workbook and a Manual for teachers, by which to recognize and re-align the mind to teach and learn from an unconflicted source and nature - even amidst the results of having taught and learned conflict - and taken it to be  our world or reality. So among other things, a miracle in this context, is a shift of perspective when a false sense of causality is released... along with the symptoms that it embodied - in timing of willingness to accept.

While the Course may seem abstract or otherworldly - one can see example in such things of our world as fake currency of narrative invested and believed from which outcomes follow as inevitable effect to the believed and accepted cause. One can point to this with the term 'ego' or 'WW3' - but one is the wish-belief from which the symptoms arise and witness to. Only in general we don't call or see such beliefs, while they operate as (accepted) reality.
I know I answered twice. I simply enjoyed doing so. But your joy is your own path of an unfolding discovery - if you will - and meets what serves you in who you are the being of. I say this because I don't see different sources of inspiration as being of conflicted purpose - regardless their form - if the embodiment of them in our lives is a receptivity to and honouring of the freedom of each other.


- - -
Seraskier responded:

[[ Are wars what they seem – a struggle between powers? ]] 
Oh no, all that stuff about powers is long forgotten.
Wars are the means by which multinational weapons corporations keep their businesses running smoothly. No-one cares about countries or powers any longer.

My response:

You are somewhat saying what my ‘question’ implied, for the acting out of competing ‘powers’ is nurtured as the narrative for public consumption – by which indeed a population may be literally entrained and consumed.

The mind-capture beneath market share, asset stripping and power fed thereby, is subtler and more pervasively inhibiting of freedom to live and grow from within. Indeed such a technocracy of systemic imposition replaces the relational field with the ‘mind’ of the automaton. Life lived is out of bounds – save as a carrot by which to come under the stick.

The consolidation of power – as the world worships power – operates corporately across boundaries and beneath and behind the scenes such that in due turn – those means that were used to break the old patterns will themselves be broken – so that no threat or rival will exist or rise but to be cut off or shut down. This creeping paralysis holds a horror that turns a mind away to focus instead in the dynamics of conflict – as if it can be won, or in distraction – as if it can actually escape.

Perhaps it becomes clearer now, that the power of illusion, operates an illusion of power, that baited carrot by which to forget the true by eliciting investment in the false and the accepting of its framing as our thinking. Fear of loss of power to not suffer further hurt or loss, sets the mind into unquestioning compliance, while compensatory identities express rebellion along the various templates provided or subverted.

But the power of illusion is the embodiment of creative imagination – and does not have to be focused within and harnessed to the war-mind of a weaponised and marketized identity. Nothing has built in or fixed meaning – unless your mind says so and you choose to believe it and act as if true.
RT says ‘question more’. I suggest to ‘Question Everything! For the basis upon which we think and feel, provides the perception-experience to which we automatically react. Becoming self-aware of our conditioning is an expansion of creative possibility – but not when addicted to the fix of an old identity-investment. I see that running dry, cutting off its own supply and masking powerlessness with every kind of nonsense – to which sacrifice must be made so as not to allow exposure. Yet what is that but fear of pain and loss! Is this actually the god we seek to appease? Is this the thinking that is given priority beneath our scenes?

Running on a negative self-definition can only result in a negative result. Imposing and enforcing an overlay of apparently positive spin not only compounds the error, it fakes, dilutes and undermines the true positive. A demon-fear given protection, becomes the demonizing of our joy. It turns life inside out and back to front. Everything is backwards! (So take of the mind-adjuster).

What is the ‘self’ exactly? For we are in effect acting from what we accept to be true for us in each and every moment. …Is it true…? How much exposure to self-honesty can we access or allow?

- - -

Dead World Walking commented into this page:

The insatiable, avaricious psychopaths who rule the planet will not rest from their quest of complete economic domination. We, the people, must resist.
For the sake of our children and the Earth.
I empathise with your feeling - but I call to resist the temptation to align in hate. Feel it...? Yes; there is hurt within hate and a deep sense of violation of life being different than it 'should be' . So heartbreak is beneath the pain that set a heartlessness of unfeeling to anything that triggers the threat and pattern of the violation or betrayal of trust. The journey I sketch is what the 'psychopathic' mind embodies the denial and refusal of. You can recognize your own resonance with any energetic by its triggering your own sympathetic vibrations - for hating the hater is the propagation and reinforcement of a focus in hate.

Economic domination is a false economy. True economy balances and flows and works or not - and there is only limited capacity to argue with the truth of what fails to support life - for we kill ourself to do so.
So I call on 'King Midas' to remind us that if we make a symbol of wealth the context of our world - and sacrifice all else to its 'rules' - then we lose the Living of a relational dance in life - for the static and meaningless idol.

You can only free yourself from tyranny of fear (hate) or false thinking (idols instead of the Living) - by truly living this moment and this day. Yet you can't do that alone in isolating thought that rules out the felt quality of your relationship with others, with your world. So for the love of Life on Earth - resist the temptation to engage or persist in loveless thinking no matter how it presents itself. Love isn't as the deceit-mind says - it is the movement and presence of life - free of the deceits that sacrifice true to have to keep up a masking compliance.

Making a new name by which to deny others is seeded by the energetic of denial - but once established, expands its usage to include others who don't comply with imposed rules set to 'save us' and therefore are associated with the evil set against us.

But for sure, address criminal behaviour and call out deceits for what they are.
Beware becoming framed and set in terms that hack your own life to operate a hate agenda.
Pathology of psychic-emotional relationship and communication is basically the fracture of trauma that re-enacts itself through the millennia.

- - -

PsyOp defences

(Further activity on the off-guardian on 'Russian hacking' psyops):

(To a commenter who wondered what the diversionary tactic was defending against being uncovered)
 

Psychological defences operate against exposure, feared and believed and lived as a 'reality' to never be repeated - ie: associated with conditioned psychic-emotional trauma.
As long as one engages the defence - one plays the same game in shifting roles.  I don't believe it possible to understand the nature of such 'defences' without meeting and moving through our own. The name, blame and shame game persists a narrative assertion upon one's reality that overrides the true in a movement of self-survival - within the conditioned framing of the mind-fragmentation passing off as 'self'.

For political issues there will be a variety of causes that are themselves symptoms.  In a sense there is the 'way things work' at the level of social agreements - that one usually conforms to as the parameters in which to NOT attract penalty and perhaps to find a measure of success. Corruption is systematic. The system itself has to be challenged - alongside whatever else we are moved or obliged to do. Systems are ideas  accorded currency by adoption and acceptance. So challenging the system begins with suspending allegiance and agreement to a pervasive insanity regardless the fact that it will make you seem to be the insane one.

First, change the world you perceive and react as real - and then you are in the territory of discovering what is operating beneath the masking that you used to simply blindly operate as if true. Name, blame and shame wont allow this to happen - and the crab-barrel world will pull you back into its own. So one has to WANT truth enough to pause and challenge the mind of guilt - which may seem mostly everyone else's - but then that was what it was assigned to do. Self-guilt in any pervasive belief, operates a crippling and self-destructive agenda - generally under 'good intentions' as the spin of seeming to offset or validate an invalid sense of self. Exposure to your true nature may be felt as damning of healing - depending on your alignment with true - or an attempt to make something true that by definition sacrifices truth to a seeming - that doesn't become any more true no matter how many and what force is invested in pushing it.

The whole global 'Economy' - and all its agencies - is a pack of cards. This is not just banking, but pharma , military and energy cartels, and the whole of the institutional establishment that has been subverted to their influence. The world we think we know is false. But this disclosure is itself potentially psychotic. My sense is that everything is coming up (from a suppressed and denied unconscious) ANYWAY - and so guardianship or guidance is for those willing to learn to swim rather than isolate within 'protection' from changes that are felt dangerous or threatening. A false kind of protection is costing the Earth - and on an individual level costs a true appreciation of Everything while we are alive.

Instead of seeing the world crash and burn - take a crash course in self-knowledge. The only difference is a willingness in place of cursing and damning. Regardless such behaviour can be presented as if rational or as if wise.

What is hidden is not just our fears and sense of lack or guilt - but the true movement of our being. Think like the fairy tale; the true love is protected by terrors. Therefore something has to truly MOVE you to move past the boundaries set upon your consciousness by a negative conditioning loop. That calls for a cease and desist of the false in some moment of willingness for true. The fruits, grow the shoots by illuminating a different pathway than define, divide and control. Because it is different, the mind of the old paradigm cannot and will never - see it. But what is left unused fades, while what we appreciate, appreciates (grows).

We are obliged to grow a different mind by acting from a fresh 'take' instead of subconsciously persisting a mis-take. No one else can accept for another's willingness - but we can extend faith in another's capacity to choose by honouring this instead of seeking to manipulate them to align our own private agenda - (regardless the good intentions).

Labelling something is not a diagnosis or cure - but rather a way to package and normalize a dissonance calling for attention. This reminds me of disk software that maps out bad blocks - ie: just don't go there! It is also the basis of a fraudulent medical paradigm.

The matrix mind is wrapped in multiple complex layers of wrappings that all share the intent NOT to know - and in this purpose it works very effectively - while seeming to be busy managing the every more complex and insane symptoms as if realities in themselves.

But twilight as the crack or cusp between worlds - is a bleedthrough portal for consciousness denied by the mapped out definitions of daylight focus - so observing an increasingly fake and crazy world can only stir the deeper currents of an otherwise discarded or denied consciousness.

- - -

I honour your feelings as part of you. I responded as a noticing of the way mind operates - not yours in particular but the mental-emotional patterning that MAKE the 'parallel world' we say we do not prefer - yet persist in unconsciously or subconsciously generating.

A self-protective gut reaction can still express via a partial or mistaken sense of self - so fear of loss can and does drive a world of war and lies. Who sees the breakdown of what at least seemed sane without meeting a fear of loss?

I don't have an issue with that we feel - as we feel - but how we interpret and act as a result. Mind-manipulation is not just applied externally - it's built in as an invested identity. You took personally what is not addressed or intended to deny or invalidate your feeling of being you. Blame is a fake currency of exchange as far as I am concerned so I also don't go out of my way to protect you from your feelings - which are valid feedback for you - no matter what is actually being believed and experienced.

A sense of a 'fake' or shifting reality is the basis of the curiosity as to what truly is. That is my interest; opening the curiosity as to what is going on - and especially what is going on in the mind of the perceiver - because that is where I see the deceiver or manipulator emanating from  and I state that without implying guilt. For if I am in some measure participating in my own suffering, I am no longer powerless under any kind of 'Caesar-driven' (parallel world) in which hate sacrifices love to preserve its self-specialness.

No offence is intended. Feeling what we truly feel is the only way to uncover what we actually believe... and be free to change it.

Saturday, 1 April 2017

Fake masking and mind as creative

Spiritual-Bypassing-Ten-completely-B-S-practices-of-supposedly-spiritual-people

The above inspired my comment:


The 'ego' hides in pointing out the fault in others - and in this case in forms of  'spirituality being used as a mask'.


The form is not the reality - but the meanings you accept, you give.
Assigning or associating forms with meanings is fantasy interposed over what is.

That forms of mutually agreed definitions are used to mask in so as to keep secret, and mask out so as to protect a fake narrative reality against true, is simply observable. The invitation to focus exclusively on errors as if escaped or judging over them - is the playing of the game of separation in place of the healing or undoing of the error.

Mistakes are inherent to learning. When new perspective opens - an old sense of self as un-owned habit - will at some point attempt to reassert the new wine in its old bottles. This will operate every kind of egoic mind-trickery that is now more open to noticing. Noticing the 'default' choices of past learning AS choices is the awakening freedom to choose or align in the presence of a true acceptance. So in this sense the 'errors' are not the source and means of blame and penalty - but the breadcrumb trail to an expanded and embracing awareness - in freedom to focus within a true sense of worth or integrity in place of attempting to force a false sense of self in struggle.

When communications are employing the name and blame and shame modality - they are invitations to play self-superiority and self-righteous hate under the mask of seeming to be correcting the error in others. But the ONLY way to correct an error in another is to correct OUR perception of them. For unless we first accept correction for ourselves - self-rejections go forth to find their target in every justification for the withdrawal from and withholding of love. Love is not what you DO - but what you ARE - when nothing is taken away (judged and rejected) and nothing added (narrative overlay of self-inflation).
The capacity to accept love for your self is the extension of worth and recognition of love in the one who seemed 'other'.

Love is simply being - but what the mind in egocentricity has made of love is fearful indeed. Fear of love is replacement of self with a stranger - by which a world of strangers arose. Fear of love is an evasion of intimacy that acts out in forms of separation, distance and delay, so as to focus in an exclusive sense of split-off self. And a love-hate alloy of polarised self-experience that is all based on conditional or 'special' love. To make special is to separate from - not in truth - but in wish.

You CANNOT bypass your true being indefinitely - for pain has limits to tolerance. When the game is no longer felt as 'worth the candle', it fades from even the seeming of meaning - and the stirring of the desire to embody meaning finds movement in conscious awareness as the noticing of recognition amidst the mind and world such as to shift or align toward reintegrating to what and who you simply - and always already are - which is a relational field AND its embodiment in thought and form. But don't take my words or any words, for your recognition.

- - -
(On the same page)

forestkitty said (to the article):
everything you need is right inside of you. it is how you project it that counts.

My comment:

Yes, as need-lack or wholeness of an unfolding need-fulfilment. True desire is connected movement of being. Not a state of lack or disconnection.
Projection of need-lacks 'makes a world' of separation, struggle and loss.
But true need recognized at source is already a true movement in being - and abiding as and in alignment with true being releases the 'mind' of lack to recognition of living presence in act or flow.

The mind cannot NOT project the thought accepted there - so the nature and the quality of the thought we accept is either aligned with our true signature vibration or not. Taking in or taking on who we are not is part of the human experience - as part of entering and attuning to a world in which to participate and share in. Yet the developed ability to learn a world of separation and lack is the forgetting of our true being - until - the mask of the personality becomes too tight, painful or joylessly meaningless to WANT - and then the rewakening to the true of you rises through the seeming breakdown of what you are not.

Releasing what doesn't work LETS in to that which does. But while a sense of lack seems to bring me a pay-off - it will be protected for what it 'gets'. As I recognize what doesn't work CANNOT work, the 'pay-off' becomes irreversibly associated with futility and suffering - that I know I do not want - and so find willingness to truly look at and let go the persistence of.

We can always and only meet 'where' we are coming FROM, and so in true and in false the Law applies equally - that can be said as 'what you give out is what you get back', or 'As ye sow, so SHALL ye reap', (shall being a present choice and not a future tense).
Determining to see worth in another counteracts the habit of seeing what is wrong with everyone. It may seem 'unrealistic' or denial of reality - but it is changing the projection and the frequency of one's thought. True vision is always a gift - and so the willingness to see a different world (than fear made) is not the forcing upon it of a 'nice' version.

The sickness of a world fear made needs to be felt to allow it to be challenged. But projecting blame hides the feelings as 'at the hand of another' in a sense of victimhood and powerlessness. Collapsing blame upon oneself is no different in error but horrible and hateful to experience, so the thoughts of guilt - are the dissonances to be truly looked at and questioned.

Freedom from guilt is the gift of our true being - that moves through us to others and reflects a world of a different order.
What I wrote here arose as a meditation upon your sharing - so I thank you.

Friday, 31 March 2017

Belief in helplessness



While relating to a specific point in a current narrative spin the off-guardian article on the nature of the 'Russian hacking' investigation - the issues that I see underneath the specifics are addressed below:


Belief in helplessness or indeed asserted fear of powerlessness is a foundation-belief to the human conditioning. A sense of lack seeks to cover and inflate itself as if to guarantee and justify its assertion of identity. It seeks to take or get what it feels denied or deprived of by the 'enemy' - that is this life cast in is envy, fear and hatred seeming justified.

"Frantic and loud and strong the dark ones seem to be. Yet they know not their enemy, except they hate him. In hatred they have come together but have not joined each other. For had they done so, hatred would be impossible. The army of the powerless must be disbanded in the presence of strength. Those who are strong are never treacherous because they have no need to dream of power and to act out their dream. How would an army act in dreams? Any way at all. It could be seen attacking anyone with anything. Dreams have no reason in them. A flower turns into a poisoned spear, a child becomes a giant, and a mouse roars like a lion. And love is turned to hate as easily. This is no army, but a madhouse. What seems to be a planned attack is bedlam.

The army of the powerless is weak indeed. It has no weapons, and it has no enemy. Yes, it can overrun the world and seek an enemy. But it can never find what is not there. Yes, it can dream it found an enemy, but this will shift even as it attacks, so that it runs at once to find another and never comes to rest in victory. And as it runs, it turns against itself, thinking it caught a glimpse of the great enemy which always eludes its murderous attack by turning into something else. How treacherous does this enemy appear, who changes so it is impossible even to recognize him!

Yet hate must have a target. There can be no faith in sin without an enemy".
 (~ACIM)
You can read the section I quoted from at:
http://www.jcim.net/acim_us/TxtChap-21-8.php

As the stark insanity reveals itself obvious, Reason either awakens or hate and fear dedicate to yet deeper dissociation and fragmentation.

The need for the belief in the 'enemy' is not confined to the article's 'experts' - who can as easily themselves be cast as liars operating evil agenda of the 'Enemy'. If the true 'enemy' is a faulty formulation of reality - then the correction is not in the effects or symptoms of that faulty formulation. However, the identification within adaptation to a world predicated on error, is heavily defended AGAINST exposure - above all else.

Everything is sacrificed to the survival of such a sense of self. And the mind operates the justifying narrative to hide and cover such a self-betrayal. The breakdown of the narrative mind can expose the raw awareness of a deeper need than conflicted self makes symptom of, and this is the heal the conflict - or correct the error - where it is - and not out on the world of 'other'.

Regardless where hate and fear drive us to assign 'enemy' - all such operates the allegiance to the belief and faith in 'anti-life', and its magnification as the driven narrative of subjection or hollow and pyrrhic 'victories'.

"Do I desire a world I rule instead of one which rules me?". (ACIM)
Such is a true sovereignty of being - for what you accept true of you IS your received experience - and your gift to the whole. Polarities are embraced by their true context. Problems have to be seen from a perspective beyond or outside their framing, to be truly resolved. The re-packaging and re-distribution of problems, is the business of self-evasion - not progress.

When the 'guardian or protector' becomes an insane prison guard, is it not time to release their employ?



Sunday, 26 February 2017

Existence, History and Culture

A thought on Culture as an Integral Part of the Conditions of Existence
by Norman Pilon
- - -

My Comment to the theme:

One need not understand how life works to align in its movement and know the fruits thereof.
Indeed the attempt to understand life, may be usurped by the mind of define and control - upon a life, a world, a relationship - unseen, unfelt and unshared. Understanding in the heart does not deny or exclude the use of the understandings of the head, but knows itself an integrative movement of thought and feeling - and not a coercion operating the deceit of control over a denied sense of subjection - for the true of such being is invalidated, deprived, used, discarded, suppressed, denied.

I feel the nature of our conflict and suffering , arises from false currency accepted, identified and defended as true - and reinforced by acting forth from mutually held definitions of unconscious, subconscious and so-called waking or surface conscious assertions and defences. What we made  - knowingly or not - is made upon (and depends on) that which truly moves us. The substitution of a truly felt life for a mind in story is to trade sovereignty of being for subjection under fear and division under the belief one is getting something better or that without one will be lesser, and so is getting away from something worse, in fear or belief of greater pain or loss. The conditioned and conditioning identity of getting, overlays and substitutes for what in words I can only call receiving and giving - which is the gift of the current through the focus or choice of our recognition of living in its terms... or getting in terms of a segregating self sense.

What happens is always only current. Even to say Now is to separate or collapse to a focus within an imaged reality. A seemingly possessed reality.
Happening is a totality, an instant, a knowing or wholeness prior to mind. To feel and know this is to release investment in a sense of possession or identity in getting - and fear of loss. Because life is never somewhere else - excepting to the mind that takes the bait of believing it has become something else and has such power - and suffers in the measure of its own making.

To make story is to subject Current... to a framing mind of accepted meanings, and open the consciousness of subjective differentiation.
This sense of self existence is the thought-feeling-knowing "I am". This is the First - unqualified acceptance and expression of self-awareness. Prior to time and space that operate within unfolding Idea-experience of the qualities of being. And beneath the coverings of conditionings arising from a sense of betrayal and loss of such intimacy of experience to a mind-capture that seems instead a subjection to unchallengable external power.

What happenED is story that arose as a getting and fear-conditioned pattern.
The living current is represented by currency of symbol, imagery and concept as a 'short-cut' to the actual intimacy of true currency. And the identification of love and self with what we thus make is like unto a cuckoo concept that kicks our true creations out of the nest. Our life functions become aligned to serve a parasitic, destructive - or un-creative deadness that grows self-illusion upon the living relations we no longer have time or permission or consciousness to recognize, live and share in as the knowing and being of our living.

Conditioning substitutes for living response and response-ability. A mechanism imposed upon life constructed by disconnect-thinking that would give it life in its own image. That would posses by consumption, domination, and usurpation, that which it feels denied and deprived of by a sense of life unworthy and treacherous, and which is thus defended against with rage and defiance to the very last.

The story can take every and any forms, and yet the core content is the same in all. Yet the story of self-struggle over and against a sense of loss is history-defined. And where history carries the charge of betrayal, rejection, abandonment and denial - its imposition upon the Current is the re-enactment of the past in terms of retribution and vengeance. History but repeats the original separation patterns of experience in ever new clothes. But at what point is the futility and fruitlessness of using life thus - and being so used - unavoidable?

Perception is selective. You see what you want to see and disregard the rest. That this happens so fast your 'waking mind' is unaware of its operation is part of the defence that made the masking off of what merits focus or disregard. Yet this reveals what we are believing to choose to see and experience as we do - and in reclaiming this awareness we can re-evaluate if it is true of who we Currently accept and feel and know to be. When formerly unconscious framing thought is released - a fresh perspective opens as a greater participation in the true Currency of life. Life more abundant - in terms of integrative aligning of self, and world in life. Ideas or core beliefs in fear and lack are no less abundant in their fruits - but are not recognized as fruits - but insults and failure amidst an abundance of fear and lack.

Everything I write is toward reclaiming - or being found - in true foundation that naturally aligns thought and feeling from which natural responsibility follows and indeed flows one with.
"The more acceptance that technology gets, the harder it is to change. If enough people are stuck at the same level, they think it's the truth." ~ (Bjarne Stroustrup).
I rephrase the above quote as the more acceptance the mind of defining, predicting and controlling life is given, the harder it seems to challenge it. If conditioning sticks, its symptoms or effects are accepted as the human condition.

In a love hate mind and world, everything is an alloy - and yet a willingness to know does not have to be perfect to align in and receive of what Is to be known and the desire to change a poor experience for a better one has roots deeper than a manipulating mind seeks to re-frame and harness for its own attempt to get for itself from what others are willing to give away - if tricked and conditioned to do so.

When the model or construct of self and reality - for these are two sides of one Current Event - no longer serves purpose - and operates destructively as a sacrifice of purpose to a fantasy played out upon a mechanical 'life' - then all basis for thought and be-life has to be redeemed in true Currency - as willingness allows and accepts.

It is conceptual - image or idol based thought that divides and rules out Sanity - in the self-illusion of ruling over. But its acceptance as true is its righteous defence against being challenged or exposed as a narrative control wearing the masks of power, prestige, learning, and any other culturally institutionalized idol.

To demonize the mask is to be baited and diverted by the mask - and so in that way the mask of life operates the denial of the living - while claiming righteousness against the perceived wrong of the other. Indeed even suggesting the disengagement from the mask is to trigger all sides of every conflict to reject, attack and invalidate the common 'threat' - because the masking belief is the identity of power and protection - without which is the belief reality will reject, attack and invalidate.

The nature of receiving/giving is made obscure by belief in the value of getting. But the measure we set in our giving is the only limit on our receiving. Everything else is a trick in the mind - but surely, you have noted, the mind is not the tiny thing that thinking has made it seem - and suffer real.

Saturday, 25 February 2017

End of the Story or vengeance as usual?

Under the article:
Trump, Watergate, Nixon, Rockefeller: the real lesson
jerseyg said:   

If “they” didn’t want Trump to win, he’d have never gotten into the WH in the first place. Their high tech weapons could have taken him out long before he even won the nomination. Let’s get real here. Attributing all the power to the Rockefellers and Rothschild and then acting as if they created such a monumental blunder of letting him slip through to the presidency is a ridiculous assumption. He is beholden to the zionists. They financed him through his failures. He is their puppet. End of story.

- - -

"End of story?"
Rather, the continuation of 'Story' as 'narrative control'.
Look how everyone takes a part in the framing of events. Are we being manipulated? Or are we suckling the juices of our own emotional investment?

But your point is that Trump - for all the 'outsider' status - (true within certain levels of identity aligned within Establishment Was) -  was/is being run by 'insider' cabal - even if as a 'controlled explosion' or shaped charge.

No asset - allowed or installed into agency of power or influence - is to be allowed to out-serve or out-grow its purpose. Nor will such a notion of power itself out-serve or out-grow its purpose.

So while we invest in Its framing as our own aligned identity - such purpose serves out its time in Story.

One of the realisations of noticing (aka mindfulness), is that attention WAS scattered and fragmented in preoccupation with fantasy of past and future imaginations. But the 'continuity manager' or ego of self-sense runs the automaton of a fantasy life or subjected virtual reality of adjustment to its lack of presence - so as to present worthiness, love or power - as if one had it. Possession is the name of the game - for who would possess, is thus possessed or entranced by the game until played out.

Story calls for sacriface in justifiction, which is backwards. Original nature creates from a just or true awareness in which no one has to deny or be denied, to behold it is good - very good.
A false sense of rightness asserts and propagates the very 'evil' it sees in OTHER - as its own blindness. Some carry this role to extremes - but it takes one to know one. Noticing allows awareness of choice and change in place of an apparently unchangeable self, mind or reality.

But the wish something be true... or not true - resets and reinforces the conditioned imprint of the golem. Fantasy fulfilment has one outcome - no matter how often repeated... unfulfilment. Be that structured upon the symbols of love or power.

In a book I appreciate is the line: "There is no life outside Heaven" - and yet of course what passes as life, is traded in and exchanged and made real to such mind-drift into unreality - is viciously defended against wholeness of being, against a light in which a mistaken identity is no longer accepted or accorded real. Gone!

- - -


A further comment in the page:

"The people spoke loudly enough"... (referring to Trump's election)



Was that rage seeking vengeance or a refusal to accept false power over true sovereignty of being?

I'm not asking anyone to speak for anyone else - but to ponder that these can be co-fused and reversal operate such that the demonic is accorded faith - or the true healing messengers - demonsided and killed.

The Lie - and the identity trick

The Corbett Report "Why do people lie about climate change?"  (and lots else too).

#1

The question ' why do people lie'' is posed within the surface assertion that freedom exists at the personal level and presumption that we have it.

The answer is that fear (terror) operates beneath and within - and upstream to the personality focus, AS the basis (along with victimhood) for the personality led (sic) experience.

Top-down or externally imposed fear of pain and penalty, conditions the mind in conformity to evade threat - and much of this occurs beneath the waking consciousness - so that the moment of choice is given a blind eye. Any sense of Self-betrayal is then associated with the failure and treachery of 'others'.

The 'lie and the father of the lie' - aka the 'tares among the wheat '- is untruth given power of acceptance and allegiance as true. This operates a 'Forgetting' or denial of our true nature in creative freedom that operates an 'anti-life' principle or agenda... until Awakening from the spell of the illusion of power as falsely framed by fear or lack.

Within awakened responsibility, 'negative agenda' is repurposed to serve the opening of new perspective upon creative freedom. For such is the implicit nature OF Creation. However, a false sense of freedom is the power to override and exploit Life under mis-taken image, symbol and concept of self/reality- which is a use of mind in denial of Life - that then declares the denying sense to be life! This is a reversal that accuses everyone (else) of what IT does.

Power in the world can make and break you - in the world - and the making of such a self is the subscription to its world of conflicted reality, because the persona masks the un-owned and unhealed conflicted self.

So why do we lie but because it serves a purpose in that moment that we believe saves us from pain or loss of self. This is what the mind was made to do as a protector and defence against fear of pain and loss of Self - with the instruction to never let it be lived again. ("Hold that door Hodor!"- Game of Thrones ref).

BUT there is no freedom or joy in a substitution-life - excepting in a vanity and arrogance of exploiting and using life (our relations) for private gratification, and thus become hollow. The reluctance to accept this takes time to recognize - so timing is everything.

The replacement of true with false was a blind self-serving self-belief - bolstered by a sense of adversity and enmity (and secretly dependent upon it - because only persistent conflict establishes the conditions in which truth is denied awareness) - But the re-awakening of true is of a different foundation that does no violence to the false foundation - but simply shines to knowing. This quality of being establishes a different consciousness than what increasingly is now recognized to have been reactive conditioning (while believing itself free).

The pathways of mutual entanglement and individual responsibility set up a dream that turned to nightmare, and have persisted as further dissociation and fragmentation ever since. And so within each of us, is a timing that honours our free willingness - or power of acceptance - whilst illuminating the illusion of self to its increasingly recognized checkmate or futility and facilitate the clear choice between alignment in true and the submission to false.

The desire to persist as the dream operates to keep such awareness out of focus. For example; if something calls your attention and you follow it - and persist in that while ignoring the call to a wholeness of being, you are not disconnected from wholeness of being - but the dissonance of such persistence brings that belief and experience as a result.

Our submission to fear-reinforcing 'reality' is the submission to Narrative Identity. But the yielding of such mind to the true movement of being is to be graced with a mind renewed - and living AS this (of this movement in being) is the way to grow and share and thus abide as our waking life.

In a recent Corbet report discussion:  there was a shared appreciation of the need for a true foundation FIRST - because otherwise the error goes forth to multiply - as if getting everyone ELSE to change is the prime directive. See how the sacrifice of self appears and appeals in the form of an evasion of having to yield to true. Why do we - any of us - evade, avoid, deny or block out truth? Because the mind is Already the act of so doing and we follow it as our self.

Within our relationships in the world - this is because feared truth terrorizes or conforms us to false 'self-presentation as a sense of self-preservation' - and operates as 'natural' strategic self-interest. But within the denial or masking of such fear is the WISH that something-be-true that embodies the denial as a mitigated or limited sense of pain and loss. Again this is experienced as self-inflation and self-importance and not in the underying terms that set it.

The lie is thus a 'convenient truth'. For those seeking insulation from pain and loss - as the embrace of a crusade that gives them some sense of righteous or powerful or helpful identity.  This operates the motif of "don't let the truth get in the way of a good story'.

We are each invested in our own 'story' and that is not wrong as an exploration of teaching/learning and uncovering of what we find in such a  journey experience, (and not necessarily in terms of the goals of the characters. Life is for living - not for-getting or for using up!

I find that I CANNOT interfere with or change another - I cannot 'tell' anyone anything they are not already of a willingness to know or a vibrational match to the communication. So the narrative frenzy of an attempt to TELL (others) what to do, substitutes for sovereignty of will, as addiction to Story - and to the power of the telling. For regardless the 'powers that be' - the secret judge within operates the same in all.

- - -

#2

My response to a climate change exchange on the same page - with regard to 'conspiracy of controlling agenda' vs pumping toxins into the atmosphere.



You bring up (retch?) another facet to the Climate con's piracy - and that is the capture of the true environmental movement (regarding actual toxic effect/fouling the nest) to a demonisation of CO2 which is absolutely essential to Life on Earth and to life more abundant! You may notice you breath is partially under your control - but you are not in control of breath. Likewise covert weather modifications can and do effect weather but do not control climate.

The Universe is essentially electromagnetic resonance - not gravitic - in nature - and Solar and Galactic influence are airbrushed out or hidden by the agenda that rides the gravy train of an induced scare-city.

Common sense - as I see it - pauses from ANY thought of reaction or identification to FEEL what is going on here - as the context to 'facts' being thrown about, colluded in and made identity of.

You can tell when a fear agenda is being used to manipulate a response - IF - your identity is not already running reactions that prevent you from pausing to see, hear, feel and know.

I don't care if the end of of the world is nigh if such news is being subverted and exploited to serve a fear agenda - a toxic agenda - a death agenda. No thanks!

Keeping a channel of Communication OPEN - is abiding in a connected presence WITH whatever is going on. This means NOT falling for the trap of a fearful identity - and that takes practice over time to get your life back - if you let it drift into a false sense of power and protection that you must start to realize is a racket you ultimately subject yourself TO - regardless the manipulators or the force of common illusion as the allowed reality.

Conspiracy is a poor term to use because it is coined by CIA and used to invalidate critical challenge to Narrative Control - which is going on in the open - but hardly anyone sees it - because they think within its framing. Half of this is that people WANT unconsciousness relative to their fears, shames, rages, that grow out of a deep sense of guilt and terror. No wonder - but it doesn't WORK to stuff toxicity out of 'mind' when it still runs covertly ALL THE TIME. The other half is that a power structure - and a market, arise from meeting the demand for unconsciousness, that fuse to become a slave-owning elitism - though it may start out as shepherding the flock to hold the balance of needs of the tribe and society.

Just below the surface reality is hate of private agenda that justifies itself by what they hold as done to them - or even the threat that it might be. So it doesn't seem like hate - it might feel like saving the Planet! But anyone NOT in that self-righteous compulsion can Feel immediately that these people are driven - compelled - fearful and coercively demanding - and there's no talking to them in the terms they set except to become entangled in the same nonsense!

Tell me when change HASN'T been the nature of life in the body. Show me anything that does not rise and fall from awareness as part of the always changing experience of being. There's no such Thing, but the wish and the grasp and the defence and the fear of loss all make an identity that loses TOUCH with its own nature - and periodically has to re-align with what is actually here - rather than running on Narrative Control.

Everything is Changing - and the basis on which we 'think' is changing - which feels like the breakdown of reality (but it's the dissolution of unworkable identity). In the true flow of our joy in being - no 'identity' needs assert its right or justify or apologise for being all that it is. Identity struggle is the adjustment to being out-of-true instead of living out-from-true. Struggle resorts to every kind of coercion and deceit - but true being is a no-brainer. No need to call in the dark arts of obfuscation. Feel your way - and all your resources align as needed.

It is true that those focusing on 'conspiracy to wield power over us' tend to also become fearful and polarized in identity Against Them. One can only start with where one is at, and the disturbance of uncovering a fake world is the beginning of an unfolding 'journey' to true apprecaition - a real world we can actually meet in and work and play and rest in - without all the armouring and fakery of masked intent.

Wednesday, 22 February 2017

NASA to Announce Alien Life?

NASA to Announce Alien Life?



- - -

 The pushing of this meme in the main stream, to prepare the way for "we are not alone in the Universe" - may serve the fear-drip..drip..drip that frames attention in stress chemistry (in which a sense of disconnect from true feeling being operates the fight or flight response). But it can serve the recognition that the belief "we are alone" - which is a collective expression of a personal sense of isolation - is NOT true - and that the framing of an exclusive sense of defence against fear COSTS us our true being.

The 'alien'-ation of our true being makes us stranger unto our self. As for top-down consensus - how else could a lid be kept on the fear of loss of control. But - if you are following this - how much of what we assign the term 'control' to, is in fact an investment in illusion of control that actually generates or feeds disorder.

Life that is not within our sense of definition and control is often feared - because we contain urges or motives that are fearful and hateful. Including the manipulation of others by leveraging their guilt and fear.

What to believe and who to trust in these times? Without a true foundation, one can be in effect 'phished' or hacked by someone else's thinking running as if your own. Especially when this is an emotionally triggered reaction.

Meeting the reality of an 'other' Life can only be through the true of our own. Or else we simply 'meet' our fears or 'shadow self' and recoil in horror in attempt to kill it - shut it down - put a lid on it - hide...

But whatever we deny is only pretended away - and is no less active in our reality for being redefined or re-assigned. The desire NOT to know is the mask - and yet the desire to know and be known is a movement of being. Disclosure can be a wonderful surprise or a traumatic dissociation. Are we preparing for a life more abundant - or to compress into further fragmentation? We are beings of choice - but only within conscious awareness.

The kind of people we attract into our lives is not random and the qualities we draw out of those we meet is not random. Fear given negative imagination is mis-creative or as they say - a self fulfilling prophecy. And wishful or good 'intentions' are only a further mask over un-owned fears.

Tuesday, 21 February 2017

Is Marriage the power of the State?

The case for civil partnerships for heterosexual couples is refused

I commented into the Guardian paste up of an article:


When the State legislates 'marriage' - that 'marriage' becomes a matter of state legislature.
So the state 'marriage' is in fact a civil partnership status called 'marriage'.
The expropriation of living relational participations and indeed freedoms - by the state - are its controls in the name of 'fairness' or evenness.

When the law is made into a weapon for private or elitist agenda - it is no longer the Law - but the demand of 'Caesar' regardless what system is apparently in place.

"The other two judges effectively said ministers can have longer to review the situation."

What is the missing phrase here - 'be allowed'?

I feel the patriarchal issue irrelevant. If same sex couples are free to obtain legal rights and protections in civil partnership - why not ANY couple? What exactly is to lose here? Is the institution of marriage being used as a weapon of social engineering? Where are journalists in these times?
The idea of controlling people is never recognized to be the basis for creating more disorder in ever more complex forms - leading to bankruptcy and exhaustion. Or is it?

- - -

Further to the above, The Guardian ran an article - of 'reader opinions' but no comments open beneath titled:
"Should heterosexual couples be allowed to enter civil partnerships?"
Please pause to notice the way this is framed. Do you pick up when language is manipulatively framed?
What reason is there for denying civil partnership status under the law to consenting adults?
Who decides that heterosexual partnerships should not be allowed access to the same rights as extended homosexual partnerships? Apparently, two out of three judges.

Social engineering operates a kind of mind-control in many ways and on various levels.
I appreciate the recognition and support for relationships of commitment and yet assigning these  - and all else - to the State - is a false religion.

Sunday, 19 February 2017

What lies beneath

I read the following article

How to institutionalise the world
by Darren Allen

and felt glad to meet Off-guardian's willingness to give focus to the issues addressed - but felt it presumed too much that was already conflicted - so wrote my own offering to the themes of what lies beneath...


Inner conflict embodies separation trauma; the denial or suppression and evasion of which calls up the masking persona  as 'survival' within a world of split minded conflict to which the living is sacrificed and lost love and power are sought in substitution of 'external' conditions, gratifications, validations.

Mind as evasion operates the persona in terms of positive achievements but always secretly defined or framed in negative belief. Such is addiction or identification in externals by sacrifice of self as the means to 'get' what they are believed to offer.

Until an addict recognizes and owns their addiction - they live the denial of it and their minds operate self-justification and shifting evasions of diversion or presentations of listening or understanding that are simply ways not to listen while seeming to be in relationship. I could say everyone is addicted to their own thinking - until the lack of true foundation for such thinking is seen and accepted - not merely thought about. We do not recognize the addiction when we react as if it is in fact our true function of mind when it is conditioned reaction - whose conditioning traces back to the imprinting of fear in guilt, hidden by denial, protected by thinking that embodies the strategy of 'surviving' in terms of the particulars of the separation trauma of its core beliefs.

The use of thinking - which at root is communication - for the limiting, defining and control of communication is a breakdown in communication. The very attempt to define and control operates the lack of listening and of truly spontaneous response. It systemizes and manually overrides a 'fallen' nature - where the error of mind is projected onto nature and attacked - and then validated in all the 'proofs' of guilt that a preset belief puts there.

Key to all is the nature of mind as the distorting filter of the true - and of joining in ideas - many of which are tacitly induced and communicated - is how they are strengthened as witnesses to a reality of interpretation - where the filters of that interpretation are hidden and covered with defences of diversion and taboo to ensure against exposure to reliving the pain or terror of the mind our thinking rose to blot out.

I have written of the covering over of our sovereign nature and its sacrifice in 'gaining the world' - but the quality of our true nature is a directly felt recognition that cannot be defined or described nor needs any such mind to perfectly be itself. The reintegration of the belief in fragmentation within the felt recognition of being exactly You - is of an abiding in and of this quality of being - that in simple terms is the call to joy rather than the call to sacrifice.

Because fear and guilt were hidden in the evasive manoeuvre - the reintegration or undoing is an exposure or bringing to light of what was denied within the desire for healing, wholeness of being, sanity of true presence.

The shifting from fear-defined self to a conscious recognition and acceptance will generally meet extremity of conflict. Particulary while the old mind-framing is used to 'make sense' of (demand sacrifice of) the new.

Releasing the mind is simply not using it as a basis from which to act until and unless it is within a clearly felt recognition of being. If you want to fool yourself, you can and you will - but if you have opened relationship with true, you will not tolerate self-betrayal regardless how good the alibi or the cover story by which to seem right.

Fake news is the mind that wants something ELSE to be true - and gives that priority over true. If one only looks OUTSIDE to resolve what for each of us is an inner conflict then we seek to make sure never to find. If we look inside without the context of real relationship we are certain to find endless conflict upon which to make fantasy of escape that likewise has no real intent or capacity to be truly found but makes the search into an endless diversion from simple self honesty now.

Losing face is a socially invalidating experience - but the mask is not the source of worth - so much as the need to act as if you had it. True worth extends and is recognized in reflection. False presentations assert or impose to be validated in reaction. Conditional 'love' says "if you break my conditions, you will meet withholding of worth, the receipt of guilt for causing pain and rejection or open conflict'. Society operates collective agreements and conditions - some of which are consciously acknowledged, most of which are tacitly asserted and conformed to.

Consciously held culture embodies the worth of Life even if alloyed with the fears and limits and distortions of fear of loss of worth and life. True culture is not a system but lived values that are uncovered in real relationship. Systems that truly serve Life do not demand the sacrifice of life to protect and maintain the system!



Saturday, 18 February 2017

Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe

My Amazon review after watching

Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe

This documentary is well made and understated in the desire to allow the issues involved to become openly and freely discussed, so as to bring transparency and accountability to the science, the politics and the business of vaccine manufacture, in regard to safety, efficacy and cost effectiveness. Mandatory injections of healthy people (especially babies and pregnant mothers) - with cocktails of known toxins but also (hopefully) unintended contaminants - constitutes one of the greatest health risks to human health - while being promoted and protected as a religion - free from scientific scrutiny - and as part of a captured medical regulatory system that legislates to outlaw or deny the growth of anything that threatens a virtually global pharmaceutical hegemony.
The freedom to choose to vaccinate should be protected - along with the responsibility and accountability of vaccine manufacturers and providers for culpable negligence and malign intent. Note that vaccines withdrawn from Canada for causing meningitis were then sold to Uk - same results and a few years on, withdrawn from use in UK and sold to Brazil and elsewhere. WHAT is this but murder?
If vaccines were founded in true scientific findings - the science would not be hidden behind laws pretending to offer protection against fear. Fear that is persistently and consistently injected into our minds by a media who is no more independent than doctors - with those few exceptions proving the rule. Sovereignty of being is lost to fear and traded in for fake saviours - who may or may not hold 'good intentions'.

If we persist with the causes of sickness in the belief they are protecting us  from imagined causes of sickness - then we are too sick to recognize health - and see instead only a state that can and will be corrupted - and so we get there first - to 'pre-empt' disease! The kind of 'consciousness' that is generated by the inoculating of fear and associated guilt in ALL its forms - is a dissociated and fragmented sense of disconnection from naturally felt relationship and communication. These fears are of deeply felt trauma and yet suppressed and denied their expression and acceptance as valid communication.

In the name of abating or countering such fear we worship false gods - but then a baby cannot articulate its experience but only seek to limit pain and loss with WHATEVER is to hand to then shut down on the possibility of ever reliving such pain again. This is a religion of masking terror - that goes to any extreme to protect the MASK. And can never begin to heal the terror - nor ever will for all its 'power' is based upon keeping it secret.

The autism or self-ism felt outside and apart from relational being, is tragically lived out in those whose extremity renders them unable to ever function in society without constant supervision and support - but is no less true of the 'socially adapted' autism that is invisible because it is so 'normal'. When a baby screams and hits their head over and over - they ARE articulating their need. They are in an extreme over-toxic exposure of inflammatory damage and need urgent and appropriate support to antidote the toxin and clear it out of the body. Patent run science is not the agency through which such treatments arise - but they already exist and are known of - but not employed.

There are 'scientists' who would rather let children die than resort to quackery that saves their lives - who then is the quacktor? When the law or the model or the system or the program is made the power to which humankind is sacrificed - a reversal of LIVE is accepted in place of truly living. No matter the circumstance - this is a choice. Those who seek to deny choice seek to deny their own consciousness of Life - in favour of a dictate they willingly sacrifice self ... and others to - in exchange for the partial and temporary 'protection' of a fear-stamped mind.

Friday, 17 February 2017

Mis-creation, mis-identity and missing the point of living





 To the main article:  The Matrix Revealed: victimized or inspired? by Jon Rappoport

Jon wrote:
“This is, in fact, an objective of mind control. It seeks to trap people with their own knowledge. It seeks to make insight a self-defeating proposition.
(Therefore, Jon presumes)… “If they can create Reality for me, I can create my own.”

You cant trap people within their own knowledge but you can insinuate false or distorted ‘knowledge’ into the currency of their thought by appealing to fear or fear-based wishing.

The premise that “lying is creating”, fragments Mind to the self-run matrix of private creations in private minds.

Creation is of a wholeness of being – and yet if run through a self-contradiction … LIMITS – amidst the illusion of power.

If the mind can ‘create’ false reality, then unsubscribing or withdrawing allegiance from it – restores awareness of true. The FELT recognition of true is the Movement of being that creates or Sources you WITH all that you are aware of and focussing within.

So yes to that a world made of lies can serve a different purpose!
But that purpose is giving only as you would receive – which is NOT a ‘mind-job’.

The transformation of the mind is the pausing of mind-reaction to allow the abiding in the Movement.

Inspiration and imaginative freedom is freely given and received – not patented and weaponized under the power of a private agenda.

The mind CAN serve another purpose that that which brought it into operation as ‘false creator’.

The defence of masked denial in assertive narrative reality CAN be undone to an embrace within multi-dimensional synchronicity. In place!

The fundamental nature of mind as foundational to all experience, is hidden by the realities… it makes in secret! So live openly in light within yourself and bring the ‘denial’ mind into a free awareness and see if it is truly aligning your joy now – but see that until and unless you do, you live under its rule and will see as it dictates to stay hidden.

The world is your feedback – both on the screen of consciousness and apparently ‘outside’. Attacking the messenger is missing the point. But false presentations with hidden payloads are not to ‘run automatically’ as if true – either in our thought and behaviours or in our receiving of information. It is impossible to not get back in the measure one gives out. Mind is not partial to what you ‘run on it’. The Sun shines on ‘good and evil’ alike. But you cannot know – and intimately know – the nature of being AND split off in private agenda. The will IS the capacity to discern balance points within wholeness and NOT compromise of Spirit to idols or ideals of coercion and deceit that undermine self-worth – under false pretence – and reflect as a world of like kind.


Bob Clem says:
Please humor me for a moment as I can grasp what you are saying on some level, but perhaps it’s my own cynicism , but although I have seen through the false realities and societal controls , I cannot separate the the everyday reality of dealing with the people who are still locked into these belief systems , it’s the unwitting minions, not the power brokers who give me so much grief , the acting out of their illogical assumptions of mundane experience as will of God.
My Achilles heel is their never ending ritualistic abuse of their own thought process and interpretation of the rules of interaction and that this is somehow my subconscious or God or the universe itself as being sadistic, and although , I know logically this is not the case , but that I am somehow undermining my own efforts here , that my reality is what’s being projected here and I can’t seem to circumvent this tail chasing reactiveness. I can’t stop blaming the idiots who constantly interfere in my life, to be blunt,
any feedback is greatly appreciated

Why do you need to force another to align with your accepted reality-experience?
Why are you unable to communicate from who you accept yourself to be without seeking and demanding validation and reinforcement of your beliefs?
I don't dismiss that the experience you have is maddening - but rather invite you to go deeper into what YOUR beliefs are creating as your experience of others and world. (Which may or may not find reinforcement in others).

Beliefs are held because they fulfil or serve a function at a deeper level than they operate.
The belief in self-guilt cannot BUT operate a sadomasochistic version or interpretation of existence.
The belief in the assertion that such guilt is in the Other or at the hand of the Other is the attempt to escape it while believing it real. This is the management of guilt-sickness-symptom rather than the healing or undoing of a false identification.

If you would truly serve the undoing of the need to believe in a false and destructive sense of power - then you must yield your 'beliefs' to the willingness and desire for truth.

Attempting to fit truth into a narrative or story reality is a reversal in consciousness. We can 'live' in the acting out of story reality but only at cost of denial or sacrifice of awareness of true.

If you're tired of the strain of maintaining a lie - then you cant persist in seeking the truth of it!

If I am having an experience 'out-of-true' in the sense of dissonance and misalignment - then what must I be holding in belief to be drawing or attracting this interpretation of whatever is ACTUALLY occurring and being experienced in consciousness?

The attempt to FORCE reality gave rise and gives rise to the experience of being forced (subject) to it. The polarising result of action and reaction is evident as identification AGAINST.

We have the opportunity to re-learn how to truly live. From the movement WITHIN - that our previous 'training' learned to deny or invalidate - and still does if you don't pay attention.

Learning to attend to that movement of true willingness in others is true hearing and seeing. When you feel truly seen or heard you KNOW you are truly embraced or acknowledged by another - or indeed by your true Self or Existence. For these are never separate. You cannot embrace your being and reject that of another - though of course you don't have to align in the choice of another and can leave what you don't want while embracing what you do.

Sovereignty of Will has been called the Will of God and Jesus exemplifies releasing the mind of reaction in trust and willingness for the true movement of being. A mind of reaction is a mind in denial of its true source and movement. But a mind of aligned action is at rest in the movement of its own true being and knows itself one with that movement - which is very different from wielding 'power' against perceived evil. Why did he say 'resist ye not evil'? Because standing wholly in truth is not at war with false - nor drawn into its framing concept or self-image.

What bugs you in others is what you have not forgiven or truly accepted and embraced in yourself. But that is not to condemn you doubly; but to call you to address your foundation first - because a mind at war with itself is no foundation at all.
It's ok not to know - in fact it is the condition in which a false mental assertion is paused, that the movement of true knows Itself - through you.

Grasping to possess is the way of losing wholeness and then assigning blame to the perceived and believed cause of loss rather than undoing the cause by releasing the grasp.

I cant  - nor would I want to - live your life (or make your choices for you. But in truly living what is given me to be, in any moment of receiving it -  I meet within the context of such purpose.

You receive what is your 'measure' and by your choices you grow or diminish your capacity to embrace Life. But no one else sets your measure for you - excepting only if you give the power of your Word to their power to do so.

That this operates at levels of mind we call 'unconscious' and deny awareness to - does in no way mean it is not active. the 'black ops' of 'rogue elements' within a fragmented loss of true governance is a pervasive un-sanity. But none can reach that which is unwilling to be reached. However, the desire to be known is native to being or we would not come into being to fulfil it, so listening for willingness  - through our own - is rebalancing and reintegrating to the wholeness of being that cannot be truly recognized through Humpty Dumpty mind.

Did he fall? Was he pushed? Did he jump? Was it a false flag? A psyop deceit?
None of which are relevant to wholeness of being.
If you wait for conditions to be 'right' (including the aligning or agreeing of others) you put life on 'wait' forever and a day.
The Call to Life is always. Or always the now of your being. Notice the mind that fragments into past and future to use 'now' just as something to get from or dump on. Give due to true joy in life and don't let guilt-thinking deny or deprive you of your being-right.