Protecting the Peace
or Looking for Trouble?

Self-honesty or transparency cannot be self-judgement.
In seeking to 'validate or vindicate our 'self' we stand accused BY our defence.
The inner gaslighting or guilting manipulation runs AS IF to scape responsibility for thought to an 'othered self'. Self-alienating dissociation is 'normalised' by mutual and social reinforcement. IE: Once everyone 'learns to see' the Emperor's new robes, the operating system for the evasion of exposed illegitimacy runs tyrannous while truth of love is rendered 'invisible'.

But what we learned under pain and fear can be unlearned under the guidance and support of a wholeness of being that reveals obstructions to healing as mis-taken belief and definitions that beget a false inheritance. Illusions given power have no more power than we give them - but never less.

Learning to leave the baiting lie of fear and division un-chosen, is a discernment of the spirit and not and achievement of an ego. Much that seems victory is defeat, and much judged defeat is a victory - in terms of growing willingness through which the spirit or purpose of truth aligns all things to an awareness of wholeness.

This is literally inconceivable to a broken, powerless and frail self-imaged control-boosting 'defence-mindset'.
Yet within the movement of the integrality of being is a world of lies framed in terror inconceivable.
To ask 'how did the impossible come about?' seeks a past cause or external 'causes' for a use of the mind persisting in the moment or situation at hand.
How and why do we perceive in different and conflicting lights, instead of knowing within one light?
Seeking to establish a claim of function within a gain of fiction?

But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here.
~ Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland

The 'human world' represents and reflects a focus of mutual, social & cultural agreements that run invisible and internalized as assumed and perceived reality.
The recognition that this is a result of 'seeing through a lens darkly' or via a shattered mirror, approaches the terror that guards the holding of the mind and focus FOR a 'physical' existence.

Indeed terror frames and equates the mind to the body - by which to act out 'archetypal' themes of Separation trauma as attempted 'solutions' to a Past set in fear, guilt, denial, conflicted hatred, treachery and betrayal.
To truly question any aspect of lies given power is to make way for truth to enter. That fear interjects to 'reset' the mind is a defense mechanism running 'protection' for the split mind of a wish for ego-autonomy of a private 'creation'.

Mind is the creative level - yet when assigned to its own 'shadow-projections' results in an isolating and conflicting dissonance often interpreted as a self-violating attack and thus grievance. Such is the fruit of JUDGEMENT as a personal and private 'claim of function' by which victim and victimizer split from a Mind we do not create - but of which is All That Is.

Love of peace can only rise from truth. The assignment of 'conditions' as representing peace are at best symbolic links. But can shift from a living participation in felt relational exchange, to a mind-set of assumed knowledge, power or virtue - chained to a currency of conditional 'meanings' running as idols or ideals of symbolic 'perfection' by which life is rendered unworthy.

False light is 'stolen' & extended or withheld in frame of fear or pain of loss - for true light shines and shares freely on all as one.
'Gaslighting' or guilting manipulation always carries signature characteristics. Recognition of this patterning in our inner dialogue or thinking - offers a freedom to release it instead of 'running its code' as our output or 'fruits'.

Those who look for trouble will find it - but see that seeking a target for hate as a basis for 'joining in identity' in hate will normalize trouble as 'legitimized' attack or countermeasured 'solution' as the overriding necessity of an 'existential survival'.

An 'attack on truth' cannot approach or edit truth but only our awareness of truth.
To a captive mind set in derivative currencies of scarcity-driven dictates, this cannot communicate. But truth can and does communicate to all as one, and aligning in truth - if even an instant - will receive and share a light beneath all masking defences as an invitation to align true - without coercion.

This is a signature of peace in truth - acceptance of what is - as it is - without asserting a guilting or manipulative coercion of post-processing reality adjustment.
'Dont-know-mind' is released of assuming to already know, as freedom to learn of life anew.

"Behold I make all things new!" is associated with the 'moving of mountains - ie catastrophic apocalypse, but in truth each instant is a new Creation-regardless our experience of object-continuity. The Timeless is not 'hidden' within Time, but that we make time serve a linear series of terms and conditionality, as permissioned freedom to be.

Accepting the moment at hand as the instant of peace and freedom is not an attack on lies, a claim to virtue, masking defense or power set over against perceived evils. That is - it is not a mind usurping the Spirit in a personal claim or capacity to cast out demons, but simply true with-ness.

There is a field.... Rumi

in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2025/02/08/avoiding-trouble/

A Ruled & Filtered 'Reality-experience'?

A Ruled & Filtered 'Reality-Experience'?

in response to the themes in:

Hegemony and Propaganda: Love Your Servitude!

https://off-guardian.org/2025/02/04/hegemony-and-propaganda-love-your-servitude/

 

Awareness of the underlying 'rules+filters' governing or framing of perception and response, opens the freedom persist in judgemental of wilful
a-tempt to force perceived reality, or release a locking-down of the will to such dictates into true willingness or freedom of being - as distinct from freedom assigned or associated with imaged forms of object-reality.
Judgement set over meanings projected onto image & form (the body of the world) will always split (the) mind to a judging over-&-apart from the judged. Nor will it escape the measure it accepts by giving.
Yet within the giving or projecting of meaning & power to a world outside+apart from its 'self' is a driven+conflicted life+world denial, limitation & loss.

So adaptively normalized is the ego-mind as judge over & defenses against a world of fear, threats & evils, that felt & known reality is blocked by the rules and filters of temporary 'solutions' running narratives of object-continuity against recognition of truth.

Fear of truth looks not within as the conviction of self-damming judgements (for why else do we seek+find the errors & sins of others but to divert & mitigate inner guilt-conflicts - over which a narrative mindset masks in vengeance as victory over a past set in grievance.

The mind that makes a world be-lived real can not be our true Creator if we can uncover and notice it.
Nor can it really Be a power set over and against true Creation, if by such recognition, we can release and be released of it.
A split mind is acted out on bodies, because Mind cannot be conflicted in itself. What is a 'split' but a projecting from Mind for Getting or to Get Rid of?
Think you can escape the Mind of your Creator? or that you would Want this true if you could but be-live you Can and Have?

I write of my own willingness to let truth in. Not to make true or contest conflicting 'truths' seeking power in a world of lies.

The ego is already a golem under AI. Already an artifact of a matrix of rules & filters. That it 'creates in its own image and kind' is the nature of Mind - except limitation and division 'creates' an abundance of debt, conflict, pain and loss. But a mind made opaque to truth by its own 'diversions' can also choose to release such blocks to awareness to realigning in transparency to life and existence as Communication of wholeness in being.

There is no way to pour 'new wine' into old paradigm or mindset. But the instant of remembering truth is as 'the father rushes in' to greet a 'lost son'.
We say 'awareness rises' to a recognition, but is it not really that something else fell away which had engaged attention.

 

 

The Idea of 'Normal'

Posted into the themes of 

Normalization and the Resulting Death of “All that Is”

Todd Hayen

https://off-guardian.org/2025/01/11/normalization-and-the-resulting-death-of-all-that-is/#respond 

Technologised or weaponised 'psychology' runs as an extra layer of manipulation.

Any pattern of repetition 'normalises a habit of expectation, as a context for choice.

I noted that some became 'normalised' to the hell of trench warfare in WW1 - such as to find 'normal' civvy life (when on leave) maddeningly unreal - thus more 'at home' in the war.

Dissociated states can be remote in place and time as well as in the frame of socially accepted awareness.

From the outset of Opcovid I noted the use of the 'normal' as part of its hypno-suggestion (interjecting memes into mass-mindshare).

Almost anything can be 'normalised' to an experience of seeming to be the only possible reality. But is it natural? Not in terms of social constructs (rules and filters) of "Nature" - but is it natural to who and what you are?

Clearly the experience is possible within what you can conceive, perceive and believe, but is it true of you?

Attempts to reach beneath the 'thinking defences' of a normalised mindset to war' must be to a true or already nature - that runs obscured by rules and filters of masking defences that operate on some level as 'solutions' to underlying conflicts that are progressively repackaged and redistributed via mutually agreed definitions currently called 'narratives' that run on symbolic derivatives as social currency that determines the priority of attention, import, funding and protections for such narratives, as 'saving' from greater or deeper fears or ills.

The gragmentation of mind is so directly observable as to not just be in our face but to have become our face! Yet facing OUT is the defence against looking within (the living moment that is already here beneath the shifting appearances of driven conflict or self-lack).

Trying to conform the outer world to terms and conditions that support our respective psychological-emotional adaptation is not only war on life, but on Self or true Nature and thus in vain futility. Such a Cosmic Archetype of War is not enjoined BY truth - (which remains whole or unconflicted as truth) but will run on symbols of truth and lie - or good and evil - such to shatter the Peace of being by substitution to a split sense of self-separateness set in masked & terrifying Threat.

Trauma and mind-control are synonymous. Weaponised trauma is another layer. But the dissociated fragmentation of its 'shaped charge' is set on lies believed true - and thus none of its begotten or derivative effects have in fact happened (as believed).

Before an addictive identity in grievance attacks its most treasured or sacred sense of love - albeit a broken or killed love, consider that nothing we currently experience is the Whole Truth, but a ruled and filtered effect of our own respective and collective attempts to make some kind of home within Fear, Pain and Loss as 'normal', that for the most part we mask over and distantiate or project 'away'. Yet it leaks out in all that we do and masks most heavily in our 'projective solutions'.

I don't call for guilting blame and sacrifice (we already have the fruits of such a mind-set), but from a Native curiosity - quite different from the driven problem-thinking of mind set in rules and filters of which it is almost completely unaware.

All That Is - is so far beyond our own thinking as the ocean to a ripple on its surface. But our awareness of reality is threatened and undermined by the acceptance and normalising of false currencies of thought, meaning and response. Defend then not truth but our awareness and appreciation of truth in life, in our Self, each other and world.

The ego asks 'how?' as if It has to know, organise and control an outcome in its image. This is an example of 'how' the ego of a normalised self-image masks over a living being to persist in its own thinking.

Think not what you are going to do or say, but live this day.

Practising willingness for life in what Is without predefining and pre-empting what it must be.

The critical key is beginning here and now rather than deferring fulfilment to tomorrow.

A monkey trap works on the unwillingness or incapacity to release a seemingly immediate 'future gain' running as a present pain (or loss of freedom). The more we hit on false fulfilment in the symbols of life, the more we 'migrate' to a normalised arena of 'driven need'. The dislocation of an inherent nature to a false inheritance piles up ever denser denial. Look on the 'bio' technate as an explicit reveal of implicit rules and filters (judgments running as normal).

We are each and together living through the revealing of Mind as the basis for choosing where we stand within 'all that is unfolding'.

Acceptance of our Nature is the releasing of what we 'made of life', not to damning destruction, but to a discernment that we do not and can not manufacture.

The Peace of being is beyond understanding -as we seek to define and control. But we truly understand what we recognise and share in love and appreciation.

Look at the attempt to join in fear, pain or loss (as solutions that do NOT heal), and decide if you want that, if it serves who you are now, if not, leave it abiding and opening to another way to see. Willingness (for peace of wholeness of being) grows by acting from it.

You could depict that as calling on Spirit for truth within the appearances of any given situation instead of reacting from a well-worn program that doesn't represent who you are now.

 

The Weaver in the Web that he Made?

 The Weaver in the Web that he Made?

 

I allow synchronicity to prompt questioning of the themes 'in play'.
The principle of which I see here of which is a web of deception.
Indeed a 'self and world' of deception - which can also be seen as masking defenses that necessarily run as masked agenda seeking gain of fictions under false claims of function.
Human conflicts have inner and outer facets, where the presentation or behavior can operate as a masking diversion, ruse or camouflage, and engaging or responding to such behaviors at face value will then reinforce the 'issue' as being framed in the arena of the 'diversionary' or scapegoating 'solution'.

Warring narratives of staked identity seek to distribute blame and thus penalty or sacrifice.
That someone else pay (the greater cost) is the dictum of a 'self-survival' framed by fear in division. Existential survival invokes ingenuity for 'creative evasion' at a level of the mind rarely allowed consciousness as terror shapes the 'consciousness' that then aligns or seeks and adapts a self and world to 'escape and avoid it'.

But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here.
~ Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland

But there's a paradox here, because the self-honesty to being 'mad' is itself a light of awareness by which we are now only partially so, and with a new perspective or framing of consciousness by which to discern a self-honesty from a 'protective' self-illusion that carries hidden costs. The nature of which run 'dark' until rupturing the mask of coping an impossible situation.

Growing a 'new consciousness' within a mad world - and partially mad adaptations to such a world, is a step of willingness at a time, as an instant of willingness in which a prompt of desire and curiosity to heal gives welcome to a deeper recognition than the face value of shifting appearances. I cant put this into words, but it can and does align, reintegrate and heal thought, perception and response prior to the split of victim and victimizer that fragments a dissociated and dissociating grievance and conflict management system.
Synchronicity may seem mere chance or happenstance, and yet beneath all appearances are relational themes 'playing out' archetypal patterns of problem-driven 'solutions' that buy time against reliving what might be called 'separation trauma' - not for dramatic effect, but as the basis for a self-image set at odds with (our own) Life or Self. The alloy of love and fear that characterizes the 'human conditioning', such as to co-fuse both in a woven defence of controls against a deeper fear of love, of relationship, of communication - that runs (in our name) to protect the split mind from a healing it cannot conceive or imagine, but only perceives as threat and at best as of being excluded.

To live free willing self-inclusion, I have to extend a recognition of worth to my world and relationships. But 'I' cannot 'do' that as a means to get for a sense of lack, nor get rid of what I hate in myself by wanting to see it in others. That is what reinforces and tightens the 'net'.

Recognition is a grace of noticing. Our capacity to not know what we know runs on engaging the active ignorance of presuming to know - such as shortcut references that no longer actually connect to a true currency of exchange. Has not a weaponised language rendered an Orwellian reversal for the breakdown of a socially masked imposition of order? There is a true basis for growing trust, but not within the vested idols of substitution for relational honesty.

 

 

I first posted this to

https://rxisk.org/deciphering-the-web-we-have-woven/

Robot Love

 

 

in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2024/11/23/robot-love/

 

 If there is no 'dead' matter but all is a vehicle of embodied expression, then the Life is not IN things and agency is not IN things.
That Mind can phish itself in its own thought, allows the projection of thought to a 'thinging' - while its underlying 'thinking' is 'backgrounded' to give the focus to the engaging of an experience.
The backgrounding is the rendering unconscious or subconscious of the whole from which the selective focus of the part is being played out.
Intelligence can be thus seen as split between the 'back-end' and the 'front-end' of interactive reflections and resonance of significance and value.
Mind is Creative, but when creativity is given to mythic construct, the created is no longer alive BUT for being given meaning or power that then frames or dictates 'choices' that are no longer creative though they may remain ingenious.
What we make is in that sense a machine, device or prop by which to persist in story while ignoring or masking out a true or whole relational awareness. Narcissus 'loves' empathy.

For, we are 'normalised' are we not? to perceive external agents as 'causes' or to perceive Cause as external - as being done to - if not unfairly treated, denied and deprived - at least somewhere within a story that we are sticking do - til death do us part... or perhaps that is also a prop to maintain the tension that frames the whole of who and what we are -in death or afterlife or as the agent of destruction if not damnation!

The reflection of the robotic dictate as technocratic systems – as much as robotic 'agents' or mechanoidal functions runs convergent with a robotification of 'humans' - that is of 'humans' framed and operated in image or screen replacement as 'running in movie mode' as a narrative over-rule of ideological 'social' survival.

The programming of robotic presentations as ingenious defence strategies against fear of pain of loss, is a machine defence. I may use the term ego for a self-imaged projection to which we are all partial - or as The Cat said to Alice, "We wouldn't come here".

But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here.
~ Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland

But to wind this up so as to move on in my day, the True Unconsciousness is God, or if you prefer Unselfconscious Joy in Being. Not all the discarded, suppressed, demonised, hated and feared self-denial that may be pushed out of a surface awareness but remains in the mind that thought it.
For thoughts do not leave the mind that thinks them - but in concept.


Last night we watched "Previously Saved Version'. Very much on the theme of Todd's reflections. I wont say anything about it except it contributed to the cultural reflection on machined humans and the 'ghost in the machine'.

Projection casts out.
Everything in the dream is cast from the mind of the dreamer.
Healing unto wholeness is where the script serves Reintegration and renewal.

 

 

 

Our Deep State

A deep state of dissociated fragmentation 'looks out' to see it own reflection.
The quality of free awareness is unified purpose - that All the king’s horses and all the king’s men can only seek to mimic in polarising attempts to 'push the big muddy'. Whence does a true, grounded and direct awareness arise?
Come on - its not difficult to acknowledge truth of being!
But deep habits are allowed to run unchecked.
Speaking to the robot is futile.
It cannot 'hear for you' only you can accept reality as it is - by putting the robot aside.
God is true Unconscious, yet can as well be called Superconscious.
The suppression of fears and hated material masks over the face of God - which is Holiness that cannot be found or imagined within a world set on guilting.
The projection of 'sins' (of error, conflict &confusion) runs a-tempt to get rid of THOUGHT outside itself and thus makes a world - not in truth but as a way of perceiving in different lights.
Jesus actually didn't 'forgive' but yielded judgement to the Father's Will - hence "Forgive them Father" or "Neither do I condemn thee". If we keep vengeance for our selves we think to resist evil as the arbiter of 'holy guilt' which is the root of all contradiction or double think set in 'loving to hate'.
By pausing reaction, we can call on what I call the Holy Spirit of a true discernment, for truth to reveal the situation to us - ie wisdom, as we can recognise, accept and embody.

Coming from a different place (from an uncarved block) is not polarised by reaction. Is not a manufactured or manipulated outcome and is not of the mindset of possession and control.

A blind eye becomes a habit.
The notion of an 'unconscious' is a framework by which which to categorise and articulate something of our thought-process in concept.

 

Mind forged manacles are bought+sold as 'freedom'.

They are not entirely imposed on 'victims'.

Some of this is of a collective will to engage in a 'self-will' running on false pretences that carry inherent 'overheads'

The true nature of a free will was exemplified by Jesus, but while he is made special as the crowning of a God demanding 'sacrifice', his teaching demonstration is subverted to a 'Care System' for virtue credits under systemic 'moral dictates.

There is a fundamental reversal in our current thought system that 'sees' all things awry and yet defends against messengers perceived threatening to its identifications of face and control.

Accepting healing for our own errors releases others and world from distorting projections, and release from conflicts otherwise deeply hidden.

That there is a collective arising from the choice to live in a 'dolls house' is inseparable from my subscription to its service - which runs on the conviction in its reality or necessity as survival in its terms.

Willingness to question reality has to rise from being itself - else it is not areal question but a statement of concept framed as a question.

To release claim to knowledge as a movement of life stirring within us, opens to receiving of or from That Which Knows. Not 'about' as a predictive controlling set of mapping definitions', but to know as to be one with - as a knowing field and not a parcelled off staked of claim in exploiting a 'commodity' or resource for private agenda set in mutually reinforcing contractual entanglements.

To be still and know - does not predefine or predictively shape the 'knowing' for such would not be the unconflicted willingness that only truth be true.

Facing Illusions

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cM3195Ho898

The video linked above looks at a particular effect arising from changing faces viewed peripherally.

@MKdGlu
Amazing! It would actually explain a lot on anthropology and the development of mythology.
@bishopp14
I've always wondered how much mythology came from people with vision issues living in a time with limited or no way to correct eyesight.

 

I'll posit that myth or 'story' of symbolic significance underlies 'object reality' as a continuum or 'time' set over experience of a split mind or separation trauma as a masking dissociation giving 'survival focus' as a 'consciousness' by which the split is rendered 'unconscious'. Faces communicate personae or masking aspects of the 'god' or characteristic quality of emotional/mental balance/imbalance in expression.
That the 'gods' are constellated in shifting alliances and oppositions is the basis for hyper-alertness to 'change in the Heavens', now operating as reading the room or the situation in play. This function is relegated to subconscious routines so as to allow a bubble of 'normality' as a stable or reliably predictable sense of self and world within a split or dissociative mind or focus.
The distorting faces illusion is partly framed in the release of the 'fixing continuity' of this focus to a peripheral awareness which can be called 'psychically sensitive or receptive' - receptive to information from wide field, but selectively sensitised to triggers relative to conditioned fears along with defences invoked to offset, allay or mitigate fear.
Staring at our own face in a mirror or a mutual session with another, face to face, will -if allowed' drop into peripheral awareness, open the realm of 'angels and demons' in terms of projections that can initiate self reinforcing feedback.
releasing projections to receive a true presence is giving a true with-ness. Without this centring or grounding quality, the enforcement of 'normality' will be aligned in as either the breaking or blocking of communication, or a contract to mask in social distancing - as in a clique without real intimacy or a psuedo-community. But from grounded acceptance of the moment as is, the synchronous smile of the eyes moves as one in the release of specific focus to the wider situation - the room, or the flow of relationship as a whole in the situation at hand.

Without the grounding embrace of the center - all attempts to 'correct sight' will war with our own unconscious conditionings and thus endlessly repeat or reinforce it in shifting narratives of self-inflations and destructions or boom and bust, relative to the 'gods' of our particular and collective alignment. Rationalisation as distinct from grounded Reason, seeks monopoly under ideals set over and apart from the 'mess' of life viewed unworthy and treacherous by contrast. Usurping the mind's true function is the 'split mind' of self-illusion by which we seek to gain for a split off self as our overriding or existential necessity or dictate. The focus of a mindset at war will override all wide-field or peripheral 'messengers' or evidences, as attempt to control reality 'externally'- which is clearly delusional and self-destructive - or rather denying our own 'wider' embrace' of creative being for the belief such a war makes sense or can be won.

There is an objective reality that is truly lived and shared, but that subjective bias discards or rejects for its own 'reasons' - but its unifying quality and characteristic is not an objecting rule and filter of imposed dictates, but in the nature of giving and receiving as one- which is a Gift that cannot be commoditised, patented, manufactured, weaponised or officially mandated.

We are always looking into the Face of Reality - but who is looking 'out'?
What we choose or accept sets the measure of our receipt.

To "Transhumanism, the Death of God, and Eternal War"

 

 

I have been mostly active on X within the discipline of succinctness alongside the 'focus of the day or the era as being perceived.

I might start a substack-but that's only a seed at the moment.

I do also comment into web articles but have not often posted them here, but as a way of showing I am active here are some of today's:

Transhumanism, the Death of God, and Eternal War – OffGuardian

https://off-guardian.org/2024/11/19/transhumanism-the-death-of-god-and-eternal-war/

We are always teaching... and learning from what we teach.
"Do as I say, not as I do" represents a split mind.
We can call it a masking adaptation to a loveless or conflicted world,
or an acceptance of the split-mind as psychic adaptation to the human conditioning, or Separation trauma by which a focus in and as a body masks and distances from underlying conflicts that are thus projected onto others and world - onto life as something 'other'.
Not least because an unconditional but undifferentiated love opens to or takes on conflict-solution as the terms or conditions of (its) being.
The child takes on the large unspoken conflicts, denials and exclusions of its family and cultural context as the expression of;
"Love is sacrifice, and demands sacrifice".
Here is the 'gaslighting' or guilting pact of victim and victimiser that masks its deeper conflict in the acting out of one-upmanship - where each seeks to get from the other - or get back from the other, what they believe they are unfairly denied, deprived of - or will be if they don't get the upper hand.
Socially masked coded behaviour is manipulative as the setting of conditions to the permission to 'love' or the 'justification' to hate - withdrawing & withholding a true with-ness for a masking substitute - such as a smile of condescending sympathy.

But love is not sacrifice nor does love demand sacrifice of anything but self-illusion - or False Evidence Appearing Real.

Invested self-illusions are accepted and defended as self. Their mutually reinforcing 'contagion' is rooted in their lack of truth. They cannot pass off as real without reinforcement, and thus the demand for sacrifice drives attack as the basis for existential survival or 'salvation'.
Special (or specially focused) hate is thus masked by special 'love'.

Self-specialness runs the same assumption and projection of 'separateness' in positive as in negative expression.
Its conflicts maintain a veil over the sacrifice OF love to a life set in fear's demand and locked down by guilting accusation - that teaches the same whether directed to self or other.

Can love enter fear and be real?
Is this not the psyop beneath the 'Great Projection' in which

“Everything is BACKWARDS; everything is upside down! Doctors destroy health, Lawyers destroy justice, Universities destroy knowledge, Governments destroy freedom, Major media destroys information, And religions destroy spirituality". ~Michael Ellner

'The lie and the father of it' is not a call to war but to truth.
For by 'choices' framed false is truth denied that self-illusion be 'satisfied'. But there can never Be satisfaction there, but only a hollowing out to externally driven dependencies.

Pain is not our true father, but pain is valid feedback for a willingness to learn of truth rather than persist in what doesn't work (or truly serve us now).

After writing all but the last 4 paragraphs I read with my companion in life the following:

Illusion and Reality of Love

Be not afraid to look upon the special hate relationship, for freedom lies here. It would be impossible NOT to know the meaning of love, EXCEPT FOR THIS. For the special love relationship, IN WHICH THE MEANING OF LOVE IS LOST, is undertaken SOLELY to OFFSET this, but NOT to LET IT GO. Your salvation will rise clearly before your open eyes, as you look on this. YOU CANNOT LIMIT HATE. The special love relationship will NOT offset it, but will merely DRIVE IT UNDERGROUND, and out of sight. It is essential to bring it INTO sight, and to make NO attempt to hide it. For it is the attempt to BALANCE hate with love that makes love meaningless to you.

The extent of the split that lies in this you do NOT realize. And until you do, the split will remain unrecognized, AND THEREFORE UNHEALED. The symbols of hate against the symbols of love play out a conflict that does not exist. For symbols stand for something else, and the SYMBOL of love IS without meaning, if love is everything. You will go through this last undoing quite unharmed, and will emerge AS YOURSELF.
~ A Course in Miracles

To comments on the page

Howard
Nov 20, 2024 3:25 PM


Perpetual war is anything but a modern phenomenon. History makes it clear that war has always been man’s natural state. And it’s not just for the sake of territory and resources – it’s equally for the sake of the human need to destroy. You see this from day one, when so many kids – not all but many – seem to go out of their way to destroy their toys. And it’s not just so they can get new toys – it’s equally for the sake of destruction itself. Aggression has always been the prime mover of humanity. In that regard, I firmly believe that this abomination called circumcision was established primarily to increase aggressive tendencies in males – to prime them to be better soldiers when they grow up. You cannot deliberately maim someone without instilling both fear and anger.
As to God: it died stillborn. It’s always been a means to an end; and to think otherwise is simply to deny human nature. Even if a particular God starts out nice and loving and advising restraint of human aggression (as the Christian God did) – it always ends up championing wars of conquest. Man’s imagination goes into overdrive coming up with ways to have God justify anything he does. God can never die because it was never alive. “My God can beat your God” has always been the essence of every religion ever conceived.
Transhumanism has but one synonym: unhumanism. Whatever the lunatics who espouse it imagine it to be, it is simply the antithesis of human. Period.
All of which leads to the one true and only possible meaning of life: to live.

By your own will you have your own reward.
But is it truly your will, or the acquired inheritance of the human conditioning? Running as if thinking to know.
Be-living the meanings we carve out and fashion into currencies issued by the teller, is a freedom to take the ride of a story for what we 'get out of it'.
But when the game is no longer worth the candle, the light being given it can be given elsewhere.
However the insistence that the game must deliver our identity will die in it - in rage or sacrifice or despair.
The light we give is all the meaning we shall ever know.
Gaslight and shadow gives & receives false witness.
Blessed are the poor in Spirit - though they deprive themselves a true Inherence while running off in the bait & provocation of a false or mis taken inheritance.

To truly live is to be truly moved.
Who would 'save his self' shall lose it.
Over and again.

Clutching at straws
Nov 20, 2024 12:40 PM
Reply to  antonym
It’s an interesting point.
How many of us think of ourselves as a transitory species ?
Because, without a doubt, that’s what we are

In this case I embrace a healthy scepticism.
I agree that we 'think of ourselves as'.
This is a creative act that can give itself to a habit, or mechanism of persistent error.
With a doubt, we can posit anything to conflict with what we (simply) are, and engage with its conflict as if reality depended on the outcome.
Our capacity to recognise or receive and extend truth is framed by vested judgements taken in or accepted true.
Illusions are temporary associations of imaged reality.
But they can reflect or resonate truth or obfuscate in conflicted denial of truth.

The transhuman idea is evident in the prevalence of 'humans' as a species, indeed a lab specimen. The self-hatred that runs beneath smug and arrogant cynicism is given expression in a self-generated mass extinction event. Gloating self-vindications reframe language to 'justify' the verdict.

The death of God is merely Self-attack masking as special knowledge. But God is not mocked any more than truth can be attacked by lies.
However our awareness and appreciation of truth can be attacked while doubt can be weaponised to guilting fears framed true.

Nunya
Nov 20, 2024 8:09 AM

You’ve got to start naming people who are responsible for this satanic trajectory they’ve put in motion.

Without scapegoats - all is lost!

Yes crime needs be checked else it runs uncorrected to corrupt the whole.
But the nature of corruption is at the level of our thought.

Naming Satan so as to take an identity in opposition isn't addressing what 'Satanic' represents in thought, perception and behaviour. In our own - and in our cultural framing or currency of believed & assumed 'knowledge'.

Self-illusions are temporary, for their conflict with truth drives their development or self-inflation as it does their disintegration of 'Fall'.

Responsibility for thought is abnegated to the belief we already know - which runs self protective and seemingly autonomous in both reinforcing or boosting its claim of function, and attacking, subverting or excluding 'threats' to its gain of fiction.

While we could say humanity is 'possessed', it would be more honest to notice we are dispossessed of true felt worth and value by a grasp on substitutions that run hollow and ghastly parody of life.

'Waking up' into variants of the same underlying reactive contagion, is just such a parody.
What is our true or innate responsibility to life, our self and others?
And what runs as the burden and yoke of guilting accusation and manipulation set in blame as the arbiter of sacrifice - by which 'the show must go on'?

Shall we look on - fixated in horror? Or look AT the horror in willingness to heal or release it's fascination to a wholeness NOT of our manufacture or control?

Todd Hayen
Nov 20, 2024 1:59 PM

Reply to  Sofia
I don’t think any of us know what God is. I don’t know if we are supposed to.

Change 'what' (object framing) to 'That'. (Resonance as recognition)
Knowing that God Is, would be redundant as a statement but for thinking to know otherwise.
The idea of 'meant to know' runs within a 'need to know basis' framed in a 'hierarchy' of knowledge - as in a pyramid of levels descending from the all seeing I. Which like a tower of Babel begat a confusion of split and shifting 'symbols' of fragmentation under 'all the king’s horses and all the king’s men'.

Only by loving can love know itself.
"Why tarry all night in the ruins?"

What we do think is active, but largely masked against thinking we suppress, hide & deny. Note the use of 'thought control' is increasing out in the open, yet only for selected examples.

Can we know what God isn't? - or rather what God does not create, sustain and love?
In the true sense of knowing - no!
For to know is to love.
Modelling (our notional thinking) can phish the mind of the thinker, but can as well be released to serve the reintegration to wholeness, instead of taking life apart to then put together in its own image.

sabelmouse
Nov 21, 2024 11:51 AM
i love this. I bless the world because I bless myself. it’s the wrong way around to our thinking.

Ok - but the innumerable instances in a day in which we deny a blessing to our self or others are the opportunity to recognise and release our script of self-denial and let the light in (of awareness to our willing appreciation).
Our attempts or intent to DO love as a counter to hate is the error I invite noticing.
Virtue shines of itself and to the recognition of a like quality in others. But false virtue must crown itself as attempt to claim the right to dictate reality by opposing evils, sins or lacks, (errors) perceived in others.

There is already living that moves or prompts or aligns us, but we are trained to attend only that which supports the self-image of our focus in our world. Opening to receive runs counter to the recoil of defences or the projection of attack.
Thus a wholeness of being - or the miracle - comes of itself into our willingness to receive.
Giving and receiving are one in truth, if not seeming so in time.
Giving to Get, actually 'gives' or teaches lack - as in an addiction affliction; the more you get the more you need to get rid of the pervasive underlying pain or dissonance of being that drives external seeking.
It is in the midst of such a habit that the miracle is needed.
'We do not create our self' is more than an intellectual argument, but what we make does 'make us in its own image' while we be-live it necessary, irrevocable or unquestionable

To Align in the Living

 in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2024/06/22/looking-forward-to-the-future/

 

 

To align in the living is to let the dead bury the dead - this is addressed to where we are giving attention, focus and value, which must include why? or for what?

The contextual framing of thought is effectively a form of programming that then runs sub-conscious or automatically as a shaping of values and goals.

Fragmented & compartmentalised consciousness may not seem so as the flow of experience under a continuity manager in which a capacity to mask over conflicts will assign or project them out to others an world - such as a workman blaming his tool.

All the 'functions' of an ego-framed experience are first in the consciousness before becoming developed as tools for collective frameworks of development.

Likewise 'They' - that is witting or unwittingly tooled manipulative and coercive deceivers - can only work the mark of a corresponding blind wishfulness or egocentricity such as driven by self-lack-driven envy, greed or lust - that run 'selfish' to use others (and true self) for fantasy gratifications that grow dependencies for Getting, in place of integral relationships of felt worth & value- freely shared in.

Focussing on the difficult (the fears that configure poor 'solutions', makes fear the master - even as it generates yet another 'solution' in which to mask over or mask out facets of our Consciousness that we hold out of alignment, in fear of pain, of loss.

But the means or conditions for joy of connected presence as its own freedom to be, feel and know life, re-establishes a basis from which to recognise reaction-habits as choices, as a freedom to not persist in choosing them, and to let life in as the More of who we truly are.

The Gift of our awareness of being is never going to become a tool of our own making, but that BY THE ATTEMPT we become tooled by contradictory thinking, to learn and teach a conflicted self and world framed in dispossession, scarcity, pain of conflict and deeply set defences against healing-threats to an insane reversal of mind-normalised as IF automata run by thinking.

We cannot truly leave the Gift of Awareness of Being, but are free to refuse or deny it for a gift we make for ourselves/each other, by which to no longer recognise either.

Self-alienation runs on a core curriculum of learned bias for 'getting' from a fear of lack & disconnection. Which arises or is relived when conditions are not met.

I WANT IT THUS! may be artfully concealed in masks of care and concern or justifictions of nurtured grievance.

SEE WHAT YOU HAVE MADE ME! runs the undercurrent accusation to a life, a past and others who reiterate its deprivations and denials as a persistent state of offence, from which to mask, distance, suppress or deny-by withholding an acknowledgement of being - ie 'blanking'.

There are many ways to look on or think on our 'ego' of masking defences, but insofar as they operate moral guilting manipulations they remain within the frame of fear masking in love that 'turns to hate' (because it was but a permission to love set on conditions of compliance).

Self-image or self-consciousness is a part of our toolset, as a vehicle and focus for thinking, feeling and participating in the human experience. That a part of the mind is phished by image and form as a realm of possession and control - is as simple as grasping at beauty or recoiling from fear of dispossession. There's the 'Fallen Angel' as your own archetypal patterning. We all share the 'ego' of a sense of lost love or power-by which both become distortions of each other: love of power set over love made powerless, frail and in need of boosting protections.

The Way of undoing self-illusion set to collective pandemonium is very different to the way in - that we have learned as a second nature set over against our first - and thus projecting its toxic consequences onto life, nature and being.

Regardless what we can each make of our self and world, "God is not mocked!" means truth remains true! Re-alignment to trust in being cannot be done as a further adventure in ego-framed going forth to Get - but is the recognition and release of what doesn't work and cannot work, in willingness to receive truth (as distinct from mind-manufactured means to make a future solve a past that isnt here now - except we stamp it on the presence that Naturally -of itself- expands and extends Future of unfolding Potentials.

The art of not getting in our own way is the way of unselfconscious joy in living. This necessarily meets the obstacles to joy that we (each and all) have - for our own reasons set as limits or disqualifications by 'judgements' that may come from our world yet resonate in our self-or they wouldn't have 'taken root'.

Thinking about or judging 'sheep' is a generalising intellectual perspective that hardly engages with or meets living ones in whatever unique expression of masked and defended 'self-presentation'. Yet the choice for unconsciousness seeks reinforcement through a call to join in the mask that overlooks or looks away from the Living.

If we are not awake to the living, our self proclaimed 'awakening' is yet another movie-variant within shifting narratives set in war for 'truth' as the last judgement.

But just to bring this simple - life is felt through us in the living as a natural or unforced giving. The fruits or reflections come back to us from our world and our relationships in like kind, freely. The substitution for Reality by imaged symbols, meaning-maps, rational models and coded screen output set up a game of deadly competition where 'They Live' on the 'Sleepers' - as a covert identity raised from the death or denial of the living.

How many identify with the aliens in that movie?

Blanking life to Get a self as a self-alienation running dark mode.

True Genesis is neither a book or a code complex - and cannot be brought into a false-framed mindset by religion or science.

The Movement of and within Being is not limited to time and place, but an ever unfolding and embracing All That Is. Honest desire and conscious intention align naturally when masked agenda is no longer given automatic authority.

 

 

 Locked down Globalism
as a Mindset

 in response to the themes in:

Sincerity by Blaž Kavčič | Chișinău Forum 2024

at https://iurierosca.substack.com/p/sincerity-by-blaz-kavcic-chisinau/

Thankyou.

I don't see the stated 4 dogmas (democracy, money, CO2, virus) as more than engineered pretexts for banksterism of marketised & weaponised 'knowledge'. Ie: manipulative deception seeking gain of function (in its own private terms set against the unrecognised or feared whole of life).

The underlying dogma I see is a psychically driven physical determinism that in effect demands or guarantees the false flagged 'cause & diversionary displacement from truly addressing anything, by engaging in solutions that persist and protect the problem, as shaped BY authoritative & insidious narrative control that repackages problems as 'solutions or assets'.

In the 2008 crash it was noted that toxic debts (worthless promissory notes treated as real assets) were hidden in complex financial instruments that were then marketed as worthy assets. This pattern is endemic to a banksterism of system capture and manipulation running on the ideological premise of closed system thinking set in cybernetic technologism. This logic breaks communication or trust as a qualitative field of shared being to assert life treacherous and unworthy by usurping the functions of the field of relational honesty as the judgements of private self-interest 'generalised' and weighted as an imposed hierarchy of dominance and control. In short the accept and and assertion : life is war, such that all else is a means to serve it, and any other 'god' is false, heretical and a threat that must be countered, subverted or brought back into the fold of war.

Conflicts are thus the food and energy supply for a mindset of control.

Masking conflict to false premises & false profits is a function of a mind or will of persistence in self-imaged experience. Self-imaged 'reality' is not a sin, but a facet of creative imagination. Persisting in self-illusion by attacking truth is where errors compound to a guilt that generates blocks to communication with or from the unworthy, hated or feared.

Self-honesty or depth of sincerity is difficult to embrace while guilt conflicts frame thought, perception and response. Self-judgement or self-hate can and does project to our relationships and world. Bringing this or rather allowing this to come into awareness rather than engaging the mindset of masking and distancing is where we regain truth in Self and Life because we do not and can not manufacture the Gift of being, which is always or already given and reveals its nature as our own by sharing in like kind. An Innocence of being is uncoverable to our willingness to receive and extend it. Not a relative 'innocence' framed under shadow and threat of guilt and 'sin' as the worship of our own mimetic judgement as pre-emptive sacrificial mitigation of full Disclosure.

The mask of self-image is set against disclosure as existential survival.

But Who told you you were 'naked' (lacking presence or conflicted and susceptible)?

 

Who Has Ears To Hear?

 in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2024/06/08/ai-and-commercial-music/

 

 Artificial music has degrees of removal from source-inspiration.
Music as pharmakon developed an externally assisted focus for inducing specific feelings & states of consciousness. Developing a theme is part of human exploration and experience. Becoming trapped in and subjected to or driven by our themes is a result of the "Fallen Angel" syndrome. Phished by self-image to be-live the experience of a lens of artifice. To grasp the image & form of desire as the symbol of a self-lack seeking union by possession or control.
The manipulation and manufacture of image and form applies no less to music than any other medium of exchange, as a-tempt to make love, get power or enforce peace by means that compound conflicts to toxic dissonances that can only be undone or healed at the level of their arising - a sense of driven self-lack framed in getting - for a sense of self & life framed in opposition, deprivation and denial.

To yield through the expressing to the movement of our being is a profound or total fulfilment. For by truly giving we receive and only by receiving can we truly give.

Back from the backstory to the modernity of a machine-mind...

Studio produced recording represents a significant shift from a living relational co-creation to a product for milking or generating markets and mindshare - in this case identity-forming musical backdrop to formative experiences. Recorded musical production interjected a machine between giver and receiver. But to the normalised or aculturated, this is invisible - and to a large extent a real musical intimacy is reframed as not real - as it isn't through the official medium'. The 'audience' wants a fix, a psychic need to be stroked in favourite ways, replay their lives back - while iphones are held aloft as a further seeking of self-validation. "Did you get that?"

Some dance to remember, some dance to forget.

Remember what?
Forget what?
Love and pain are woven together in our human experience.
By seeking to mask or blot pain out, we can engage fantasy as a form of regressive unconsciousness. There's a market opportunity to cell the mind to substitution for the intimacy of Soul-connected movement of being.

For some time now I found Crassmas to have become such a 'Satanic' artifice of marketised and mutated ritual as to welcome its breakdown, for the truth of the Christ within is a holy instant within time - yet unbound by it. Transcendence of limitation at the heart is not waiting on anyone or anything to happen - or not happen, but a flow or flowering of an already-fulfilment. My cup runneth over.

Music of art is re verbing being, such that object models become transparent to the joy that can never be contained - such that in one form or another a music is in play.

'Artists' may shine into times that cannot or care not to recognise the gift, perhaps allowing a gift without strings attached? That can then serve a true seed in any other moment of time and space, past or future. Where else is inspiration but from a Now that we can not manufacture or conform to any presentation of self, life or world.

Who has ears to hear - let them hear!

 

 Integral Wholeness of Being
Not Afterthought

 

Misperceptions give rise to and rise from defended identity - to then frame reinforcement for misperception as suffered or subjected reality.

The principle reversal to be healed is at the level of mind, where body and world are assigned causative or creative agency relative to a subjective adaptation or identity of defended or 'justified' judgements, that 'share' a mutually agreed self & world as framing of unconscious definitions and beliefs; perceptions & responses; habits & rulesets.

The theories of karma seek 'other lives' to 'justify' punishment. There Is no punishment but this: as you judge, so are you judged' Note the present tense also applies to the wages of sin Is death.

To communicate this to a mindset of linear cause and effect as separated, requires intuitive discernment, for all of our concepts filter and subvert to a reinforcement of such a premise - which runs as the 'father of the reversal' of Natural Order, to the focus in the physical experience - as we frame our 'reality' - rather than  recognition of psycho-physical or spiritual expression in no way separate from its active Cause, Nature & Condition.

Hence masking and distancing to a premise of pre-emptive attack is our 'toolkit' for survival AS a mind & face of private judgement as a means to limit, control or block & filter Universal Communication. When the mask fails to maintain the continuity of a 'closed system', it is reset as if exposure of its fallacy or lack of substance never happened - or shall not be accepted - such that and Open Channel of Communication is not only blocked, but framed and demonised as threat.

The framing of idea through which we think and perceive is a creative faculty.
The development of conception and perception overlaid an underlying nature of having, being and knowing - which we have temporarily discarded or 'lost' - for the focus of experience, exploration and consciousness development as both extension and reflection of a qualitative non-physical 'light' or Self-Awareness - as distinct from a 'self-conscious reflex' within awareness, by which we grow or adapt a self for the world that we also cocreate at a deeper or prior movement of being.

I essayed to sketch this from where I stand rather than engage within the frame of a reversal consciousness because I hold that the 'physical separation' is winding up to a mass 'death' or dead end from which I see the freedom to recognise and release the lie and the father of the lie that is not merely in the bad actors or agencies of evil that we can see, but blocks the beam of light in our own vision.

The extension of love is not an act of a self, but a willingness to receive and give as one. Hence the restoration and renewal of a true self that undoes or heals the misperceptions and countermeasures of the false or mis-taken identity. Without a recognition and release of attempts to mask and 'mitigate' or seek gain or credit by 'caring' framed as an independent authoritative act, the substitutions for love operate as a basis for denial of exposure to a lovelessness that properly understood is the Call for love in truth. But our ego-defences can not understand anything BUT a call to war, to judge, to blame and to punish, cancel or exclude.

It is our own Temple (focus of devotions in life) that needs 'sweeping' of what has no true belonging, else we 'see' the sins of others as our own justification or mitigation.
This is not to say everyone else is in the 'right mind' either, but a grounded reference point is not the basis for resetting a reversal in a new set of robes.

Now if everyone reads this with the thinking mind, then the patient is indeed 'completely under'.
Not to demonise any facet of our being, but what we generally call the mind has to pause so as to allow receipt of a 'knowing' that cannot be conceptualised or patented, but does align intent and desire in unified purpose. Not our agendas or counter measures, but of a wholeness of being to which we are integral - not afterthought.
 

 

I posted this into

The Profound Decline of America's Scientific Institutions

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-profound-decline-of-americas/