Our Deep State

A deep state of dissociated fragmentation 'looks out' to see it own reflection.
The quality of free awareness is unified purpose - that All the king’s horses and all the king’s men can only seek to mimic in polarising attempts to 'push the big muddy'. Whence does a true, grounded and direct awareness arise?
Come on - its not difficult to acknowledge truth of being!
But deep habits are allowed to run unchecked.
Speaking to the robot is futile.
It cannot 'hear for you' only you can accept reality as it is - by putting the robot aside.
God is true Unconscious, yet can as well be called Superconscious.
The suppression of fears and hated material masks over the face of God - which is Holiness that cannot be found or imagined within a world set on guilting.
The projection of 'sins' (of error, conflict &confusion) runs a-tempt to get rid of THOUGHT outside itself and thus makes a world - not in truth but as a way of perceiving in different lights.
Jesus actually didn't 'forgive' but yielded judgement to the Father's Will - hence "Forgive them Father" or "Neither do I condemn thee". If we keep vengeance for our selves we think to resist evil as the arbiter of 'holy guilt' which is the root of all contradiction or double think set in 'loving to hate'.
By pausing reaction, we can call on what I call the Holy Spirit of a true discernment, for truth to reveal the situation to us - ie wisdom, as we can recognise, accept and embody.

Coming from a different place (from an uncarved block) is not polarised by reaction. Is not a manufactured or manipulated outcome and is not of the mindset of possession and control.

A blind eye becomes a habit.
The notion of an 'unconscious' is a framework by which which to categorise and articulate something of our thought-process in concept.

 

Mind forged manacles are bought+sold as 'freedom'.

They are not entirely imposed on 'victims'.

Some of this is of a collective will to engage in a 'self-will' running on false pretences that carry inherent 'overheads'

The true nature of a free will was exemplified by Jesus, but while he is made special as the crowning of a God demanding 'sacrifice', his teaching demonstration is subverted to a 'Care System' for virtue credits under systemic 'moral dictates.

There is a fundamental reversal in our current thought system that 'sees' all things awry and yet defends against messengers perceived threatening to its identifications of face and control.

Accepting healing for our own errors releases others and world from distorting projections, and release from conflicts otherwise deeply hidden.

That there is a collective arising from the choice to live in a 'dolls house' is inseparable from my subscription to its service - which runs on the conviction in its reality or necessity as survival in its terms.

Willingness to question reality has to rise from being itself - else it is not areal question but a statement of concept framed as a question.

To release claim to knowledge as a movement of life stirring within us, opens to receiving of or from That Which Knows. Not 'about' as a predictive controlling set of mapping definitions', but to know as to be one with - as a knowing field and not a parcelled off staked of claim in exploiting a 'commodity' or resource for private agenda set in mutually reinforcing contractual entanglements.

To be still and know - does not predefine or predictively shape the 'knowing' for such would not be the unconflicted willingness that only truth be true.

"Do as I say, not as I do" is what I call a split mind in which conflicted ideas are dissociated from each other or kept apart, as a compartmentalised mind. So hardly surprising that it runs pervasive or systemic to human society. A masking presentation can run as a self presentation of 'justification' within social presentations.

The need to mask rises fas a means to hide from - as in defence - and to hide as in masking attack or loveless agenda.

Social masking identitie form an 'Overton Window'.

Shaping the underlying and internalised of officially accepted beliefs and definitions runs the attempt to manipulate the thought, perception and response of others as a means to Get from them, or Get rid of guilt-consequences onto them. Ie: loveless agenda.

I see the phrase "Who told you you were naked?" indicates the rising of self-consciousness as dissonance masking as guilted fear for 'private creation' (agenda). But it also speaks for the innate capacity to question self-created 'reality' - which is always a mutually reinforced contract or compact.

The difference between what "God Creates' and What we think (and make via rules and filters of tacit and consensual agreements,is between truth and illusion, and yet bringing the mask to a true awareness repurposes the mask (mind) from a means for hiding, to a means for revealing and releasing or reintegration (healing).

The Prodigal Son motif offers a very simple sketch for a mis-taken identity.

The parable of the tenant landlords for the active defences against the messengers of the "absent" Master. (defending a split mind as existential survival).

'Bottoming out' represent the breakdown of an egoic 'control, as a 'turnabout' from a love revealed.

That the ego subverts and incorporates the symbols, forms & behaviours of living is its 'job function' as masking defence. Hence it mimics spirituality, caring or healing (in any arena of life) but always loveless, for the appearance so love are only masks that turn to hate when its conditions are not met. The ego cannot tolerate love, hence it must seek to provoke and bait conflict to maintain a 'conflicted way of 'seeing' as defence against (fear of) total sacrifice.

in response to the themes in:

Lucid Summations of Fundamental Issues – OffGuardian

https://off-guardian.org/2024/11/24/lucid-summations-of-fundamental-issues/