Rage against the Zombie

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PV8VUbf_Zo4\

Vernon Cole

#1

The fearful, mask in props of alignment to a 'protection racket'. But they only see the protection and are fodder for the racket.

If you are less fearful, you are privileged to be in the opportunity of extending a blessing to those who deprive themselves of blessing by withholding its extension.

But the pre-emptive defence of the fearful seeks to deny communication, and mask the denial in narrative claiming moral justification. However, you have the capacity to see past the masking presentation to another freedom - like yourself - regardless the current choices being made. If we react in the same energetic pattern as they are, then we resent them for not conforming to our rules, terms, demands and conditions and thus 'justifying' our judgement of their unworthiness of love's awareness now - from an unquestioning moral sense of self-righteousness. The thing is, even if we are right with regard to the lack of true basis for their fears, we are not loving or honouring of their being to override their freedom by telling them they are wrong, and so need to find ways to support their capacity to re-evaluate their current or active choices in terms of their results. This then reinforces or strengthens the same in us - and grows a consciousness of compassion and discernment that is NOT a mask of sympathy or condescension pretending virtue as a means of manipulating or using others to offset our own sense of self-lack.

Self-lack is when we withhold our blessing - and the unselfconscious nature of joy or wholeness of being is to shine. When we mask over our light, we no longer meet relationships or synchronicities of resonant exchange.

Rage is also associated with temper tantrums. The terrible twos is the stage where most of us learn that our persona is not the centre of the Universe - at least in terms of socially acceptable behaviours - but there is a core self will that we all have that so deeply WANTS life to support or conform to its invested identity as to be shattered and betrayed when it becomes clear that this is simply not what life is or does - or how life works. Fear (of pain) of loss of Face is so deeply humiliating that many will choose death as their 'saviour' rather than suffer such a fate openly to the light of exposure. In this way a death cult operates the cover story for deeper fears and shames that can never be undone, resolved or healed because they represent the dread and terror of truth FEARED - and structure a split mind of the re-tooling of fear and conflict as substitute for the Creative (for our lives together). Fear and control are thus two sides of one false currency - as is denied and denier.

The mind of ingenuity is the capacity to protect the separation or 'split' from exposure - and for this is must generate darkness or the discarded and unwatched mind.

Fear of truth is the same as fear of Is. It makes no sense or nonsense - and uses nonsense as a reference point by which to frame and judge truth as its own image.

'Truth will out' is the flip side to 'illusions or idols must fall', We are still re-enacting the Fall - as if it were a new way of seeing and creating that has somehow usurped (and broken) truth - such that All the king’s horses and all the king’s men are desperately seeking to put it all back together before your Father gets Home. It's a Prodigal nightmare that casts reality as vindictive and malign from the belief we ran off with a false inheritance - that has failed us and our judgement of failure also convicts us of guilt that renders us unworthy of our place in the heart of life. And so we judge ourself and world in ever meaner misery as the basis for maintaing 'control' against the light that would damn us. But the light gently shines on the mind that damns itself, as the Re-Minder of the freedom to Come out and Play. Relationship is Creative. The exchange of creative relationship for systemic rules is the choice for death - even if the rules present themselves as the Voice for guidance and protection. A simple check in the heart will reveal the underlying impulse or active purpose. If it is denying your life it will lock you down and set you in a  mask for ITS control, in YOUR name.

#2

We call it cognitive dissonance these days.

The mind has the capacity to identify falsely - and defend its bubble of reality against direct or true presence. (what is).

We all have a share in this mind and its world or we would not be here - and in some sense lockstep in mutually reinforcing agreements, belief and definitions.

I see 'Fear' calling unto its own, who think their power of protection calls them, and so they answer.

But regardless any 'religious' identifications - love is who and what we are - despite all fears and despite all the hates and evils that denied fear, begets.

So I see a fundamental Choice as the nature of these 'times', as to revealing the choice for fear for what it truly is, does and costs.

If you still WANT it - then truth cannot FORCE itself upon you and remain true.

You have the capacity to invest identity where you accept it.

But if we want a self-isolating reality, locked down in density of fear, threat and conflict monopoly as conflict management - we have to find others to lockstep with.

But to rest in truth requires NOTHING of us, but recognition and release of illusions as illusions.

The freedom to be who you are is lost or limited to the freedom to be what you think or image yourself to be. Once we take an image of reality and run off with it, we have the basis for 'skin in the game'. There is a way of growing and living deep attachments AND of releasing them to a greater love, but it is masked over and ruled out by fear given power. The fear is thus LOCKED IN! - not out!

#3

While Gates acts out from a profound cognitive dissonance, most everyone here can be so easily induced to join in hate as a groupthink of lockstepped minds. Indulging private or group 'mythology' will set up a bubble of self-righteous identity. 

Witnessing truly is very different from 'spreading' anything over or on anyone.

I appreciate Vernon Coleman's witnessing. I remain a free companion and am not a blank check/cheque for anyone's hate agenda - even if set against 'hate agenda'.

If all that remains is a binary polarisation of the accusation of sin in another, then do your deserve each other?

If you choose the sword, you set the measure of your receiving. But you can choose anew - as a change of heart.

Can you find your heart - now - as you read this?

Then you can extend to the hearts of others without a word.

#4

@Jen V The idea of 'destroying evil' is the appeal for seeing and attacking guilt in the Other. It is this 'script' that runs the Gated agenda.

A true communication allows a shift to a new perspective from which everyone literally walks forth as a new mind and world.

Evil is protected as the 'other' so that virtue can be signalled as the basis to make war holy (sic).

#5

 Barry Hercules  He is one of millions who accept and propagate the belief that overpopulation is the major threat of humankind - which is also degraded to the status of a virus or cancer on the Earth. As the population is not going to democratically agree to a genetics agenda that effectively tools or discards them to someone else's ideal all democratic function of communication, transparency and accountability has to be degraded and replaced. The tool for effecting this is hate fuelled grievance set in moral superiority over others. The fear is used to set up the polarising identities in hate. We hate to be awake, and seek operating systems of unconscious escape that such that' wherever we want to go today' will be provided without any fundamental moral responsibility to address our core integrity and align there 'just because'. And so we have systems of manipulated guilt by which to coerce compliance to the system dictates OR ELSE!

Victimhood is a State of Mind

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuAd_IAkOl4

Victimhood is a State of Mind" - Ayishat Akanbi

BLM is one strand of the weaponisation of language to serve a guilt and punishment dictate. Who gets to form or shape or determine such narrative? Not the proxies who are used to enforce it nor the weaponised victimhood of the selected grievance. Power given to guilt and fear is the subjection to its framing - under the illusion of power as control.

Fear and control work both sides of the divide. But truly aligned purpose is not divided against itself as an attempt to become vindicated or validated - but rather - receives by the giving or extending of worth. Ayishat Akanbi is exemplifing what she speaks such that virtue is extended - not masking in, or signalling as 'please don't hurt me' to potential abusers or terror threat.

To identify against a false framing is still to take an identity from what you deny, and so the crash course in miracles is to live from a willingness for communication as a receiving and giving that find balance points in practical and constructive ways. In some sense we meet our patterns of denial to either release them to a more expanded self-compassion (that automatically extends unless we actively block the extension to restate old habits as current choices), OR to rededicate to them as the masking protection from fear we are unwilling or unready to face at this timing.

Masking in who and what we are NOT requires sacrifice and seeks validation and support to maintain itself against the underlying dissonance with who and what you ARE. So when others do not sacrifice to fear and guilt, they are undermining the mask of protection against exposure - and this is felt as threat that seeks and finds offence and justification for withholding or withdrawal of love, acknowledgement, appreciation - such as to invalidate, deny, blank and project onto - and attack.

A Questionable Virus

https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1554-james-corbett-documents-the-collapse-of-the-covid-1984-narrative/#comment-87771 

Knee jerk reaction can do the mindless reaction in any direction.

It is not no virus, so much as no proof of virus as THE cause of The disease specifically assigned as a contagious infection of The virus.

This releases virology from dominating and suppressing all other mechanisms of causality - which include the fear response itself - as well as toxicity, biocides and other exposures, ingestions or injections.

Quite apart from the medical industrial complex that grows upon the framing of sickness in terms of pathogen theory and all the corruptions or social and research fear and funding, there is the science of whether an asserted virus has been truly and uniquely isolated.

Looking into this uncovers all kinds of fudge and workaround in every more arcane specialisations that are essentially opaque or misrepresented.

IE: the team that claimed to discover a novel coronavirus specifically did NOT claim causation.

The methods for 'isolating' viruses changed when they could not be found and proved by Koch's postulates. The sample PRESUMED as an isolate of matter that can contain many things is genetically investigated for fragments that are in effect splice to reconstiture a 'whole' in the lab.

The exceedingly few or even singular electron micrographs of 'the virus' offer no unique distinguishing morpology and no evidence that this particular structure is a cause.

Nor in general is there any clear understanding how or by what mechanism viruses 'cause' all the various symptoms, while at the same time assigning the virus as the active agency when it has no more life than an email - but can none the less be expressed by living cells as code signalling to other cells that replicate the code or not according to contextual parameters. In other words virus is a living cellular response and associated with toxicity and stress of lack of nutrient support for full function. In this sense a virus is part of immune response and not the attacker as such.

However it is pointless to ignore the fact that invested belief in the virus as contagious pathogenic infection of dreaded disease is deep seated and heavily underpinned by our psychic-emotional structures or cultural archetypes and it is these that manipulaters are targeting and effectivly using to hack the minds of others under the mask of ‘authoritative science’ - which is asserted like news headlines to be quietly retracted whil other ‘news’ is used to maintain damage control and initiate new cover stories to runs as the basis for new social, political and econonomic controls.

Welcome to the bio-security

#2

Opinionated dumps are nothing to do with what the opinion is.

You set yourself up by making conditions you cannot keep.

There are all kinds of people that may start our reactive but who may in time recognise it does not serve them and is generally counterproductive. Just asserting 'being right' as if to trump an argument and invalidate others is a symptom of lack of worth.

It can also be provocative and I recommend you learn not to take offence when provoked - or at least not respond until you have identified what belongs to you - or you will counter dump and it is the polarised retorts of no willingness to communicate that 'hijack' a thread with noise over signal.

What you ascribe as 'no virus' opinion is much more nuanced and has a long pedigree. Superstition (fear and search for magical solution) was never banished by science, but substituted for. All 'panacea' operate as psychic magnets for every kind of conflict, denial and unfaced self-evasion. And so become the arena of collusion in denial.

#3

Just as people think money is in the banks, they think scientists have seen viruses and proved that what they see causes a specific disease by contagion.

When a gifted few developed ways to see the living - (Rife, Naessans) - then their equipment was destroyed.

The new ways to 'see' don't require electron microscopes but detection, modelling and splicing of code fragments, bio markers and surrogates such as antibodies. They do NOT require clinical illness excepting as initial clusters that medication and managed perceptions can then run the brand, on mindshare.

Managed 'reality' abandons relational being to upload itself into virtuality that feeds on the very life that it must deny as a contagion of light and awareness by which the bubble is popped.

The consciousness of the lone wolf is of agency as a private agenda at war with life. But cells are symbiotic.

Realities that run cover story for feared beliefs

Bob Wakefield

“Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn’t go away.

@Bob

I'm taking your statement as a starting point. My reflection is not personal to you.

A personal reality is the belief you do not know you believe, having reacted to as if true.

Augmented or masking overlay to our reality are personal and social masking of 'reality adjustment'.

Transparency to truth adds nothing and takes nothing away from what is here - and so truth requires nothing to be itself and is the true state or quality of rest.

Illusions that function as personal and collective substitution, require maintenance and support, and become the image, model or ideology to which life is sacrificed - so as to raise and maintain its idols for what they seem to give. Fear and division seem to give personal control, the worship of control as a private possession locks in the bubbled and masked sense of the need to manipulate reality of self, other and world, hence setting an oppositional or reverse psychology to life as open communication and relationship (truth) and its expression or embodiment (reality).

The nature of a dissociating mind is that it doesn't know that it doesn't know by design, and seems to know what is not true, as an active ignorance by which to see no call to question its 'reality' (and every call to defend it). Fear or 'separation trauma' runs beneath our surface awareness as the overriding control or 'survival' within the persistence of such division. Its beliefs are whatever is to hand as the means to effect the denial of the fear to its projection out and away from 'self' as a sense of private control or defence.

We 'love' to see what we hate... in 'Others' whom we can judge, deny, invalidate and attack.

I sketch this out for reflection - not to persuade or seek agreement or belief.

We can only operate with our current belief or thought system, but in bringing to awareness of conscious noticing, is our capacity to test and refine or replace false or outmoded beliefs.

Reality is never an exclusively physical or tangible component, but always the result of accepted and extended thought, desire and intention. If there is a 'reality' without awareness of existence, it has no existence! But we take our tiny little dalek-like focus of a surface awareness of a discrete and bounded field of attention, and equate awareness of existence within such a mind. In a Universe of Total Instant or synchronous Communication, awareness is more 'like' to what we assign as nothing, or space - which is factually a VAST plasma that makes up about 99% of the physical Universe and self-organises in patternings that are fractally reproduced at all scales - but express differently through different densities and mediums. Our beliefs are largely conditioned by impacts and densities and objects - and so is our model. The idea of closed systems is only part of a greater reality. Balancing inner and outer conditions is the maintaining of any cell, self, or system of self organisation with a relational field.

If you note subconscious patterns of acquired action and association, you can see that you can stop thinking about walking and walking doesn't suddenly stop.

I only respond to invite depth and a willingness to be curious rather than set myself or anyone else in beliefs - or indeed anti-beliefs - that constitute an active but invisible ignorance of the More of who and what we are. No one else is living your life - or can. (Even if you give your power of responsibility and decision to others, or to ideals or beliefs).

Wherever you go - there you are!

Garbage in; garbage out!

Have a good day - if you will, though not all gifts are appreciated as such in their initial opening.

Being with the truth is where a love or felt and recognisable appreciation will arise from the extension of who we are - and its resonant reflection.

The word misery represents a loss of the willingness to give as result of belief and fear of lack.

When the forms of familiar attachments change, we are revealed to our beliefs - perhaps in pain of loss.

Honouring the past allows its blessing to stay with us.

Demonising our past invites a curse of grievance to stamp itself upon all that we endeavour.

'Who controls the present controls the past, - (and thus controls the future'), expands to; who accepts the past, opens to presence as the release of the need for control as unfolding presence to an open future.

Manipulation evolved from fear and division.

There is a better or more truly aligned way of seeing and being than a fear-control system of defence and survival under threat - but only to the willingness to questions our own experience.

Technologism is a progeny of Our dissociating mind

Technologism as such is a progeny of Our dissociating mind - that can be recognised as fear-defined self in subjection or sacrifice (of wholeness) to perceived and believed external controls.

And so it is the collapse or recoil against Infinity - of a split identity where Infinity is discarded as Not Self - or ‘othered', and thus given the attribute of opposition or threat to a separated, locked-down and bubbled off sense of self-consciousness in need of reinforcement for its masking identity - as the ongoing reiteration of an inertial fulcrum set in fear and division as self-protection and therefore usurping or masking over the Infinity point of its own inherence. 

This breakdown in Communication generates constructs within Consciousness that we experience as ‘The Fall’ or 'the Separation’ in every moment of time that is in this sense mis-taken or imposed upon timelessness of being, as a patterning or focus of attention and intention through which to open, unfold and be the human experience of a forgetting, set as lack-driven drive for getting.

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall,

Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.

All the king’s horses and all the king’s men

Couldn’t put Humpty together again.

The attempt to regain wholeness is set in configurations of the experience of its separation trauma.

Loss of power, love or any of the primary virtues or qualities of being drives the strategy of the persona of adjustment, rebalance and re-enactment seeking resolution - but as externalised manipulations of self and world and other that result in reinforcement of the original error.

The experience of loss of love is the reflection of abandonment, rejection, betrayal, and the progeny or derivatives of what is at root a denied and denying impulse of ‘alienation’ are the technologisms of defences and compensatory adjustment such as to limit awareness of fear or pain of loss, to a realm of conditions of control in which a bearable sense of temporary existence can be lockstepped or solidified by tacit reinforcement of mutual definitions of invested identity that operate as coherent domains of shared spin within which an attention can be exclusively focused as the ‘maintaining of a world order’ over the denial of feared and hated chaos instead of the discernment of universal order WITHIN the movement of being as Current or synchronous recognition and resonance - for ‘Self-recognition’ as the function of awareness is the nature of desire as magnetic attraction.

The nature of our giving is in setting the measure of our receiving - and in truth synchronicity or cause and event as one, cannot be dividulated, But in image and given meaning is the capacity to create experience of cause and effect as unfolding from each other.

As we release investment in masking images that no longer serve who we are recognising and accepting ourselves to be, we release exclusions and confinements to a sense of control that is no longer useful, necessary or constructive - and to perspectives that open new ways or understanding and expanding in compassion and embrace that includes and transcends the experience we have grown through.

Our experience of this process may be any kind of drama that brings us in time and in its timing to re-cognise our starting place:

We shall not cease from exploration 

And the end of all our exploring 

Will be to arrive where we started 

And know the place for the first time. 

Through the unknown, remembered gate 

When the last of earth left to discover 

Is that which was the beginning; 

At the source of the longest river 

The voice of the hidden waterfall 

And the children in the apple-tree 

Not known, because not looked for  

But heard, half heard, in the stillness 

Between the two waves of the sea. 

Quick now, here, now, always-- 

A condition of complete simplicity 

(Costing not less than everything) 

And all shall be well and 

All manner of things shall be well 

When the tongues of flame are in-folded 

Into the crowned knot of fire 

And the fire and the rose are one.

                 Little Gidding V, - T.S. Eliot 

The Infinite did not, cannot leave us, and peace is an attribute of our very being

and yet the learned ‘normal’ or habit of mind-substitution for a living will persists as if an autonomous and even alien ‘will’ in a split mind of who and what we are and who and what we are not.

Resonance is the basis and nature of Communication, and the capacity to choose to be out of resonance is the freedom to willingly and freely align and accept truth as the quality that finds recognition as the heart of overflowing or extension. Creation is Open and Self extending as Gift - and the mind of coercion serves the recognition of gift in the giving. For if truth were forced upon you, no relationship would be possible and therefore no extension of  the gift.

So perhaps this sets a context in which a ‘negative agenda’ can be at some level looked upon and recognised for all that is yours (and ours) and for all that in truth has no belonging, meaning or use for you - and therefore no basis as a foundation or derivative currency for sharing on or extending or projection to others and world.

Even as the cleaning of the Augean stables was essentially a making way for the flow that did the work, our primary responsibility is to notice where we are getting in our own way, and bring curiosity and willingness there in place of reactive judgements that compound old adaptations and responses by which we unknowingly consent to participate in loveless, uncreative or destructive patterns.

The mind than ‘made the blocks as defences against greater fear’ is not the mind of the sorting out or discernment, and so there is no way to organise ‘religion’ of a true relationship in this or any other moment.

Living from and as the movement of the being of you is no masking virtue nor convicted sin.

T)here is a Field… I shall meet you t)here…

We can see our situation in different ways, and the urge to see a positive as an escape or counter to the negative is a way of masking from looking at the dis-integrity as it is. And so we look on it as it isn't - through a mask of fear seeking virtue.

Only God Knows.

This could be the recognition of the relief and release that we do not have to carry the burden of ‘trying to know, love, create, survive, control or manage. Its already in the Field of Infinity as our living Inherence.

But the making of ‘god’ or power as a thing unto itself is a closed system.

releasing the gesture of self-exclusion and isolation is letting the Field in - as any instant or moment of recognition of the truly feat qualities of life as love in action.

Living this moment, and living this day well - from the wellspring of a willingness to ask and listen or feel for the movement of answer that may not be at all in the forms we expect, is the natural discipline of taking joy in life, honouring self honesty and growing truth in our life, and truly addressing the evils of the day thereof - rather than chase false flagging of displacement realities as if ‘this time’ the shadow will be defeated, eradicated, for what we make time for, can waste as well as be wasted.

Nasty and Very Contagious?

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/06/26/covid-the-strange-the-inexplicable-and-the-weird/#comment-167148

Commenter:

...I have no doubt that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is very infectious and Covid-19 is very nasty. Disentangling all the known risk factors for a bad outcome is a mammoth task...

Previous no-doubt infectious scares have come and gone. That fear is viral contagion is demonstrably true - not only as emotional reaction - but as the basis of a new normal (sic) mindset upon which to institute a no-doubt world order, because if The Science is invoked as authority, we are to follow it regardless that it is invoked to shut down scientific or even reasoned debate.

Is your professed lack of doubt the result of conscious and conscientious enquiry of a result of taking things at face value - in terms of pre-existing beliefs and allegiances?
Is a lack of doubt a restorative to unified health in functional response?
Or an attempt to enforce 'health' to fit the belief system.
I have read very credible reports at attempts to demonstrate 'transmission of various presumed virus-caused infection that failed to find proof it occurred - but the BELIEF in contagion is so primary as to ignore evidences  and develop ways to test by surrogate markers that do away with such inconveniences.

Epithets such as 'nasty' for natural processes are telly-tubby thinking.
I do not begrudge you your problems - and the joy of untangling them, but the problems that arise from mistaken identity or false and falsely framed leads are a completely different set of ultimately unsolvable problems that effectively 'hang the computing process' in loops of recurring futility, and yet offer a means for the direct injection of 'contagion by foreign matters' by trojan deceit.

Proofs of infection often resort to direct injection of diseased matters directly into the brains of animals. The underlying question might be "why do we so WANT to believe in contagious disease, such as to seek and find only evidences and reinforcements to its premise?'.

This might expand to 'why do we accept external and social authority in place of standing in our own as a contribution to a full accounting?'

Toxicology, treatments and existing dysfunction as a result of attacking and undermining the immune function (life as homoeostasis amidst change and challenge), along with strain of persistent intensities of stress (fear mounting on fear) -- ALL provide worthy and fitting and treatable causes for disease conditions that are effectively patented and controlled by pharma-defined and driven virology.

By all means the choice is yours, but I write in witness to there being a choice, where the new normal has defined choice as an engineered, framed or shaped response to stimulus.
Ruling elites used to claim the noble lie was necessary to hold social order among those seen as unwilling or unable to live their own responsibilities. And so narrative or story became a matrix of control within which the demos was ruled by the hieros. The saying is, 'dont let truth get in the way of a good story' - and a good story is any that we have invested emotional energy in reaction that binds us to side within its frame.

If coronavirus is simply part of normal genetic material, then defining it in novel ways and associating it with a key 'cluster event', propagating it via blitzkrieg of a lockstepped media, while widening the net to include almost every respiratory infection or fever or death, and using known to be unreliable genetic sampling tests that are NOT fit to diagnose 'cases'. Then not only was it contagious - it was already here!

Consider the view the HIV is a normal and harmless retrovirus whose markers are found in humans, does not in itself lead to AIDS, and is not infectious - nor sexually transmitted. Then consider the frame of terror and hateful aversion and social exclusions that - for example - led to clinically fit young people committing suicide on receiving a 'positive' - which could register as such for a variety of other conditions that give a 'positive' - including flu, TB, or pregnancy - and then a baby is born into a firestorm of toxic treatments. Iatrogenic suicide is all the rage - but we might do better to safely express rage so as to connect with something true in the heart, that kill life to contain its conflicts.

Horror, Disgust and Damnation

Covid-19 Has Turned Public Health Into a Patient-Killing Experiment

(This is an Offguardian article I found first on SOTT)

https://www.sott.net/article/437009-Covid-19-Has-Turned-Public-Health-Into-a-Patient-Killing-Experiment

Cameliani

Totally disgusting and merits the perpetrators to an eternity in hell. Turning the other cheek is not proving to be a wise philosophy and in fact encourages the "sinners" to continue targeting the helpless without impunity. 

They are already in hell, and denied eternity by their own attempt to cover over hell with masking cover stories.

Be mindful of what you wish for another, for it represents your evaluation of what you would do you yourself if exposed in such a blind hate.

There are many ways to interpret 'turning the other cheek'. One of them is to live an equality of being regardless masking presentations of being set over or under another. Jesus was not a doormat, nor did he encourage sin, sickness and death or torment as worthy choices.

What you may be equating with Jesus' saying REGARDING THE TEMPTATION TO TAKE OFFENCE AND PLAY OUT THE VICTIM AND RIGHTEOUS AVENGER - is passive compliance.

You live in the era of the psyop - as deceits cunningly targeted to your fears, and to your hope of escaping them, and so If I were to seek to deceive you, you have already given me a profile by which to induce you to sell your integrity for a 'sword' by which you can want to kill and therefore give consent to being killed.

The 'helpless' in your casting may indeed be so in the frame of the social and cultural constructs of our adaptation to a human world. Indeed the belief and fear of helplessness drives the whole CONTROL AGENDA in all its blinding deceit.

Your concept of Eternity is for everlasting torment and yet you put "sinners" in quotes as if to suggest there is no sin.

I appreciate the feeling of disgust - which cannot be altogether without some element of self-disgust - for human minds are clearly capable of unimaginable callousness, cruelty and cynical disregard for life. In face they are so able to compartmentalise a self-exception of judgement of others as unworthy of love and life, as to be willing to give them hell, so as to be more comfortable in their own bubble.

There is no real escape from our thought and intention - regardless how ingeniously the mind can limit and conflict itself into complex instruments for the masking of toxic debt. But the accounting to which we are each and together responsible is where our own sin has denied love's reality in favour of its own judgements - and resulting experience of self-illusion given value over and at expense of truth.

The toxic debts of a long period of human expansion and development are increasing rendering and revealing insanity - over which controls are increasing seeking to mask, so as to demand increasing sacrifices to the god of control - that is the flipside to a god of terror-seeking-protection in limitation, separation, distancing and masking over. The victim and the victimiser. You can cast your life in these terms and see everything in the frame of murder and deceit - but it will come home because YOU gave these meanings and so they return to you as faithful witnesses to the devotion you accept in your heart.

There IS a human dilemma in being split between the movement of our love, and the demands of social duty, law or demanded compliances to rules, rulers and structured society. Jesus also spoke to this in terms of giving to Caesar what is due or needful to do in order to function in the world, and giving to the Living (God), the love that is due to the giver of the awareness and experience of being love - which is most clearly revealed in loving our 'enemy' because there is no personal manipulative 'getting' in the extending of embrace and awareness of one who does not support or reinforce your 'identity'' or 'worldview'.

That such a practice is merely 'thought about' rather than resonant as a tuning truth - NOW! - is the result of "sinners" persisting in targetting and reinforcing their helplessness, without ANY recognition that this is the principle device BY which to render ourselves 'locked down' in fear-defined defences that DO the very thing we invoke or accept them to defend against - but behind a masking filter of judgement. We are now being shown the nature of the MASK, such as we are willing to step FROM its bubble and look at it - and at the fear symbol that it represents.

Try to tell anyone a truth they are not yet ready to hear and you find they are NOT helpless, for they can always find a way NOT to hear or something ELSE to attend, or a way to misrepresent and subvert what you say to serve their own defences - and attack you with.

Truth is not a possession to be acquired and controlled. That is judgemental self-illusion. Truth is in your heart, wordless and still, and yet holding the centre as embrace for all that spirals and radiates and expands as the movement of reflection. FEAR of truth is the result of invested illusion - and the 'tenant farmers' taking their tenure as possession in their own right, kill the messengers of truth as their survival set in threat. And so to fear of truth, anything true is a 'contagion'. This operates a reversal of consciousness - running upon the body of life. Uncovering and releasing such an error without triggering psychotic fragmentation and dissociation is the function of the 'Holy Spirit' or the purpose and spirit of reintegrating to wholeness of being - that remains available as your Help - beneath the mask of terror - and therefore misperceived, distrusted and denied by a 'self-control' seeking reinforcement - as well as scapegoats on which to dump the consequence of its actions, and narratives by which to redefine sin as our 'normal'. And remember, I am using sin for the willingness to persist in self-illusion at COST of truth, and as an error that can be corrected by releasing the investment in the beliefs and fears that drives such an identity in lack.

Medical (physical) transference of psychic emotional conflicts operates on the wish for panacea. When some promise of leverage over negative consequence appears or is publicised to 'sell itself', the many flock to take it as a way of fixing their life, or bolstering their ability to control and leverage life without penalty, and so they bring ALL the psychic elements that properly belong to their own relational being - into a drug culture - and industry that in willingness to play the role of 'saviour' takes on and becomes trapped in these densities of demonic entanglement - of hates, shames, and terrors set under rage.

You could say we ARE locked into hell or self-torment - as if at the hand of Others who we gave power to, and lost self-awareness to a reactive defence the perpetuates the very conditions of conflict as the idols and ideals of 'order'. But as order imposed upon life, others and self. Fear begets tyranny, but identity made in fear is the last one to re-cognize the error by which they 'live'.

It is sometimes suggested that our politicians cannot find a way out of 'lockdown' without losing face. But they are no longer operating Sumption's gumption in terms of evaluating all views and using common sense, but are handled, guided and told what to think, what to say and ways to say it that bypass or trick the unwary into giving allegiance to, or inhibiting the ability to openly challenge.

The 'tenant pharmas' are not just operating to avoid losing any face of credibility, but are desperate to make a new face of biotech as 'security' in a life normalised as latent infection. For your 'sins' are now viruses that can be defined and tested for by rules and regulations that you have NO VOICE in overseeing or participating in as decisions. Nor in UK as of new laws only yesterday, by any process of democratic oversight other than a minister's decision (instructions).

It is the HELP that is being targeted, which in medical terms is your immune systems - for they are the dynamic and living relational being over which a masking persona operates - with less and less alignment in true function. The 'ego' of self (and world) imaged thinks to order and control all things - including our genetic encodings. But then that was its job description as substitute for the active extension of love.

Perhaps, 'waking' to hell, is opening the conditions in which the true prayer of the heart is recognised and aligned in. False desires cannot extend joy in life. Hollow lives cannot 'add' truth or make a silk purse of a sow's ear. How do you know the true from the false? Well do you truly WANT to know?


#2commented on the off-guardian article page
https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/24/covid-19-has-turned-public-health-into-a-patient-killing-experiment/

'Virus' is used for a false (fear-based) religion - perhaps to be soon upgraded to 'faulty genes'. You can assign viruses pathological agency, and so justify yourself in isolating and attacking the body of their 'contagion' but none of that is anywhere but in the mind of its believers. 'Virus' originally (and correctly) denoted toxin or poison.

Viral expression to environmental challenge is fact.

Even those who claim to have 'discovered' a novel mutation of the ubiquitous coronavirus did NOT claim any proof that it was THE CAUSE of the clinical conditions of those (few) who were used to sample genetic materials from.

It isnt true to say 'there is no virus' without qualifying what 'virus' is intended to mean. Because the 'religion' of salvation from virus is so invisibly structured in a pharmaceutically medicated and trained mind.

The idea of contagion pre-dates the idea of pathogens, as a psychic or demonic corruption or attack. When the mind is locked down into a fight flight response, the reptilian brain dominates, and shuts down all unnecessary functions until the danger is passed. The 'lizard' motif serves well enough for the fear-captured defence (attack) response - operating as a blind dissociation under masking strategy.

Your post drips with derision, and hardly merits a response, but is this not because you defend the 'facts' that serve your religion - or 'ideology'.

I do not speak against your freedom to evaluate all relevant and resonant views, so as to arrive at your own current sense of life and world and how to be it. Nor need you trash or deride others to make a positive point - if you have one.

Iatrogenic disease - and death - is a Medical Nemesis - and in my view the primary method, route or framework of belief by which disease and death operate in industrially developed populations as captured revenue streams. Denial of development along with 'medical 'aid' operates on those who have no resistance to a global technocratic monopolism.

I understand these are emotionally triggering times. But if you come here only to raid or score points or sow discord, then are you fully willing to reap in the reward of your own sowing? For that is how life works. You want to lump OG readers into your own narrative definitions, but what are narrative definitions other than invisible frameworks that align visible identifications of allegiance.

Do you really believe that the 'government' and its lockstepped agencies has YOUR safety as its paramount concern? Is not everyone's actual safety being sacrificed to a collectivised abstraction?

#3

Pharma represents one critical facet of a broad spectrum dominance - or subjection if you prefer. But yes the mask in medical science is our cultural 'trojan horse'.

If you researched AIDS or polio - as a willingness to look beneath the cover story, you would find that the ruse is tried and tested - but the sheer scale of this one is partly the result of the effective capture of all vectors of influence - not least the Media and political classes - along with a vertical restructuring of thought that divides function from its relational context.

So yes a covert power is being revealed as overt power - but it can only run on darkness and so darkness is to be the new normal. We are to comply in the lockdown and denial of our own consciousness.The means by which we are induced to do so is guilted fear.

Therefore the bringing of such fear to our own consciousness is the releasing of a hidden correspondence or back door though which 'control' mentality' substitutes for relational being. The one activated or triggered into 'control mentality' cannot be woken by a response of like kind. And the attempt to do so becomes our own triggering identification in control mentality - or polarised reaction.

If the mask of quarantined earth is deconstructing - which may have some parallel in the weakening magnetosphere that allows more cosmic rays to enter - then we have to get our House in order - that is we have to address and account for baggage of conflicts that represent dysfunctional self-protections - in our own lives. What else is a mask for but some kind of shield or hiding from fear and threat? We think our world is solid until the ground moves or disappears from under our feet. The attempt to move to lower ground in contraction, limitation and sacrifice is itself mindless blindness of 'control mentality'.

Let's say we are all dying to the self and world we (thought we) knew and our freedom is in how we choose to live this moment. We never had any other freedom - but in large part gave this over to learned, acquired or inherited habits.

Fear and Self Interest Rule Men - Napoleon

in response to the comments and themes in:

https://youtu.be/GTYl_dmX_Kw 

Fear operates as belief to which the heart is hostage and sacrificed to deceit.

Because we react FROM it, instead of bringing it to the heart.

Willingness FOR the truth of the heart, amidst the confusions of the mind in fear, is the refusal to mask in false virtue as a personal contract of private self-protection. But those who do not recognise the choice by which they took a fear identity as their living will, defend it as their only life.

Predatory and parasitical minds are adapted opportunistically to seek out and leverage fear. When virtue can no longer be masked in - and passed off as real, vice is postured belligerently in bold and terrorising bullying, so as to intimidate and undermine the target to compliance.

#1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTYl_dmX_Kw&lc=UgwH_b6ljtgD9HqBpid4AaABAg

Murray Krause

Like Napolean said 'Fear & self interest rule men"

This is a a partial truth. What mind did Napoleon see with? Fear and self-interest?

It takes one to know one - and once we see and believe we respond automatically as if what we see is truth.

Love of what fear and self-interest seem to give us, overrules our true appreciation or recognition of shared being.

Rule is thus coercive - but if we fit into the filters of compliance and conformity, we can believe such a bubble is righteous and deny or subject to unworthy' to exclusions, deprivations and denials. This is the archetype of order set over chaos, as distinct from discerning the true will of One within apparent chaos that we react to as the call to war, defence, lockdown of withdrawal and withholding and masking.

I see the willingness to NOTICE our mind of masking defence as the preparing of the way to the releasing it from usefulness.

Therefore noticing our fear and self interest rather than judging and hiding it, is the first self-honesty of acceptance for what is currently so, without locking into it as irrevocably or unchangeably so.

The concept of releasing separate self interest is of course abhorrent or meaningless to separate self interest, and so the qualities of a love that has been covered over stir as curiosity and desire to truly know. This is where the 'Christ-child' of a renewal of mind is activated or seeded as a different purpose for the mind and developed abilities, and world - than fear and self-interest.

Whereas fear and control divide and rule out so as to seem to rule over, but struggle within a world divided, love is. And is the communication of a field or frequency of alignment and attunement to wholeness that embraces by expansion.

Fear of change is the invested identity in forms of self-by-association, but the movement of life is not in the forms but through the generation of its own expression. When we recognise a quality of worth or value from which to live and in which to meet, share and exchange, we give it embodiment. But fear and self-interest are locked in habituated forms of possession and control as IF an autonomous and independent entity and reality. All the focus on the particle - as a thing - and none on the wave-field as the call or impulse to move as expression of the whole. The idea of self will and Universal will as being one is the idea of true Self-acceptance - rather than self-Self conflicts or split-levels and compartments seeking narrative cover and defence. 

#2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTYl_dmX_Kw&lc=UgyTSLUQQA9XUi3kh254AaABAg

Archie Bald

Pompeo said we're in a live exercise and people keep talking about it like it's real....amazing how even the "experts" can be fooled.

The drill is really being carried out, but this time the full toxicities are not being deployed - so its like using blanks while framing almost all deaths in a media blitzkrieg. Conditioning to obedience as a lockstepping compliance while testing out the system for refinement. BTW experts generally know an awful lot about an awful little. To see the world or life through a very specialised lens is to not see life at all. The exceptions to this are those who break the frame or masking framework of compartmentalised separateness by honesty to empirical evidences that reveal a falsely invested model.

#3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTYl_dmX_Kw&lc=Ugx1UPyMgK65XDLE17x4AaABAg

Angela Rasmussen

What about Dr. Andrew Kaufman's hypothesis that viruses are not a real thing.

Nice overview of those questioning the idea of virus vs no viruses.

https://youtu.be/kdY1IMzyQIc

You mean - 'not a real cause. That has not really been isolated and uniquely identified, and so it a filtering or framing belief through which we are perceiving and responding to toxic biological immune responses - that includes fear (cortisol) poisoning and all the undermining and disregulation of immune function resulting from every kind of injection, intervention and toxic exposure.

So the virus works the cover story as the invisible enemy by which fear is leveraged to fund war and sacrifice of life and liberty to coercive and tyrannous agenda - that self-justify as necessary evils, set against a greater evil.

Kaufman offers a very good example of willingness to question and communicate sanely - which is anathema to the NEED for cover stories to maintain function as coverings over feared or shameful truth. But to be sure, truth itself is not fearful when you at one with it.

#4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTYl_dmX_Kw&lc=Ugy5XD_vv8My1r3WOA14AaABAg

Planetgonenuts

"General opinion is the least proof of Truth, for men in general are ignorant. Then, too, the Law decrees that the surroundings and circumstances of man shall be more condusive to deception than to Truth." - The Kolbrin, Wisdom Of The Ages, Truth.

“Nevertheless, to strive for Truth must be one of the main aims of life. Therefore, Earth, the wise instructress, teaches man the nature of deceit and places it all about him, that he may observe its ways and learn to distinguish its illusions. It is in the nature of a game wherein man tries to discover what is reality, so far with little success. For the road to Truth lies through the thick forests of illusion and across the wide wastelands of deceit.” – The Kolbrin

We are born into this world alone - could be restated as we are born of Oneness to a conceit of aloneness. The concept of self imaged, is a symbol and form of a Field in Expression that we each and together run with as independent facts, or things born of thinks - held in place by an intensity of love set in fear.

But yes, what we believe, we perceive, and are then defined and conditioned by as framing or causing our being. Nothing could be further from truth - excepting what we accept into our hearts is given power to run as our mind.

The introduction of self-doubt was the gap through which self-conflict, self-judgement and self hating damnation operates a shadow or denial agenda. To be certain, is not to overcome doubt by force, but to align wholly in trust of being truly moved.

#5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTYl_dmX_Kw&lc=UgzWm9BpYpITZDFNEEt4AaABAg.9A0XDiW5aol9A1Mdrqy_2m

Motersickle Bum

we now must decide if we want to live on our knees or die fighting for freedom.

#6

@Motersickle Bum Or simply live from a true heart instead of fucked up mind. No need to frame it in hate of tyranny - though I understand the feeling!

Is Our World a Computer Simulation?

Is Our World a Computer Simulation?
https://www.thunderbolts.info/forum3/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=306&sid=aa1f2ba9d18eeb9c6550211bfa08eea5


How we frame a question may be a statement in disguise.
Firstly 'our world' - Is this the model through which we experience and interact an externalisation or 'explication' of an implicate realm that is formless yet gives rise to forms - as like the idea of vibrational qualities or frequency domains - that are essentially patterning and not in and of themselves concrete structure - such as can be readily observed as interference patterns?

Our model is fundamental or founded mental - and is in and of the realm we call thought, imaginary or creative. We can have a experience of a mistaken identity as if the rope were in fact a snake - but if we abide long enough, the 'snake' reveals itself a rope.
Our model is thus different from 'my private imagination of wish or fear' but group wish and fear can and does operate distortions to the model - so as to operate a virtual alternative to a true and innocent perception.

But what would such a perception be, or see?
Is there a 'world' a unified externality of existence? And what are its essential characteristics? Because data cannot be gathered without interpretation, selection and differentiations of assigned scales and values. And so I see the 'Ancient of Days' as the laying down of the lines, points, angels and measurements, from which organised and stable or persistent patterns of predictability can establish a fundamental structure though which life unfolds or evolves its own postulates. Go forth and multiply - does not specify WHAT is formed as a vibrational identification to participate in the whole as integral and yet unique - each to its kind. And in human terms, our predicate identifications determine all that derives or unfolds in response to our relational counterpart - for nothing exists in and of itself but always in relation to its relational field - as a whole, but as interacting specifically in part-iculars. We meet the world that we call forth, and at the level of physics, we meet a core existence of the will or desire to live - as an unfolding persistent and somewhat predictable experience of relational recognitions.

Memory has a deeper counterpart than our personal recall, that Sheldrake points to - and which hold the idea of inertia - not just as a state of persistence but as a fulcrum for experience. For the nature of any balancing disequilibrium is of balance points - and of a balancing of fluid balance point as a systemic whole within a larger relational field. The persistence of an imbalance or offcentred focal point can then operate as split domains of apparent incongruity that nevertheless depend each on the other.

When the informational system is thus bubbled off in a seemingly separate bubble or entity, there is a 'local' or 'private' experience within a whole that is masked or ruled out by a sense of existence set against 'other' threat or Not Self - and posits the idea of self as a locked down fragment regarding or seeking to 'whole' itself while effectively running as a polarised and polarising sense of control or limiting reaction to a 'world' no longer felt as a unified informational field - but socially distanced, self-isolated and masked - excepting as a set of filters and rules for protection and self-reinforcement determine. Such a 'world' is an identity imposed upon relational expression, by which to maintain 'control' of the model or narrative of allowed expression and behaviour as a 'don't look' or denial command by which to suppress or redefine a rope as a snake - when the snake is serving to purpose of a 'keep out!' or 'access denied!'.

The term computer is a simile with the term simulation. For by representing a situation in quanta, the interactions and results of the quanta can be used to consider alternate realities as simulations - as part of deciding how or whether to act or what parameters to adopt or impose on a situation so as to arrive at a desired outcome - and where the actual outcome can be used to refine the model.
Our imagination can thus simulate realities as if outside of current temporal sequence - but never really outside of its embracing relational field as a form of augmented reality. The self-conditioning of the mind to its own experience is the identifying with a fragmented bias of polarised augmentation of reality that are the 'rabbit holes' of misidentification that operate as inertial fulcrums set against being truly identified in simple relational integrality. Thus a mind of dissociated and fragmented thinking can question its own existence - or that of its world of relational interaction - in frames of thought that mask the recognition of existence as a total state. In simple terms the release of the snake for the rope is a shift from mind-polarised reactivity to a heart centred release. I use the 'heart' to refer to the intuiting or communication of wholeness as  the quality of embracing presence - and not as a symbol for reactive emotional states or lockdowns that mask true relation for private agenda running on past experience as if current.

The role of imagination and creativity in our experience can seem to be locked down, masked off and consigned to fancy or wishful thinking. But the determination as to what we are, what we hold true, or truly value, is the setting of the measure from which our results are then lived. An attempt to control reality can only project such an intention to its world, and to others -  and live from that conviction as a basis that seeks and finds reinforcement. Likewise the decision to accept and understand reality as it is - restores a freedom of communication and interactions to result as synchronicity as conscious and resonant awareness, rather than negative synchronicities in which cause and effect are effectively obscured by filters, and controls of opacity.

"What 'code' or thought of desire and intention is currently active?" is a question not for thinking about, but for an immediate checking in or observation of self-transparency. But only if we want to know. The desire NOT to know what (for whatever reasons) we are not ready of willing to know - operates the 'mind-control of reality - by which we 'escape' to a displacement reality in which the themes of our 'separation trauma' populate and replicate as external conditions - set in time and space as distanced from a 'now' that shifts in focus at such a rate of evasive manoeuvres as to always be ahead of our thinking - as the frame and filtering by which we think. The gift of such an experience of partiality within an obscured wholeness is ultimately to ourself - and therefore to and from each other. The nature of a gift is a synchronicity, a recognition, a resonant match, a shared joy in being. If our 'mind-control' denies all awareness of and movement of inspiration for giving - in favour of a world of controls, set up as a Gated computational system, where or what is the profit? The capacity to destroy (our) life or relational awareness of being, is the capacity to consciously and free willingly choose NOT to. That we do not recognise 'mind-control' as a surrogate and substitute reality, is the persistence of an Ancient Hate - set in guilt (invalidation) and fear (exclusion). As a program or framework of instructions, such a strategy can only arrive at its starting place - after using up or binding up its energy in conflict and depletion. Garbage in; garbage out ;-)
But that this runs invisibly as a 'second nature' is the measure of investment in it as a saving belief in fear as (basis for) power of protection, and guilt as leverage of manipulated control. If we can accept this 'consciousness construct' as a tool or set of abilities - rather than as our identity - it becomes transparent to consciously accepted or inspired purpose - rather than rebreathing our own exhalations and nesting in our own pollutions of toxic debt.

The ego of self imaged, is not the problem. The problem is when it frames us into some kind of question - that runs unquestioned. To notice our mind-in-act is not to judge or suppress or eradicate what we don't accept - as if to arrive at an ideal answer, but to align wholly in what we do  such as to release what no longer serves without attaching negative charge. For we are Masters in the art of creating what we don't want under the guise of denying or making war upon it as a mask of virtue set over a negatively conditioned imagination. The triggering of which can literally cause us to lose our relational sanity to archetypal and thus apocalyptic terrors.

While we can suggest that such archetypes are imprinted or hardwired as the Human Condition, I hold that the difference between conditions and conditionings is all the difference - where we have the gift of free awareness to observe and own our responses - and thus allow new choices of more truly aligned results. Thus I hold that our true Archetype is neither idealised form nor idols made in awe and terror, but is the Creative Will - of which we share as the awareness of existence - given and received in every thought, word and deed - regardless the overlay of code by which the personal sense operates as social masking realities.


The question on thunderbolts forum linked here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnGcTPNHR0k&feature=youtu.be
Where I also posted

I hold that the term 'recognise' is the same root meaning as the term 'word'

The sending forth meets a resonant recognition and behold (ie nothing actually leaves Source) It is Good (God).

There is no separation in Meaning but only in concepts of derivative meanings - and so in this sense the Original and Only Currency - is represented in our modelling mind as derivate meanings, and derivatives of derivatives - that adulterate a true or transparent appreciation as a filtering opacity of a bubbled off worldview or identity (both individual and collective or contextual).

All attempts to reassemble or reconstitute Reality - stem from the belief it is broken and also from the guilted fear of a sense of responsibility for breaking it - which is mitigated by assigning agency to others, to world, to god, and to viruses - as a kind of negative pass the parcel game in which guilt-reality is to be repackaged and passed on so as NOT to be caught with it when the music stops.

The idea that Cause was one with its Event is not at all circular but synchronous. The realm of cause and effect as a timeline is arbitrary, but necessary for our current functional consciousness. Orwell's quote on the control of the past as the means to use it to control the future (extend that past seamlessly as the repeating future) id the use of the Presence as a means of control - instead of the extending of presence to both past and future as one. THAT is Creative.

The idea of a god lording it over a (separate) creation is the posit of a separate masked off,  isolated and socially distanced mind - locked down in a body  and set in sickness, struggle and death. (The Fall idea). This can be seen as the inevitable or innate result of using presence as a possessive control for self inflation (boom) and its breakdown or adjustment to reality (bust). A kind of polarised   cycling from a unified 'flow'.

I haven't listened to the whole video - but the timeless is represented by the field  and has no material or physica 'existence' apart from its particular expressions. The vibrational field moves upon the waters and Is the waters as the patterning of expression within the field of resonant recognition - or 'knowing being'. But not as anything apart from or other than being.

The idea of knowledge as a possession and as a means of control is a derivative.And the identification with derivative realities is an experience of being possessed and controlled - or subject to the measure of your own word - and yet unrecognised amidst the reflection of conflicted premises and purposes. - thus leading to the belief that power is in the world of things in themselves and our word or thought is a wishful ghost in a Universal Machine. A fantasy seeking reinforcement or re-enacting upon the body of a world that forever dis-appoints its ideal.

#2

murphIf our universe is computer simulation, coronavirus is hacker's attack.

Do you mean our biological viral responses? or the mind-control of the assignment of pathogenic agency to such processes by protection rackets that are crowdfunding fear as a source of support for illusions of escaping or overcoming fear by limiting consciousness of life?