Is Our World a Computer Simulation?

Is Our World a Computer Simulation?
https://www.thunderbolts.info/forum3/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=306&sid=aa1f2ba9d18eeb9c6550211bfa08eea5


How we frame a question may be a statement in disguise.
Firstly 'our world' - Is this the model through which we experience and interact an externalisation or 'explication' of an implicate realm that is formless yet gives rise to forms - as like the idea of vibrational qualities or frequency domains - that are essentially patterning and not in and of themselves concrete structure - such as can be readily observed as interference patterns?

Our model is fundamental or founded mental - and is in and of the realm we call thought, imaginary or creative. We can have a experience of a mistaken identity as if the rope were in fact a snake - but if we abide long enough, the 'snake' reveals itself a rope.
Our model is thus different from 'my private imagination of wish or fear' but group wish and fear can and does operate distortions to the model - so as to operate a virtual alternative to a true and innocent perception.

But what would such a perception be, or see?
Is there a 'world' a unified externality of existence? And what are its essential characteristics? Because data cannot be gathered without interpretation, selection and differentiations of assigned scales and values. And so I see the 'Ancient of Days' as the laying down of the lines, points, angels and measurements, from which organised and stable or persistent patterns of predictability can establish a fundamental structure though which life unfolds or evolves its own postulates. Go forth and multiply - does not specify WHAT is formed as a vibrational identification to participate in the whole as integral and yet unique - each to its kind. And in human terms, our predicate identifications determine all that derives or unfolds in response to our relational counterpart - for nothing exists in and of itself but always in relation to its relational field - as a whole, but as interacting specifically in part-iculars. We meet the world that we call forth, and at the level of physics, we meet a core existence of the will or desire to live - as an unfolding persistent and somewhat predictable experience of relational recognitions.

Memory has a deeper counterpart than our personal recall, that Sheldrake points to - and which hold the idea of inertia - not just as a state of persistence but as a fulcrum for experience. For the nature of any balancing disequilibrium is of balance points - and of a balancing of fluid balance point as a systemic whole within a larger relational field. The persistence of an imbalance or offcentred focal point can then operate as split domains of apparent incongruity that nevertheless depend each on the other.

When the informational system is thus bubbled off in a seemingly separate bubble or entity, there is a 'local' or 'private' experience within a whole that is masked or ruled out by a sense of existence set against 'other' threat or Not Self - and posits the idea of self as a locked down fragment regarding or seeking to 'whole' itself while effectively running as a polarised and polarising sense of control or limiting reaction to a 'world' no longer felt as a unified informational field - but socially distanced, self-isolated and masked - excepting as a set of filters and rules for protection and self-reinforcement determine. Such a 'world' is an identity imposed upon relational expression, by which to maintain 'control' of the model or narrative of allowed expression and behaviour as a 'don't look' or denial command by which to suppress or redefine a rope as a snake - when the snake is serving to purpose of a 'keep out!' or 'access denied!'.

The term computer is a simile with the term simulation. For by representing a situation in quanta, the interactions and results of the quanta can be used to consider alternate realities as simulations - as part of deciding how or whether to act or what parameters to adopt or impose on a situation so as to arrive at a desired outcome - and where the actual outcome can be used to refine the model.
Our imagination can thus simulate realities as if outside of current temporal sequence - but never really outside of its embracing relational field as a form of augmented reality. The self-conditioning of the mind to its own experience is the identifying with a fragmented bias of polarised augmentation of reality that are the 'rabbit holes' of misidentification that operate as inertial fulcrums set against being truly identified in simple relational integrality. Thus a mind of dissociated and fragmented thinking can question its own existence - or that of its world of relational interaction - in frames of thought that mask the recognition of existence as a total state. In simple terms the release of the snake for the rope is a shift from mind-polarised reactivity to a heart centred release. I use the 'heart' to refer to the intuiting or communication of wholeness as  the quality of embracing presence - and not as a symbol for reactive emotional states or lockdowns that mask true relation for private agenda running on past experience as if current.

The role of imagination and creativity in our experience can seem to be locked down, masked off and consigned to fancy or wishful thinking. But the determination as to what we are, what we hold true, or truly value, is the setting of the measure from which our results are then lived. An attempt to control reality can only project such an intention to its world, and to others -  and live from that conviction as a basis that seeks and finds reinforcement. Likewise the decision to accept and understand reality as it is - restores a freedom of communication and interactions to result as synchronicity as conscious and resonant awareness, rather than negative synchronicities in which cause and effect are effectively obscured by filters, and controls of opacity.

"What 'code' or thought of desire and intention is currently active?" is a question not for thinking about, but for an immediate checking in or observation of self-transparency. But only if we want to know. The desire NOT to know what (for whatever reasons) we are not ready of willing to know - operates the 'mind-control of reality - by which we 'escape' to a displacement reality in which the themes of our 'separation trauma' populate and replicate as external conditions - set in time and space as distanced from a 'now' that shifts in focus at such a rate of evasive manoeuvres as to always be ahead of our thinking - as the frame and filtering by which we think. The gift of such an experience of partiality within an obscured wholeness is ultimately to ourself - and therefore to and from each other. The nature of a gift is a synchronicity, a recognition, a resonant match, a shared joy in being. If our 'mind-control' denies all awareness of and movement of inspiration for giving - in favour of a world of controls, set up as a Gated computational system, where or what is the profit? The capacity to destroy (our) life or relational awareness of being, is the capacity to consciously and free willingly choose NOT to. That we do not recognise 'mind-control' as a surrogate and substitute reality, is the persistence of an Ancient Hate - set in guilt (invalidation) and fear (exclusion). As a program or framework of instructions, such a strategy can only arrive at its starting place - after using up or binding up its energy in conflict and depletion. Garbage in; garbage out ;-)
But that this runs invisibly as a 'second nature' is the measure of investment in it as a saving belief in fear as (basis for) power of protection, and guilt as leverage of manipulated control. If we can accept this 'consciousness construct' as a tool or set of abilities - rather than as our identity - it becomes transparent to consciously accepted or inspired purpose - rather than rebreathing our own exhalations and nesting in our own pollutions of toxic debt.

The ego of self imaged, is not the problem. The problem is when it frames us into some kind of question - that runs unquestioned. To notice our mind-in-act is not to judge or suppress or eradicate what we don't accept - as if to arrive at an ideal answer, but to align wholly in what we do  such as to release what no longer serves without attaching negative charge. For we are Masters in the art of creating what we don't want under the guise of denying or making war upon it as a mask of virtue set over a negatively conditioned imagination. The triggering of which can literally cause us to lose our relational sanity to archetypal and thus apocalyptic terrors.

While we can suggest that such archetypes are imprinted or hardwired as the Human Condition, I hold that the difference between conditions and conditionings is all the difference - where we have the gift of free awareness to observe and own our responses - and thus allow new choices of more truly aligned results. Thus I hold that our true Archetype is neither idealised form nor idols made in awe and terror, but is the Creative Will - of which we share as the awareness of existence - given and received in every thought, word and deed - regardless the overlay of code by which the personal sense operates as social masking realities.


The question on thunderbolts forum linked here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnGcTPNHR0k&feature=youtu.be
Where I also posted

I hold that the term 'recognise' is the same root meaning as the term 'word'

The sending forth meets a resonant recognition and behold (ie nothing actually leaves Source) It is Good (God).

There is no separation in Meaning but only in concepts of derivative meanings - and so in this sense the Original and Only Currency - is represented in our modelling mind as derivate meanings, and derivatives of derivatives - that adulterate a true or transparent appreciation as a filtering opacity of a bubbled off worldview or identity (both individual and collective or contextual).

All attempts to reassemble or reconstitute Reality - stem from the belief it is broken and also from the guilted fear of a sense of responsibility for breaking it - which is mitigated by assigning agency to others, to world, to god, and to viruses - as a kind of negative pass the parcel game in which guilt-reality is to be repackaged and passed on so as NOT to be caught with it when the music stops.

The idea that Cause was one with its Event is not at all circular but synchronous. The realm of cause and effect as a timeline is arbitrary, but necessary for our current functional consciousness. Orwell's quote on the control of the past as the means to use it to control the future (extend that past seamlessly as the repeating future) id the use of the Presence as a means of control - instead of the extending of presence to both past and future as one. THAT is Creative.

The idea of a god lording it over a (separate) creation is the posit of a separate masked off,  isolated and socially distanced mind - locked down in a body  and set in sickness, struggle and death. (The Fall idea). This can be seen as the inevitable or innate result of using presence as a possessive control for self inflation (boom) and its breakdown or adjustment to reality (bust). A kind of polarised   cycling from a unified 'flow'.

I haven't listened to the whole video - but the timeless is represented by the field  and has no material or physica 'existence' apart from its particular expressions. The vibrational field moves upon the waters and Is the waters as the patterning of expression within the field of resonant recognition - or 'knowing being'. But not as anything apart from or other than being.

The idea of knowledge as a possession and as a means of control is a derivative.And the identification with derivative realities is an experience of being possessed and controlled - or subject to the measure of your own word - and yet unrecognised amidst the reflection of conflicted premises and purposes. - thus leading to the belief that power is in the world of things in themselves and our word or thought is a wishful ghost in a Universal Machine. A fantasy seeking reinforcement or re-enacting upon the body of a world that forever dis-appoints its ideal.

#2

murphIf our universe is computer simulation, coronavirus is hacker's attack.

Do you mean our biological viral responses? or the mind-control of the assignment of pathogenic agency to such processes by protection rackets that are crowdfunding fear as a source of support for illusions of escaping or overcoming fear by limiting consciousness of life?