Robot Love

 

 

in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2024/11/23/robot-love/

 

 If there is no 'dead' matter but all is a vehicle of embodied expression, then the Life is not IN things and agency is not IN things.
That Mind can phish itself in its own thought, allows the projection of thought to a 'thinging' - while its underlying 'thinking' is 'backgrounded' to give the focus to the engaging of an experience.
The backgrounding is the rendering unconscious or subconscious of the whole from which the selective focus of the part is being played out.
Intelligence can be thus seen as split between the 'back-end' and the 'front-end' of interactive reflections and resonance of significance and value.
Mind is Creative, but when creativity is given to mythic construct, the created is no longer alive BUT for being given meaning or power that then frames or dictates 'choices' that are no longer creative though they may remain ingenious.
What we make is in that sense a machine, device or prop by which to persist in story while ignoring or masking out a true or whole relational awareness. Narcissus 'loves' empathy.

For, we are 'normalised' are we not? to perceive external agents as 'causes' or to perceive Cause as external - as being done to - if not unfairly treated, denied and deprived - at least somewhere within a story that we are sticking do - til death do us part... or perhaps that is also a prop to maintain the tension that frames the whole of who and what we are -in death or afterlife or as the agent of destruction if not damnation!

The reflection of the robotic dictate as technocratic systems – as much as robotic 'agents' or mechanoidal functions runs convergent with a robotification of 'humans' - that is of 'humans' framed and operated in image or screen replacement as 'running in movie mode' as a narrative over-rule of ideological 'social' survival.

The programming of robotic presentations as ingenious defence strategies against fear of pain of loss, is a machine defence. I may use the term ego for a self-imaged projection to which we are all partial - or as The Cat said to Alice, "We wouldn't come here".

But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here.
~ Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland

But to wind this up so as to move on in my day, the True Unconsciousness is God, or if you prefer Unselfconscious Joy in Being. Not all the discarded, suppressed, demonised, hated and feared self-denial that may be pushed out of a surface awareness but remains in the mind that thought it.
For thoughts do not leave the mind that thinks them - but in concept.


Last night we watched "Previously Saved Version'. Very much on the theme of Todd's reflections. I wont say anything about it except it contributed to the cultural reflection on machined humans and the 'ghost in the machine'.

Projection casts out.
Everything in the dream is cast from the mind of the dreamer.
Healing unto wholeness is where the script serves Reintegration and renewal.

 

 

 

Our Deep State

A deep state of dissociated fragmentation 'looks out' to see it own reflection.
The quality of free awareness is unified purpose - that All the king’s horses and all the king’s men can only seek to mimic in polarising attempts to 'push the big muddy'. Whence does a true, grounded and direct awareness arise?
Come on - its not difficult to acknowledge truth of being!
But deep habits are allowed to run unchecked.
Speaking to the robot is futile.
It cannot 'hear for you' only you can accept reality as it is - by putting the robot aside.
God is true Unconscious, yet can as well be called Superconscious.
The suppression of fears and hated material masks over the face of God - which is Holiness that cannot be found or imagined within a world set on guilting.
The projection of 'sins' (of error, conflict &confusion) runs a-tempt to get rid of THOUGHT outside itself and thus makes a world - not in truth but as a way of perceiving in different lights.
Jesus actually didn't 'forgive' but yielded judgement to the Father's Will - hence "Forgive them Father" or "Neither do I condemn thee". If we keep vengeance for our selves we think to resist evil as the arbiter of 'holy guilt' which is the root of all contradiction or double think set in 'loving to hate'.
By pausing reaction, we can call on what I call the Holy Spirit of a true discernment, for truth to reveal the situation to us - ie wisdom, as we can recognise, accept and embody.

Coming from a different place (from an uncarved block) is not polarised by reaction. Is not a manufactured or manipulated outcome and is not of the mindset of possession and control.

A blind eye becomes a habit.
The notion of an 'unconscious' is a framework by which which to categorise and articulate something of our thought-process in concept.

 

Mind forged manacles are bought+sold as 'freedom'.

They are not entirely imposed on 'victims'.

Some of this is of a collective will to engage in a 'self-will' running on false pretences that carry inherent 'overheads'

The true nature of a free will was exemplified by Jesus, but while he is made special as the crowning of a God demanding 'sacrifice', his teaching demonstration is subverted to a 'Care System' for virtue credits under systemic 'moral dictates.

There is a fundamental reversal in our current thought system that 'sees' all things awry and yet defends against messengers perceived threatening to its identifications of face and control.

Accepting healing for our own errors releases others and world from distorting projections, and release from conflicts otherwise deeply hidden.

That there is a collective arising from the choice to live in a 'dolls house' is inseparable from my subscription to its service - which runs on the conviction in its reality or necessity as survival in its terms.

Willingness to question reality has to rise from being itself - else it is not areal question but a statement of concept framed as a question.

To release claim to knowledge as a movement of life stirring within us, opens to receiving of or from That Which Knows. Not 'about' as a predictive controlling set of mapping definitions', but to know as to be one with - as a knowing field and not a parcelled off staked of claim in exploiting a 'commodity' or resource for private agenda set in mutually reinforcing contractual entanglements.

To be still and know - does not predefine or predictively shape the 'knowing' for such would not be the unconflicted willingness that only truth be true.

Facing Illusions

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cM3195Ho898

The video linked above looks at a particular effect arising from changing faces viewed peripherally.

@MKdGlu
Amazing! It would actually explain a lot on anthropology and the development of mythology.
@bishopp14
I've always wondered how much mythology came from people with vision issues living in a time with limited or no way to correct eyesight.

 

I'll posit that myth or 'story' of symbolic significance underlies 'object reality' as a continuum or 'time' set over experience of a split mind or separation trauma as a masking dissociation giving 'survival focus' as a 'consciousness' by which the split is rendered 'unconscious'. Faces communicate personae or masking aspects of the 'god' or characteristic quality of emotional/mental balance/imbalance in expression.
That the 'gods' are constellated in shifting alliances and oppositions is the basis for hyper-alertness to 'change in the Heavens', now operating as reading the room or the situation in play. This function is relegated to subconscious routines so as to allow a bubble of 'normality' as a stable or reliably predictable sense of self and world within a split or dissociative mind or focus.
The distorting faces illusion is partly framed in the release of the 'fixing continuity' of this focus to a peripheral awareness which can be called 'psychically sensitive or receptive' - receptive to information from wide field, but selectively sensitised to triggers relative to conditioned fears along with defences invoked to offset, allay or mitigate fear.
Staring at our own face in a mirror or a mutual session with another, face to face, will -if allowed' drop into peripheral awareness, open the realm of 'angels and demons' in terms of projections that can initiate self reinforcing feedback.
releasing projections to receive a true presence is giving a true with-ness. Without this centring or grounding quality, the enforcement of 'normality' will be aligned in as either the breaking or blocking of communication, or a contract to mask in social distancing - as in a clique without real intimacy or a psuedo-community. But from grounded acceptance of the moment as is, the synchronous smile of the eyes moves as one in the release of specific focus to the wider situation - the room, or the flow of relationship as a whole in the situation at hand.

Without the grounding embrace of the center - all attempts to 'correct sight' will war with our own unconscious conditionings and thus endlessly repeat or reinforce it in shifting narratives of self-inflations and destructions or boom and bust, relative to the 'gods' of our particular and collective alignment. Rationalisation as distinct from grounded Reason, seeks monopoly under ideals set over and apart from the 'mess' of life viewed unworthy and treacherous by contrast. Usurping the mind's true function is the 'split mind' of self-illusion by which we seek to gain for a split off self as our overriding or existential necessity or dictate. The focus of a mindset at war will override all wide-field or peripheral 'messengers' or evidences, as attempt to control reality 'externally'- which is clearly delusional and self-destructive - or rather denying our own 'wider' embrace' of creative being for the belief such a war makes sense or can be won.

There is an objective reality that is truly lived and shared, but that subjective bias discards or rejects for its own 'reasons' - but its unifying quality and characteristic is not an objecting rule and filter of imposed dictates, but in the nature of giving and receiving as one- which is a Gift that cannot be commoditised, patented, manufactured, weaponised or officially mandated.

We are always looking into the Face of Reality - but who is looking 'out'?
What we choose or accept sets the measure of our receipt.

To "Transhumanism, the Death of God, and Eternal War"

 

 

I have been mostly active on X within the discipline of succinctness alongside the 'focus of the day or the era as being perceived.

I might start a substack-but that's only a seed at the moment.

I do also comment into web articles but have not often posted them here, but as a way of showing I am active here are some of today's:

Transhumanism, the Death of God, and Eternal War – OffGuardian

https://off-guardian.org/2024/11/19/transhumanism-the-death-of-god-and-eternal-war/

We are always teaching... and learning from what we teach.
"Do as I say, not as I do" represents a split mind.
We can call it a masking adaptation to a loveless or conflicted world,
or an acceptance of the split-mind as psychic adaptation to the human conditioning, or Separation trauma by which a focus in and as a body masks and distances from underlying conflicts that are thus projected onto others and world - onto life as something 'other'.
Not least because an unconditional but undifferentiated love opens to or takes on conflict-solution as the terms or conditions of (its) being.
The child takes on the large unspoken conflicts, denials and exclusions of its family and cultural context as the expression of;
"Love is sacrifice, and demands sacrifice".
Here is the 'gaslighting' or guilting pact of victim and victimiser that masks its deeper conflict in the acting out of one-upmanship - where each seeks to get from the other - or get back from the other, what they believe they are unfairly denied, deprived of - or will be if they don't get the upper hand.
Socially masked coded behaviour is manipulative as the setting of conditions to the permission to 'love' or the 'justification' to hate - withdrawing & withholding a true with-ness for a masking substitute - such as a smile of condescending sympathy.

But love is not sacrifice nor does love demand sacrifice of anything but self-illusion - or False Evidence Appearing Real.

Invested self-illusions are accepted and defended as self. Their mutually reinforcing 'contagion' is rooted in their lack of truth. They cannot pass off as real without reinforcement, and thus the demand for sacrifice drives attack as the basis for existential survival or 'salvation'.
Special (or specially focused) hate is thus masked by special 'love'.

Self-specialness runs the same assumption and projection of 'separateness' in positive as in negative expression.
Its conflicts maintain a veil over the sacrifice OF love to a life set in fear's demand and locked down by guilting accusation - that teaches the same whether directed to self or other.

Can love enter fear and be real?
Is this not the psyop beneath the 'Great Projection' in which

“Everything is BACKWARDS; everything is upside down! Doctors destroy health, Lawyers destroy justice, Universities destroy knowledge, Governments destroy freedom, Major media destroys information, And religions destroy spirituality". ~Michael Ellner

'The lie and the father of it' is not a call to war but to truth.
For by 'choices' framed false is truth denied that self-illusion be 'satisfied'. But there can never Be satisfaction there, but only a hollowing out to externally driven dependencies.

Pain is not our true father, but pain is valid feedback for a willingness to learn of truth rather than persist in what doesn't work (or truly serve us now).

After writing all but the last 4 paragraphs I read with my companion in life the following:

Illusion and Reality of Love

Be not afraid to look upon the special hate relationship, for freedom lies here. It would be impossible NOT to know the meaning of love, EXCEPT FOR THIS. For the special love relationship, IN WHICH THE MEANING OF LOVE IS LOST, is undertaken SOLELY to OFFSET this, but NOT to LET IT GO. Your salvation will rise clearly before your open eyes, as you look on this. YOU CANNOT LIMIT HATE. The special love relationship will NOT offset it, but will merely DRIVE IT UNDERGROUND, and out of sight. It is essential to bring it INTO sight, and to make NO attempt to hide it. For it is the attempt to BALANCE hate with love that makes love meaningless to you.

The extent of the split that lies in this you do NOT realize. And until you do, the split will remain unrecognized, AND THEREFORE UNHEALED. The symbols of hate against the symbols of love play out a conflict that does not exist. For symbols stand for something else, and the SYMBOL of love IS without meaning, if love is everything. You will go through this last undoing quite unharmed, and will emerge AS YOURSELF.
~ A Course in Miracles

To comments on the page

Howard
Nov 20, 2024 3:25 PM


Perpetual war is anything but a modern phenomenon. History makes it clear that war has always been man’s natural state. And it’s not just for the sake of territory and resources – it’s equally for the sake of the human need to destroy. You see this from day one, when so many kids – not all but many – seem to go out of their way to destroy their toys. And it’s not just so they can get new toys – it’s equally for the sake of destruction itself. Aggression has always been the prime mover of humanity. In that regard, I firmly believe that this abomination called circumcision was established primarily to increase aggressive tendencies in males – to prime them to be better soldiers when they grow up. You cannot deliberately maim someone without instilling both fear and anger.
As to God: it died stillborn. It’s always been a means to an end; and to think otherwise is simply to deny human nature. Even if a particular God starts out nice and loving and advising restraint of human aggression (as the Christian God did) – it always ends up championing wars of conquest. Man’s imagination goes into overdrive coming up with ways to have God justify anything he does. God can never die because it was never alive. “My God can beat your God” has always been the essence of every religion ever conceived.
Transhumanism has but one synonym: unhumanism. Whatever the lunatics who espouse it imagine it to be, it is simply the antithesis of human. Period.
All of which leads to the one true and only possible meaning of life: to live.

By your own will you have your own reward.
But is it truly your will, or the acquired inheritance of the human conditioning? Running as if thinking to know.
Be-living the meanings we carve out and fashion into currencies issued by the teller, is a freedom to take the ride of a story for what we 'get out of it'.
But when the game is no longer worth the candle, the light being given it can be given elsewhere.
However the insistence that the game must deliver our identity will die in it - in rage or sacrifice or despair.
The light we give is all the meaning we shall ever know.
Gaslight and shadow gives & receives false witness.
Blessed are the poor in Spirit - though they deprive themselves a true Inherence while running off in the bait & provocation of a false or mis taken inheritance.

To truly live is to be truly moved.
Who would 'save his self' shall lose it.
Over and again.

Clutching at straws
Nov 20, 2024 12:40 PM
Reply to  antonym
It’s an interesting point.
How many of us think of ourselves as a transitory species ?
Because, without a doubt, that’s what we are

In this case I embrace a healthy scepticism.
I agree that we 'think of ourselves as'.
This is a creative act that can give itself to a habit, or mechanism of persistent error.
With a doubt, we can posit anything to conflict with what we (simply) are, and engage with its conflict as if reality depended on the outcome.
Our capacity to recognise or receive and extend truth is framed by vested judgements taken in or accepted true.
Illusions are temporary associations of imaged reality.
But they can reflect or resonate truth or obfuscate in conflicted denial of truth.

The transhuman idea is evident in the prevalence of 'humans' as a species, indeed a lab specimen. The self-hatred that runs beneath smug and arrogant cynicism is given expression in a self-generated mass extinction event. Gloating self-vindications reframe language to 'justify' the verdict.

The death of God is merely Self-attack masking as special knowledge. But God is not mocked any more than truth can be attacked by lies.
However our awareness and appreciation of truth can be attacked while doubt can be weaponised to guilting fears framed true.

Nunya
Nov 20, 2024 8:09 AM

You’ve got to start naming people who are responsible for this satanic trajectory they’ve put in motion.

Without scapegoats - all is lost!

Yes crime needs be checked else it runs uncorrected to corrupt the whole.
But the nature of corruption is at the level of our thought.

Naming Satan so as to take an identity in opposition isn't addressing what 'Satanic' represents in thought, perception and behaviour. In our own - and in our cultural framing or currency of believed & assumed 'knowledge'.

Self-illusions are temporary, for their conflict with truth drives their development or self-inflation as it does their disintegration of 'Fall'.

Responsibility for thought is abnegated to the belief we already know - which runs self protective and seemingly autonomous in both reinforcing or boosting its claim of function, and attacking, subverting or excluding 'threats' to its gain of fiction.

While we could say humanity is 'possessed', it would be more honest to notice we are dispossessed of true felt worth and value by a grasp on substitutions that run hollow and ghastly parody of life.

'Waking up' into variants of the same underlying reactive contagion, is just such a parody.
What is our true or innate responsibility to life, our self and others?
And what runs as the burden and yoke of guilting accusation and manipulation set in blame as the arbiter of sacrifice - by which 'the show must go on'?

Shall we look on - fixated in horror? Or look AT the horror in willingness to heal or release it's fascination to a wholeness NOT of our manufacture or control?

Todd Hayen
Nov 20, 2024 1:59 PM

Reply to  Sofia
I don’t think any of us know what God is. I don’t know if we are supposed to.

Change 'what' (object framing) to 'That'. (Resonance as recognition)
Knowing that God Is, would be redundant as a statement but for thinking to know otherwise.
The idea of 'meant to know' runs within a 'need to know basis' framed in a 'hierarchy' of knowledge - as in a pyramid of levels descending from the all seeing I. Which like a tower of Babel begat a confusion of split and shifting 'symbols' of fragmentation under 'all the king’s horses and all the king’s men'.

Only by loving can love know itself.
"Why tarry all night in the ruins?"

What we do think is active, but largely masked against thinking we suppress, hide & deny. Note the use of 'thought control' is increasing out in the open, yet only for selected examples.

Can we know what God isn't? - or rather what God does not create, sustain and love?
In the true sense of knowing - no!
For to know is to love.
Modelling (our notional thinking) can phish the mind of the thinker, but can as well be released to serve the reintegration to wholeness, instead of taking life apart to then put together in its own image.

sabelmouse
Nov 21, 2024 11:51 AM
i love this. I bless the world because I bless myself. it’s the wrong way around to our thinking.

Ok - but the innumerable instances in a day in which we deny a blessing to our self or others are the opportunity to recognise and release our script of self-denial and let the light in (of awareness to our willing appreciation).
Our attempts or intent to DO love as a counter to hate is the error I invite noticing.
Virtue shines of itself and to the recognition of a like quality in others. But false virtue must crown itself as attempt to claim the right to dictate reality by opposing evils, sins or lacks, (errors) perceived in others.

There is already living that moves or prompts or aligns us, but we are trained to attend only that which supports the self-image of our focus in our world. Opening to receive runs counter to the recoil of defences or the projection of attack.
Thus a wholeness of being - or the miracle - comes of itself into our willingness to receive.
Giving and receiving are one in truth, if not seeming so in time.
Giving to Get, actually 'gives' or teaches lack - as in an addiction affliction; the more you get the more you need to get rid of the pervasive underlying pain or dissonance of being that drives external seeking.
It is in the midst of such a habit that the miracle is needed.
'We do not create our self' is more than an intellectual argument, but what we make does 'make us in its own image' while we be-live it necessary, irrevocable or unquestionable

To Align in the Living

 in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2024/06/22/looking-forward-to-the-future/

 

 

To align in the living is to let the dead bury the dead - this is addressed to where we are giving attention, focus and value, which must include why? or for what?

The contextual framing of thought is effectively a form of programming that then runs sub-conscious or automatically as a shaping of values and goals.

Fragmented & compartmentalised consciousness may not seem so as the flow of experience under a continuity manager in which a capacity to mask over conflicts will assign or project them out to others an world - such as a workman blaming his tool.

All the 'functions' of an ego-framed experience are first in the consciousness before becoming developed as tools for collective frameworks of development.

Likewise 'They' - that is witting or unwittingly tooled manipulative and coercive deceivers - can only work the mark of a corresponding blind wishfulness or egocentricity such as driven by self-lack-driven envy, greed or lust - that run 'selfish' to use others (and true self) for fantasy gratifications that grow dependencies for Getting, in place of integral relationships of felt worth & value- freely shared in.

Focussing on the difficult (the fears that configure poor 'solutions', makes fear the master - even as it generates yet another 'solution' in which to mask over or mask out facets of our Consciousness that we hold out of alignment, in fear of pain, of loss.

But the means or conditions for joy of connected presence as its own freedom to be, feel and know life, re-establishes a basis from which to recognise reaction-habits as choices, as a freedom to not persist in choosing them, and to let life in as the More of who we truly are.

The Gift of our awareness of being is never going to become a tool of our own making, but that BY THE ATTEMPT we become tooled by contradictory thinking, to learn and teach a conflicted self and world framed in dispossession, scarcity, pain of conflict and deeply set defences against healing-threats to an insane reversal of mind-normalised as IF automata run by thinking.

We cannot truly leave the Gift of Awareness of Being, but are free to refuse or deny it for a gift we make for ourselves/each other, by which to no longer recognise either.

Self-alienation runs on a core curriculum of learned bias for 'getting' from a fear of lack & disconnection. Which arises or is relived when conditions are not met.

I WANT IT THUS! may be artfully concealed in masks of care and concern or justifictions of nurtured grievance.

SEE WHAT YOU HAVE MADE ME! runs the undercurrent accusation to a life, a past and others who reiterate its deprivations and denials as a persistent state of offence, from which to mask, distance, suppress or deny-by withholding an acknowledgement of being - ie 'blanking'.

There are many ways to look on or think on our 'ego' of masking defences, but insofar as they operate moral guilting manipulations they remain within the frame of fear masking in love that 'turns to hate' (because it was but a permission to love set on conditions of compliance).

Self-image or self-consciousness is a part of our toolset, as a vehicle and focus for thinking, feeling and participating in the human experience. That a part of the mind is phished by image and form as a realm of possession and control - is as simple as grasping at beauty or recoiling from fear of dispossession. There's the 'Fallen Angel' as your own archetypal patterning. We all share the 'ego' of a sense of lost love or power-by which both become distortions of each other: love of power set over love made powerless, frail and in need of boosting protections.

The Way of undoing self-illusion set to collective pandemonium is very different to the way in - that we have learned as a second nature set over against our first - and thus projecting its toxic consequences onto life, nature and being.

Regardless what we can each make of our self and world, "God is not mocked!" means truth remains true! Re-alignment to trust in being cannot be done as a further adventure in ego-framed going forth to Get - but is the recognition and release of what doesn't work and cannot work, in willingness to receive truth (as distinct from mind-manufactured means to make a future solve a past that isnt here now - except we stamp it on the presence that Naturally -of itself- expands and extends Future of unfolding Potentials.

The art of not getting in our own way is the way of unselfconscious joy in living. This necessarily meets the obstacles to joy that we (each and all) have - for our own reasons set as limits or disqualifications by 'judgements' that may come from our world yet resonate in our self-or they wouldn't have 'taken root'.

Thinking about or judging 'sheep' is a generalising intellectual perspective that hardly engages with or meets living ones in whatever unique expression of masked and defended 'self-presentation'. Yet the choice for unconsciousness seeks reinforcement through a call to join in the mask that overlooks or looks away from the Living.

If we are not awake to the living, our self proclaimed 'awakening' is yet another movie-variant within shifting narratives set in war for 'truth' as the last judgement.

But just to bring this simple - life is felt through us in the living as a natural or unforced giving. The fruits or reflections come back to us from our world and our relationships in like kind, freely. The substitution for Reality by imaged symbols, meaning-maps, rational models and coded screen output set up a game of deadly competition where 'They Live' on the 'Sleepers' - as a covert identity raised from the death or denial of the living.

How many identify with the aliens in that movie?

Blanking life to Get a self as a self-alienation running dark mode.

True Genesis is neither a book or a code complex - and cannot be brought into a false-framed mindset by religion or science.

The Movement of and within Being is not limited to time and place, but an ever unfolding and embracing All That Is. Honest desire and conscious intention align naturally when masked agenda is no longer given automatic authority.

 

 

 Locked down Globalism
as a Mindset

 in response to the themes in:

Sincerity by Blaž Kavčič | Chișinău Forum 2024

at https://iurierosca.substack.com/p/sincerity-by-blaz-kavcic-chisinau/

Thankyou.

I don't see the stated 4 dogmas (democracy, money, CO2, virus) as more than engineered pretexts for banksterism of marketised & weaponised 'knowledge'. Ie: manipulative deception seeking gain of function (in its own private terms set against the unrecognised or feared whole of life).

The underlying dogma I see is a psychically driven physical determinism that in effect demands or guarantees the false flagged 'cause & diversionary displacement from truly addressing anything, by engaging in solutions that persist and protect the problem, as shaped BY authoritative & insidious narrative control that repackages problems as 'solutions or assets'.

In the 2008 crash it was noted that toxic debts (worthless promissory notes treated as real assets) were hidden in complex financial instruments that were then marketed as worthy assets. This pattern is endemic to a banksterism of system capture and manipulation running on the ideological premise of closed system thinking set in cybernetic technologism. This logic breaks communication or trust as a qualitative field of shared being to assert life treacherous and unworthy by usurping the functions of the field of relational honesty as the judgements of private self-interest 'generalised' and weighted as an imposed hierarchy of dominance and control. In short the accept and and assertion : life is war, such that all else is a means to serve it, and any other 'god' is false, heretical and a threat that must be countered, subverted or brought back into the fold of war.

Conflicts are thus the food and energy supply for a mindset of control.

Masking conflict to false premises & false profits is a function of a mind or will of persistence in self-imaged experience. Self-imaged 'reality' is not a sin, but a facet of creative imagination. Persisting in self-illusion by attacking truth is where errors compound to a guilt that generates blocks to communication with or from the unworthy, hated or feared.

Self-honesty or depth of sincerity is difficult to embrace while guilt conflicts frame thought, perception and response. Self-judgement or self-hate can and does project to our relationships and world. Bringing this or rather allowing this to come into awareness rather than engaging the mindset of masking and distancing is where we regain truth in Self and Life because we do not and can not manufacture the Gift of being, which is always or already given and reveals its nature as our own by sharing in like kind. An Innocence of being is uncoverable to our willingness to receive and extend it. Not a relative 'innocence' framed under shadow and threat of guilt and 'sin' as the worship of our own mimetic judgement as pre-emptive sacrificial mitigation of full Disclosure.

The mask of self-image is set against disclosure as existential survival.

But Who told you you were 'naked' (lacking presence or conflicted and susceptible)?

 

Who Has Ears To Hear?

 in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2024/06/08/ai-and-commercial-music/

 

 Artificial music has degrees of removal from source-inspiration.
Music as pharmakon developed an externally assisted focus for inducing specific feelings & states of consciousness. Developing a theme is part of human exploration and experience. Becoming trapped in and subjected to or driven by our themes is a result of the "Fallen Angel" syndrome. Phished by self-image to be-live the experience of a lens of artifice. To grasp the image & form of desire as the symbol of a self-lack seeking union by possession or control.
The manipulation and manufacture of image and form applies no less to music than any other medium of exchange, as a-tempt to make love, get power or enforce peace by means that compound conflicts to toxic dissonances that can only be undone or healed at the level of their arising - a sense of driven self-lack framed in getting - for a sense of self & life framed in opposition, deprivation and denial.

To yield through the expressing to the movement of our being is a profound or total fulfilment. For by truly giving we receive and only by receiving can we truly give.

Back from the backstory to the modernity of a machine-mind...

Studio produced recording represents a significant shift from a living relational co-creation to a product for milking or generating markets and mindshare - in this case identity-forming musical backdrop to formative experiences. Recorded musical production interjected a machine between giver and receiver. But to the normalised or aculturated, this is invisible - and to a large extent a real musical intimacy is reframed as not real - as it isn't through the official medium'. The 'audience' wants a fix, a psychic need to be stroked in favourite ways, replay their lives back - while iphones are held aloft as a further seeking of self-validation. "Did you get that?"

Some dance to remember, some dance to forget.

Remember what?
Forget what?
Love and pain are woven together in our human experience.
By seeking to mask or blot pain out, we can engage fantasy as a form of regressive unconsciousness. There's a market opportunity to cell the mind to substitution for the intimacy of Soul-connected movement of being.

For some time now I found Crassmas to have become such a 'Satanic' artifice of marketised and mutated ritual as to welcome its breakdown, for the truth of the Christ within is a holy instant within time - yet unbound by it. Transcendence of limitation at the heart is not waiting on anyone or anything to happen - or not happen, but a flow or flowering of an already-fulfilment. My cup runneth over.

Music of art is re verbing being, such that object models become transparent to the joy that can never be contained - such that in one form or another a music is in play.

'Artists' may shine into times that cannot or care not to recognise the gift, perhaps allowing a gift without strings attached? That can then serve a true seed in any other moment of time and space, past or future. Where else is inspiration but from a Now that we can not manufacture or conform to any presentation of self, life or world.

Who has ears to hear - let them hear!

 

 Integral Wholeness of Being
Not Afterthought

 

Misperceptions give rise to and rise from defended identity - to then frame reinforcement for misperception as suffered or subjected reality.

The principle reversal to be healed is at the level of mind, where body and world are assigned causative or creative agency relative to a subjective adaptation or identity of defended or 'justified' judgements, that 'share' a mutually agreed self & world as framing of unconscious definitions and beliefs; perceptions & responses; habits & rulesets.

The theories of karma seek 'other lives' to 'justify' punishment. There Is no punishment but this: as you judge, so are you judged' Note the present tense also applies to the wages of sin Is death.

To communicate this to a mindset of linear cause and effect as separated, requires intuitive discernment, for all of our concepts filter and subvert to a reinforcement of such a premise - which runs as the 'father of the reversal' of Natural Order, to the focus in the physical experience - as we frame our 'reality' - rather than  recognition of psycho-physical or spiritual expression in no way separate from its active Cause, Nature & Condition.

Hence masking and distancing to a premise of pre-emptive attack is our 'toolkit' for survival AS a mind & face of private judgement as a means to limit, control or block & filter Universal Communication. When the mask fails to maintain the continuity of a 'closed system', it is reset as if exposure of its fallacy or lack of substance never happened - or shall not be accepted - such that and Open Channel of Communication is not only blocked, but framed and demonised as threat.

The framing of idea through which we think and perceive is a creative faculty.
The development of conception and perception overlaid an underlying nature of having, being and knowing - which we have temporarily discarded or 'lost' - for the focus of experience, exploration and consciousness development as both extension and reflection of a qualitative non-physical 'light' or Self-Awareness - as distinct from a 'self-conscious reflex' within awareness, by which we grow or adapt a self for the world that we also cocreate at a deeper or prior movement of being.

I essayed to sketch this from where I stand rather than engage within the frame of a reversal consciousness because I hold that the 'physical separation' is winding up to a mass 'death' or dead end from which I see the freedom to recognise and release the lie and the father of the lie that is not merely in the bad actors or agencies of evil that we can see, but blocks the beam of light in our own vision.

The extension of love is not an act of a self, but a willingness to receive and give as one. Hence the restoration and renewal of a true self that undoes or heals the misperceptions and countermeasures of the false or mis-taken identity. Without a recognition and release of attempts to mask and 'mitigate' or seek gain or credit by 'caring' framed as an independent authoritative act, the substitutions for love operate as a basis for denial of exposure to a lovelessness that properly understood is the Call for love in truth. But our ego-defences can not understand anything BUT a call to war, to judge, to blame and to punish, cancel or exclude.

It is our own Temple (focus of devotions in life) that needs 'sweeping' of what has no true belonging, else we 'see' the sins of others as our own justification or mitigation.
This is not to say everyone else is in the 'right mind' either, but a grounded reference point is not the basis for resetting a reversal in a new set of robes.

Now if everyone reads this with the thinking mind, then the patient is indeed 'completely under'.
Not to demonise any facet of our being, but what we generally call the mind has to pause so as to allow receipt of a 'knowing' that cannot be conceptualised or patented, but does align intent and desire in unified purpose. Not our agendas or counter measures, but of a wholeness of being to which we are integral - not afterthought.
 

 

I posted this into

The Profound Decline of America's Scientific Institutions

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-profound-decline-of-americas/
 

Do Ideas mutate the minds that host them?

Do Ideas Mutate the Mind that Hosts Them?

That Ideas goes forth to multiply (Is) Creation.
Garbage in; garbage out applies temporarily as freedom to mask conflicted thought in a fragmenting mutual self-reinforcement of private thought split off from integrality of being.
'A bit on the side' has its own invested identity-protective 'self-interest' and 'self-reinforcement' drawing from the field of active and passive support- as conditioned habit.
Such defences are made to mask or limit true creation, thus run as machine-thinking as 'self-protective' adaptation & resilience to risk or threat to persisting as (our) guide/protector).
Ideas thus mutate in minds that host them - as the mindset of a hacked or hijacked thought, perception and response.
If Self-evasion is understood to run undercurrent to 'self' survival in terms of invested 'skin in the Game', then the lie given power to mask & protect or distance from denied truth, represents a choice to enter, entrance or engage in a world of experience though the lens of mutually agreed self-illusions that provide the focus for -and in- a world we learn to think and see and experience as a compelling reality - of inhabited idea-projection, that can - in the sense of 'fallen angels' become a compulsive addictive identity - driving a depleting and destructive exchange of Soul or felt awareness as participance of being, for a world of progressive mutative fantasy gratifictions - of seeking value fulfilment in the hollowing out of the heart of a true receipt.
Our ego as Guide & Protector then, knows us not, but attends the defence of the bubble or encapsulation of a bubble of life set in a bit on the side that may have initiated a dream but then set the terms of a nightmare in which attempted escapes only reinforce the terms and conditions within 'solutions' that merely shift psychic energies to mask the pain and loss in a re-brand of sacrifice as virtue.

Predictive control is invoked as a modelling of Reality or Creation as security set against fear, lack and conflict. This is not because the body or forms of tangibility and visibility so defined, but because we so accepted definition under contract to mask and distance from the fear of denial that generates active denials. Hence the attack or denial of body and world as unworthy, weak, unreal, weak, and treacherous - to the 'mind' of a split that judges according to its own artificial lights - indeed gaslighting - as the use of guilted fear for persisting private or covert identity manipulation. It is this level of mutual agreement that binds love's expression (you) to a realm of sacrifical subjection seeking credits of remiussion or mitigation - as a 'better' version within the terms & conditions of a Game whose first rule is that it is not a game.

The narratives direct the attention and funding to the means to mutate or shift the narratives masking as thescience of a technologised psyop - that runs through our own beliefs, definitions and assumptions.
In very simple terms the story of Job posited an oppositional adversity to a native faith or self-honesty of being, as a means to shift the cultural consciousness from stark terror to initiate Communication within the Vortex of Infinite Power. Satan's wager was that Created Man was but a robot or conditioned react. A hackable animal. As such this represents our own fear of self-lack, self-conflict and self-solving mask of technologism - or thought that explicates to a tooled world of externalised 'solutions'.
But WHO told you you were naked? said the Lord?

 

This reflection was prompted by the complexity of a culture of fragmentation in

https://wrenchinthegears.com/2024/05/21/bobby-goes-ape-signaling-austins-lunar-punks/

But isn't a reference to its contents, but a pointer to seek the underlying patterns within a realm of obfuscation.

Shock That Splits The Mind

 The Shock that Splits the Mind in the Body

 in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2024/05/25/and-the-cancer-keeps-rolling-in/

 

Reductive physical determinism represents the assignment of Causation to external factors producing physical effects (That extend or multiply a chain of cause and effect).

This negates, discards or downplays the psychic element of a psycho-physical experience - albeit perceived through a dark glass of its own thinking.

Because such a 'consciousness' or definitional posture is socially, culturally and economically normalised, it runs invisible BUT for its effects or fruits of experience.

Yet conflicts, incongruences & dissonances are effectively remapped to support the original thesis of a separated or encapsulated 'self' seeking externally for connection and sustenance as survival and fulfilment within the frame of mortal threat.

The pattern here is of a life-shock by which a mind is split from it true source and nature to operated from a false or mis-taken inheritance - ie from separation trauma associated with fear of pain and of loss, set in rejection, abandonment, treachery & betrayal.

To the post-separation psyche, nakedness is undefended, and shame is an exposure to lack of having, knowing and being - hence the invocation of the masking defences of the means to distance, divert, displace, deny and obfuscate - a mindset we see more readily in others rather than recognise ourself in.

When fear is projected to a 'solution' by which to scape it from our mind, we give the power of mind to the elements and arena of its premise as a gain of function – to boost the mask of 'defences' by sacrifice of 'conflicted' life to external associations or answers.

That this can relieve temporarily makes it expedient as a temporary measure against overwhelm under fear, but as a basis for protecting conflicts from healing, runs a death wish of refusal to love or give & receive a wholeness of being - at 'cost' of invested identity in defences.

Death wish operates on many levels, such as to take many forms, and a collective loss of joy in being collapses to 'normalised' despair framed in psuedo-community that seems to join while maintaining distance against knowing and being known truly.

But we are sharing in the realm of life-shocks and countermeasures that reveal more threat than the conditions they are purported to defend against.

The experience of operation covid - regardless the shaping of our individual pathways of perception and response - was shocking. The countermeasures were also shocking. The consequences on many levels of our participation in these is shocking, and yet while the shock is active, many symptoms are suppressed. It is as we start to heal or regain perspective that the healing phase or release of shock from our body-mind manifests as symptoms of what our current culture attacks as 'disease' caused by alien or external powers.

Such is the scape-value of the war on 'disease', that it has become systemic as an institutional, corporate and financial capture of the mind that made it. The sacrifice of truth in life for idol, model or invested self image renders itself to a false god of possession as control - by which to become dispossessed of all that we have and know and be.

Not in truth! But in concept of minds set in lies given power to usurp our own recognition, and sharing or extension of true with-ness and worth-ship.

What are the respective life-shocks running through the shock-hyped 'pandemic' and its unfolding of coercive and deceitful countermeasures?

Opening perspective on our being - as distinct from enacting countermeasures of learned or acquired self-interest in the frame of what I wrote above, is not a basis to release from responsibility for criminal acts, but the law for correction of error to the restoring of a true peace needs address underlying social and cultural terrain - else it becomes a mechanism for scapegoating collective blame to socially or politically defined 'diseases' that can be arbitrarily framed by the manipulation of narrative or mythic identity, especially in the mask of science, but clearly generating a market in equally manipulative anti-science identities.

 

The Compleat Angler - A Cast Away

 The Compleat Angler - A Cast Away From Being Caught

in response to the themes in:
https://off-guardian.org/2024/05/19/the-killer-instinct/
by Edward Curtin

 

Value-fulfilment is integral to being (& thus to being you).
Seeking outside ourselves is a world of conflicting or competing values. But the experience arises from a creative 'casting out' and being caught!
Aligning our giving & receiving has an outer aspect - wherever your focus is actively manifesting-such as sport, or writing as a quest-ionic uncovering of 'deeper fishing' by which to undo or release 'being phished'.
Are we ready to be 'realed in'?
or is there something 'out there' that MUST be different than it is, because we made it an image of self-conflict. How many hoops must a man jump through...
That Gorilla suit attention test comes to mind.
Your mission; count how many times the basketball bounces.
Identity contracts to such an external fulfilment as value 'achieved' - excitement! Don't take your eyes off the ball!
A spotlight hides far more than it illuminates.
Such is an attention to a received situation- whether incisively focused or fragmented and diluted.
A Field-awareness is always and already beneath, prior & embracing our harvest of each according to its kind.
 

Non duel awareness is not locked down in conflicts seeking external fulfilment but embracing the richness of polarities that might once have been appreciated as life engendered.
My first angling catch was a perch - a stunningly uncategorisable experience that I didn't know how to respond to. It wasn't properly hooked as it wriggled off the bank back into the lake while I stood there like a boy whose first date says "yes". I regained my wits to run and tell my siblings and parents in the pent up excitement that outweighed the 'got away' - "I caught a fish!". None of them believed me, but laughed at me as if nothing had happened ergo I was nothinged.
Themes of our lives repeat like a tapestry in so many different situations and perspectives.
Now I am caught by a life I thought to run off with as mine to win friends & influence people or at least be someone to someone else.
James Carse writes in 'Infinite Games' that we seek to prove we are not who we think our parents* think we are. You may need to read that again.  (*or other significant placeholders for authority - that are inherently facets of our self).
Casting out is projection. It has been said Man is the measure of all things - or that as a Man thinketh, so he is. Giving and receiving are one without a second, but in time we can seem to scape our unwanted consequence or fruits to others, to world or a life gone wrong-including our bodies.
A Prodigal wasteland is really a reflection of an inner landscape or terrain - like factory pharmed humanimals or laboratory experience.
All truths can be misused or 'taken in vanity' as a permission slip to mask agenda in covert identities judged real. yet all that we deny or 'kill' thereby now lives within us as the shadow to a right to be seen, honoured and accepted.
It is fashionable to say 'everything is connected', as a cutting edge science in search of a Spiritual connection - or value fulfilment. I'd say that nothing can truly be disconnected, but that we die trying, over & over & over again. A resonant integrity of being need take no thought for itself alone and apart, nor teach another they are what we do or don't need them to be.
Balance points of consciousness are more of a fluidity of renewal within flux than a lockdown to an Ideal by which endless hoops are manifested from failure by design.
Biodiversity of consciousness is aligned purpose of joy in being (and thus being you).
Neither forcing inclusion or exclusion as the fish is one with the current flow of living waters.

I didn't set out to copy - but to join with, which for me always involves a tuning into qualities. I don't mimic other's songs, but give them life through my attunement to the spirit of their being through me. But I have appreciated a 'give & take' or dance of qualities through words and meanings of value appreciated and felt in the singing.
Judgement is a killer instinct. I now see that first fish was a greater gift than if I'd netted it to show my score and claim to title. New eyes to see release a tired world else I let baited react engage in futilities of hype-fully framed netting. Not because action is uncalled forth, but because ungrounded reactions block a true Calling - that cannot be defined externally to 'resolve a past in a future' by sacrifice Now!
I drowned a poisoned & dying mouse once - I'd found it on the lawn. There is a spirit that comes into the release that honours the spirit of life in death - when the mind is not 'charged' with the function of control.

Masking Presentations,
True With-ness and Discernment

 

in response to the themes in:

Propaganda, Sincere Speech, and the Intuition of the Samurai
Mattias Desmet

An article I appreciate and found much to feel at home in.

 

 

What can we believe?
I would discriminate between acquired or inherited beliefs - which are for the most part internalised frameworks through which we think and 'see' our self and world, and the beliefs we seek to add to ourself as if to become an identity that offsets, masks or solves our self-lack or self-conflicts.
Apart from both of those is what I step forth in acceptance of in active with-ness and worth-ship. The form of the belief is secondary to the qualities or virtue extended and shared in. Hence it operates as a vehicle or instrument for a communioned appreciation of a living moment, situation or opportunity for joy in life and thus for healing to the restored awareness of joy in being.
The power of the mind in beliefs is such that our safety from self-deceit is in our defencelessness or 'not knowing' such as to ask and receive answer rather than reactively strategise to pre-emptively judged situations. Power given to conflicted thought brings conflicting results. Garbage in; garbage out applies! If we are receiving a conflicted self and world, we have a basis of feedback to guide our curiosity. But guilting blame aborts the native movement of curiosity. So our inner gaslight is an active block to our own acceptance and awareness of truth - that is self-honest revelation - not any intellectual or mythical construct of claim or invoked belief.

There is always another way of seeing this.
Some point out the language of psyop persists its contagion, but another is the inversion of ego assumptions that frame us in self-depreciation.
An experience or indeed era of propagandised deceit is rising through our awareness.
Yet we live in God. I don't care if you don't like to use the word God - just feel directly into the awareness of existence as living this situation while thinking is given a rest.
What in our heart's honesty can we simply not believe? Even if the world (our adaptive survival) demands it?
What I am - (with you) is infinitely greater - than any framing of belief I might set forth to live and share the fruits of - but by living this step now I open perspective fin willingness for a greater embrace of all that I am - for you are part of my peace even if I May currently perceive you as a failure to meet my terms and conditions! (ego).