Nanoscale as a novel vector for leveraging the mass-mind?

 

The novel is always weaponisable or marketisable to the imaginations (creative faculties) of the masking agenda both to hide in and to use to hide from.

I came here (https://swentr.site/news/612723-alarming-media-reports-microplastics/ )

via comments under an excellent article by Sasha Latypova
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/faking-fakery-the-prequel-how-theranos/

Claim of function is pitched and leveraged for private gain of fiction. Some scams run for decades before being dropped. Others become foundations on which to build more 'stories'.

Fear runs as conflicted predicates. Masking fear seeks to unify a 'winning' order over un-owned or projected and denied conflicts. It's a specific use of the creative (mind) against itself.

All particles are such as expressions of relational field-forces, and their interactions and changes or exchange and organisation is the 'embodiment' of such field-forces. An object-reality gives primacy or cause to objects and conditions as if independent or autonomous agents of change - which effectively 'personalises' projected aspects of the mind of the perceiver.

Consent to experience embodiment is 'will to live' - not merely survive in terms of a face or control set on object-continuity but be and share in the appreciation and exchange of Life - 'Life' capitalised to indicate the relational field of all apparent 'forces' of attraction and transformation.

Masked agenda runs a face of 'justifictions' that collectively operate as mutually agreed virtue and 'necessity' masking against (fear of) attack. Tyranny would normalise terrorism masking as order, by countermeasures against scapegoated proxies for active agenda running 'dark'.

Self-contradictions or self-judgements can be compartmentalised, dissociated and set in 'solutions' that protect the split against direct exposure to conflict, and thus protect against healing in truth. Seemingly lesser ills or evils are chosen as the escape from a greater fears running as fear of the 'Unknown' which is the suppressed or denied 'Unconscious'.

The above was prompted by

a comment to the article:

‘It doesn’t harm us’: Russian scientist busts myths about microplastics

Alarming media reports about the harm of microplastics to the human body and the environment are greatly exaggerated, Alexei Khokhlov has told RT

 

Isabella H wrote:

2/16/2025 at 10:39 AM

I welcome this article which takes some of the FEAR that they again are trying to create in humans.
What I however consider dangerous are nano-particles, nano-plastics, because the nanoworld acts on other principles, being so much smaller than micro and not having fully been explored and tested yet. Nanolipids are known to be dangerous, nanodust can be weaponized… and they can be added to food, water, air, soil, without our consent or even our knowing its there…