Who trusts what?

Who trusts what?

 

in response to the themes in:

A Midwestern Doctor

This also raises another question; at some point you have to trust someone, so who do you trust?

That said, Matthew Crawford has made what I believe is the most important point. For movements to succeed, their leadership has to be decentralized, so there isn't a leader that can be targeted to destroy it. In my case, the influence I have on this is purely on the basis of if what I say makes sense and people want to agree with it, not because I told them to do something, and I think that lots of people doing that is the best possible scenario.

 

There are two parts to this:
Who is?
And what is trust?
Because our current 'answers' are predicating a breakdown of communication as a starting point.
Which in some sense could be described as mass-dissociation or separation trauma.
But trust is fundamental to being. It is integral communication.
Do we trust our self? Our life? Our being?
or are we split between unselfconscious functional being - of what comes naturally to us - and the thinking or mind of masking controls set in personal and social survivals that mostly focus on learned habits for getting what we need or want that rise along with getting rid of what we don't want - in terms of suppression of our natural being for the sake of family and social order and inclusion.

So 'who do I trust?' will be answered by 'what am I currently or actively extending trust by accepting identity from? But who can even pause to ask or notice if they are already identified by their thinking so as to see only what it frames them in? This 'trust' runs blind and knows not what it does - because it comes from a mask that hides to 'make you safe'. When the world breaks such a trust -  as it must seem to do, we have opportunity to choose anew, but if we take offence in 'betrayal' we will double down in our story to effectively withdraw and withhold trust from living, to give instead to control, as fear of pain of loss averted - or at least masked out of what we set and defend as our distanced and masked 'self'. Trusting 'defences' against fears that are not here but that we thereby stamp them on our present as if slavery is freedom. For if we seek freedom in terms of personal escape from natural consequences, we will give trust to whatever seems to give power to protect an unconsciousness to pain set in distrust of self, life and others.

All the animals have their home, but the son of Man hath no place to rest - points to the nature of free will as a process of transforming consciousness - not a world in which to sleep and die - try as we may!
In this sketch is trust in the nature and flow of communication - to the freedom of any who alight in it from and for their own resonances of value - if any - to where they are now. In this I live and grow what I am consciously trusting to, as an unfolding fulfilment that shares, instead of a need to get boosted, liked or stroked by agreement -or even being noticed. So that there is also a freedom to deeply appreciate interaction as a communion of being - and live this even to those who respond with emotional reactions that in some sense code for what they haven't clearly articulated to themselves yet.

Decentralised. Yes in terms of a conscious culture held in enough individuals such as to be a leadership of fluid synchronicity by exercising leadership - which is following by listening to then act or speak with and for the whole situation - instead of taking roles and not releasing them, or giving roles as a way to escape them. Fundamental to this is that true communication is honoured as a recognition of the power of hearing and speaking. That a voice and desire for self-inclusion CAN be heard and received. Forced inclusion is not 'safe' but tyrannous. Forced decentralisation no less. The process of relationship as communication is life, Jim - but not as we know it!
(Star trek ref). 

Our desire to concretion or structure this is part of an impulse to posses & control - that underlies a mindset of predictive control. Which is not evil, but needs follow or serve Conscious purpose or shall deliver us unto evils that it was set by fear to defend against.

Siding with true freedom must live and share it - or becomes the thing it hates - unwittingly.
In human terms this is messy - in that we meet the emotional dissonances set in judgements that WERE part of our basis for distrust or dissociating from, but with some willingness to listen past the appearances, to feel through the reactions, to give as we would in truth receive.

My sense of the breakdown being revealed is of bringing a deeper questioning to who and what for, in place of persisting in futility as if 'this time' it will be different. Most of this is under Herod's radar! Or if you prefer is outside Sauron's mindset. Power in life is invisible to seeking power over life. But having taken the fruit we have taken on the self it gave us; "I Want It Thus!". I may not think I think this - but that deep or bitter grief reveals the grasp that failed.
he who binds unto himself a joy
Does the winged life destroy
but he who kisses the joy as it flies
lives eternity's sunrise
~ Blake

I trust the living - not the packaging.
I am no man's judge
including myself!

#2

Further to my other response I come back to this one.
When you release your version of another, you also release your judgements of yourself. This is not obvious, but demonstrable in practice. You can now trust the field of communication that flows or aligns without distortion - no matter what the situation or who you are in relationship with.
'Thinking' will misinterpret this because 'thinking' in the sense I am using it, is a product of symptom of distrust - or more accurately, trust in believed defences.
Because we cannot 'do' this from a control mindset, we make love impossible in practice but set as an ideal by which we 'fall or fail'. But the release of invested focus in judgemental 'thinking' allows unselfconscious flow of relationship in which we 'know how to be' in relation to what is current.
The alternative is to 'trust' in terms of social contracts, stated or otherwise, such that if conditions are not met, love turns to hate (rather than permission to share relationship). That our social masking becomes invisible doesn't mean our normal is natural! The extreme end of such 'trust' is the control file or bought and captured status of 'trusted' servants, or the elitist initiatory sacrifice of shared identity for insider status via acts that 'show loyalty' by breaking moral sensibilities for the group - which is a sort of mutual blackmail for cultic lock-in.
Likewise the "vaccine hesitant" are seen as lacking 'trust' that must be manipulated by incentivised manipulations (!).
So trust is fundamental. In fact, without trust, self-honesty will not be allowed, and as we can see, this means we are owned and controlled by the lies that we have accepted and used as our own 'defence' against a pathological or treacherous life - that as part of our self-belief, extends to our perception others.
Our capacity to become attached to the forms of life is how we relax vigilance by trusting appearances to sort of run themselves while we 'take the ride'. Yet precisely because something becomes 'trusted' sets it as the form or idea to 'mask in' as a way to seek gain of function from 'blind trust'. Without a true discernment, there is no 'movement' that doesn't soon faction to mutual distrust - helped along by the baited memes and  psyops of mind/emotional management. And I note that fear porn is just as much a proclivity of the 'health freedom movement' - not as a blame but as an awareness that we are so deeply condition to the ways of thinking that characterise our subjection, not our freedom. trusting words and phrases as if we know what they mean - within an emotional or even intellectual exchange. perhaps, I think because we are not used to taking open responsibility for our own thought and word amidst social expectations of 'normal' or risk social exclusion. Covid Op revealed fear of social exclusion set by guilting as 'virtue' to be very deep-seated.

Abiding in Integrity of being

Abiding in Integrity of being

 in response to the themes in:
https://mikestone.substack.com/p/debunking-the-funk/

(Remaining in integrity when meeting an intent to undermine, attack or invalidate the messenger as a means to block a message without engaging in communication).

 

It may seem like you stand in a cesspit, but you stand in the truth as long as you don't accept the framing of self-deceit as anything worthy of engaging in.
The wisest path I feel, is to see the assertion or claim for existence as an offer, that you provisionally accept, subject to receiving supported answers to a list of reasonable questions that would then validate the claim. Without which the offer is left unsupported and of no substance as a basis in law.
If you make counterclaim, you present a claim that can be required to likewise be challenged or called to account - not just with clear questions that could be answered, but into every kind of trick, trap and burden on your time, energy and resources.
Likewise for all of us who are not only unconvinced of virology's basis and its offshoots such as vaccines - but are aware of many fraudulent claims. A sense of moral outrage can be quick to react in counter-claim that them initiated a 'battle of wills' or polarised defence against an enemy - which is unproductive and actually protects the issues for m being investigated due to the invested identity in an outcome.
I would encourage NOT to merely assert non- existence as if 'we are right and they are wrong' as if persisting the same position 'should win' when it becomes tedious or going over and over the same points. This means to integrate and expand our own sense of the issue in all of its many aspects by teaching it.
This also becomes an ongoing education that opens both personal understanding and appreciation as well as sharing and growing in a culture of worth. Otherwise we grow an anti-culture or identity that fixates on what we don't want as a basis to get what we think we want (ie self-vindication).
As for engaging with abuse, I feel that if people resort to such reactions and persist after some reflection or notification of it invalidity as a communication - then there is no relationship, and no call to answer or persist in a pretense that masks as communication in order to hijack the mind and replicate its 'thinking'. There's your 'virus'. We can be certain it is out there seeking to get us because we automatically project our own intentions to others, as if real if we still engage such manipulation and believe it real.
Contagion is a subset of communication - indeed a reception to transmission. This has been applied to ideas sin who knows when, and is akin to the idea of corruption. There is a realm of antecedence to the 'rational projection of virus particles' that is avoided within a science that has been trained to discard, downplay of dismiss Mind, the Psyche or Soul as a form of immunisation against communication unless it supports the current rules and filters of assertions running as 'self-evident reality'. So I would use 'the virus' issue as a means to look at our mind, our thinking and our emotionally invested identity. For this is where the error can be addressed or revealed to a shifted perception of self, life and world - which is each other.

Everything scripted-but to a revealing or unmasking or reality?

Iain Davis
https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/bbc-musk/
There is a whiff of desperation in the air and it is emanating from the BBC. In a car crash of an interview, reminiscent of Kathy Newman's self-immolating attempt to shoot down Jordan Peterson for Channel 4, the BBC’s North America Technology reporter, James Clayton,

 

My assumption is that it was in some sense set up. (?)
How or in what way and under what narrative assumptions - who knows?
But the energetic of any charged situation cannot be static, and beneath all appearances are toxic conflicts of entanglement that are no less active for being repackaged as 'solutions' at expense of a felt consciousness of life. So the 'Matrix' is a virtual mental substitution extended to & in some sense reflected as - our world experience.

At some level I take a 'God's Plan" perspective; a Script is playing out that reveals the split mind by which self-illusion is acted out on bodies as a 'getting mode' or 'defence system'.
Such as to 'break' the spell and move within as an agency of curiosity and desire - but initially framed within deeper assumptions or definitions and beliefs as to who and what we are and what (our) life is.
So facing - rather than giving a blind eye to - who and what we are not, is a negative experience in that it is owning suppressed emotional conflicts as part of turning from a desire to self-evasion or masking & dissociating unconsciousness. BUT this is the willingness to question beyond what we presume to know, and thus open resources we didn't know we have, that includes a quality of grounded awareness from which to discern within life rather than judge as if set over (or under) and apart from life. yet such qualities of being are not within the bounds of 'control' yet do hold a field of support and guidance as a capacity to recognise how to be in relational honesty and equity - as we relearn to trust the nature of our being directly.
I didn't say we wont die in the sense of life in the body! But that never was the problem, so much as became the result of fearing truth as a result of grasping self illusion and becoming locked down in guilted fear.

What is the underlying pattern of manipulative and coercive deceits but guilted fear?
As we learn to recognise the 'gaslighting' signature regardless the forms it takes, we are releasing the liability of accepting or engaging in its 'offers'.

I feel that personal judgements are very likely to be where truth is hidden - because what we hate or are ashamed of in ourself is what we most cast out and wall out. Not to say we need engage in blame but seeking a true responsibility for our thoughts, emotional results and shared meaning or cultural expression.

Fascination with horror, and addiction the the 'dynamics' of conflict serve to keep self-masking defences operating against what we are or were not ready or willing to accept or see. No one can force or make another see what they are not willing to see. Nor need they. But even as we engaged in mutual entanglements of projected fears or mistakenly assumed responsibilities that are not ours, so is there a relational gift to the release of deeper grievances and strategies that are recognised to no longer serve who we accept ourselves to be now.
A love of humanity is fundamentally a quality of recognition of life within - such that regardless our current appearances, we know something truly worthy abides within - as a potential that does shine forth in various moments of sharing in the gift of love. Not the manipulative masking in the forms or masking passing as love, but a genuine extension of presence that shares a Field - not just an 'information'.

The masked and distanced 'join in fear' (on any side of a conflict) - which is a false unity dependent on the threat or evil that is joined against. There is no true intimacy in it - but that if the threat is no more, the bond is undone. the apparent order is based on hidden hate - that rises in ever shifting 'variants' to necessitate sacrifice for boosting the framework that 'makes us safe' from Disclosure to truth -feared as worse than death - because death becomes the 'escape' or 'triumph' against utter loss of face - whether by abnegating will to 'others' or conditions' or locking into death in conflict as defiance. But as I intimate, there is a universal will that is unconflicted or integrative. I don't see we need to believe in it, but to not be actively believing against it. Willingness to find a way together has the spark of recognising another as our self. Each uniquely expressing life in free association.
How can our 'private sense of control' not see love as threat or sacrifice? yet the 'control mind is perpetual war set in sacrifice of love's presence now. So there's a choice!

Where is the Information for life stored?

Michael Levin researches bio-electricity and consciousness.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qninhhFlfKE&lc=UgwOyfJCDgB63A_qYd14AaABAg

 in response to the themes in:

Andrew Palfreyman:

After viewing many Levin videos, I still don't know the answer to the question: where is the template/target pattern/setpoint stored. and in what form?

My sense is a qualitative whole that is in some sense translated through self-structuring water (that includes nano & molecular phase changes or actions & events) - as the contextual domain of bio-field that stores energy & information for the local biological embodiment of a non-local qualitative field.

I am speaking intuitively here but not without looking at a broad spectrum of informational perspectives.

There was once a belief in vital force that assumed bio-electric to be of a different order to that of non living physics. This vitalism was associated with a God that had imbued life into matter, and it has been cast out of orthodox thinking to a mechanical reductionist view that is thus free to 'play god' over life as 'mechanical processes' hence the human lab-specimen of today's bio-assets. But the error was a God separate from the unfolding, extension or explication of qualities (spiritual) to quantifiable form - or rather to visibility and tangibility that can be in many ways mapped and measured. This implicit self-aware quality is non local, while our assumed or 'front end' consciousness is expressing in temporal-spatial specificity or particulars - that is, our life and world experience.

The feedback loops within such a creation (of definition-result) have a self-reinforcing focus and continuity as part of the desire and development of consciousness within a field of pure or infinite potentials. In that sense 'Mental' or Idea, but not in any sense linear conceptual representations (drawn from the results of living Idea).

Rather than mechanise life, why not vitalise a living Universe? Nothing need be done to it but stepping out of a Cartesian conflict that split knower from known; creator from event & mind from thought - such as to become trapped in and subject to our own thoughts, projections and systems of predictive control.

Well we cant Really be trapped by thought but relative to a point that temporarily matters more to us than Reality (which doesn't go anywhere while we persist our pet projects or self-illusions).

That which informs is upstream/higher level or prior to form (or formed result).

This is also called within, but not in terms of autopsy!

Within any given moment is Infinity expressed - what are we receiving?

Or should I say what are we giving active focus to in any given moment?

And why - or to serve what function?

At the qualitative level I see value fulfilment.

In embodied terms this translates as growth - but of a nature that includes and embraces what we would call death or destruction.

Transience is itself both out of each other - but the that is the movement over the waters - not the desire for Creating out of a unity or infinity point.

By giving is receiving. But in current human terms Garbage in; garbage out!

You Are Your Own Awakening

in response to the themes in:

Video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdJWuMrVDv0

 

When Will The Masses Finally AWAKEN?
Uncovering the Fourth Turning

 by Kate Wand

Are we living in the fourth turning? Will there be some kind of global awakening? When will the masses finally wake up? What can you do to be free within a totalitarian society? Who are the Remnant? These questions and more will be addressed in this video. "It raised the obvious question: Why, if all that were so — if the enterprise were to be a failure from the start — was there any sense in starting it? "Ah," the Lord said, "you do not get the point. There is a Remnant there that you know nothing about. They are obscure, unorganized, inarticulate, each one rubbing along as best he can. They need to be encouraged and braced up because when everything has gone completely to the dogs, they are the ones who will come back and build up a new society; and meanwhile, your preaching will reassure them and keep them hanging on. Your job is to take care of the Remnant, so be off now and set about it."

 

You Are Your Own Awakening

 
This is indeed a way to see & hold purpose in life for life as life amidst a drama playing out as a framework of consciousness - as transformative experience of exploration.
The unfolding themes of what was hidden but is being revealed is not really IN the world - excepting its correspondences or resonances within us - at the level beneath our social masking identity/reality.
Not unlike the dying process, we are unpeeled of our illusions if we choose not to die in them or for them!
The uncovering passes through the 'negative' or suppressed, hated and feared to then pass through terror or horror symbols set against a deeper Disclosure.
If it were not for the last minute, nothing would ever get done - said someone I forgot her name.
Or what can be put off until tomorrow can pile up pressures on Earth - such that un addressed and unhealed conflict can no longer be put off, diverted from masked over or evaded, and yet this is the healing process that we are most likely to see as a violation of our normal in which we sought to be made safe from intimate conflicts by displacing to masked projections or externalisations that reiterate patterns into mutating problems masked as solutions - up to the tipping point or bottoming out.
It is in my view impossible to predictively control the conflicts generated by predictive control. Just as we can never get ahead of our deceiver - but that we release the whole game of self-illusion as the attempt to manipulate our existence from a belief that we can and have succeeded in so doing and becoming.

Connected presence is a basis from which to extend life and know we share in life as the expression of life - all of which is wordless or natural to a true self-appreciation as distinct from self-judgements that would set up or gas-light self-specialness. We can learn to be-live a gaslit world under a Promethean mis-taken inheritance, but the true light remains inviolate. We can only steal a copy, but only God can copyright. The attempt to hack and hijack a mind so as to elicit the heart-support for love-in-a-mist or love-lies-a-bleeding is a tempt that would be a game or a movie if we didn't become phished to suffer it under mortal terror as a Separation from All That Is - and That is being us - despite our 'mass formational psychotic dissociations'.

Self-honesty to energy and emotion or energy in motion is an experiential navigation within life. We may find it intense as there isn't time for 'all about me' or 'what about me' when brought to the point of choosing for life in place of choosing to frame in a death that would separate, withhold, and withdraw so as to predictively model controls by which to generate a framework of support for freedom to persist in such a 'death' as the drive to regain a sense of lost Self, or stuff a sense of self-lack with what we thought we wanted or needed to complete, or vindicate a sense of grievance set holy as the war on the life that we hate for rejecting, abandoning or betraying who we are thus specially chosen to manifest vengeance as the expression of our faith.

Listen within by the grace of noticing - always where you are - or indeed always nigh - not in time - but as a shift to intimacy of being that is not found or at least kept 'outside' but that we step up to stand in a like quality of being. Or actually allow ourselves to be transformed instead of seeking to get ahead of ourselves and thus getting in our own way.

The qualitative realm is expressed in tangible forms. Because you are moved to align in a true movement of being you are opening a shared awareness upstream to the thinking that thinks to get in the way and sign it off as its own creation ;-)

 

Living waters above & below

These reflections arose in a private forum at

https://the-symbolic-world.circle.so

 

To set themes of living waters, and living thought. That contrast with our current 'order' that reveals itself as organised crime seeking control over its own chaotic result.

 

 

 1. Q

 Within the creation story, and elsewhere in the Bible, there is a description of the “waters above” and the “waters below.”

In the creation story, the waters are first separated to be above and below by heaven/sky. Then the waters below are separated by earth. 

With that context, here’s my question: if the dry land (earth) means stability/order when compared to the waters below, is heaven the stability/order of immaterial things when compared to the waters above?

Are the “waters above” chaotic/disordered ideas/thoughts/etc.?

 

The electric universe perspective reveals that the physical universe is about 99% plasma. Plasma physics opens a deeper connected model of energy in motion as self-organising patterns. It also opens new eyes to look at symbolic representations of historical human experience.
Sometimes called plasma cosmology/mythology.

We live a world view of uniform gradualism (that was more political than scientific in origin - as is climate alarm today). But our view and experience of our world or cosmos has not always been as it is now - but has been very different, such that ancient pre-historic myths are rarely connected with what we call our physical reality and set under the determinations of scientific institutions.
Yet the underlying patterns of such 'mythologically mapped' constellations are archetypal to our minds as dramatic elements to a narrative structure for unfolding meanings. Indeed our 'rational' superstructure is in many ways a masking over a sense of dissociation as a drive to fill or regain a sense of self-lack.

Creation in mythic terms has been put as "God moved upon the face of the waters".
 

As well as now having a cosmic & scientific sense of the alignment of order within apparent void and chaos, I also have the recognition of the waters of the body - for this is the medium of translation for energy & information currently assigned to 'genes' as material determinants (to be mapped, hacked, forged or adulterated by the same mindset of mis-creative thought as ever phished a mind).

So in our own direct experience  we have the Holy Spirit of a discernment of the waters resonating coherent to our field of awareness of being, contrasting and so allowing choice & release of the waters of a dissonance of thought that persist as self-reinforcing loops of a segregative, limiting and conflicting self-image.

In an object model a living aether was got rid of and replaced with 'space'. Likewise living water (in the sense of self-organising structures of support for life and consciousness) is reduced to H2O and discarded for a mapped out mask of predictive control.
 There are innumerable facets of exploration of the nature of waters above & below. But the experiential is felt life.
Energy-motion; E-motion.
Felt qualities of love & life are verily 'Good'
Emotional states set in the grasp of possession are conflicted or adulterated.
Take no image of reality to our self, but have and be the experience of, by giving to God what is due to God. We then have and be at one rather than set at odds with Creation as the unfolding of value-fulfilment - as a basis for endeavour, growth and cultural enrichment.


2. Q:

The information technology (IT) triad is

1. Information processing
2. Information transmission
3. Information storage

The analogy for human experience is 1. thought, 2. action, 3. perception.

"As above, so below." Perhaps God can be approached analogously through the three hypostases: the Father, the Holy Spirit, and Jesus Christ, respectively. The Father is the Plan or the Program or the Thought. The Holy Spirit acts in the world and transmits information. Jesus Christ witnesses and judges, perceives and stores transcendent information.

Of course, God, and His manifestations should not be trivialized with any simple distillation such as this. But do you see any resonances in scripture with this breakdown?

Our liability is to become tooled by our tools - which are the extensions of our own thought..
Our 'thinking' creates in our own image, which then conditions our 'results'. Garbage in; garbage out.
The logic or law of mind does not predicate, but operates on selected predicates as assumed or asserted definitions that are necessarily meta-physical or upstream to any results or process of consistency.

Living Thought is of an order that linear concepts cannot approach.
Yet the symbols on which they are founded can still point to living Meaning, when we yield our predictive modelling mind to a felt relationship in being we are not making or manipulating.

In-form-ation as a field of functional integrity.
As a living record of service to functional expression.
As the framework for developing consciousness as experience and exploration.

 

What ARE the Influences for Influenza?

 Nike

April 18, 2023 at 10:54 am

I would like an article that discusses the lack of direct evidence (the non-existence of that evidence that cannot be interpreted) regarding the so-called material structures in the sub-microscopic realm that so-called scientists claim exist beyond all doubt.

 

Direct evidence is to BE the event or experience.
Anything then said about the experience is a selective act of defining interpretations that was not  present in the quality of knowing prior to subject & object division or judgements.

Real or honest scientists would never claim 'beyond all doubt', but within the bubble of their collective thinking they will share the experience of 'knowledge' as serving a gain of functions to their personal sense of identity as continuous and protected or boosted. This is by the applications of such 'science' for invested agenda seeking to profit or progress their own current sense of self and world.

the Nature of Everything All At Once is so far beyond computation in terms of the linear thinking of human concepts  (made form blocks to communication) that the only Rest is in That Existence Is. or in terms of a Self-Awareness; I Am.
Anything added to this is what we give, and determines what we then receive.
Giving and receiving as one is 'knowing' but where receiving is generated with a bias, we perceive an experience that finds reinforcement in mutual or socially agreed masking - as in learning how to see the Emperor's new clothes.

So my sense is to focus in what truly serves who we now accept ourselves to be, so as to release what doesn't, instead of engaging in war on the unreal, as if its proponents must concede, confess and stand as damned by.

I have no direct evidence of a world outside and separate from me.
But in our bubble of group identity, I share in the wonder and drama, as well as experiences of dissociated subjection.

So your question resonates to me desire for a psycho-physical honesty, regarding information usually masked or hidden - for reasons of saving face, maintaining credibility or social inclusion -relative to the Old Paradigm.

Into the theme of the main article:

https://viroliegy.com/2023/04/16/challenging-influenza/

Any belief that is used to serve a purpose will come with its own built in self-reinforcing reflections, interpreted evidences, and justifications.

The influenza phenomena has a body of its own evidences apart from the modern gain of funding and control running via enemy germ-cum pathological code fragment theory..

The opening chapter of I haven’t read it all but obtained a copy of “The Transmission of Epidemic Influenza”. by R. Edgar Hope-Simpson (1994) documents some of the controversy that ran as open dispute until the ‘electroscopy’ was accepted a decisive argument in terms of open critiques – though there are innumerable anomalies that call the official belief/science of infection into ongoing question, if not the virus itself.
He brings out the Solar/seasonal shaping of its cycle and has a lot of interesting information – regardless the virus constraint.

A subsequent 2008 article in orthodox literature raises many incongruities in standard model, but does not question the fundamental premises of existence – not just of a virus but of a detached observer to events and evidences framed to pathological theory. But its not long and you’d find it interesting.

https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-5-29

For myself, I align with Seth's (among others) psycho-physical appreciation of existence as a whole  in a different framing of belief systems as identity complexes, as interactive communications or energetic states that are at root symbiotic or ultimately aligned purpose – regardless the generating of conflicts and conflicted beliefs as a tool to use and be used by.

In simple terms I ‘catch’ my own version of whatever is available and of service to who I am currently accepting to be by acting as the expression of.
Because this is very complex, it cannot be generalised to rules without becoming divorced from the individual or specific occurrences.

My sense is that a masking ‘reality’ operates as a valid tool for exploration as experience, for the development of consciousness. We could call that mythic beliefs or symbolic values running as augment or override to Natural Function – ie life of its own unfolding gift. This usurping function is where our own imaginations phish our identity, such as to perceive only as its continuity development dictates.

Some of what we call sickness is in fact adaptive resilience and evolutionary development – in terms of value-fulfilment, that translates in physical terms as growth – personal and cultural. Some of what we call death is as much a function of life as an exhalation within a 'greater whole' that is masked over by the focus in the physical sense.

Praise & Blame

I wrote this into an off-guardian page. It wasn't to a particular article but to an ongoing political focus, that I recognise, can feel for, but don't limit myself to.

 

 

 

Has anyone ever looked at human systems in terms of charge redistribution of praise & blame (penalty & sacrifice)?

Note I didn't say human relationships. This remains the underlying truth; human relational being. But the charged nature of identity-in-conflict generates 'systemic' replacement by a predictive control mindset.

Gain of function set over real relationships runs as social masking - that is as a basis for recognition, acceptance or inclusion in the official system of reality.

What is 'official' or main-streamed 'reality'?

Is it a composite reflection of the current state of invested belief set in action?

Is it no less a personal reflection by which to recognise our own participance running beneath our covertly managed ID, such as to regain freedom to look AT our beliefs, instead of living from them?

At the same time 'It' or 'They' subject humanity to every kind of insidious abuse, they are revealing the mind through which they operate. The 'back doors' by which we are hacked, hijacked, manipulated and tooled are in our thought and belief as core definitions.

The Face of ego is not just a fronting over lies or wishes given power, but a sense of continuity. The ego of facing OUT as a means to diminish or deny the Resources Within, is actively undermining its own life support - at every level of function; ie broad spectrum subjection - operating as IF an approaching victory.

An alien 'perspective' operating through a living love - given to masking defence systems, by which to set conflict as the masking signal that saves a face of control over life. The gaslighting of a Promethean mistake set in chains of defiant contradictions.

Waking up to a nightmare is still dreaming.

But who casts the dream that is uniquely your life?

But better - who is being the whole experience - regardless how you are currently framing yourself within it?

Not for thinking more along the themes of what we are habituated to - but that we are.

There is a feeling awareness to That we are.

It is not partial in praise of blame - but may SEEM so if we give ourself conflict and seek to discharge or leak it onto others, so as to persist our personal themes without owning or addressing our conflicts that remain active but 'hidden' in our 'adjusted reality' or world.

Perhaps not so well hidden now?

 

The Crossover Point

The Crossover Point

Out of my own morning themes and a comment in

https://off-guardian.org/2023/04/11/russia-is-still-complicit-in-the-great-reset/

on the nature and capacity of a mind for and in denial

Denial runs out of masking in time and space to reset itself from and as Reversal.

In a sense we are at a crossover point.

The ability to hate, attack and seemingly kill or deny our self in others, is the victory or 'escape' of an elitism of self specialness vindicated by vengeance set 'holy'.

The choice for a split mind is to persist in a mis-taken inheritance.

Bottoming out is the undoing of the desire to persist in a self-destructive futility as if 'this time it will work'.

As I see it, no one can be forced against their will, but that they give or assign their integral sovereignty to external, alien or foreign agencies as a boost to their wishing to be what they are not (or not be what they are). fantasy given power generates the emporer's new clothes, fear of disclosure, and a kingdom set into coded rules in place of free relational endeavour and exchange.

The need to look on fears, is to undo them as a source, basis, foundation or backstory from which to live. For once looked on we can look past the 'Stop! sign' they represent.

Excepting addiction to conflict as the 'dynamic' of a life set in drama that must counterpoint an evil. Fascination with evil reveals attraction to guilt as source of power or manipulation (as in narrative shaping, gaslighting or seductive grooming).

We live the momentum of along deep enslavement to ideas that are now being shown on the Big Screen of our reality-experience.

If we let the fear frame and define our thought, feeling, word and action, then we ARE contracting with its terms, as an energetic consent no matter how much we kick or screm to the contrary.

Taking a true pause for grounded connection in life - as being life in expression - will reveal a true alignment or NOT - in the mindest and perception-response of active habit identity.

There is no interpersonal argument but with our self. But where different perspectives find a common ground is the vessica pisces of creative seeding. A segregative or exclusive identity complex will cut itself off from life, from the creative exchange and embodiment of life.

Insofar as I looked at the monolithic structure of the WEF, I saw no life. it has no creative power, spark or capacity to love. BUT what it can attract by such mimicry of life to sacrifice of life against perceived and shifting evils as credits toward some symbolic image of an ideological or symbolic 'good'.

The lies by which we live cannot be who we are.

But props against a feared or hated disclosure (which is underway in any case)

I will not engage with its terms of woven deceit, but I understand that our engagement is largely unseen by a mind trained to not see or allow into conscious awareness.

As for globalism of unified human awareness - it cannot come out of coercion and deceit, but a direct exposure to the lie of a violation of our life serves to release it as a basis from which to live. That is NOT the same as 'making sure it will never happen again'. Which serves to reset the exact same pattern BY the very nature of the defences raised against the feared & hated evils. Evils that are thus covertly set as conflicted foundations of the structure of 'good' OR ELSE!

Notwithstanding the horror - I hold that we will all meet what we do not expect because the basis for our own thinking was set to predictive controls as a closed or known system.

 

The nature and fulfillment of a true question

 in response to the themes in:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yp0sBxZl4gg

 

Many of our questions reiterate statements couched in the form of a question, so as to frame the 'answer' in predefined terms - that can also be used to set predetermined outcomes. Self-reinforcement persists in a particular set of beliefs or definitions as the current or active focus in or by which our reality and self are framed.

The native movement of curiosity is a direct quality of desire to know and to have and be the experience of the result. When enough people get stuck in the same place they call it reality.

Questioning in our being is then not just a me seeking a fulfilment, bot the potential of that fulfilment stirring and aligning my attention, thought and even timing, towards finding what I seek.

But framing statements or beliefs that we already know into forms of a question or quest or even "War On" or "Campaign to save..." are running under the dictum "seek but do not find!"

So it may seem that science is uncovering frontiers when it is in fact cannibalising reality to serve its invested models in ever more complex instruments of obfuscated blocks to knowing if not bollocks - or so would be the recognition to anyone who persisted a true love through the thorny thickets of their defences against disclosure.

To recognise and live our question is to choose not to squelch it with the usual suspects that we learned under whatever conditioning experience of our formative years. Cant do, not good at, too complicated, out of my depth or reach, but most of all - I am unworthy or unqualified to know, or don't trust myself to open up in ways that met social disapproval when I was young.

To be as a little child in a new world is to abide with in trust that what is needed will make itself or its ways known in a way that I can recognise and understand - that is as part of who I am, but haven't yet uncovered or are in process of discovering. I'm sure most of us recognise perfect parents, schools or whatever other institutions shape our lives do not exist. Our parents have their own blocks, blind-spots, squelched needs and pent up conflicts, and so that is the world we are in a sense suckled into as part of developing an adaptive capacity to participate.

But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked. "Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad." "How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice. "You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here. ~ Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland.

We have to mask our self in various ways and degrees to belong, fit on, or survive our world, but then become so identified in mask as to lose a felt connection with life as presence of unfolding qualities that are the More of Who We Are, put to some degree on hold, while we establish base camp in a realm of potential conflict and limitation along with consciously shared joy - balancing within the action rather than polarising in reaction.

A true answer is never just bits of data or information to fit into an already complex structure of attempt to get a handle on a life we learned to lose BY trying to control our model of a world to the exclusion of a felt embrace or appreciation. That could be seen as locked down in defences against... reliving the experience of deep squelching - if not seeking vengeance on anything we associate with our sense of being denied or deprived recognition, worth, value - love.

So if you are not willing to let love in but blame Them or It - how long to wait for Them or It to give you permission to be yourself? Quite apart from what you are running on as yourself is a mixed bag of acquired beliefs or outdated strategies?

The old Say; Be still and know God - holds true without the word 'God'.

Be still and know - without any trace of a doubt, a movement that is forming some kind of ask or desire, that may or may not find words that fit, or come out in words that frame and limit - but by not squelching is given welcome if only a moment before the old habits pile back in - but see, you noticed that!

So without giving fuel to any self-blaming diversions, persist in the new habit of noticing, valuing and abiding with a quality of who you are that may have been long or deeply denied - but is felt as a vitality or even peace of integrity of being that is of a different order to the manufactured obfuscation of a mind running on manual override to try and manually manage or override 'What comes naturally'. We are not lacking a biotech-cum A.I augmented transhuman exogenous control system.

 

Do Nanobotnets run dark ops as agents of our own manipulative intent?

 in response to the themes in:

 https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/what-are-the-risks-and-benefits-of/comment/14404801

 Yes potentially EZ water can store information. But that's not active computation, that's just passive retention. The active element in this case would be the human being's own consciousness. The reason I'm not believing this stuff is because self assembling crystals may create passive elements or potential matrices for computation, but where is the active element? There's no spirit, there's no DNA, it's just dead matter. Nanobots and nanocomputers require active complexity that is not precedented on this scale.

Excellent comment!
If nano-tech draws on bio-field energy as driving its function - like a sail uses wind, then the electromagnetic fields also operate some level of instruction.
My own sense is that our own consciousness is such a field of interaction, but that it operates at different levels so as to seem to be compartmentalised, with significant elements externalised.
or to put it another way projected or cast out such as to result in a virtualised sense of self subject to world whose accepted and given meanings, attributes and functions represent a distorted mirror to a persistence of focus within the body as the framework for experiencing.

Your agency in engaging with me is a field of interaction that is part of my experience but not directly of my control. How I engage with and create or share meaning from our interaction is a result of the thought I accept as resonant with my core value system or individual consciousness.
That we can communicate at all evidences a shared field or nature.
Ideas that resonate attract by association, and ideas that have no resonance do not at least directly communicate at all.

So the idea of augmenting our living body with technological means for meshing with external controls set by others using invented systems of EM communication is an extreme example of subjection to body under alien or other control. A version of 'They made me do it' or even "Look what you have made of me!"

If we observe our thoughts we readily see how pervasive such ideas run as part of blaming or guilting manipulations set in social masking of 'normalised behaviours'.  But for all the perks we may think to gain by masking off intimacy or conflicts. it is such patterns of behaviour that attract and align in subjection that denies personal responsibility for thought - which is freedom to create, extend and share in felt or resonant meaning/fulfilment.

A arbitrary divide between psychic & physical splits life to give cause or priority to a (model of) physical representation that can then be manipulated to generate a derivative experience of existence as if independent agencies from the Field of Spirit of Living Thought. I capitalised this because post-split 'thinking' is conflicted by an element of manipulative or private GoF, no matter how ingeniously concealed. Living Thoughts are 'symbiotic' expression of unified purposed. We know their being us is our true connection in life - as one with and not split off from life - as our ordinary state - not as a special state.

Now it may be that a world made utterly joyless is freely released as not worth the candle!
But my sense is we are beings of thought and therefore of choice, and by our choices are we revealed or concealed. Fear of Disclosure is what I see driving a blind technologism for getting more of what doesn't even fulfil, but boosts a mask of control set over fear of total pain and loss.
I feel a deep learning or evolutionary shift for our human world, towards a reintegration of consciousness & release of conflict rather than double down in conflict to reset the mechanism for "New game!".  The call to joy also undoes masking defence against pain - and so initially unconsciousness seems the short term solution, and conflicts are put off or masked out to grow in the dark, but joy is of a wholeness of being that given welcome will grow new pathways of perspective as participation in life.


 

Variants on the Theme Unfolding - Resurrection of Life

Here are three separate reflections I wrote (the first a day or two back - the others this morning:

 

 

 

Comments into the themes beneath and within “What are the risks and benefits of each vaccine?”

https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/what-are-the-risks-and-benefits-of


By sharing worth, we strengthen and grow it, so of course give as you would (in truth) receive. Beneath our mind and world of errors omissions & lies is a felt quality of existence that our thinking cant get hold of, but can set in symbols, ideals or models of exploration and experience - as a sense of self-becoming. Representations or symbols are not 'true or false' so much as fit for purpose or not. But taking them as reality itself sets a lie and the father of it, for now the idol or the model tells us what we must think. This is coercive experience of limitation. Yes we can assign the dissonance to past, to others, to faulty, weak and susceptible bodies, or treacherous minds but the primary error is a mis-taken identity, phished by our own image and thought. So it isn't that I am pessimistic or cynical, but that an addict has to 'bottom out' before he or she can 'look within' to find what was feared or hated to be true (of self) was never so. There is another basis for living in the world we map and model or uncover to wonder at and wander in, but it cannot be given or taught to those who are insistent that they already know, and that life is set in emotionally invested judgements set too big to fail. Context is everything, and despite our posturing of independence we have a primary conditioning of belonging for survival, and rejection as loss of self and life. So if everyone else acts to a 'reality' we don't see, we may mask in it while seeking further evidences as to what is happening. This can then become a 'face' to maintain against an experience of social conflict. Many are content to lead their own life in the role of follower that uses others who are set up or disposed to take the lead - while it suits them, but to reverse roles as the take-down or subjugation of a leader when they don't lead where followers want to go. The desire for unconsciousness or a bubble of protected self and life from raw conflicts, adjusts and adapts within the limitations such evasions inherently impose. As a path of depletion and diminishing returns, set in rigidifying structures - or strictures. The nature of deep fear set in conflicts of emotional pain can set a life to choose suicide (overtly or covertly as giving up the will to live under official channels) rather than move through pain to a deeper joy or wholeness of being. So I am moved to align in the call to renewal in life that can yet reach to any whose love for life finds them despite, regardless or because of an (dissociating) insanity set in fear of pain, loss or humiliation.





Self assembly of nano-particles is part of natural body function that amidwesertdoctor points to as zeta potential as the colloidal suspension - as well as the phase transitions of 'folding proteins' or molecular transformations.
So at an inconceivably more complex interactive sense biology is a living computational process that fools thing to hack and hijack to gain of private/masked function.
If you search out graphene flagship and the PR output for its ongoing research applications - it includes bio-medical interjections or augmentations of body function - using bio-field as its host.
If you look at Pollacks EZ structured 'gel water' it is a liquid crystaline hexagonal lattice of molecular alignment that holds myriad functions in life (and in our physical matrix or Natural world/Universe). Graphene also has such structure and electromagnetic properties.
I have no doubt this is a cutting edge research that will also run dark (defence GoF etc).
As to whether it is workable may be secondary to the investments in it and the ability to run the belief system based on a cluster of events used to 'prove it is real' in the public mind. (Which I see with both genetic dogma and germ theory - as models of a partiality forms by a desire to possess and control that generate artefacts of thought by which to block or counter a true appreciation or what in principle is Nature as Communication (at all levels and scales).
Our own minds are likewise given to either generating imaginative artefacts from wishful or fearful thinking, or locking down against a greater communication as a sense of shutting down mind or communication to regain or reset a sense of stability, possession and control.
One of the conditions for assigning life is the balancing of inner and outer states as maintaining the conditions for life to operate through and as.
the tech-transhuman idea is the replacement of biofield support & regulation with human/AI tech systems of surveillance (ie insulin levels) and control (user alert or auto-medication). This is merely a logical outcome of a pattern of human thinking given licence to run as a mass reality distortion. However, if the willingness to sacrifice is deeply invested in, the abnegation of self-responsibility, can subject itself to any idols of possession and control - and the boundary between real or imagined becomes a dictate of the idol, rather than owned or conscious purpose in coherent experience.
So not unlike various entertainment/entrainment scriptures, we 'evolved' into a movie of imagined curated existence. or rather our thinking unfolded and developed such themes to their logical conclusions or results.


The Saturnian archetype (Chronos) includes the Parent eating/sacrificing its Children at the end of its Era or Cycle of what became the Golden Age of an 'old normal' or lost Paradise. The regaining of which set the 'progressive development' of All the king’s horses and all the king’s men (ever since).
The hollow nature of setting reality in image and form is a hungry ghost seeking fulfilment for a sense of driven self-lack that consumes and perverts a natural extension of desire to a 'blind getting mechanism'.
The archetype of sacrifice to save a centrally controlled collectively guilted fear from its own Disclosure runs as 'existential survival' in the mode of an addiction that cannot and will not look within. But must pile ever more structure of sacrifice as 'virtue' against the 'Inevitable' - which it defends against as death or worse utter humiliation and damnation - from which death becomes 'saviour'.

if we ONLY fixate on hateful guilted evils to the exclusion of the 'More of Who and What we truly are' we become set or reset in their image by the attempt to stamp out, deny, with all the hate that can be mustered as the foundation of a new order.
Is the NWO a self-replicating mind-virus, or is it here by invitation to serve a deeper awakening to Self-responsibility within a true Inherence - in place of a Promethean cycle of gaslighting and sacrifical bondage?




If the mRNA operating system has been effectively installed via shock, fear and guilting, to serve a spiked agenda of hype-demic application via manual 'transfection' then the 'virus' operating system has mutated or shifted to the capture of a false genesis. For by defensive reaction to False Evidences Appearing Real, we invest identity in their premise for our own protection and as active stakeholder in the very thing we think or say we hate, or join in "War on" as basis to sacrifice as credits or boosters by which to 'save' from our unowned projections of fear - which run like Orwell's Room 101 - except the nameless fear is limited by any specific expression to restore a sense of limits by which to persist or survive in its terms or dictate.

I don't see we can get through to an actively dissociating or blocking defence mechanism. We have to open resonance with the being where they are free to think and reflect of their own desire or curiosity. That is, to look at their thinking and recognise choices that are being made, from a context of shared worth or equity in life. So we also have such defences that set up how we perceive or frame others as threat, enemy or as ideologically captured by such, and so we can be immediately recognised as not accepting them as they are, but coercively pushing them to be what we think they should be. A 'battle of wills' never really arrives at real communication and relationship. We can witness in with-ness to other ways of thinking, seeing and acting as an extension of shared worth that is freely aligned in rather than lockstepped with - or against. But recognising this is the basis from which to practice - by which we soon meet our own proclivities that get in our own way, come too soon, or inhibit a true word for fear of upset.
There are rules in our mind of which we are unaware.
Discriminating the legal or contractual from the lawful is another 'layer' in our current situation. Legal instruments for corporately defined entities (including persons, citizens, as well as governments & institutions) are a form of technically augmented Law, in a prequel pattern for augmented biology (via bio-pharma™, biogenetics™, biotech™).

I see the use of complex instruments for the obfuscating and repackaging of toxic conflicts running counter to resilience, adaptability and evolutionary shifts.

Toxic is also 'imbalanced' or process of uncovering to a process of release and elimination. Where I have choice let me align in life. Where I have no choice let me trust life to support me regardless - and remain open to what is my responsibility so as not to give power to my own often hidden (self) judgements.