On the Novel Biotech Reset

 in response to the themes in:

https://khmezek.substack.com/p/mrna-madness-its-only-just-begun/

The PR sells to investors as a means to profits, as well as capture and control of marketshare - which is now called mindshare.
So the story is spun on the basis of 'emergent' opportunities that are often ingenious devices to evade  disclosure for fraud.
IE the lack of empirical basis to support virus contagion theory - a mainstay of pharma's model - led to a retreat into genetic modelling in which no empiric science as such need be engaged - for the genetic definitions are in effect 'globally imposed standards' that have no whole, isolated or characterised thing to which they pertain. Humpty Dumpty code constructs that can be inserted into PCR 'tests' as well as programmed into the printing of 'mRNAcode™ under a biotech (Pharma 2.0) monopoly cartel.
The wish, fear and belief that transfection results in the programming of cells to then manufacture proteins is a Frankensteinian variation of standard contagion fear.
There is a basis in life for making your own version of 'realities' with which you have resonance, in your own way and for your own reasons, in your own timing , as part of your own unfolding of experience through which to 'know thy self', including freedom to experience yourself as you are not by living the reactions to false imaged beliefs given love of energy and attention.
This is the 'original sin' or error by which the mind can hack itself - as if at the hand of another. This is the grievance-based victim that would justify attack and make love and virtue of joining in hate. This is the vengeance that rages - hot or cold - at God & life for not supporting its wish to make self-illusion real, as a deeps sense of rejection, denial and treacherous abandonment that it has NO sense of participating in, for it casts out separation trauma by distance and masking attack so as to save itself from exposure to truth it was invoked to 'make you safe ' from.
So there are and will be collective experience of 'diseases' and iatrogenic 'solutions' as the repackaging of life-conflict into forms more masked, insidious and dysfunctional to the point of crisis that force a radical change. Yet here we are with a concerted intent to double down into radical reset of the 'hijack & capture to control' model.
It is always some form of black-box of 'mysteries' of contradictions set in arcane obfuscation to be guarded by a priesthood of elitism or self-specialness usurping authority and its enforcements or natural protections. Above all it defends against Disclosure of an alien will - that is loveless and without true father - as invoked to replace true Power in life by power set over and apart - alien - to life.
True presence is not only the nature of love's appreciation, but that of true with-ness and worth-ship - as a resonance of coherency. Felt and shared.
I also note the funding and seeding of nanotech development under pretext of gaining function for pharma-drug and bio-code delivery systems, These are on the cusp of a biology that uncovers bio-field functions far far more complex and subtle than the grafting of computer coding to the 'serpents' - that are really the nature of self-organising plasma - that has a unique translation through the 'waters' of life.
Bio-field manipulations are more likely the mass 'experiment' of the intent to marketise and weaponise a 'new frontier'. THAT is fear set for Getting as the driver of a predictive programming set in and technologised for war.
And the more upstream the insiders, the more able to steal not just the kingdom but the minds and thought of kings. Who controls the imaging symbols, codes and languages of our thought gets to play Simple Simon through a world of golems?

I recommend reading with your own discernment always; "The Individual and the Nature of Mass Events" by Jane Roberts (Seth) - even if you would usually avoid 'communications' that don't fit within our current culture of a physically determined and bounded reality.

Toxic debt repackaging has a long history that we see as evolutionary development, if we shift from Self-evasions to self integrative Self revealing, then all serves as a vehicle through which to more consciously embrace and appreciate a greater shared participance in all that we are.


Howard, I was prompted to join with your point - not to address it all to you!
(Michael Levin may be able to provide such a relocated

Retraining our mind to operate from listening within

in response to the themes in:

https://tessa.substack.com/p/chaos-agents-vs-love/comments

 

 I find this 'ego dynamic' very clearly revealed in A Course in Miracles, but as that is a retraining of the mind to live from the miraculous nature of love we do not make, that is our truth - regardless (what we make or buy into), it (The Course) isn't an intellectual or philosophical teaching, so much as serving the recognition we can and have mis-taught ourselves (personally and collectively) such as to generate a masking substitution for reality by which the false sets the true in its rules and filters to a reversal of cause and effect - such that a world outside and Other seems to make, subject and define a 'limited and broken' love, set in seeking outside itself by a sense of lack and disconnection that rises from the wish to specialness.
I don't generally promote the Course or quote it, but live my own reintegrative willingness of its principle teaching, which is listening within to the quality of wholeness and unified purpose that is the gift of our being - beneath the gift we sought to give ourself 'special'.
So yes to aligning our thought and word to a love that moves all things, and reveals in the loving, not the mind of grasping. This is a basis of true cultural recognition and exchange. Rather than seeking to put Humpty together again from a position of a broken or conflicted sense of limitation - in which we will never truly be Homed, yet we may cling to and die in rather than risk out of the comfort and control zone of the 'self/world' we have made by the attempts to separate, mask, hide, escape, overcome, fix, eradicate or heal in our OWN terms & conditions - running beneath as our learned or acquired conditioning under fear, guilt and offset or diversion of blame as penalty of sacrifice or loss.
It's all a mind of judgement set AS IF over and apart.
It can speak to your 'specialness' as 'love' and yet in an instant turn to guilting hate if you don't comply. This inner gaslighting is part of a trauma-survival complex that is no longer active - but persists as if the past is stamping the present into a future like itself. True Presence is a gift of being that a dissociated mind has discarded, forgot and set in fear of pain of loss FROM a mind that persists the patterns of fear as control, conflict and lack.
Changing our mind about our mind is the willingness to question and release what we have accepted and believed real and adapted to, because only truth is true. There is no peace in lies, and no joy but expresses the freedom of being truly moved.
The understanding that there is nothing hidden within lies that reveals truth is free to those who seek not to hide from truth.
However the game of Peep Boo! is universally recognised by babies, as a basis of consciousness in our experience of unfolded being - our lives. The gift we gave ourself was not for Getting, but for Giving and receiving in the heart of one.

Consolidation of leverage owns 'The Science'

 in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2022/12/19/watch-the-climate-change-gambit/

The effective capture of ‘global’ organisations in terms of narratives to guidelines to regulatory dictates inserted into contracts, is not much concerned with arguing as it effectively owns “the science”.

The current vast disparity of wealth is not just assets but leverage, that is used to consolidate control to those who join in corrupting lawful communication and exchange to serve a private self interest: that is to structure a hierarchy of control that locksteps freedom into ‘survival’ set against fear of pain of loss – which runs corollary with being out of true with our life, world and true self.

Hence it masks in ‘saving’ narratives that appeal to a future alignment after breaking the ‘obstacles’ that are scapegoated or false flagged to be the cause of toxic dissonance – so as to weaponise its guilt by repackaging as virtue under ideological capture to crafted lies of self-evasive gain of function.

(Degradation and dysfunctional life as sacrifice for the persistence of a segregative ‘separation’ set over and against its own life).

I am not a body automata

 in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2022/12/19/a-howling/

Look into the eyes of those your meet and greet or you will look to images you raised instead. For we can mask in the forms of love or affection so as to learn ways of seeming to meet without really joining.

Why do we not - but what we expect to see is already imaged in mind to shape 'automatic' defences or reactions that 'prove' the belief that set them?

A little willingness is not a stare, but an opening to presence not pre-manufactured by a concept that carpets and blinds to a realm of shadows cast to a screen or cave wall.


The ideal of self-autonomy - to be as a god to our own life - runs an automaton of unconsciousness if running on judgements set by a past that sets them still.

To be as one with God in our own life is established in that we never did or can create our own existence, but that mutually agreed alignments in ways that selectively focus so as to collectively discard, deny or put out of 'mind' can and do put us out of the awareness of the Mind of God. If 'God' is too abused a term, choose for whatever stands clear when we 'thinketh not'. For 'Is' Is. And what we think cannot replace the field of desire that alights the moment of fulfilment, even if we so grasp as if to keep or possess for a 'self' we take from it. But who can hold focus in the world but by persisting an experience of a 'self-possession' that meets conflict, adversity in change and challenge through which an ego is both grown or developed and adapted to as an adjustment or compromise - through which we have the time of our lives, that is - we unfold our experience together through terms or contract of largely acquired and inherited patterns of a collective 'agreement' if only be default of running as result of not choosing differently, from a fresh evaluation. So the past stamps to present a future like itself as if THIS time, it will be different! And it can seem to escape, to win, overcome or prevail for a time until the core contradictions reassert the predicates that we assign to Others and to World (and to God).

Uncovering conflict in our own mind can be experienced as incandescent rage, putrid disgust - that is intolerable pain & sickness of 'self' that has no capacity to 're-evaluate' anything but every liability to project out onto our life, our relationships, our world in ways that may offer mitigation or temporary respite by casting or projecting OUT and AWAY from the attempt to manage what remains, and remake some sense of 'solidity' or normalise a masked out sense of self-protection.

Yet a 'protection' or a 'love' that is re-triggered to conflict and defence when its terms and conditions for 'safety' are not met. When love turns to hate, is it not that attempts to mask over or escape fear break down to reveal an attempt to DO love from a fearful sense of threat, disconnection and pained fear of loss?


Choosing not to join in hate or harm must abide it to the point of recognising we do not want it. And standing in that decision.This in effect gives up the attempt to 'fix ourselves', to a release that opens to That which truly releases us from self-reinforcing conflict.


Love that is impotent, is not love, but a substitute accepted in its place that will bind us to false or magic 'protections' that require sacrifice to maintain and can never have 'enough' control. For no amount of control will substitute for love, regardless the acting out of fantasy upon the body or the world.


A grounded reference point:


https://twitter.com/onemindinmany/status/1528364482828898306?s=20&t=7Qw0ul_fmxxrsfVkDIBPHw

Fact that cant be questioned show you where to begin questioning

 in response to the themes in:
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-most-important-dataset-of-the/

Find established fact that cant be questioned and you know where to begin questioning.
DNA was/is a globally invested technology that did not deliver promised/expected returns.
Like so much else of the 'science', it is spun out of a black box that is linked with or identical to 'dark research' be that military or corporate (its both).
Note 'Intelligence' is now a cloak of transnational security for a global biotech agenda. Upstream to what DNA dogma was supposed to reduce life to, is the realm of bio-electromagnetic field or bio-field. The research into this is the intent to weaponise and marketise 'applications' using nano-particles (which are a natural component in bio-function) but are being designed to 'gain function' from Nature so as to 'fix it' or 'improve and upgrade it'. Graphene Flagship being but one example.
Virology was falsely conceived, unfounded but so invested in as to be too big to fail. It retreated to pathological GENETIC modelling (black-box definitions - but WHO regulates or validates the elite institutions that announce them - often by press release!
So the biological model of life is the most pathological factor involved in all of this, but it is too big to fail as a compound global investment over generations - such that everything/everyone ELSE must be sacrificed to 'save it'. - albeit as a much more rigidly defined and controlled dogma.
The model assigns artefacts to life that either don't exist or introduce distortion filters by which to work against healing - ie as if to boost 'your immune system', or 'fix your genes'.
As for shedding (anything but toxic substances) - I not only question it's veracity but question the narratives used as 'science' for transmission by  germs, or their imaginary nano counterpart viruses.
It isn't just elites who are invested in a pathological worldview, but the Many, whose investment is of a personal and social identity.
So a falsely founded identity in assumed science is compelled to look within the black box of its assumptions for what isn't there - excepting as a derivative pattern - which is pervasive and increasing evident to anyone with eyes to see as exactly like a usurping, hacking virus, or rogue parasitic cancer in its operation at the level of our minds, our currency of thought and our resulting feedback of interpretation we call the world.

If you are precise you cant say 'the vax' when there are known to be various batches of various brands kept and delivered and injected under various conditions, but I feel reasonable in asserting it is a toxic shock at least - for it has to be to qualify as 'generating an immune response'. (Discounting the known switch to saline placebo in at least some conscientious medical staff).

Shock can be also emotional or dare I say it 'psychic'. The overall emotional context for this agenda was of unprecedented and deliberate application of shock treatment to the goal of coercing such and outcome - either for the result of the injections themselves and/or the institutional structure of biotechnological status of bio-insecurity, that is no longer merely inadequate but a risk factor to the 'herd' collective and so no longer holding rights as an individual under 'contagion theory' running unchecked. (quite apart from carbon guilting or thought crime regarding other securitised narratives for economic control, through the enforcing of 'environmental, social and governmental' regulatory requirements.

Many think damage control is still feasible as part of an establishment set in an old normal.  So I expect they will be used for such purpose as a tool of the intent to reset human beings as bio assets for experiment or whimsy.
Genetic control/eugenics is not just for depopulation agenda.

#2
A Midwestern Doctor
The only possible alternative hypothesis I can think of was that the people in charge decided to switch on 5g when the vaccines were rolled out and have the vaccines act as a cover for that. I don't think that's what happened, but that is the only possible alternative hypothesis I have come across.

the tech we sort of know about is not just that 5g can be turned on, but that it can be used in various modes and intensities, that interact with mind and body functions. At the very least to interfere with functional integrity of the biofield/gel water with living systems, and in some cases to affect nanoparticulates - ie to ionic dispersal or molecular clumping. I don't know what is being sprayed in the skies - now officially - under 'weather control' or sun dimming or aerosol 'medications/vaccinations'. It's a black box. Just as the 'elitism' generates a sealed unit in which we are to operate with no user access - not unlike a rat maze in a lab.
So there's a few more far-out possible factors that might play into either the physical or the psychic realm of effects that are both in play.

I am aware that belief in a threat operates as effectively regardless of being real - especially once induced into defences given status of protecting or boosting immunity. So I lean to a world of lies going much deeper than we would think - for thinking was derived from them. But on a brighter note, the lie is only thus as a capacity to pass off as true. So uncovering the false is the freedom to now seek and find truth - not least by refining our questions from an expanding embrace of truth, lived felt and shared rather than 'modelled' for predictive control.

#3

If the spike preceded its 'virus' what is it?
It seems to me to be indirectly assayed by means of the same kinds of 'tests' as generated a test-demic. It is supposed to be produced (minus its virus body) by genetically modified human cells after injection and transfection (via nanotech hydrogels), for that is the stated purpose and function of the gene therapy-cum-vaccine.
But is that taken as fact because experts say? is it another case of cell debris being flagged as 'spike' protein - as a spiking narrative in a mutating novel?

I note the MSMedia(lockstepped as it is) & social media, pushing the memes of sudden death athletes and celebs WITHOUT assigning injections as suspects. This leads the public to 'join the dots' and set the belief as their own thinking - bases not unreasonably on distrust of the whole business of fearporn led globally orchestrated coercion. So while I do believe they are toxic, I am wary to being coopted into consenting against my will by mindless reactions.
In their terms the result they seek is a biosecurity state or a biotech revolution.
I translate this as bio-insecurity status set into technocratic controls even at the level of biological augmentation. In order to get consent I see a narrative of being irrevocably damaged to become a reset for original sin under a new Technate.
Again :- Belief something is so, can function as such, regardless truth - once invested in by reaction. Who has eyes to see is of a discernment in the heart of wholeness or integral sovereignty - that is - within life - not set over or as if apart.

#4
I don't prefer the use of 'immune system' as such but of the natural homeostasis of a living system in maintaining its core functions amidst change and challenge.
I also lean to Hamer's understanding of cancers as 'biological shocks' that have both conflict and healing phases according to the nature of the shock and the organs affected - ie fear of death goes to the lungs.

But I note research on nagalese and GcMAF, such that one is in some sense supporting the 'cancer' growth and the other turns off to allow reintegration.
As with anyone achieving real results for those with cancers (especially the 'go home and die' stage), David Noakes and Lyn Thyer were subjected to thuggery.
While not about GcMAF, the thuggery was very clearly revealed in the documentary "Cancer is a Serious Business", freely watchable.

One we bought into an immune system, we had to keep it boosted!
But our sense of self and life can be shocked, undermined, depreciate and depleted under constant strain and set into recurring patterns of resetting the trauma such as to regress to an incapacity to sustain the conditions for living.

Reflections on the root of technocracy

Reflections on the root of technocracy

in response to the themes in:

https://iaindavis.com/china-the-worlds-first-technate-part-2

The mind of predictive control is our capacity to model in imagination as a means to both define and navigate a world that we then adapt to or ‘inhabit mutual agreements running beneath our focus of consciousness in the world as we then perceive it.

With the explication of such consciousness to technological infrastructures and computer processing, we are increasing inhabiting our own explicated mind, as a prison that once operates a means to ‘make safe’ by evading, working round or overcoming conflicts. But like a military Industrial habit, ratcheted only tighter for it has its own identity complex, and generates the results that serve its persistence.

The interesting thing about a model or image of reality is that it is a kind of copy or representation in parts but never can be reality – even if it can be of service to a coherent or practical outcome in life. Yet by it we have collectively displaced or alienated our consciousness from a flowing connected presence -EXCEPT when in alignment with service to a coherent or practical outcome in life – ie joy in purpose.

Whys sketch out such observations?
I feel the territory of our unfolding world changes is not just externalised subjection to systems of our own making, but a result of a default persistence or loop of mis-taken identity, within a humanity that is not as we mask and perceive it to be but as an invested collectivised identity dictates. What might this be but what a predictive control was made to substitute for? That is to say, an original basis from which to live that was lost or covered over by separation trauma – from which a fragmented sense of self developed abilities to adapt to and define or normalise brokenness as a becoming in our own right – or at least in rights under All the king’s horses and all the king’s men.
The attempt to manually usurp what life already is, makes us into daleks 😉

 

 

 

Luciferase in Biotech & its namesake

 

 in response to the themes in:

 https://khmezek.substack.com/p/the-truth-about-luciferase/

 

Consider the shift from clinical sickness requiring empirical facts to 'syndromes' set in biomarkers setting diagnosis by adjustable 'tests' rigged to definitions that spin out of a black box science of a self-regulating elitism.
In other words question the veracity of 'the science' ESPECIALLY when funded by huge investments that not only seek a profit, but a platform through which to operate.
From 'virology/immunology' to 'genetic modifications' to biofield hacks.

The ability to use biomarkers is set in narratives based on heavily funded and often dark science - ie spun out of defence research to corporate 'application'.

Perhaps you believe viruses have been found to operate as sold, but even so you must be able to see that belief generates an ideological capture.
So there may be something in cellular debris that 'spike'-protein can be assigned to, but it didn't come from a whole virus as purported. It preceded the construct of the gene sequence from which it is suppose to have derived. So how can mRNA 'work' to make 's-protein' - for example.

I am suggesting a deeply set series of fallacies on which a framework of experienced meanings are be-lived real, by reactions that 'deliver to the physician'. That is 'Luciferian' in terms of guilting or gaslighting as a means to possess and control the living as a source of vengeance on life.

How many see the lie on which the world of control set in fear and conflict operates?
But then to truly see is release, but to set the lie as a mystery cloaked in terror, is to believe it the source of life; the way it works, the stamp of a mind by hate. In other words a self-reinforcement of what we are looking WITH.

Well done for picking the strands out and honouring each for its contribution.
Both the religious and the scientific mind can serve the masking of truth even while seeming to seek it. But deep dissonance needs to be brought to light, rather than used to invoke light as a weapon. For when we would make truth a weapon, we run off with a false light, that reveals only to conceal - as endless hoops or rabbit holes by which to 'seek truth' but never find.
The mind of defence is ingeniously evasive to capture the belief we have eradicated it.
But only love is truly creative. Fear makes shifting illusions by which to 'keep us in the game'.
That illusions have only the power we give them, is hardly powerless to the mind made by believing.

Terrain is True Context

 in response to the themes in:

https://mikestone.substack.com/p/all-terrain

 

Any specific expression is of a field or total environment.
We have a 'reality adjuster' of a mind that creates a model of its reality to 'contract into'.
Reality is 'one' - (the one is redundant).
But our imaging projections - given priority as a self-creation generate a 'choice' between imaged meanings of truth and acceptance of truth.
Why do I go 'deeper' than our world?
Because there is a sense in which we 'made a world' to hide in & hide from by contracting to mask a split mind in mutually agreed definitions. Not by bits of paper but by mutually reinforcing self-illusion. So in that sense we are deeply invested stakeholders in an underlying  'war' on reality-feared' and protected by projection of denial cast out to 'others' and to 'world'.
But thoughts do not leave the mind of the thinker, and so there is nowhere 'else' to get rid of denied or ignored Self but unconsciousness that is nested IN the arena of its denial as its filters of experience, and running as if 'conscious'.
But thoughts do not leave the mind of the thinker, and so you never did and never did and never could 'leave' or be rejected from the Mind of your Creator, of which your true expression as a true heart, waits only on welcome and not on time.

There is a meme that we only use a tiny percent of our 'brain/mind', but the reality is we use 100% to create the experience of being tiny, limited, vulnerable and bio-insecure in need of constant boosting via sacrifice to fear masking control as Protector and Guide.

The disempowering of Mind is an 'attack' on reality, but if looked at directly it reveals our power in its ability to set up defence against (our own) reality, as if at the hand of an other.

The pathogen is but one specific representation of the 'reversal of cause and effect' of a virtual image or model running the minds that made it!
So at this level 'terrain' is Context - not just of associated symptoms or effects - but of of an embracing reality denied by the focus on selected effects as causes to the masking or denial of our own participation.

So every experience has an element of usually unconscious participations that can be revealed by willingness to let curiosity move us past the rules and filters of a masking strategy for surviving lovelessness set in fear and guarded by guilt. Likewise abiding through the appearances of lovelessness to the uncovering of a true appreciation, removes support for a gaslighting around an apparent security set in substitutes for a real relationship. Love and science area truly grounded reality. Both are used to mask in - but then our experience of reality is false, hollow and demanding sacrifice to maintain 'control' or save the face of our ego from a real relationship (Reality).

Life Set in Projected Symbol

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zY8DMV2SY98
I was about to watch the above but it premised its outset in the modelling of scientific ‘dark fudge’ to support its model and save the appearances claimed real – as the Emperor’s new clothes.
So I wrote this instead.


Separation trauma sets symbolic archetypal patterns as primary conditioning to a split or dissociation from Mind.
Such symbols are the architecture of our sense of meaning, identity and culture - that after its catastrophic past set the steady state cosmos and consciousness of world that generated rational and organisational capacities to the shift from a mythic sense shaped by religion, to an object model of predictive control shaped by science.
Plasma physics and electric universe paradigm offers a re integrative path to a science set in active ignorance as the investment of identity in material manipulations, by which to marketise and weaponise discoveries, as well as to distort or conceal discoveries that were seen as threat to possession and control as an inherently private agenda, regardless its social or political organisation, for control is set over life, others and world and so at its root it separates and conflicts to a pathological model requiring sacrifice and fudge as 'too big to fail'.
And so even as the first recorded impressions of pre antiquity onwards became mutating stories and themes that could no longer be linked to lived experience of peoples around the Earth, yet reveal psychic or psychological patterns that replicate in always morphing arenas of thought and endeavour, so also do scientific models become cultural identity complexes that seek to maintain a unity against fundamental revision by an active ignorance of 'discovering' new iterations that reflect and reinforce the original premises - regardless lack of empirical validation - excepting where technological applications require ever more complex ad-hoc mathematical extensions - expressed not as human science, but as a recipe or formula for manipulating objects or matter.
There are various aspects to the Lucifer in mythic or symbolic themes, but in scientific terms I venture 'gaslighting' as the true nature of the Promethean theft, or indeed the mis-taken inheritance of the Prodigal Son - as the nature of a dissociation defended against truth of a relational being that cannot be brought INTO dissociation - excepting as symbolic substitutions that are then 'objectified' or taken out of living Context.
Fear set in shock can trigger recoil to contraction - along with distancing as denial, masking in a basis for control from which to set a focus in NOT KNOWING, as the basis of becoming something in our own right; a self in itself, surrounded by thing-in itself, whose Source is so distanced as to allow the developing consciousness of a world and universe in its own terms.
What is the basis for control but guilt that stamps the boot of its past grievance onto the rising of a present into a future like itself? It doesn't see itself as anything but justified or compelled by externally driven necessity - which is its 'dark father'.
The Saturnian era became a lost Golden Age, an old normal that a hateful and unworthy chaos has deprived or denied a self-reality set in image and form.
A projection, cast from Heaven seeks to regain what it took as its right, in image upon the body of the world to serve fantasy gratifications that set a mind for getting.
And within this is the hate that was cast out as by denial of the loss of love and power - to an Other.
Self-vindicated by vengeance running as false god or 'dark father'.
There is no peace in it.
It knows not of love, but to manipulate the masks of virtue.
Be mindful when tempted to join in or give identity to hate - regardless the offset of a 'greater evil'.
An abusive 'relationship' uses the relationship to Get from, manipulate, and take possession of, regardless whether as victim or victimiser, for the dark and the light set in symbol are both a mask over a true awareness that is light and knows light by extension, not by sacrifice.

Fear as false basis for thought given power and protection

 The contagion or communication of fear operates a break or breakdown of natural communication to pre-emptively defend a position under attack against a postulated threat.

The mental aspect is not more than a story of asserted differentiations assigned as causal relationships to a potential outcome of impending pain of loss, that itself becomes causal in the mind that then takes the story in by acting from its premise to avoid or mitigate expected attack.
The emotional aspect is of a looping intensification of attention given to the modelling of strategies set from the perspective of the negative outcome as a reality, along with the story that models it.
Thus the self-conditioning investment of identity by which to become a stakeholder and subscriber to such an interpretation as an accepted imposing reality against which to think and act  to limit loss, and attack or overcome the threat, to survive in the terms and conditions set by the modelling of the story.

True relationships partake of one. That is, one extends to another as a relationship in which order arises as the nature of the one through the many.
Our minds have learned & developed the ability to dissociate reality in exactly the pattern of thinking described above. A preferred & persisted imagination of a negative or lack, threat and attack basis, from which to  seek and find validation and reinforcement for the justifictions set to gain a covert dysfunction, over natural relational order of wholeness as unified symbiosis or synchronicity in the purpose of one through the many.
To the self-conditioned reflex, the realm of attack or threat based reality, is without rest of abiding connection, relational integrity, direction or functional support, and so what is innate to one, has to be substituted for by the use of the mind as a command and control function, to make safe within an impossible situation that has only happened in the polarising identification of a mindset in dissociative denial of integral wholeness for the focus in a specific but shifting modelling of arbitrary judgemental selections, that operate as temporary basis for experience of a personal mask of self set by fear to seek substitution for life in collectivised or socially reinforcing narrative distributions of fear, pain & loss in sacrifice to a masking control as the saviour from total loss of face, of self control, to a life feared for what we project onto and attack. Thus our expectation is in like kind, of being projected into, and killed from a reality outside and alien to a tiny fragment of love that is defended and protected against total loss within its complex of masking defences against real and natural relationship and communication by guilt driven fears of retaliation and guilting manipulations of defence.
However, the nature of true relational being is not broken in truth but in concept, as a mis-taken identity in private creation, that can be represented by "I Want It Thus!". Which usurps relational recognition by the pre-emptive set of terms and conditions for reality in which it will permit relationships to conform.
The development of personal and social checks and balances on overriding dictates, becomes the masking arena through which it operates by stealth and guile as a systemic expression of defence against the life it depends on to subvert & deny, as its claim to your existence in its terms.
A segregative movement within life is part of its whole expression. But without life runs blind, loveless and self-limiting, to the point of incapacity to serve or support life.
That we live in life is not a body of imaged thoughts and beliefs running as subconscious conditioned reaction, but that there is no other to life, we have not become other, or set power in other - but by our persistence of invested identification in such a use of freedom to think as an oppositional substitution for Integral Creative, for wholeness is not an in-silico Humpty Dumpty stitched together by all the king’s horses and all the king’s men. Even if that is the driven need of a mindset in limit and loss, seeking wholeness in a 'world' set outside and other by an image that can never by fulfilled or vindicated, but that the dream shifts to nightmare.
It shall run its course, but at any moment of true relational appreciation, it is undone to natural order in which we learn to choose to accept what we are because we want it instead of wanting what we are not and learning to choose for it to gain a normalised or internalised inversion of cause and effect.

“Everything is BACKWARDS; everything is upside down! Doctors destroy health,  Lawyers destroy justice,  Universities destroy knowledge, Governments destroy freedom,  Major media destroys information, And religions destroy spirituality".    Michael Ellner

False framed - Why not Both And...?

 

 in response to the themes in: Covid-19 – Mass Formation or Mass Atrocity?

https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/11/investigative-reports/covid-19-mass-formation-or-mass-atrocity/

 

When an issue is framed in such terms, I feel disinterested in participating in its terms.
Mass formation is a coined term for emotionally driven mind-capture as narrative framed identity.
Conflict in the mind are never in one alone, but expressions of a shared field of unconscious resonance.
That I can articulate some of this does not reveal it nor enable me to claim freedom for myself alone or apart.
Truth reveals only to an honesty of relationship, which in our terms will involve a release of a masking dishonesty set in defences that are for the most part internalised, invisible and running subconscious as habit strategies.
So where is our self and world in what I said so far?
As inherited and acquired conditioning its split runs as causal but masked over.
As an experience its result reflects and reinforces its cause.
Yet within our lives run conflicted and conflicting thoughts, beliefs and purposes - including attempts of All the king’s horses and all the king’s men to maintain a mask of control, continuity and unity. And such is the overhead in unconsciousness and taxes as to leave little free attention for receiving and sharing in anything outside the terms and conditionings of personally nested social rules and filters of security or support relative to an arena of conflict whose core holds archetypal patterns of separation trauma, that can be now articulated as forms of rejection, abandonment, treachery, betrayal, shame, and corresponding defences or coping substitution, but were laid down prior to the development of a mind that is predicated in and by such defences.

So where in this is agency or freedom of will to align in truth that heals and corrects error in ourselves and others? In our present and our past, such as to release the stamp of a past set in grievance to receive future of unbounded potential as our true inherence of being?
It is not in understanding about, taken as knowledge, and applied as a narrative as if to nudge or frame life into order - but in this specific situation given in faith to an awareness that is not our manufacture, but the source of life as one through the whole. In practice this can be likened to pause reaction, so as to listen at the heart in a moment of stillness for connection at a level of knowing that is entirely qualitative - or directly felt or known yet through the situation and to it, so as to run prior to conditioned reactions of a mindset of distancing, masking and attack.

When a masking 'reality' breaks down, it becomes increasing unworkable even in its own terms, such that what was kept hidden or 'cast out' and attacked in the other, can no longer be redefined in a continuity of supplied unconscious for the identity within 'control'. This implicitly offers an opportunity for healing, awakening and reintegration, even while presenting as breakdown to defencelessness against rising threat as loss of control and therefore loss of face to ourselves within deeply unsettling inability to regain or re-assert 'control' without sacrifice of consciousness of integrity or self-honesty. HERE is the choice to NOT choose to deny the life we have and know despite our fear, and this is the release of a groupthink or stake in 'mass formational identity', as a freedom to give attention to the movement of our being, as innate curiosity or freedom to question the questionable. while partaking of a love we have chosen not to deny.
That what we accept we extend is the nature of mind, such that we no longer accept the mask of socially reinforced denials or projective hates as true of us. Or find the habit deeply distressing to allow to run for the sake of 'peace'.
Do the extension in the doings of our lives of a qualitative connection goes forth to gather witnesses and align outcomes, just as did the teaching and learning of a split mind set in evasion or distancing as its 'salvation' from a deeper fear that shall not be known, but masked and attacked in complex defences that teach 'love' demands sacrifice as the means to keep the little that ye hath from the whole of total loss.
There is no substitute for love, nor can All the king’s horses and all the king’s men regain or remake a Golden Age set in and by trauma of loss to seek vindication in vengeance for being denied.
But there is a freedom within being to release the mind of its own mis-creative self-reinforcement, that is ours but for the giving.
But of ourselves alone we cannot give life or even recognise another in life, but must 'join' in substitutions, coded ritual behaviour, wishful acting out of symbols set in mysteries kept obscure.
Eyes to see are not denied us but by an inner dictate running under a blind eye. For believing is seeing, while what we say we believe seeks to mask over what we hate, fear or are ashamed to look on.

Law is rooted in being, by true with-ness given true worth-ship.
False premises set false profits to align as false witness to protect its invested stakeholders.
Attacking the lie and the father of it, is its means of contagion and replication as a 'mind -virus'.
Undoing the basis for the lie to pass off as real, is the result of seeking and loving truth.
Who would make truth a weapon must frame a life in vanity.
But defending awareness of truth is the basis for our sanity.
For without a grounded reference point, a mind spins in its own tale to reap as it sows.

 

The parasitic mindset

in response to the themes in:

 

https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/the-parasite-class

 #1 (from the opening statements)

Elitism is a cult of self-specialness.

It's exceptionalism or supremacism stems from a conflict of possession and control. IE: a sense of self-lack or fear set in illegitimate or envy or vengeance-driven 'getting' for a special or personal vindication.

Bastard was an illegitimate child - that is not lawfully entitled to inherit. Baseless claim or indeed unlawful claim or act also merits this meaning. Though the usual meaning is 'what I most hate, seen in others' as an expression of denial withholding or rage.

That's as far as I got - but regardless the world and its history of self-fulfilling guilt and fear, I use my perceptions and reactions to reveal myself to me - because the very nature of projection is unconscious or it would not work as a defence against what I haven yet or am not yet accepted as having a correspondence in me. This looking within cannot operate at the same time as a gaslighting or blaming mentality - in perp or victim mode.

#2 (To the main article's themes)

Parasites serve some symbiotic function. This may be said - not always, but for any living thing, I suggest always - whether we are aware of it or not. Nothing and no oneexists in and of itself alone.

I agree self-interest is the underlying principle but that self-definition is key to what at that moment operates to frame perceptions and responses.

The experience of fear or threat will have an effect on the mind of an individual as on a group that can be looked at on many levels ie biology as well as psychology. The reflex would resolve to restore natural rested function, but if the conflict persists, loops or is reset over and again, a condition sometimes called 'amygdala capture' operates as a reptilian brain override for in the focus of a fight-flight reaction all else is subordinated to the 'emergency powers'.

Under intense and extreme conditions, adaptation to a conflict state becomes identity within it. Here are the blocks to the peace from which to release an identity that fears loss of self, face or power as a result of restored Communication. So guilt and guilting aka the blame game operate every kind of manipulative masking deceit to protect the problem, the conflict, the realm of death and taxes - for neither are inherent to our creation are the level of our spirit but pertain to the mortal coil of masking in the body as a distancing and separation from Infinity - which is neither big or small - being edgeless or 'non local' as the locals here use as a more sciency term than anything associated with non-physical perspectives of the past.

But in the Bible as an example, the idea of the Adversary is within a greater 'Plan' or function, as activated in a sleeping Adam, initiated in Job but then restated in fulfilment in NT Jesus. I know the idea of evil get CAPS and generates an identity set over and against as if The Good Guys, but Jesus says resist ye not evil for a very specific warning, namely (in modern terms) what you resist persists, while that which is left unused fades from non use.
Perceived evils feed on emotional reaction, and 'transmit' contagion by resonance to the attempt to eradicate them - which righteously kills all the bastards as a self-vindicating sacrifice - and once started sets the basis of an identity that loves to hate, and so must hate to love, and so can only mask in virtue that it thought to claim in righteousness.
Pausing an instant to check in at the heart is not a technique, but the only way to truly live conscious to our life, for otherwise our conditioned reactions replay or reset our past - which is protected and mutates to ensure no future can 'break in' to relive the trauma that such strategies were set by and learned under.

Excepting that the complex of defences set by lies to conceal against true disclosure ARE a compound of death and taxes - for as you may have wits to see, death is 'unconscious ness' or denial of function to awareness set in the focus of an identity theft, or mis-taken inheritance.

So the masking order disintegrates to the rising of awareness - along with all the suppressed denials, conflicts and grievances, that a surface 'order' pushes beneath the table or gives a blind eye to.

One more point; the attempt to escape from our conflicts without addressing them, operates the 'magical solution' that repackages them into novel forms that effectively redistribute psychic energies such as to determine 'who pays' in a negatively operating pass the parcel of blame, running in a Fabian construct of musical chairs, accelerating under opportunistic orgy of plunder from destruction.

For fungi feeds on dead stuff, without which life would choke on death (as in fact a culture of death does in denial of life). So a willingness to take the feedback of our experience of a world as valid results to an input that also runs under our own radar as subconscious habits or unconscious denials is the willingness of bringing the unconscious to awareness in stead of endlessly sacrificing light and life to a gaslighting complex of defences set very deeply in protection under trauma and self-protected from casual interference - ie surrounded with thorns or guarded by terrors. What is true love but nothing added or taken away?
Notice how in emergency held in presence is guided to only do what is needful and not do what is not required. This is not a moral code, but alignment in energy and purpose.
There is more could unpack from this because a seeming unity can access resources that are unwise to underestimate. Fear driven agenda can access ingenuity that predictively anticipates what you were about to think, but it cannot create, it can only feed off the Creator it must deny in order to seem to exist.