Whose idea of normal?

https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/12/covids-willing-executioners/#comments

in response to the themes in above link article.

Whose idea of normal applies to ‘previously normal people’?

Is it not simply an expression of previously presumed and accepted reality or identity?

Terrain theory posits the individual or specific as an expression of its relationship with terrain or context. This is more of a Field of resonant communication than the object model of external or material causes.

Automatous theory assigns causative agency to specific entities as an independent entity, relative to a world of objects and forces in which it presumes or is presumed to exist. This is the projection of an image-belief we create our self.

The normalisation of pathological theory as a basis for social masking of inner conflicts as a basis for survival as a distanced, locked down and masked separateness is a human expression of self-consciousness as trauma to be denied, escaped and adjusted for in a social persona through which an augmentation of reality substitutes for natural recognition of life and existence as it is – as I am.

While the mind is masked in its own image it does run as an automaton in place of an aligned will within the Will or Desire to live and share being. It cannot see or hear or know anything by virtue of a self-investment in oppositional thought and intent given power as a split mind acted out on the body of the living.

Anything can become habituated and adapted to as normal, but there are limits to tolerance for pain at all seeming levels of our being that root in the heart of original separation trauma. So in time we will come to question insane ways of ‘thinking’ that self-contradict and mask over the cracks, that dictate ways of ‘seeing’ that initiate reactions of a dissociated mind running its own convictions in polarised support of the shadow projections of another broken relationship.

Unless a movement from which the question reality as adapted to and normalised, no introspection is possible because the mind of masking doesn’t and cannot know you, for not knowing who you are is your chosen defence to which it was invoked to supply.

Fear of infection can lead to casting it out onto others. Hateful and loveless thoughts are made real thereby in the denier and can infect the denied if they are susceptible to the same learning errors. While we deny and disown hate and fear, we will seem to escape temporarily, at cost of diminishing and disempowering the mind of our freedom to release such a choice in aligning anew. Instead we repackage ‘reality’ in solutions by which to mask the problem in external pathogenic actors and agencies that shift and mutate with every attempt to eradicate them.

The insane fragmentation of such a ‘reality’ collapses under its own contradictions to reveal a lack of substance or basis in reality.
Instead of seeking influence and impact with such conflicts, consider what is it that the mask of lies was set to hide or make safe from?

It was an error in the past, whose consequences the whole world is suffering today, to believe that in order to conceal the truth from the unready, untruth should be told to them.

For with the growing capacities of men growing rebellion against being misled was certain to come.

~ Paul Brunton