All in what together?

 #1 All in what together?

https://principia-scientific.com/covid-19-lockdowns-liberty-and-science/

No arguments with the article, but noticing how long it takes for shock to subside enough to allow consciousness to restore some sense of perspective.

Any science to 'lockdown and its associated impositions' is that of the development of already accepted beliefs to generate an even more consolidated identification in fear as control.

So the resort to psychological (psychic) manipulation would seem to be a science of control over outcomes but doesn't recognise its own driving fear as a conflicted predicate.

Garbage in; garbage out.

This is teaching that control is masked fear if we look honestly at the feedback.

That we are all in this together - is a truism, although it could be seen as all in what sets us apart,  but setting apart is a casting out or splitting of what is otherwise unconflicted or innocent of polarising identification.

We might say we are entangled love and fear, set in hate and control - as if the hate could be eradicated of cast out and denied existence. But hate masks an armouring over hurt, which is always ultimately hurt love. WHO exactly attacks the love that we are?

WHO tells us we are naked? - and in need of masking armour?

The capacity to think is creative, but the expression of thought in conflict with the Creative, generates a dissonance, and through the focus in dissonance is the capacity to think I think alone and apart.

So what exactly is 'this' inferred to that we are all in together?

It is an insinuation of an identity being proffered as an offer of an apple that can be left unshared in, and given no reinforcement as worthy of persisting in or building from by reaction.

The invocation of love is framed in a sense of lack, set against a projection of common threat.

This is how we hurt or attack and deny love. Even though the initial attraction is a to a guilt set OUT side a private sense of bubble reinforcement under a narrative of protective control.

To recognise the point of consent, is the capacity to think with life, instead of think we are thinking under a substitution for life set in fear and control.

We have to accept fear as our guide, protector and self for the program to run as conflict management masking as the escape or eradication of conflict.

Any moment of willingness to own or acknowledge fear is at least no longer masking an active denial, and opens the way to be curious as to what is really going on within my own realm of responsibility.

#2 Releasing the mind of a masking deceit

https://principia-scientific.com/covid-19-lockdowns-liberty-and-science/#comment-42834

The mind is split. Who knows what - exactly?

The core message you identify is of forgiveness as the recognition and release of error.

I cannot release another of the consequence of their own choices, but I can join with their innate capacity to align in a truly aligned choice - which may be the last thing a fear-possessed mind allows into awareness.

A world made on fear uses 'masking over', as the basis to grow substitute or escaped self and world set over the denial of feared consequence, as a personal salvation from such fear pain and loss - now cast in narratives that set its world in seeming virtue or necessity - such as controlling viruses and allaying climate change. It is all about conflicted fear and guilt management.

And all about 'me' in terms of a reactive and emotionally reinforced perception and experience, such as to only see what fear allows to be seen, so as to 'make you safe!'

At some point the fear leveraged by control can no longer be hidden and questioning arises that looks where fear says 'don't look!.

Nothing is more dangerous than a completely false sense of safety.

#3 Invoking Ancient Fears

https://principia-scientific.com/coronavirus-a-perspective-from-britain-part-16/#comment-42866

Part of the thing is the assertion of a shock that generates a reaction that becomes a structure for identity, funding as the targeting or framing and directing of attention and intention.

It isn’t a novel shock, but hit on and invoking of denied or ‘deeper’ ancient fear.

Like grief, going round and round what ‘shouldnt be’ wears recognisable ruts that become a self-imprisoning instead of a process of releasing deeply felt connections.

Not to take away from the attempt to make sense or undo the nonsense so as to release its grippe on our heart and mind.

But another facet of a British perspective!