Drop 'conspiracy theory' mindspeak and address 'paranoia'

https://principia-scientific.com/are-pcr-tests-secret-vaccines/ 

Ddwieland

I’m afraid this is the kind of article that supports accusations that PSI promotes conspiracy theories. In the interest of critical thinking, which should surely be promoted, carefully consider the statement that this technology “can potentially transport any drug and release it gradually into your body”. How much drug can a dust particle carry? Are any vaccines delivered bit by tiny bit? Furthermore, recognizing that only a small minority of the population gets a test, why would test swabs be a useful vaccine delivery mechanism?

Sadly, this article presents only a bit of science before jumping into the pit of fantastic conspiracies.

Instead of 'con theory' which is weaponised mindspeak, why not be specific and use use 'paranoia',

Paranoia is ungrounded fear that runs of in its own modelling as is fact, and induces the fearful to react to what is not here or there as if it is real.

The article would be less sensation-seeking if it said 'deliver drugs or toxins'.

The search in the war-minded for secret weapons or leveraging is ongoing and heavily funded and protected.

This joins with the ability to keep weapons 'secret' by means of coercion and deceit, and with the psyop of cultivating fear of terrible weapons or evil consequence in resisting, in a target or rival.

The trace amount of a toxin does not have to be large in size to be large in effect. There are endotoxins that are deadly in extremely small doses.

However, the gain or function of administering mere poison would be simply disease reaction that would serve no purpose as an indiscriminate test, and likely become known as an open attack.

A lot of the current regime change is of conditioning the public to a 'medical' (sic) subjection that ratchets up via all kinds of measures that make no sense if scrutinised. Part of this is the establishing of a biosecurity state under which we are not just data assets to a corporate technocracy, but bio-genetic assets to 'genetic control'. So the collection of genetic information is likely to be ongoing.

In terms of samples likely to give a positive result, I have read the particular points of collection are maximal, whereas coughing into a bag would be a significantly lower prevalence. As to what exactly is being 'matched' with Drostren's primers is unlikely to be anything significant - along with the count of 45!

'Fantastic' but actual conspiracy to defraud, profit and gain political, regulatory and narrative control is part of how our human world operates. This is because fantasy drives a mind or war in seeking illegitimate possession and control, as the drive to defend set in fear of loss.

So I am not out of sympathy with your criticism. Childish narrative fascination of infotainment passing off as real is a symptom of getting off on fear porn - or sharing it without due diligence.

There is a self destructively driven mindset that is 'hidden' in our core definitions of self and world, that might most simply be called self-attack or self judgement, self-hatred, self-denial, self-evasion.

Using the mind against itself is a curious proposition.

How could such a thought be actually effected - excepting in concept or as a construct of thought assigned as reality itself - from and through which to experience.

I see immensely funded props being rolled out to set the stage for the persistence of a control mind whose time is running out, and so its predicate is being 'outed'. As fear of conflict has set the structure in place, the bringing to light is a process of meeting ancient or denied fear that had been unconscious. There is much opportunity for losing awareness to the reiteration of old habit patterns, which translates as there is opportunity to recognise and release old habit patterns. If fear frames us, we take its world as real, but lose a true and current awareness of presence.