Will the Future Belong to the Patriots or the Globalists? (sic)

https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/21/trump-vs-biden-will-the-future-belong-to-the-patriots-or-the-globalists/

I wrote the following to the premise, not to the modelling of results.

#1

 Shall a future set as the conflict of polarised identity, stamp over living presence, a narrative from a past that is not here?

Using the word 'shall' brings the question from the framework of time to the recognition of decision to persist in stamping an 'old thinking' in never arriving ways, onto the source nature and recognition of living thought.

Presence expands to embrace all that is, was and shall be - without 'doing' anything.

Or rather our awareness of - and as - presence, expands the bubble of identifiction beyond  the remit of a locked down distanced, masked and armoured domain - as the re-cognition of life, as communication, in place of communication as weapon or 'spell'.

Can we see a world 'script' masking over truth, so as to contest partial and imagined facets taken out of context and set against each other?

And thus can we see an awakening script for unmasking illusion to the revealing truth?

The willingness to abide a hollow and meaningless self-betrayal is limited because our tolerance for pain is limited, no matter how the mind may spin it into complex packages by which to seem to conceal toxic debts that cannot leave the 'system' but only be redistributed within the mind that thinks it is many, while seeking to regain unity in its own split terms, as a mask of denial by which to cast its conflict out, and away from what is left as its 'self'.

Moralism hides integrity of a true communication.

The nature of true communication is sacrificed to partiality given priority over the whole.

Which abides as the presence of an unfolding creative expression and endeavour, denied us by our own demands, defended as our only protection against fear, of pain and loss.

The hateful is not hard to see, because we have trained our mind to seek and see it.

The presence that must be beneath the mask, may by hidden by wanting the hate to be out there on the others, the world and a past that repeats itself over and over as if now.

Releasing the wind up toy of stored emotional charge to a recognition of presence, is regaining awareness of innate connection, in place of 'battery operated' closed system that forsakes such connection to steal or conserve its charge.

The inducement to sacrifice a living world for a computer system, is fear driven under deceits and diversion, because no one in their right mind would give consent.

Hence the drive to promote and support wrongmindedness, that seeks and sees the hateful and fearful first, and only then allows a 'consciousness' in its framing.

The freedom to explore limitation as experience cannot be denied, but nor can it be more than accepted experience resulting from the wish to see ourselves attacked, deprived, betrayed and broken, as a point of reaction set in righteous claim to separate into 'doing as we were done by'.

The mind is a projector.

But what we choose to give and receive are a sowing and reaping that can only fruit in like kind and measure, no matter the makeover of masking narrative confinement.

Thought goes out, whether to bless or curse, and return in kind.

But while true thoughts connect with the living, double-think 'saves' the dead from waking.

True thought is miraculous.

It is not reactive or even responsive, but rising as the gift of wholeness, through you to your world, your relations, your currently accepted meanings, given and received as if truly current.

#2

https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/21/trump-vs-biden-will-the-future-belong-to-the-patriots-or-the-globalists/#comment-280060

The cess-pit beneath our seeming foundation, is become a source for self-righteous vengeance - coming into our very private chambers after we seemed to 'save face' or raise it over and against the hateful in conquest.

The presumption to be free of the evil that one has set ones face against is the generating of the 'cess-pit' as something to be eradicated, lidded over, cancelled, such as to preserve the 'order' that runs above its denial.

Self-revulsion as a concept, can be opined about, but human self-hatred is a hell indeed if not a final fact.

The revealing of us to ourselves can be the dis-illusioning of what we thought to be and truly believed but was never true - even though lived.

or the tarrying in such illusion as the exploiting of its underlying themes of 'getting' for a self set apart from the life it represents.