A Novel called 'Malice'

http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/04/28/covid-update-focus-on-vitamin-d/#comment-176168 

You are baited and hooked on fearing 'it'. 

What truly is 'it' that you might have or not have - and which may show/not show in tests one day to another?

There is no single 'it' - but there is a name. The brand has been globally launched and its mark in on the foreheads of the many. 

Just before all this push for a biosecurity state control happened, I bought and read a novel - and I hardly ever read fiction these days - but the circumstances around the novel and the author's death prompted me to get a copy and read it. It is called 'Malice' by Jennifer Jaynes. I don't spoil its drama by revealing its plot centres on the weaponising of the common cold...

At any given time do you have the viruses or antibodies associated with the 'cold' in your body?

Or indeed influenza? yes - often - and probably always some of them as well as all kinds of others. Biomarkers set to define health as sickness and protect you from it. Sounds familiar?

The payload of the covid narrative is the aggressively enforced insinuation that we are defenceless and weak and against novel (wtf?) viruses (not mutations then), that are rumoured to have leaked from biowarfare labs - or zoonotic transfer for markets we find may disgusting but which go back to when eating animals started, but may be in part the results of our own medical interventions that undermine immune response or seek to substitute for it.

But threat of death by contagion is just the wedge to break in, for you are now  a 'granny killer' by the fact of naked breathing, touching things, social behaviours, and not doing what the government tells you, or going on the wrong kind of protest, while incentivising social shaming and cancelling by those who think doing what 'Simon Says' will save them.

The redefinition of human being as risk vectors of dangerous infection is a consolidation of the idea of human life as risk of disease demanding pre-emptive strikes. The concept of perpetual war is on surface an abhorrent machine of sacrifice - in exchange for the life it allows in return.

But it is also a mindset and world-view of Me first in which others are fundamentally rivals and enemies or proxies and assets to be used or exploited, running as a persistent sense of locked-down, separated, distanced, and socially masked virtue.

Curiously this is exactly a picture of the capture of the fore brain, and a bypassing of the mid brain to a primitive or 'reptilian' brain - that has direct access to potentials of energy and accomplishment that a self-doubting and self-inhibiting social construct not only cannot access, but also cannot effectively resist being dominated or used by.

If we want something enough, we sacrifice everyone and everything else to achieve it. The intensity of fear can be a motivation to deny others to save yourself. Here is where the test of our will is brought conscious, because if we can knowingly choose this, then we can ask for and receive as we have asked. If we give this 'meaning' to our world we will have it.

If you cannot live with what you have chosen - yet you want life on your terms, you want to dissociate or not know what you do. The mind is a servant and will supply what you ask for - including a blocking of true function for the support of a split agenda running as many fronts to hide the intent of victory of life judged unworthy. And what could this be but 'death' in war and sickness set in forms to be applauded as 'saviour'.