Response to emotional blackmailing by self-righteousness

https://lockdownsceptics.org/2020/07/15/

From Toby Young’s blog

Competition to Find Best Riposte to Crazy Masked Lady
A reader has been in touch with an interesting brain teaser:
I’ve just received a stern telling off for not wearing a mask on the tube by a crazy masked lady with a posh voice telling me she’s lost six (I tell you six!) family members to the “virus”. I must admit I was left a bit lost for words but obviously still mask free. What should my response have been?!

My response to Toby’s invitation:

Dear Toby

If you are not inclined to read the full, #2 is the short answer.

If you still are not inclined to read the full, alight in any moment of resonance - if you will (or do).

But once I accepted your invitation I opened a journey of asking and answer - or considered reflection that expand to a wider context relating to masking identity and appearance.

#1 (Perhaps I had to write this to arrive at #2. I left #1 in, as it exemplifies the liability of becoming framed in reaction to the form of what is asserted instead of first noticing the way and the means of its assertion).

I can see you are upset, but after diligent study, I see that the population at large has been deliberately misinformed to foment hysterical overreaction to a not unusual cold and flu season in which an extremely few have suffered immune response anomalies, many have been poorly or wrongly treated, and almost all have been terrified into compliance with authorities that are themselves for the most part compliant to globally applied directives linked to pharmaceutical corporate cartels and billionaire’s clubs.

The wearing of a mask may give you comfort for your fears - if not actual protection, but it does not give you the right to self-righteously bully, shame or intimidate others into supporting a worldview you are masked in as if your own. 

#2 

If you believe you have a valid point of view worthy of sharing with others, please consider treating others with courtesy by engaging in communication with respect.

I question what I am told by the WHO, by the media, by politicians and their selected experts, and I make up my own mind with reference to all the resources I have available to me - not least of which is an inherent distrust of anyone in any situation who incites and insinuates fear and guilt to leverage invested reaction and compliance to a masked agenda.

This response of discernment offers essential immunity to deceits and was my initial response to yet another ‘pandemic scare’.

Only when I saw the reactions and measures being implemented did I get involved in the more research so as to be able to meet those under mind-capture with information that raised the ‘official’ assertions and methods to question - from the ‘discovery’ of a novel virus (not at all proved to cause the clinical conditions in Wuhan) - to the misuse of PCR testing - abuse and corruption or simply made up statistics - and medical martial laws that were so severe as to give weight to ‘It must be true or they wouldn't have shut down the global economy!!!’ - which is exactly the wrong way round.

I often use the quote “Everything is BACKWARDS; everything is upside down! Doctors destroy health,  Lawyers destroy justice,  Universities destroy knowledge, Governments destroy freedom,  Major media destroys information, And religions destroy spirituality”. ~ Michael Ellner

The learned ‘normal’ was a world in which the thinking that frames us in ‘backwards' could be significantly masked over, but as the means to maintain appearances disintegrates - a new normal is required to 'Save the Masking Appearances' behind which a system of controls deems itself ‘too big to fail’ - or indeed to be exposed to proper legal scrutiny. Globalists (Monopolists mask in global concern) are right in anticipating ‘Great Reset’, but mistaken in the intent and attempt to manually orchestrate this as a top down framing into a sealed unit of bio-technocratic controls that constitute a state of ignorance set in subconscious compliance to incentivised guilt and fear.

Conditioning sets the framing of our mind, perception and range of response, but the meanings we each and together give to conditions are not built in, nor finally determined by a past made in grievance and locked down as survival requirements - because we have and are the capacity to own our fear and abide it enough to observe or notice the thinking that sets us in its terms and bring it to question or to curiosity and desire of a more coherent experience.

‘Don’t just DO something - Stand there!’

The fundamental framing of the mind is belief framed by emotional reaction. Once we run with the bait of appearances, we are already invested in a polarised identity relative to outcomes set in forms of conflict. The woman on the train has every right to experience the validity, worth or power of her own being, but is seeking it in the frame of giving power to 'the virus', and receiving a righteous sense of being denied and deprived by others who do not give worship by sacrifice there. For whatever the actual role of biological responses and communications of cellular health - 'the virus’ operates as a pseudo-religion in terms of assigning an identity in separation from the inner fear or conflict that it now masks for in substitution or displacement. Not everyone wants to know or is ready to know what lies beneath ‘masking appearances’, and yet to be determined by, or subject to, fear in disguise is hardly the true unfolding of our nature or shared sense of worth and with-ness.

To be unmasked can be to lose face, to suffer humiliation and this desperately seek anything to cover over and hold to as a sense of self. But to release the mask is a freedom that arises from that which identifies truly - through us - as the extension of felt, accepted and recognised life and worth.

It is literally true that we set the measure of our receiving by what we give - but that this is not a measure of definition in form, so much as qualitative appreciation of resonance. The mind of possession and control is associated with defining and locking down ‘meanings’ - such as to become a meaningless fragmentation in search of narrative coherence.

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall,

Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.

All the king’s horses and all the king’s men

Couldn’t put Humpty together again.

Wholeness and health are being defined and normalised in a frame or identification of lack-seeking-power.

But are given no voice or witness in their own restoration.

Indeed are actively denied - excepting to gather ammunition and support for the mask of a self-exclusion seeking to hide in the forms of truth - yet preloaded in outcome.

The uncovering of guilt and fear as perception-bias is the opportunity to FREELY release it from the acceptance of a greater embrace. hate does not invalidate the love that we are - but points to hurt that has armoured against further experience of denial. Masking in the forms of love is an even deeper armouring in that it uses the forms and appearances of love to mask a hidden - and terrifying - hate. The attempt to eradicate any facet of our being is to WAR on Life. At some point, this becomes Obvious - and THEN we have a basis from which to question the ‘normal’ of the mind and the world that we have developed, adapted to and lived as real - as a reintegrative or healing movement of our being.