Masking the Vaccine Agenda

https://lockdownsceptics.org/2020/07/16/latest-news-75/#comments 

(I also posted this to off guardian)

To understand the masking edict you have to understand the thinking that drives the vaccine 'imperative' - I use this term to differentiate from vaccine choice as part of health freedom.

The thinking goes like this.

Vaccination is not once applied and forever protected. But requires periodic 'boosters' to maintain some measure of protection excepting in those who are vaccine resistant (are not protected).

Full protection seeks to either eradicate the virus from the Earth or limit it via the notion of herd immunity as a very high percentage of the population maintaining their vaccination status.

Just as a mask believed effective should be protection against the unmasked, a fully vaccinated person should be immune to the virus and to the unvaccinated - but the vaccination is only considered a full social protection when ninety something percent are up to date with the scheduled requirements.

To choose NOT to wear a mask/or vaccinate is therefore to be socially irresponsible - or as Gates coined it - a 'baby killer' - and in masking - the accusation is that of killing the old and the frail - as if lockdown itself is not achieving this already.

The underlying leverage is to undermine individual consciousness of free association and informed decision - which is the bedrock of any cultural human expression - for the subordination and sacrifice of individuality to imposed groupthink of an imagined or asserted collective - represented by victims that are weaponised to leverage guilt and call for punishment, invalidation or penalty of denial and exclusion from social acceptance or indeed status and permission to basic human freedoms - which are now to be allowed by the state only on condition of compliance with systematically regulated and enforced mandates - which may be presented as if a choice - but one which must be chosen to evade heavy penalty.

The issue of freedom and responsibility is at the core of our human experience.

The attempt to gain or boost freedom or life by dumping our consequence to scapegoated others is the mind of judgement and blame that operates power struggle by stealth and deceit in us all. But the scapegoating or demonising of human beings as viruses - (infection vectors) demanding a bio-security state to micro manage not only speech and behaviour but genetic expressions and its result represents an unprecedented human self-hatred, operating in place of connected and coherent thought, feeling and response.

Fear and hatred are always found together - along with grievance and vengeance.

Blind reactive conditioning operates exactly like an A.I system running as a self-destructive loop to the ones it was originally invoked to protect.

The mask in itself is a prop for whatever play anyone assigns it, you can give and hold the meanings you choose to give, but in its imposition by a corporately captured state mandate it operates as a legal placeholder for further mandates that override and erase individual consciousness to conditioned or normalised compliance.

There is no dialogue with such a 'mind set' in intent to deny, but nor need we respond to the masking presentation of a human being in place of the human being.

To give authority to a masking lie in return for the power of its protection against feared and 'contagious' truth is to choose to die while alive as a self set in isolation from feared exposure to an intimacy of being that undoes self-illusion as the possession of control.

Who told you (that) you were naked?