The Inversion of the Precautionary Principle

A few comments int an Off Guardian comment thread

#1

In response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/09/scientists-have-utterly-failed-to-prove-that-the-coronavirus-fulfills-kochs-postulates/#comment-189149 

Something I notice is that the MEANS to effect and maintain lockdown has been and is being demonstrated.

IE: "We have all your bases'!

That the pretext will wear thin is arguable when so many are still on square 2 after assigning their fear conflicted will to the state for protection.

But now the temporary 'immunity' of masks, isolations and shutdown and lockdown is saving them, it only needs a periodic booster of approaching fear to induce greater sacrifice to a groupthink.

So while those who are willing to question, can educate themselves - and share the journey in some ways - such as this, they are not being listened to, but more likely demonised, to in effect be social contagion under top-down security directives - that can and do disseminate at local level - even to the kids who come back to a new normal for schooling.

#2

in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/09/scientists-have-utterly-failed-to-prove-that-the-coronavirus-fulfills-kochs-postulates/#comment-189533

The precautionary principle is being inverted here. Its proper use would be to be cautious in CHANGING or introducing a new measure, treatment or protocol - until it can be demonstrably shown to be without harm.

The attack or undermining of our cognitive ability (actually conscious ness) is the lockstep to a cognitive dissonance whose psycho pathology can be seen to be dissociation under fear.

Science does not happen under fear and coercion, but rather the precautionary principle does nothing that might attract such heavy penalty - and so can be channelled into tasks that support their own subjection as a mitigated sense of threat.

#3

in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/09/scientists-have-utterly-failed-to-prove-that-the-coronavirus-fulfills-kochs-postulates/#comment-189357

Yes. I add that when benefits are defied as the escape or avoidance of risk - then true befits are no longer being desired, imagined, aspired to or given embodiment.

We (generalisation term) are fast becoming afraid to live and learning to hate what we are afraid of. Clinging to control as security and yet contracting or self-limiting and degrading in order to try to hold onto it.

Fear simply CANNOT create - but can use ingenuity to repackage toxic debt within complex financial instruments and etc. Same applies in medical field. Health is NOT a commodity but functional alignment in living purpose. Ticking check-boxes of 'correctness' operates a zombie substitution for active presence - no matter how much motivational training by which to tell yourself and everyone else how 'passionate you are'. (sic).

A correct use of precautionary principle would be transparent and accountable scientific testing of safety and efficacy of a novel product or procedure such as biocides, pharmaceuticals, vaccinations or processed food or cosmetic - before allowing release to public consumption or exposure. As well as clear and accurate labelling regarding ingredients and claims.

Britain HAD this. US does not.

#4

in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/09/scientists-have-utterly-failed-to-prove-that-the-coronavirus-fulfills-kochs-postulates/#comment-189541

Yes. I add that when benefits are defied as the escape or avoidance of risk - then true befits are no longer being desired, imagined, aspired to or given embodiment.

We (generalisation term) are fast becoming afraid to live and learning to hate what we are afraid of. Clinging to control as security and yet contracting or self-limiting and degrading in order to try to hold onto it.

Fear simply CANNOT create - but can use ingenuity to repackage toxic debt within complex financial instruments and etc. Same applies in medical field. Health is NOT a commodity but functional alignment in living purpose. Ticking check-boxes of 'correctness' operates a zombie substitution for active presence - no matter how much motivational training by which to tell yourself and everyone else how 'passionate you are'. (sic).

in response to the themes in:
https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/09/scientists-have-utterly-failed-to-prove-that-the-coronavirus-fulfills-kochs-postulates/#comment-189134
#5

The virus hunters are the determination that a pharmaceutical framework and solution operates as saviour either to the believers or to a bank balance and privileged status of its high priests and corporate sponsors.

That they effectively get away with it over and over again, is by convincing the public 'THIS TIME THE THREAT IS REAL!' (sorry to shout).

While this cycle has worked to the tipping point that Climate fear couldn't reach, it built upon it to operate a lockstepped media blitzkreig, inducing terror and hysteria through which a global coup now operates (strictly as the paramount concern for our safety!)

I recommended a couple of books on this page that I believe would expand your view rather than compound it. (I did read Klein).

If you generate a big enough crisis and make it clear that it sets a new framing for policy and funding etc - then for many it becomes the opportunity through which to survive by aligning in it.

Lies, defended against truth are always generating crisis if not perpetual war. While the cover stories are used as the basis to grow a new set of lies upon, so as to protect them.

In that sense those with the most investment in such identity are most driven and skilled in protecting their investments - and that includes pre-empting inevitable collapse, by orchestrating it as controlled demolition under covering pretext.

The globalists have pulled out all the stops here. If you think this is about a bad cold that has weird immune response complications in a very few who have weakened or compromised immune function - well you can. The cold is real enough and for some an unpleasant episode. But within the context of such fear - everything becomes amplified.

The fear of covid is real in the sense it triggering such reactions, but is it true-founded in reality... really?