Globalism is dying?

Into this article on the Daily Bell

Financial Times: Globalism Is Dying, Even Though It’s the Better Choice

# 1
Retreat - feigned or actual - is a strategy. A ratchet effect may push further than it knows it can hold, but the retreat leaves a significant gain from which to regroup for the next push. Perhaps to return as saviours to whatever chaos can be elicited or triggered in our reaction.

However the very context of consciousness shifts in ways that leaves thinking impotent that once seemed un-challengable. When everything is lies - don't listen to them. Do something real - be with what moves you.

Those who adapt to exploit change, ride close to the wave, perhaps - but exploit is not the term I would choose as much as being in alignment with what is truly going on - rather than in alignment with a predation upon what is truly going on but is not recognized because all one can see is through a getting mentality. There is no relationship or communication with a getting mentality. It is not the wave.

A persistent focus in seeking and consolidating power over generations operates through negative self interest. The 'invisible hand' in reverse. As long as fear operates the thinking then the tares growing among the crop multiply and - as I read it - bring us to a checkmate, breakdown or paralysis - if not into self-destruction on a huge scale. Is there another planet to move on to?

Our global communications and infrastructure make globalism a fact on some level - but the basis of our communication and how we organize and live is a top down parasitic financial-corporate dictate upon a cultivated but also generally accepted dependency. Whatever the futurists predict who are paid big money by big money who then position in advance to what is presumed probable it must be very dire to account for the desperation and careless and callous disregard that is inviting and creating dire consequence as a self-fulfilling fear. For there is no genuinely positive vision for humanity being offered or inspired in any way that is being taken up or supported. It is all fear-based.

The Markets are known to have an 'emotional' undercurrent whatever the rationalisations of account or control - but of course so does human society and consciousness. Drip drip poison of fear does not in fact leverage any real control so much as undermine trust, integrity and enthusiasm of endeavour. The big machinery of corporate profiteering will persist in sucking up wealth regardless of outsourcing true costs because they are set up and purposed to do so - and only a change in law could hold them to honest account or social responsibility. A free market for the power cartels to regulate all else off the Earth is no freedom at all. True freedom must have accountability and responsibility or it can and does extend to rapacious exploitation, corruption and heartless denial and destruction of life. Thus a restoration of true communication, within us as without, is the foundation from which true account is called and witnessed.

Life rises anew from a fresh sense of tangibly felt and shared worth. Our foundation is not a weapon or a leverage or a set of ideas to make into buzzword marketing spin. It is the basis from which all else derives its meaning in us. If coming from fear is conscious - then those fears can be explored, tested and perhaps moved through. But denied fear operates a lie - a concealment, diversion, masking or subterfuge.

There are some who consciously cultivate using deceit as a weapon upon those they do not count worthy or of significance - to the degree that they have no sense of 'lying' even in the full awareness of deceit, and no sense of moral consequence, self-doubt or check. "All is fair in in love and war" and the people of the lie, love to win and refuse to lose. The nature of this consciousness is exposing itself in its effects in society as hate, blame, fear and division - and whatever anyone's intended or professed agenda, these wreak destruction spiritually, mentally, emotionally and physically. Indeed replicating the terror that gave power to the lie. The pattern fruits or replicates its foundation - or one can only arrive in where one is coming from.

If the lie is not you - then watch for hate, fear and blame and honestly account for its effect in you - when dumbly reacted out from, rather than consciously integrated or may I even say healed or undone. Why presume any power to call corporates to account if you wont live the same?

Political 'analysis' often incites polarized identity in hate. Its understandable to feel it when hurt, fear or a sense of denial is triggered for we are all already loaded with conditionings that can be and are triggered - sometimes by manipulative design - but in any case in our relationships and ultimately within our selves.

Without a true foundation one needs and uses the 'OTHER' to generate a strong sense of self and others to reinforce and validate it. That is exactly what operates the attempt to control Life rather than feel and embody one's balance and fulfilment within its flow.

If you hate being lied to - be straight with yourself right now - and see if you throw the first stone or are in a perspective and relation from which to open a communication within yourself where none was believed possible. One can 'try to live' by asserting a presentation that seeks validation - but at expense of investing in a mask that compartmentalizes and conflicts - and requires the sacrifice of an inner joy - whatever substitutions are engaged instead.

Joy elicits a wholeness of being that is not indulging or engaging in hurt, fear or a sense of denial. It can be called different things - and yet you recognize aliveness and connection of being rather than lose yourself in a script of self-isolating gratification. If I don't appreciate what I appreciate in life I depreciate my life and find a script of anything and everything to hang it on - instead of turning to what works for me. And no matter what - turning to what works.

Fearism isn't really alive and so it cannot die - but it can be starved of being fed with sacrifice of life - for 'THEY' cannot force anyone to give up their will - but have to trick them into a false one. So why not use the messengers of fear to check your ground and keep your house in order - which is not really outside you - but your core integrity which grows by living from it.

LynnCarol replied to me

I don't worry about netizons, they are the quiet, closeted people who dare only to speak from a platform of anonymity, and most of them are afraid of their own shadow.

Yes - don't worry - period!
No need to resort to put-downs to have faith in self, life and world!

What the judgement of self-concept rejects or refuses to accept IS our own shadow; the 'unconscious' that we think is out of mind but is no less active as a sense of dissonance, denial and conflicted self that blocks awareness of Cause or Authorship - leading to uncertainty and presumption of anonymous creation - a platform from which the delusion of self-creation seems meaningful - is projected onto everyone else, who then fights them for authorship.
What you believe you have taken must you believe will be taken from you.

# 2

The 'globalism dying', is bait  (see the emotional reactions of the fooled) - the 'it's a better choice' is an implanted suggestion attached to that emotional response. When a positive emotional response is generated - as in "YEAY! globalism is on the RUN! the associated attachment goes in to the subconscious. Which puts an energetic of positive response with a suggestion that rationally one may have negative or critical views about. If rational views generated action advertisers and politicians would use rational discourse - and if you have noticed - they don't.

The persona or indeed its associated tribal identity of a polarised win/lose conflict is the undercurrent subconscious fight/flight routine - that runs AS you while you accept it as true of you. It is properly a response to operate when there is no time for rational evaluation or felt discernment - so as to keep you in physical existence through a sudden threat so as to then refocus in a whole or integrated attention and awareness.

Repeated triggering of this reflex in trauma and subsequent manipulation of self or other as part of perceived temporary expedient or gain - conditions the mind to be effectively run by what indeed can and has been called the primitive or reptilian brain.

Conditioning that is not addressed becomes the 'condition' that is presumed and accepted real - and any attempt to them address it is seen as un-real, or dissonant to the business of life within the conditioned reality.

The irony is that hidden in the most basic survival urge is the most destructive influence to Humanity - and perhaps to Life on Earth of which we are a Consciousness Expression.

An exclusively physical body is dead. The exclusion of the non physical excepting as exploited to manipulate the physical is using Life to bring about death. No matter how irrational it seems to the 'thinking' of a conditioned mind - the actual choice is death - but in the guise of the 'survival' of a disembodied mind - that stands outside Life and in place of it - as the power over it. Death is spiritual blindness, death is feeling disconnect - mental dissociation and denied or blocked physical function. The transformational nature of all experience includes the withdrawal of focus from the objects of identification when it no longer serves purpose - and in that sense death is not a denial of life so much as a release. Fear of change and fear of death are associated as with fear of any negative outcome.

'Between the devil and the deep blue sea' is a saying that illuminates why the deceit is chosen and the truth is kept hidden. The deep blue sea is not a sense of control or even a sense of self as we take our self to be. More like a void onto which we project our fears and the deceits that fuel them.

Wanting to know the truth in our terms is trying to force Life to join in and take part in our conditioned narratives and definitions - and this makes the Movement of Life seem limited, weak, unreliable, or non-existent - while the voice for supporting the narrative gets louder and associates as the power to protect or preserve the self-in-threat.

To know the truth of our terms we have to release them - not to an 'other' but in yielding to our own being. If the lies of the mind have not sickened you enough yet - then you will think you - as you define yourself are your own being - and yet that exclusive sense is a partial true - to be corrected of distortion and expanded within an inclusive integrative recognition of being - which is the gift OF being and not an object or ability to be harnessed or used by a mistaken partial sense of self arrived at within confusion. Silence is not empty and the Void is not annihilation, nor is space or awareness a nothing. On the contrary fear is a mistaken identity - but the waking of this recognition is a compassionate translation of denial to true acceptance. No one heals or resolves an issue they are not willing or able to face or own - but who is without some awareness of their desire for hiding or avoiding an honesty of noticing. The people of the lie are not people who lie so much as the willingness to use it as power and protection - but a lie is seeking to hide a feared true - and if that fear is truly unjustified, it is an error and not a sin. Calling for correction and not inflicted pain of vengeful hate.

As it stands the Daily Bell may be promoting the ruse by not in some way bracketing and identifying the payload. yes the word 'claims'.
Perhaps "FT ed uses 'globalism is dying' to insinuate it as the better choice?"

And is not globalism v populism another faux choice?

From your conclusion:
I am not denied my own course of action in my life - though I may act out from mistaken perceptions. The notion 'taking control of my own life' is worthy of expanding upon and consideration - for all these terms are 'loaded' and can mean many conflicting things and therefore persist a conflicted agenda of a 'control-mentality'.

Clearer saner perceptions lead to saner choices. I see that insane choices promote insane results that then validate their premise. I suggest the whole record - or thought system that we base our understanding on - is corrupted and therefore a fresh currency system is called for - from the Ground up.

If I uncovered dishonesty in my personal narrative identity assumptions - that I have invested my life in - would I release that investment to align true - or persist in what then would be a knowing falsity? And if the latter - would that be while enquiring into and discovering more as to what IS true or by denying the denial with heavier investment in narrative spin and heavier consequence of entrapment in a lie?

- - -

# concerndcitizen said

The is the end of centralization and everything will now move to be decentralization. Centralization had certain advantages that were abused by those in a position to abuse them. Those with access to the top levels of banking and politics were able to milk it for trillions, while everyone else saw a lowered standard of living. This is now obvious to the masses.

My response to concerndcitizen

Or decentralisation as defined and controlled under a technocracy administered by elitists? "You can choose whatever you want - and these are the terms in which you must operate - or else...".
Where exactly are the choke points to the ability to live? Housing, energy, food supply and distribution, water, healthcare and environmental integrity, access to information and education, social and legal requirements including means to access any of the above - ie money. The owners of the financial system have leverage through all of the above in a number of ways and is effectively strangling Life on Earth to death, or subjection or perhaps some kind of torture in which power gratification over powerlessness runs both hot and cold. But I say this in appreciation of the denial splits of compartmentalisations that operate beneath the persona we present. assert, and defend.

So maybe you mean this is the time when bad cop leaves the room and good cop enters. Are such ploys obvious to the many?