Cancer causing meats?
Although I do not eat these foods I feel moved to ask the profession of science and journalism to discern what is appropriate to the eating of such meat and what is actually a result of the adulteration via methods of it being processed and distributed - along with the adulterations of chemical and bio-interferences in the raising of livestock.
That is to say organically and humanely raised animals NOT fed GM and NOT pumped up with antibiotics or growth hormones and so forth - may not have the carcinogenic affect.
Perhaps there are other agendas here and truth cannot be allowed to interfere.
That diet, stress, and environmental exposures have epigenetic and inflammatory effects including conditions leading to development of cancer - and many other illness conditions - is now scientifically known as well as common sense.
Processed ANYTHING is a significant health risk to make a habit of eating - and there are many rich insights to be gained here that would serve us all to uncover and benefit from - not least being the breakdown of communication and relationship from which all these evils arise.
Worry can also significantly contribute to falling prey to negative conditions and outcomes. The causes of cancer are really the conditions in which cancer is the natural outcome. There are many such and addressing the causes as an integrative whole is MISSING in our society that has a trillion dollar cancer 'industry'. As is honouring and supporting non-destructive (non patentable) natural ways of cancer prevention, management and remission.
Withholding such educational freedom in the inverted claim of protecting against quackery is a regulatory corruption.
Processed people are in effect, farmed.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment. If your comment does not show - it is probably waiting moderation - which is when I notice the email notification!