The Most Popular means Of Dying

 https://off-guardian.org/2021/04/16/three-things-most-people-dont-know-about-physician-assisted-death/

I am glad to see Frei doing what she is good at - rather than opinions that are inflammatory.

Iatrogenic disease is in my view the most popular means of dying - at least in 'developed countries'. The epithet of 'healing' or 'healer' is now used officially only for PR or pipeline 'cures'.

The biosecurity state (sis) is the logical result of a death cult to which the many cling as if to their life. The choice for death is where a protectionism locks down. dissociates from life and masks as protection from underlying conflicts and contradictions. All of this is from the worship of the body as the frame of a dissociation and lockdown of the mind, under fear. A Course in Miracles offers the understanding for this, but the mind that thinks only as its body and world dictate can not hear or see anything except as its mask dictates.

The masking of oppositional self-illusion as 'virtue' (doublethinking) sets up the management of conflict, set in frames of fear, hate and guilt that are redistributed via narrative magic rather than truly addressed - where healing is.

My sense is that in this sense our 'world' is a mask and a 'power struggle' of competing and conflicting narrative addiction or compulsion. Yet is no longer able to mask it masking or deny its denials - such that always active insanity is coming to an awareness that can no longer be normalised. The limiting of consciousness is the 'answer' to mask out awareness of disturbance that cannot otherwise be flagged to external diversionary 'enemy and threat'. Limited death is thus the attempt at partial sacrifice to appease the god of terror. The idea of the self and its proxies as sacrifice to forfend evil consequence is also the idea that someone ELSE must pay or take as much a share as can be persuaded or 'incentivised' by the application of coercions and deceits set as 'virtues or protections'.

The complexity of entanglements of a mind set in evasion and projection of its own conflict is more than mind boggling - it fragments our mind and perception to operate as 'legion' of compartmentalised conditioning. Such that a narrative 'continuity' operates something like the 'Men in Black' to protect core narrative belief from disclosure.

The disturbance of pain and conflict in heart and mind can be such that death becomes called on as saviour. The industrialisation of sickness as a displacement of 'sin' set in externally defined justifications and entitlements, is set in interventions to a fallen or broken and inadequate 'nature' seen as a machine of death.

What we perceive reveals what we are looking with, through or from.

The usurping of the mind by fear and guilt is no less self-reinforcing as experience than any other ideas given priority of funding, attention. But our experience can be completely dissociated from Reality - which is whole and therefore shares wholeness.

The fragmented mind is Humpty Dumpty under all the king’s horses and all the king’s men, set to an impossible and futile task in degradation and depletion of death as the new normal. This them recurs because it cannot be addressed externally. The addiction model is helpful in my view here. Lack and fear driven Self-blindness.

The 'system' can only operate the modelling parameters. It is blind or dead to the Living Ones. Any system is only as workable as the quality of the people who run it. The willingness to sacrifice the Living Ones (ourselves in wholeness) for the system is backwards, and that is revealed by the valid feedback of a world in which “Everything is BACKWARDS; everything is upside down! Doctors destroy health, Lawyers destroy justice, Universities destroy knowledge, Governments destroy freedom, Major media destroys information, And religions destroy spirituality". (Michael Ellner).

People say 'what can we DO'? From a place of already accepted powerlessness seeking impact or leverage over life and lives of other and of our world. All doing automatically embodies who you are currently or actively accepting yourself (and world) to be. And so freedom is not in the doing - so much as in the alignment of mind and heart to the expression of a Living One - that you are - even if you 'doings' teach you to lockdown in divisions and doubts.

So whatever you do or choose to leave undone, you already are the freedom and capacity to grow in response-ability for who and what you think or accept as true by acting from it now. The fixation in lack and conflict and a fascination with evil seems to be a mind of its own - as if you cant help it, or they made you do it!. Disease can also seem to have a mind of its own - as if something OUT THERE is seeking to attack or violate you, that has nothing to do with what you think, yet hones in on your doubts and fears as a 'self-fulfilling' expectation.

Science sought to get rid of psychic context to make a 'rational world'. This is how the deceit operates; anything given power as panacea for psychic or relational conflict will BECOME the arena of its unresolved expression! But AS IF a novel set of threats and defences. This is not a reset, but a shift from broken dream to a deeper dissociation whose promise falls away to nightmare.

Truly addressing is bringing it to light, not defining in darkness made normal and then attempting to heroically and pathetically sacrifice light to 'overcome' it.

Protecting masked meanings or a covert narrative ID from light of awareness is a contract to a self-apart - set in lack driven seeking. But nothing taken out of Context is then sharing Life - no matter how many lockstep in its worship. Dead concept, image and forms do not heal, renew, inspire, and share in the wonder and gratitude for being. So why wait for our death bed to grow in the willingness to release unforgiveness set in normals of protected grievance? Our relationship with Self as Life is not our masking adaptation to a broken or loveless world.

The visceral nature of pain can be on any level of our human consciousness. I am not saying it is wrong to mask or distance, but to grow awareness of what we choose, so as to grow in the capacity to make choices from a more aligned awareness.

Do we cling to fear of pain and loss as IF a love of Life?

Are we wanting to be phished?

The tension between knowing and being known truly and a masking presentation seeking reinforcement is the seeming conflict between love and fear - where each can be mistaken for the other. But is resolved by choosing one and letting the other go. There is guidance and support for reintegrative healing, but while we are actively defaulted to fear as a kind of self-love set in a bubble of isolation, we WILL not hear or feel the prompts of the heart and mind as one.

Live this day well.

Begetting of Illusions and alignment within Living Truth.

https://off-guardian.org/2021/04/13/cija-sting-operation-stirs-fcdos-hotch-potch-of-spooks/

I appreciated you comment and reflected in its themes - as resonating in my own interest..

Illusions that serve as substitution for feared or denied reality, 'beget' according to their kind. Ideas that GENerate in their kind can reflect truth OR self-contradiction masking as currency of meaning. Living Idea is already wholeness by extension, Dead or false ideas seek to recombine fragmented and indeterminate 'meanings' to a lost or broken Communication - as if to put Humpty together again - or indeed a novel virus! Closed systems become pathogenic to Wholeness' extension through us, because conflict with reality is unworkable or unbalanced. Yet protected circles of focus and intent are inherent to the integration of experience as a consciousness or identity complex through which to explore freely.

So the maintaining of a balance of closed and open states is where intention and attention are guided or aligned within a field of receptive communication to context, such that a specialised focus does not develop defences against 'interference' to what then becomes a blind program or private agenda set in its own 'begetting'. A sense of self polarised as oppositional to Context as if a thing in itself creating along the line of its own thought - which is programmed by evasion of true Context as if exposure to loss of a self and life set as control against fear of total loss.

The shift from one illusion to another is no real change at all, only a redistribution of elements and energies within the dream. Yet the mind can operate multiple levels as different attentions given different priority within shifting contexts at a rate its personality is constructed from or upon. The function of illusion is to replace reality in the mind of its 'projection', casting out, or imaged modelling.

Any story that substitutes for truth demands truth be hid or masked over, to distance and time. In the meantime a narrative continuity gives priority to facing out into object continuity. Learning to focus such a world is a primary requirement to participate its experience. We think life is a body, but thought shifts billions of times per second to provide support and reinforcement to the total experience that of course we both have and are.

The body as a communication tool, has been developed as a separator and proxy through which to explore the experience of who we are not, or as we are not. Yet it remains purposed to communication regardless being used for fantasy gratification in substitution for appreciating reality as Is. Likewise the mind that has been mapped out to body and world as a conditioned or automatic response.

Conscious realignment to communication, releases the intent to use the tools or forms of communication as a weapon or leverage on Modelling AS IF to control reality. Communication is first, receptive, and through this, moved to act, or ask, seek or unfold fulfilment of true desire. True because nothing is added or taken away from a direct recognition free of coercion. Hence alive or communicating implicitly as presence, inspiring, resonant, meaningful, just, worthy and shared by nature.

The wish to re-Genesis life is from the belief that we both can and have such power. This mind is already looking through a glass darkly at a fragmented and conflicted 'world' that is both witness to war death and sickness set over truth, and driver of the hate of such a life as the attempt to escape it, overcome it or redefine it by adaptive compliance to its dictate.

That there is an already Wholeness of active Extension is hidden or discarded by the mind set in the conflict of its own mis-begetting and driven to complete and impossible or futile task. Garbage in; garbage out.

It is in the field of responsibility for thought that false or fixed ideals set up closed loops of accepted and invested identity. Regardless 'alien agenda' or alienating thought given welcome, our own giving and receiving remains freedom and right to align as our will, whether aligned in coherence or set in oppositional dissonance. Free willing alignment accepts correction as truth recognised and appreciated. The usurping of 'correctnesses' runs blind, as if to reset life to an image, taken in vain. Willingness to see, must release what seems - especially under protected narratives. Here lie invested self-illusions and underlying conflicts that generate them.

All Sickness is Mental or of a 'split mind' (conflict)

 https://off-guardian.org/2021/04/09/immolating-parental-rights-and-overruling-truth/#comment-352270

Lost in a dark wood: Replying within a larger mixed thread:

If “illness” is used in the medical sense, then “mental illness” is a logical impossibility. If “illness” is used in a moral or metaphysical sense, then there is no justification for the involvement of people trained in medicine. Either way, psychiatry is inherently fraudulent. And if Kaufman accepts the validity of “mental illness”, then he is also a fraud

Another view is that all sickness is mental or of a split mind - as in distanced or dissociated, locked down as in denied and denying, and masked as in narrative modelling in place of - or set over identity.

This is asserted in A Course in Miracles - which gives the most complete account of the 'psychopathic' anti-Christ from a perspective of its undoing and therefore of what is 'going on' in our world - because it illuminates the mask or mind though which we think we think alone.

This page: "Sickness is a defence against the truth" is an example.

Of course all words and terms can be mis interpreted by fear, but my appreciation of the work is its release from fear.

http://a.courseinmiracles.com/workbook-lessons/121-thru-150/lesson136.php#gsc.tab=0

The freedom to call others a fraud is as free as you want to be.

FWIW Andy Kaufman is meeting proponents Hamer's New Medicine approach in which psychic shocks or conflicts can be enacted as biological processes - the healing/resolution phase of which we tend to attack or suppress and fear and project onto as 'disease'.

So yes if illness were materially based in organism failure as a result of external violations, or internal susceptibilities, the mental aspect is merely a movie running in the brain that has no real voice or role excepting of course to comply with a terrain dictate.

Logical impossibility or self-contradiction is what ACIM posits as the basis from which a fragmentation of mind and world seems to replace All That Is.

Did you ever read of the THUD experiment - by which the previous iteration of psychoanalysts was revealed to be without substance? When invested illusions are 'destroyed' they build back better! or rather incorporate all that was used to destroy them in their defences, not least by masking in virtue.

Every 'panacea' or solution is thus a means to mask or repackage conflicts AS IF to solve them in externalise or physical displacements. If we understood this, we would be free of a lot of baggage.

Conflict patterns are not just 'personal' or individual, but are broken family constellations at all levels. Separation trauma generates a mind dissociation along with physical 'storage' of encapsulated conflict. The lock in to a body as separator and limit on Communication Feared, generates an adaptation or normalising of insane self-contradictions.

I encourage intuiting beyond self-certainties set in grievance. The Child is innately free to simply ask or question ANYTHING because it does not presume to know but still trusts that truth can be known. That this is masked over is our 'world'.

The nature of denied self is to seek acceptance, and if that denial continues to be met, vengeance. What we resist, persists. It may persist in the very 'WAR ON' whatever we demonise or seek to cast out and eradicate. There's the rub.

The Most Fundamental Error

 https://principia-scientific.com/the-biggest-mistake-weve-ever-made/

As others commenting here are on message with exposure of false science. I will mention the deeper patterns of consciousness.

The response of the mind to fear of its own conflict by limiting consciousness, while projecting the conflict  'out and away' from a sense of self as a covert and locked down control, sets the frame of what we live as our world.

A Course in Miracles describes this - but not to the problem solver in the 'world' - only to a willing desire for a peace that is not IN conflict and its repackaging and masking narrative presentation.

In the Course's terms, the 'mistake' is at the level of mis-identification, rising from taking ourself in image, from which a conflicted sense of fear and love set the basis for a fundamental confusion, such as to hold fear as guide and protector, love as threat to  private 'control' , and become normalised to then love to hate, (fear masked in forms associated with love) and hate to love, (attack and denial of open and honest relation and communication). 

The effect or experience of all this is death in life, or indeed dissociation from LIfe even in the midst of Infinite Life. And though the idea is considered archaic or misused, of the wages of sin is death, where sin is the persistence in self-illusion set against truth and life as relational presence.  AS a mind-capture or possession by fear, resulting from a mind set  in wishes taken and protected as if real.

That in general terms many choose to align in a death cult unawares is a revealing of underlying claims of identity set in fear that for the most part, the mind is set to distance from, lid over and cast out of its surface level by dissociating to narrative rules, filters and defining beliefs.

The pain of Separation trauma is associated with intolerable and overwhelming experience that dissociation, and displacement to diversionary unconsciousness, by which NOT to know what we are unwilling and unready to accept, and death in this context is seen as saviour from pain or even reward of proving a sense of life-denial 'right'.

All of these considerations run beneath the world we think or respond to and reinforce by reaction.

Intuitive Reflections in the Theme of a Plasma Universe

My reflections in such themes as plasma cosmology, are part of reintegrative acceptance. 

 https://principia-scientific.com/the-plasma-universe-and-max-plancks-musical-space-time-revisited/#comment-48430 

Perfect equilibrium would be static, and yet charge differentiation patterns a disequilibrium, by which balance points extend a static or infinite to a relational unfolding of principles or derivative values or states.

I clicked here because this site is cosmologically invested in a mainstreamed model or rather fudge by which to lose empiric science for a dissociated modelling set in technologism of markets and controls. Plasma or Electric Universe perspectives are part of releasing an object model that has become Saturnian in terms sacrificing or feeding on life rather than serving its movement in synchrony with all that is..

Recognition of Law is indeed a balance - and all relational expression embodies balance.

The = sign in all equations is itself a representation of Is.

The nature of resonance in frequency and rotational spin is part of a 'feedback looping' as the generation of communication or synchrony beyond scale and distance. Whether zero-point or ' = ' or some other signifier to Is, set in motion. Yet never truly defined.

The predicates we accept by extending give their results. Adaptation within our results develops the idea as exploration of themes for experience of the only Existence. If we lose awareness of Communication as a Field, it is to structure.

The interplay of communication and form is Life or Existence that is the balancing of inner and outer qualities, states, that are always relational and never 'thing-in-itself'.

Object model reflects the idea 'self-in-itself'. An imaginary posit. A creative act of 'dissociation' or self-differentiation. Reaping as it sows, as masking overlay upon 'know Thyself' to perceive the idea of non-existence by reactive boundaries set as a segregative, oppositional identity.

Thanks for sparking this reflection.

Blind spots, cover story and disinfo

 https://off-guardian.org/2021/04/10/whats-up-with-our-fact-checking-blind-spots/

I smell smear tactic here.

Rosemary Frie called out Bossche who runs a scam to shoehorn Biosecurity state via the ‘Good Cop’ syndrome. But then smears the Tom Cowan – while downplaying the smear as ‘a random example’. Both of them are operating divisively with disinformantion.

The very use of the term ‘fact checking’ is suspect, and then why does she deal out other’s blind spots without laying out her own?

The blind spot is where we think we KNOW, or where we identify in or against a narrative as our primary source of identity. That errors and omissions, biases or poor quoted studies, comments or associations can be invoked to smear the character of another is the INTNT to attack the messenger so as to destroy the message.

I don’t recommend FOLLOWING anyone anywhere that does not ring true, whether you love them or not. I appreciate Those who are actively challenging ‘pathogenic virus theory’. But while I hold them dear, I also hold anything they say that I hold to be questionable or inconclusive or not fully formed, in ‘brackets’, for I am not a follower, not have I any followers – excepting companions in a willingness to uncover truth.

The ‘war’ narrative dictates that your enemies enemy is your friend. Conditional ‘love’ uses others for whatever you can get from the affecting of relationship while conditions fit the terms and conditions. No thanks. It also dictates that you must not be critical of your ‘side’ or cause’ and must all rally behind it as a ‘unified’ lockstep. As in post 911. “You are either for us or against us” – Bush.

I don’t buy the war narrative at the level of Truth. Though I see that lies and deceit sets our mind in conflict with itself and with each other.

Without this deceit-backed conflict – that runs as conflict-driven deceit, fear and control would be undone to a true presence – instead of stamping on the face of a present set in the image of a past made in grievance of attacks led by blind hate – set as justified by grievance set over truth.

Blind spots are set by what we do not want to know, to be exposed or seen, by cover stories that become the vector or Trojan horse by which we act out the very thing we hate under a narrative of ‘masked virtue’. We all share a part in a world of self-illusion. And yet the way out of lies is to truly address the issues that cover stories offer diversion and redistribution of psychic energy, funding and control – so that SOMEONE ELSE pays the consequence.

An elitist clique wants everyone else to pay for (suck up the toxic consequence of) their sins. But they are also reflecting something held in everyone else, that can be called ‘control mentality’.

This goes deep, for everyone protects their ‘self’ as they define and accept themselves to be.

If we hate deceits that betray us to evils and insanity, then we have to be willing to grow in responsibility for our own conflicts of interest. Yet a social ‘normal’ works to make these conflict invisible by looking OUT from shared agreements that are tacitly or behaviourally taught and acquired, much of which is a personal and social masking strategy learned in infancy or childhood before we has any consciousness of a means to evaluate or articulate our experience.

WHATEVER we hold in mind will go forth and multiply, because the mind’s function is a projector. The issue is not of self-reinforcing significances, but of a true alignment or integrity of thought word and deed. Conflict/garbage in; garbage out. But as @dollar vigilante ALMOST says in his latest offering; “You can ignore reality, but you cannot escape the consequences of ignoring reality”. Therefore to persist in self-illusion has to generate masking cover story to account for the increase in conflict by externalising to false flags, that then justify the role of ‘rule’ over the increase of denial, hollowness and ritual parody of life ‘at home’.

So regardless anyone’s faults, I celebrate a willingness to call out a lack of substance in the ‘robes of externalised authority’. If there is a false call, then the authorities or those in such positions can easily demonstrate this rather than obfuscate, smear and attack the messenger, and drive the question out of awareness by use of securitised narrative dogma.

For when ‘authorities’ are used to assert a Big Lie, most are automatically aligned to support their investment in established roles, positions, privilege and prospects, and seek out only the ‘fact checking’ that tells them they don’t have to look or listen because ‘experts’ have already done all the work, and so they are exempted from responsibility as well as implicitly assumed unqualified to comment.

If anyone has interest in spiritual synchronicity – this was my reading today.

http://a.courseinmiracles.com/workbook-lessons/121-thru-150/lesson135.php#gsc.tab=0

If I defend myself, I am attacked

Who would defend himself unless he thought he was attacked, that the attack is real, and that his own defence can save himself? And herein lies the folly of defence; it gives illusions full reality, and then attempts to handle them as real. It adds illusions to illusions, thus making correction doubly difficult.

And it is this you do when you attempt to plan the future, activate the past, or organize the present as you wish. You operate from the belief you must protect yourself from what is happening, because it must contain what threatens you. A sense of threat is an acknowledgment of an inherent weakness; a belief that there is danger which has power to call on you to make appropriate defence.

The world is based on this insane belief. And all its structures, all its thoughts and doubts, its penalties and heavy armaments, its legal definitions and its codes, its ethics and its leaders and its gods, all serve but to preserve its sense of threat. For no-one walks the world in armature but must have terror striking at his heart.

Defence is frightening. It stems from fear, increasing fear as each defence is made. You think it offers safety. Yet it speaks of fear made real and terror justified. Is it not strange you do not pause to ask, as you elaborate your plans and make your armor thicker and your locks more tight, what you defend, and how, and against what?

Choose Not to Play The Game

 https://off-guardian.org/2021/04/05/you-cant-win-dont-even-try/
(A worthy read from James Corbett)

There's another angle to this and that is to recognise the frame of a deceit and choose not to play in its terms.

So in this sense you cant 'win' the covid game, because it is a mind trap - or rather something fundamentally running in the reality fear gives it by reacting in its frame.

Jesus expressed this as 'resist ye no evil!' Which does not mean do nothing, affect helplessness or turn a blind eye as a doormat or complicity. It means do not take the bait of reacting to the framing of that which is targeted to or corresponding to your own profile of thought, fear, sympathy and judgemental bias.

Resisting temptation to such reaction is vigilance FOR peace. Awareness is key to recognition of truth, and fear - no matter how well masked as control or the attempt to regain it - distorts awareness or filters it through a conflict of interests.

Jame's article is spot on for how to escape from a conditioning we ahve ALREADY acquired or succumbed to - and that is to accept and align actively in where we DO hold freedom of choice and responsibility. Quite apart from actions in the world this also applies to decisions as to how we see our world, the meanings and values we give and therefore set as the experience we receive.

If for example we set our goal as changing or waking the minds of others, we give our current evaluation of them priority and set ourselves to impact, persuade, incentivise or coerce them into 'waking up' what we believe is needed to save us. A moment's pause may let it be obvious that that is the problem, not the answer.

The mind is very quick to run ahead and mask in the forms of what passes of as virtue, when in truth it is a hiding place through which to persist the same patterns unchanged but in 'woke' or 'correct' terms relative to a particular groupthink, or narrative identity.

No one can fail who seeks the truth, but everyone knows how to seek everywhere else BUT where truth is, so as to protect the problem from being truly addressed by some kind of war in problem, projected out and away in diversionary displacement.

Covid - at least for some now - offers a key to recognise how a nothing can be given power by fear, and thus become fearfully destructive by reaction. For our 'defences and reactions' are the actual means of degradation and undermining of health and live and social cohesion, not a pathogen. So how do you get out of a problem that is not real? You cannot, and any attempt will compound the belief it needs escaping and make it real.

You don't need to escape from what you were never truly in, but you do need to grow in vigilance against consenting to play its game by unwatched thought word and reaction.

This is another way of saying freedom truly belongs to you as the mind in alignment with the heart - and is then expressed at body level as our experience of relationship and world. The idea freedom is a body is ALREADY a locked down and distanced mind under masking narrative.

Hopelessness and despair are active faithlessness to life, or if you prefer, faith invested in hate and fear and self-conflict.

The latter will dissociate and isolate an alienated sense of 'thinking' as your representative masking protection against fear of exposure to a greater hate within. However the key i wanted to stress in all this is that it is very possible to suffer from a fear of something as if it is a self conviction in truth, when ONLY the attempt to evade it has every given it any reality it has. The mind is very powerful, but not in the way we think. Although the limiting of Mind to such 'thinking' as can seem to trap the mind in its own thought, is fully in line with Jame's Corbett's article. For any action repeated, becomes a learned 'normal' expectation and reaction pattern, that can only be changed by choosing to NOT use the old habit by making a new choice - at a level that is within your current reach of willingness and desire. The 'identity' of the old pattern will operate an inertial resistance against change, until you persist past the tipping point to simply know what you want and choose who you are - instead of engaging temptations to indecision played out as a conflict of wills. If the old pattern has a social reinforcement - such as a medical industrial complex or similar, then that 'group' will endeavour to reinforce the resistance to 'weaken' it by withdrawing support. I think the addiction patterns serve well enough here. You may need to separate from that identity ritual to grow the strength to stand in your own light before reengaging from a more integrated place.

Fear is not overcome by force of will, but by true and free willing decision to align in who you are rather in fear of who you think you have become. Grievance and hate can distance and dissociate, but does not truly escape by denials, projections and diversionary distractions. At some point crisis demands attention, but if the fear is great, the crisis will be repackaged or reset into deeper denials and limitations so as to persist as 'control'.

The Disappearing Flu

https://medium.com/illumination-curated/the-unexpected-case-of-the-disappearing-flu-64fd1fa5e909

The Unexpected Case of the Disappearing Flu

An invested and protected belief will gather all interpretations from all possible means to 'survive' as accepted identity and authority. 

The presumption of each virus as THE pathogenesis or CAUSE of each disease disallows all other ways of accounting for empirical evidences that are effectively 'disappeared' by the structuring of thought, definition and ability to shift parameters to support the 'model outcome'. 

Phlostogen did not have such a huge gov and corp investment, because it didn't offer such leveraging as a cover story for toxic degradations (and evasion) or for the capture and control of minds (not cells) by terrifying bogeymen, to otherwise patently insane 'solutions'. 

The wherewithal to set and reset definitions, change parameters, and obfuscate within arcane and impenetrable complexity, AS IF the practice of Science or Reason is a hijack of our mind, by which to lock life into prison cells.

Our MODEL is become a death cult. Structure can become a dead thing to which life is sacrificed for what it has become associated with, but no longer truly represents. Science is not allowed to interfere with 'virology', or other protected narrative dogma. 

An Alloy of Love and Fear

 https://off-guardian.org/2021/03/24/addicted-to-hope-the-qult-of-qanon/#comment-343893

The alloy of love and fear is not a true mix and so there are tares in the wheat as well as a baby in the bathwater.

The ego in the sense I use it here - masks in virtue and so will seek to use virtue as a cover by which to prevail against the threat it perceives in truth, as so will also mask in association with truths so as to devalue and discredit or undermine them.

So aphorisms that are not untrue that could be a call to the heart are used as a front for a masked or hidden agenda. We are all in this together" - but what 'it'? and to who does 'we' signify? Context is everything.

Deceits that target us must be turned to an education that serves our capacity to discern them before taking the bait, as  a deepening awareness and responsibility for the as yet 'open back doors' through which we are still invested in some measure of correspondence or 'sympathetic' vibrations.

Emotional reaction to a provocation can release or purse strings or our bow strings - as an invested identity taken from the bait.

In the terms of the article - it feeds our ego, and we run with it as a sense of self vindication, instead of bringing it to a direct awareness or centred presence - that rises as the natural awareness to the release of egoic self reference (our own thinking). The gift of a discernment is a practical intuitive and integrative moment of perspective from which we live this situation. It is not a setting of judgements by which to set a right over a wrong - excepting as we freely release in ourselves whatever is recognised as not serving us, and align in recognition of what does. If we are apparently not intuitive this will operate as reasoned recognitions that clarify thought and action, but the actual shift from mind to a unified expression of heart and mind is recognisably an inspiration, encouragement, reconnection to joy, that shines or shares by nature, and presence of a peace beneath appearances that - like symptoms, may persist, but no longer besiege a sense of struggle.

This may be forgotten to habits of thought and reaction in an instant, because such habit runs without conscious oversight or evaluation, as a 'normal'.

Words can always be taken out of context in a world that is taken out of Living Context, but the search for love or fulfilment or answer as an external condition or set of conditions is a sign of a hate within, from which the mind is set to look away, so as to 'make you safe' by focussing in substitutions for Who you truly are, that set in image and form as if to regain or protect against further pain of loss.

But the Spirit of a truth that has never left its Source and Nature works with our mind, and our world to release an identity in lack and grievance set to vengeance, and free-willingly align in who and what we are revealed to be the unfolding of. This is always a relational whole - that the situation will then serve, and yet we can only talk of self as a mind and body rather than integral to the Terrain which is neither inner nor outer, for such divisions are mapping out of what cannot be in truth, separated from. Only in concept.

I know a shop called "Concept curtains, carpets and blinds". It gives me a smile to recall it.

I cannot say what is or is not a stepping stone for another and what is a diversion to nowhere set in futility. I cannot rescue anyone from their own decision, but I can join with and reflect that they are beings of choice and are actively deciding and so are free to evaluate their choices and make better choices in terms of aligning with who they recognise to be.

False hopes still hold the idea of positive change, but are founded on premises that keep the mind safe from any real transformation. Perhaps also because a false understanding of any problem sets its answer in the realm of a false directive - which can of course be manipulated so as to seem to work, for a short time.

Hope springs eternal, but is more of an intuition of eternal life, than a basis for predicting and controlling outcomes. Addicted to (the conditions associated with possession and) control - is a sense of driven lack, that finds a world, to know not what it is or does!

The ego, runs off with a virtual copy.

I have faith in truth alive to undo addictive results of a mistaken identity, but unless I live such a willingness as my life, I have hopeful wishes that become a cover story for a persistent unwillingness to  align thought word and deed. These are very open to being targeted by a manipulative intent.

Release and be released, or judge and be judged!

Each of these has a very definite fruit or result, and one is joy, the other counterfeit.

#2

Some attempts at communication occur as a mutual relationship, or field of resonance, and others are like meeting conditioned reactions or programmed responses. The 'ego' is in my sense of it anything but self-aware, but is maximally alert to threat to what it is predicated upon as 'self' in image and thought.

Self-aware in a true sense is self-less or transparent in the usual sense of self as separate or private authoritative mind in a body or a world of bodies (object transience).

That you are is edgeless, immeasurable and always, but what you are is your self-defining acceptance that extends as relational expression. So if you accept ideas as true of you, these operate as your self-imaged or ego.

The human consciousness is currently locked down, distanced and masked as a normal - and any attempt to talk to normals results in communication failure.

The true Nature is never really a normal, because normal is a conditioned mind while naturally felt quality is wholly present.

The inhibition of the ego is the capacity to block our own channel of expression. To get in our own way and interpret the results in terms of separation trauma.

I think the term mask works for much of what 'ego' represents.

The capacity to mask from ourselves as the hiding and denial of feelings believed threatening, is also the presentation of a masking identity - which is in a sense a psychic territory - ostensibly set in or with the body and its possessions and relationships. but principally set in the sense of private thinking. Masking thinking.

To identify the mask as power of protection is to accept it as self, and in general people become masked over from their inner being or childlike wonder and curiosity. Only in special conditions might the underlying innocence of being shine unselfconscious as joy in being.

The mask operates to 'make us safe' from a point of self-conflict that we are at that time unwilling or unready to face, to own and to reconcile or resolve. And so it is encapsulated and covered over in ways that limit awareness of conflict by both a denial or dissociation and a casting out to others and world, where it can hide in 'solutions' that do not address the conflict but provide a cover story or masking narrative in seeming to seek answers by means that persist and protect the problem.

So what I mean by ego is not a Freudian slip so much as a mis-taken identity running in the name of power and protection relative to truth feared - or intimacy of being as threat to the capacity to maintain the mask of limitation and control.

Unwanted realities are experienced as rejection, denial, deprivation, abandonment, treachery and betrayal as pain of loss.

We do not know we had terms, conditions or demands on Life until they are crushed and broken by withdrawal of support or open denial.

However, we can and do set ourselves up to fall.

Maybe QD meant that accepting narratives without questioning them is letting them trigger and frame our own mind unknowing.

#3

Unwanted inner conflicts are problems we refuse or are unwilling and unable to face and address where they are and so we seek 'solutions' outside by which to cast them out from us. When the 'solution' fails it not only leaves the underlying problem unaddressed but mutates as seemingly new problems that are intimately linked to our inner conflict but outwardly unconnected - because the external solution was a wishful cover story of self-evasion given all the force of the emotional charge of the underlying inner conflict.

Until we own what truly belongs to us, we will attack and deny others and our world for what our mind perceives as hateful intention and motivations that have roots in our own conflicts. If we were at all aware of this the world as we know it would not find support. For the world as we know it has operated this entanglement of shadows, false hopes and hidden denials, until its conflicts rise up to reveal their true address - or in common terms, all of what is ours comes home to roost.

To invested identity in masking self-illusion this is like a world of toxic debts that the ego must desperately externalise to an ever more hollow and false sense of prevailing by masking deceit.

But to the desire to heal, it opens the Way Home, as we release what does NOT belong to us that we had mistakenly taken on. There is a peace in being who you are that no illusion can give, no matter the presentations and postures of self-assertion.

When we took a problem as our self we tried to use the world as an answer for it. We have set the whole world in the frame of our problem, excepting we release it of our demands, terms and conditions and bring awareness present to learn anew of what we have learned NOT to see as anything but threat, weapons, ammunition, allies, armour, hiding place, diversionary false flag.

So yes, we are a 'built in problem' looking everywhere ELSE for solutions.

I see the psyoperative deceits as a means of revealing us to ourselves. But hooked to the bait is the experience of being played and reeled in as the belief one is freely acting. But as I said we can and do set ourselves up.

#4

When you can bear to be sober, you can meet me half way.

Because the 'normal' is so dysfunctional, the natural can induce psychosis to the sense of mind in lockdown under masking control.

You live as if you are deprived, denied or lacking connection to Infinity. How did you manage that?

Ah! You've been thinking again haven't you!

Why would you make a stash when everything is here for you already?

The supply for you is 'hidden' in not indulging what you take as your thinking. Let the mind rest. Your true thought connects you with everything alive. Live your own Q, and listen for your own A.

No point in trying to comprehend answers to a question you have not asked. No experiences are going to give you anything more than the receptive you open to receive them.

contd response to query on use of dysfunctional normal

The 'normal' is being memed as if natural - I use it to mean conditioned 'reality'.

In a world where :

“Everything is BACKWARDS; everything is upside down! Doctors destroy health, Lawyers destroy justice, Universities destroy knowledge, Governments destroy freedom, Major media destroys information, And religions destroy spirituality".(Michael Ellner).

I restate that because this is accepted normal does not mean it is not dysfunctional. the quote is back from the AIDS reset to a failing virology platform.

The dysfunctional human world is largely invisible, internalised and normal. Its structure is reflected in our technologism ( I could have called it culture, but its destructive to any real culturally shared appreciation of worth).

In the context above the presumed norm offered was that a distorted or drug altered conscious is necessary or appropriate for understanding. I invite you to consider that what is considered normal is already a dissociated and fragmented evasion of reality seeking to escape itself.

Associating another;s writing with mock humour and drug use can also be a subtle means of invalidating and distancing without actually engaging at all.

I appreciate your question. I hope that you now see it was discordant to your current expectation of meaning and usage for 'normal' - which can mean anything - for anything can become 'normal' is persisted in or under. So in the terms of the narrative setters it means 'conditioned' pattern of behavioural adaptation and response'.  But to those being played it is being taken as reality, or natural.

The dissociation of words from the territory of what they signify is a result of using them as weapons of deceit and leverage on our self and others. Dysfunction as normal is self-evident. Not least as a result of imposing functions to life that kill it, or sacrificing life to false profits, false narratives and life denying systems of control under fear and guilting.