How to use the mind to undo the mind of its own illusions?

Nike

The situation presented in the article highlights a painful truth: that even the anti-vaccinists who dispute the existence of so-called viruses still have beliefs based on the words of so-called scientists with credentials from the System… not at all on direct, uninterpretable and repeatable evidence.

 

 #1

 The conundrum that you sketch extends to words and meanings, So my assertion is the need for a grounded reference point from which to correctly identify illusions. or to put it another way, to discern what is from what we make or made of it and run with as if truth INSTEAD of true. For in a sense I see a mind is phished by its own image and imaginations to be-live' a life that is 'made up' and given social boosting by conspiring to unconsciousness of the source, the nature and the life that moves us - whether we accept it or see it through a glass darkly.

My sense of a reintegrative healing from conflicted illusion to truth that unifies is of bringing what we made to the reference point of an 'uncarved block' of stillness and awareness of which all motion springs. Then it is not up to me to judge or determine true and false but it is up to me to recognise and accept what I am shown or what reveals itself directly. My experience of accepting truth is of stepping stones of willingness that allow a maximal alignment to truth within the current consciousness, so as to transform an masking unconsciousness to a vehicle of conscious participance - ie to know and share joy in being without getting in my own way by a mind of grasping or control..

Ultimately I see that our physical senses are mapped in symbol.
The atom as various models posit may not exist. But its original idea is of an infinitesimal and indivisible particle.. We now have a sense of particle as interactive energy field effect, not so different from a disturbance in the Ether, that has been usurped by 'space' and 'time' as the Matrix of an external Universe.- that is not God-Creation, but our modelling or thinking set as Gatekeeper.

#2

The mind is an interpretive action. The only evidence that is prior to interpretation is awareness of existence without qualification.
Seeing or perception is always a selective interpretation, that always judges between and gives weight or discards accordingly. the basis for the selection is set by purpose. What you want to see or do NOT want to accept, will set the rules and filters for your result, such that what you want to believe or have the experience of, is a self-reinforcing decision or will. That our will is done is cast in shadows by the wish to NOT know the hatred in our heart, and below that, the love that we are– that would undo what we hold dear as a 'special love' or protected and exclusive sense of self-creation.

#3

George to Nike

September 4, 2022 at 6:01 pm

This is an interesting observation you have. If I understand your point correctly you are saying that accepting the credentials from an institution that promotes lies in order to substantiate a truth is somewhat questionable. Do I understand you correctly on this? You are quite right to question the existence of things that cannot be seen but I don’t know what you would accept as proof that they do exist. I would like to touch upon one other point, which concerns what I would call an ideological concept, and that has to do with the idea of a corporation. Do you believe that corporations are real? If so why do you believe they’re real and what evidence can you present that proves their existence. I would also like to point out that colleges to some extent are corporate bodies, just like a business. They are corporations concerned mainly with providing the service of education. So I think my question would also extend to them. In addition, is it possible for an institution to erase someone’s credentials? You know how some individuals are given new identities when they testify against criminals. These individuals are provided with credentials which are just as real as those provided to the people who actually acquired their credentials in a real manner.

 

To George:

I appreciate the care in your comment.

The split mind of a human being is in our capacity to align in mutually agreed beliefs and definitions as our chosen or defended 'reality-experience' or distortion.

This is another way of saying we are the extension of free willing Creator - with the caveat that a will set in Self-contradiction cannot know its own nature or freedom, but will protect a falsely split sense of self, life and world, set in defiance to war under the belief that the split must be kept hidden. Hence the intensity of the oath by which to evade Disclosure against Living truth feared as total loss of face, of control and of a world and life set thereby.

The opening quote of an emailed article today is a great example:

"To be SoulBOUND is to have your soul bound with others with a blood contract, drawing on each other's essence to protect against the servants of Nagash, the God of Death." -- WARHAMMER

https://khmezek.substack.com/p/soulbound

(I've yet to properly read it but it looks to describe a manmade basis for 'legitimacy' that claims authority by 'resisting evil' (evil is at root an outcome of miscreating or mis-thinking - hence Jesus warned against identifying in its frame by resistance!).

For myself the 'virus' projection is part of a breadcrumb trail to the 'foundations' of self and world - which is to say to the exposure of that which lacks true foundation so as to be undone as a source or basis for living and being.

The nature of a reversal by projection or casting out of a split as IF the get rid of it, sets the pattern for the evolution of problems to ever more complex and unworkable 'solutions' that only repackage conflict to seem workable, buy time and contract by recoil from an Infinity at Rest as a timelessness within all that is - as it is.

if I wasn't sharing in the agreements by which a world subjugates and denies life even to death as its reset, I couldn't post this contribution. The key is a shift of purpose, A world made to hide in, becomes a world gifted for awakening at the heart. By a shift of perspective already given to a willingness to receive that rests on freewilling, not on terms & conditions set externally.

#4

Sebastien Cormier

September 5, 2022 at 5:17 pm

I notice that a lot of the comments are about the concept of credentials being equal with authority. There’s the “appeal to authority” falicy which is the argument that “ABC must be true because such and such a source says so”. Appeal to authority is a falicy because supreme authority lies in reason, observation and experimental results. A credentialed person still has to provide citations for anything he or she writes if he or she wishes to publish what is written anywhere that is reputable. Credentials do not permit someone to appeal to one’s own authority. What credentials do accomplish though is proof of having studied what has been written on a be topic in great depth. This does count for something. You can argue that studying is not the same as knowing but you can’t get to knowing without the step of study.

I agree with this but with the proviso that what started out as curiosity and imagination subjected to rigorous and often intense scrutiny and contested interpretations or conclusions, becomes a body of presumed authority with its own institutional ego of self-protective bias against re-visiting what it now regards as its sacred canon or foundations – and which are then managed and airbrushed to bolster such ‘authority’. Just look at Koch and Pasteur.
So what constitutes study or research?
The willingness to question fundamental assumptions is NOT part of any academic or corporate training for qualification.
The entrainment of a mind by perceived authorities as entitlement or elite membership is to some degree inherent to any complex specialisation.
The nature of an Establishment is not merely money or power but the investment in a personal and collective sense of control set over fear or pain of loss which, as a result is not truly acknowledged, faced, addressed or healed – such as to effectively run as ‘dark or hidden’ agenda in Others – while internalised conditioning or trained bias in our self.

Without languages of reference to specific facets of our experience of reality, we cannot share its unfolding as our personal and collective development of conscious significance and appreciation. My sense is the theory and the terrain or territory interact. No amount of study can substitute for experience, and no amount of experience in itself can constitute wisdom – which is the application of knowledge that includes recognising we cannot definitively know. Else we drop into story as an active ignorance running blind convict-ion.

 

#5

Tom

September 6, 2022 at 12:07 am

After the last 31 months, what ever little trust I had for just about anything has vanished. There are now so many people in positions of some kind of power and influence that have ulterior motives so as to make themselves exempt from any truth or trust. I is difficult to live without trust, but these times are becoming more difficult to stomach and survive in by the day.

Perceived self interest operates from strategies of perception-response that can and does usurp our right mind when triggered. The true meanings are corrupted by our accepted currencies of thinking’ so the word ‘trust’ is itself no longer trustworthy unless you stand in truth as its extension.
Replacement of trust with contracts or bargains is a long running corruption.
The result of which is to have everything backwards.
How can you expect trust if you don’t extend it? BUT how can you give what you don’t accept for yourself?
Which is not to say you don’t trust yourself, so much as running a shifting sense of reality that cannot be trusted.
When the ‘world’ fails us, we are thrown back on our own resources – which we may not have awareness of because we’ve been running on a ‘world’ that set us in sleepwalking dependency?

 

#6

George:

This is an interesting article with an important question.

Is it ever ok to lie?

“Is it ever morally permissible to tell a lie? On one end of the spectrum we find the philosopher Immanuel Kant, who argues that it is never, under any circumstance, permissible to lie. To lie, according to Kant, would be to act in a way that is less than rational (hence, less than human) and to treat others as a means instead of an end. On the other end of the spectrum, the situational ethicist, the relativist, and the ethical egoist, may argue that lying is morally permissible at anytime and in any situation, given the desired outcome.

Add God into the mix, and it would seem that we ought to side with Kant on this, albeit for different reasons. In the gospel of John we learn that Jesus is “full of grace and truth” (John 1:14) and that lies come from the pit of hell: Satan himself is described as the Father of lies (John 8:44).

The Christian then, it would seem, should not lie.

The German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer disagrees. . .”

http://www.paul-gould.com/2013/10/16/is-it-every-ok-to-lie-bonhoeffer-on-truth-telling-and-deception/

The idea of moral permission is externally derived. For sure, we find agreement that align with integrity as we are able and willing to abide and extend it. So moral and ethical thinking can reflect qualities of integrative being. But once authority is idolised or institutionalised there will be conflicts in which for example family, social and spiritual  rules, mores or identities will not align. If protecting loved ones from thuggery should you tell thugs where you are hiding them (is absurd). But from the Law? May set a conflict of interests.
However social masking in institutionalised lies are initiating a 'waking up' to an integrity of spirit or unified conscious purpose in place of a split mind between Caesar and God (as living or truly shared worth).
True with-ness and worth-ship (worded to redeem their likeness) is not defined in or by image and form, but allows them to follow or reflect to eyes that see. For the projecting of a private unshared 'reality as the 'apple of the tree of judgement' may operate as peer review of lockstepped 'self' interest as a collective unconsciousness that literally knows not what it does, while thinking to re-enact a past of separation trauma set in multilayered complex of deceits and defences... against truth.

I may have previously linked this clip - but its goes to the heart of our capacity to join (sic) in unconscious entanglements under mutually reinforcing agreements or narrative cover stories that always set the 'good' in the reaction or framing to the evil. (Which drives narrative tension).
https://twitter.com/onemindinmany/status/1528364482828898306?s=20&t=gHIUjx6eJ_5Xv3T8KxHUcg

A quality of coherence, resonance and wholeness of being can be referenced by many sketches, symbols or teachings but is a quality of peace without conflict. Self-honesty to our being - and not just to an inherited or acquired ruleset is the test of peace or dissonance - wherever each may perceive this to manifest - ie in our gut feeling or literal body tensions or emotional reactivity.

As for the use of lies to protect lies set in a complex of identity in fear of disclosure; it runs as a survival mechanism. It also runs in an indifference or callous disregard for the lives of others - but then the survival complex is also a collective unfolding of themes through generations in which we participate.

I value Jesus' teaching on the paying of tax to a perceived oppressor (Caesar).
The ongoing discernment of dues is a process of leaning into freedom.
The most pernicious and destructive acts are committed under moral convictions or certainties, so I keep morality to each our own consistency of thought word and deed and never a stick by which to make truth a weapon or terror over others. Who lives by lies, dies by lies.

Spiritual Perspective Sees Compression as Call To Refine Back To Essence

 Mostly coining short tweets into the focus in the world events but here wrote a slightly longer missive to article and comments on the deeper globalist technocracy that underlies all sides of apparent and active conflicts.

A purely material perspective can look at what its lens frames as causal.

Our personal perspective frames in terms of blame, ie Good guys & bad guys or ideologies, but we can look at the ideas that are invested in to the extent that we are effectively possessed, framed or structured by them.

Orwell identified doublethinking as self-contradictions masked under a stamping narrative. Much of our thought is in that sense a corrupted currency for a social masking reality by which truth is 'adjusted', overlaid, augmented or substituted for.

A distortion of truth can arise as a self-inflation or 'boom' of private agenda to be inevitably followed by a 'bust' or period of compression resulting from the unworkable cost of supporting self-illusions by sacrificing (awareness of) reality.

A spiritual perspective sees compression as a call to refine back to essence and to seed from an overextension of incompatible or competing interests. First things have to be first - else we experience a world in which... “Everything is BACKWARDS; everything is upside down! Doctors destroy health, Lawyers destroy justice, Universities destroy knowledge, Governments destroy freedom, Major media destroys information, And religions destroy spirituality". (Michael Ellner)

A lack of spiritual perspective only sees contraction - as in the core Fabian principle of a closed system of dwindling resource by which life is set as war by all and any means but not least through the use of a masking 'virtue'.

The deconstruction of invested illusions will double down in deeper and denser illusion rather than open to truth that undoes our capacity and desire to believe we (and our world) are as we think to be. Which is unsettling or disturbing until the conflict resolves to decision in the heart. For our primary conflict is more a split mind by which the true heart is denied, than an imposition by an alien will, be that Others or Circumstances.

While the above sketch may seem abstract, I felt to offer something towards looking at the world in a new way; as part of our own reintegrative alignment to our being, in place of invested narrative identities of entanglement.

So while there are others calling for a Great Awakening, in terms of who and what we think we are, I see our thinking as being a product of a split or fragmented mind and world - excepting where extending a living presence that is felt qualities of resonance that 'shares' a unified or common source that is not IN our world excepting we extend such qualities of being through our relational endeavour - and our living.

Whatever SEEMS or is believed to be the cause of fracture, grievance and division, our healing to inspired presence will be of a willingness to begin now or align anew in what love is by extension, for only the living can know what life is - while the belief we know can block such an embracing quality, to set a mind apart in its own thinking, as a sense of self-lack seeking boosters, that takes us for a ride.

So what is going on but machine or dead system thinking 'taking over' from and replacing the living? The attempt to make dead thinking live is the puppet that seeks to be a 'real boy', but before we invoked such 'thinking' we were already expressions of the real, and the process of being peeled back to the 'foundations' of our ego or masking overlay, is the revisiting of ancient conflict to which our mind by recoil turned away from as if to cast out and deny. Everything depends on finding new eyes to see. For what we have learned, trained, adapted and conditioned to think is through a past set in grievance and attack.

It might be said that some sort of reset or renewal is inevitable - whatever forms of expression these might be, but that the 'best thinking' sic of the established order seeks to pre-emptively frame or set the outcome by all the means currently active to set expectations according to their ideas - which put 'control' over all else through agencies of corruption. For a 'war of survival' cannot afford truth. There's the vicious and futile circle!

The true power of thought is denied by the nature of our thinking, yet even in this - see what an experience of a self and world we can make from lack, fear, conflict, hate and guilt masked in fake love set as manipulations running below or behind the mask.

I sense the waking up is not to a nightmare, but to deeper unravelling of a love set in pain of conflicts that are compounded by reaction to operate subconsciously as if an automaton denied rather than true authority extended. A human conditioning.

The purpose we consciously hold is the alignment of our field of relationship and endeavour. So much we take as 'survival' or 'protection' works backwards when it is actually rooted in and expressive of fear of pain of loss. The hidden 'driver' that cannot be released while running as an identity complex of thoughts, perceptions and responses.

The 'territory' is the last place we would willingly open (if at all) and so we save it for last.

By self-knowledge and Self Knowledge both, are we transformed.

Finding willingness to stay open with life rather than lockdown in mind-reaction is a discipline that joy in life supports. For a short time hate and rage may seem to offer power, but leave us wasted or enslaved, yet such feelings are part of the 'territory' beneath the mask that no longer claim us once brought into light of an embracing awareness.

Is the Play upon a World Stage set for fools? or as a self-reflection from which to recognise and release what we are NOT.

Isolation ad absurdum?

Accept a part of an opponents argument but then extend it to extremes such as to effectively render it impractical, useless or unusable?

 

http://viroliegy.com/2022/08/08/rabies-the-virus-of-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-5082

Nike: It is more than obvious that so-called viruses have never been isolated, purified and visualized three-dimensionally either in decaying tissues or outside the living organism. But neither the so-called proteins together with their components nor the so-called nucleotides with their components have ever been isolated, purified and visualized three-dimensionally. And yet, including Lanka, Cowan and Kaufman still blindly believe in the existence of amino acids, proteins, enzymes, antibodies, nucleotides and DNA chains.

 

Are you taking the isolation argument to extremes that become defacto absurd?

My response is not to you personally but to the themes that I pick up on when I read you.

That our mental modelling in image, concept and word, finds a resonant match with reality as we can behold it, is a mark of a language and identity of self-significance and relational honesty. For an image can never become the reality that it represents. That we identify in image set against reality is where we become identified in and by our tool. Mind as a freedom to self-reference runs a circular reinforcement of denial by mutual reinforcement of a signal set in filtered distortions, WANTED true.

I agree that the models of science are grossly simplified narratives that are further distorted by their sharing through media - including textbooks and training. Our psychic-emotional terrain shapes what can be said or what is expected to find support if being said. This is also structuring financial decisions. This then feeds a resonance loop.

The letter A has not been isolated because it shares lines and even angles with V? All lines are extensions of a point - so what is the point? The point is extended in infinite possibility of relations at and between all angles and dimensions. (Though letters & glyphs are essentially a 2D plane or screen of symbolic derivatives). The expression of one through many is the integrity of coherent expression or indeed the tensegrity of being. There is a sense in which the human imagination runs an in vitro exploration of isolation from living context, such as to set the Living Whole as 'dead' while taking dead letter of concepts set in symbol as 'survival' set over 'death'.

In doing this we always project our own denial out and away from self, such as to experience it at the hand of another. And by this, justify our self as attack, withholding and withdrawal, to a protected grievance or exclusion zone that is in blind relationship or entanglement relative to a point of mutually conflicting self interest, set against wholeness.

How much of our 'reality' is a fudge of 'continuity support' for a masking intent set into polarised reaction? Yet none of which can even seem to be - without an underlying Matrix of Communication of shared or common properties, qualities & characteristics.
Dissociation must first know a relationship to dissociate from or deny, so denials of truth really deny awareness of truth, as a mind of filters and rules seeking external support and reinforcement by which to justify not looking within the living moment, or movement of being.


 

Science Set in an Anti-Psychic 'Materialism'?

 This was posted to Dr Lidiya Angelova telegram channel

in response to:

"I am 100 % sure that is because they isolated not a virus but  extracellular vesicles which have that S protein affecting heart, and this is the reason which causes these sudden deaths."

If germ theory can be weaponised to run a global pharming of Human assets, why not gene dogma? Why not S-protein as sorcery set by 'expert' definitions made in dark lab where no independent science can bring light to reveal the false?
Are you 100% sure of destructive agenda & false flagging this to the mRNA psyop by which a species can be genetically 'damaged' so as to set in forever dependence of genetic controls against what the 'Bad and Mad' pharma did?
The nanotech and hydrogel intent is a huge suspect, but all science set in purely antipsychic 'materialism' will ignore the Creative.
Shocks that are lived experience express through the body.
Without prejudice, consider the GNM perspective of a psycho-physical expression.
This reveals a greater life from which we mask in fear, ignorance so to attack ourselves.
Consider the placebo is also the nocebo.
If you EXPECT s-protein poisoning to be made by your OWN cells as a walking time bomb waiting to be triggered - because EXPERTS SAY! - then you are giving power away from the heart of a true discernment. That an overwhelm can break or stop the heart is obvious. That it can occur AFTER the conflict releases is less so.
That self-disgust, shame or self-dirtying can erupt pustules on the skin transcends the classifications of innumerable 'diseases' framed as transmissable.
That we are sympathetic beings of resonant communication and identity who can 'join in hate' as in 'sickness' as if to boost a sense of lack and disconnection has deep implications as does the alignment in current narratives for 'meaning', such as to want to be Covid and discard a cold.
Identy theft is 'being phished'!
Love identifies truly by its extension through us.
If we give a false word we teach, and learn, a false result. Socal masking distortions can thus become 'normal' while reality simply Is - but the mind has run away with itself.
The choice for unconsciousness as saving from conflict at the heart, is deepset, even to escape to sickness, madness and death. But only because it is protected from the light of a curiosity that can question our own thought, belief and framing definitions.

Beneath a Cover Story runs a Toxic Burden of Debt

in response to the themes in:

 

https://sebastienpowell.substack.com/p/a-closer-look-at-autoimmune-diseases/

 

 

 What is apparent at our mental and social expression is that we attack our self & each other.
A mind at war with itself extends as a society of victim & victimisers or war as the underlying nature of lack & threat driven behaviours.
Attack is usually masked in personal and social rules or norms as moral justification to the maintaining of order against fear of pain of loss.
Beneath its acting out on the body is the idea of sacrifice where separation (splitting off from or 'distancing' is equated with salvation, and so what is denied or attacked has to 'pay the price'.
War-mind of a struggle for power can be thus seen as seeking the means to evade feared pain of loss by the means to offset or divert it 'away from self to the to Othered.
The structuring of society under fear that masks as love as part of its strategy of concealment and manipulation, is then a collective but unconscious agreement as to 'who pays' in terms of social narratives that establish blame as the means to set social credit against. That these are a flux of conflicting identities is evident, but pursuit of monetary profits in disregard for the lives of others is  seen as a way to stand over them, so that others are induced to pay for elitist or exclusive privileges or social permissions of status, wealth & influence.

Most of which runs unconscious to a social masking as  accumulated compound debt or unresolved conflict that operates not just through generations, but across time & space through the law or nature of resonance.

My intent in sketching this overview is to invite a deeper consideration than merely external subjection to material circumstances, while not disregarding the synchronicities arising - both positive and negative. The first attack is on our self, but is hidden by the belief and the wish to push cause of lack, fear, pain and loss OUTSIDE and thus seek answer in external terms. Some of this is a result of unwittingly taking on the conflicts of others at a stage of development in which lack we lack self-differentiation.  But then driven to seek strategy of survival within such a relational distortion.

As with so called germs, susceptibility to disease from toxic exposure is variable, and the underlying resonances to influence will always be individual within collective patterns that again are largely unconscious or operating as subconscious conditionings of which we are in a sense trained to ride on (and be ridden by) as a 'given reality' that is of course a masking manipulation and not a basis for true appreciation of anything.

The concept of immunity at body level is absurd yet compulsive to a sense of seeking protection.
But at the level of Spirit has value as the embodiment of unified purpose that embraces to discern within all that is present, rather than compelled by judgements that set up exclusions that become toxic to or undermining of support for life.

Insofar as body can realign to health or functional integrity, despite accumulated burdens of disease, emotional or psychic conflict, and social exclusions - including fatal or negative diagnosis and prognosis by 'authorities', is outside the reach of the mind of manipulative possession and control, and so for many, doesn't exist for them. Exceptionalism is then projected to potentials and examples that we cannot or will not match, but that may yet seed in us the recognition that there is more than we know, or better, we do not really know and have accepted misguidance as a social 'reality' or normal.
Attempts to unify over against fear and threat can never be whole.
Fear of wholeness is protected by controls set in fear and guilt that will seek to limit, undermine or sabotage the restoring of wholeness, health and wellbeing as the embodiment of joy in life.
Toxic debts persist in ever shifting forms of repackaging, in a composite of blind man's buff meets pass the parcel in a game of musical chairs.

Sin as an attack on love, masking as authority

I wrote a few comments into

https://viroliegy.com/2022/07/26/the-virus-of-sin/

 That I appreciated writing.

This one prompted inclusion here:

 

Self-illusion is not a sin - for imagination can and does serve life.
But if self-illusion is given persistent priority over relational integrity it can rightly be called sin, for it must attack and undermine the witness for truth, and reap a destructive outcome.
That its wages is a world framed in death is the nature of an inversion or reversal.
That it rests on error is hidden and protected by every distortion and corruption of truth set as fear of disclosure to a self-convicted damnation.
The concept of sin as attack on love, was lost to attempts to manipulate by fear and threat as a result of no longer embodying a natural authority of love's extension and recognition, such as to seek control to cover for an inability and unwillingness to communicate.
The culture of blame or attack is so deeply set as to seek to run in stealth mode.
And seek the trappings of perceived authority in which to mask a dis-possesion of faculty and function in a frame of specialness by which to judge, denigrate and exclude.

God of our own image?

in response to the themes in:

https://viroliegy.com/2022/07/22/debunking-the-nonsense/comment-page-1/#comment-4468

 

I don't have to claim, justify or apologise for what I accept as that by which I live.

But I see that false claim cannot pass off as true unless masking in or as truth.

So an image of God is made, but we are not an image even if we can be phished by our image to mis take identity– that then projects a backstory for its support.

Mind is creative, and yet what we think, can be set out of accord with reality, as a private self-illusion or a clique of mutually self-reinforcing social masking.

The Idea of Creator in our own image is a reflection of our current sense of self.

So for many in the current era, the backstory is billions of years of random mutations that operate as survival and replication because it did - to date. I find that a curious mythic construct!

The problem of evil is generally projected away from a self that cannot abide or tolerate it, so to project blame as 'getting rid' of guilt as if to cast it out and destroy it. This is what is projected ONTO God as Retribution for guilt as sin. Many now blame genes, germs and psychopathogenic biology - that is to blame a sense of our own affliction on an external attacker or persecutor, so as to 'prove' God absent or 'Other' to a subjective sense of victim, set in frailty and littleness. 'Sickness as defence against truth" uses the body as its mask & witness. We can see the same with war or famine - for the pain of loss is grievous - so how can truth then be anything but cruel, blind or utterly indifferent to the love that you are - but must deny, suppress and adapt to a world of threat, pain and death?

The key is that we experience according to what we believe we are, and much of our belief is set by fears or conflicts before we learned to self reflect or articulate as consciousness of self, and thus as the framing we learned to think in.

It doesn't matter what anyone claims to believe, but what they demonstrate as thought world and deed bears witness is what is actually believed, but often 'unconscious' to masking beliefs that pass off as conscious! But are defences against direct awareness.



As far as I am aware a claim for the existence of God is not being used to mandate manipulative biological experimentation on the mass of the human population, so what's your grievance with what anyone says they believe? Perhaps you see religion as a virus to be eradicated? But see the exact same corruptions apply no less to science! What is the active purpose, is more to the fact than what is presented or claimed. Obviously claiming to believe anything can be a mask over self-conflict or to mask conflicts running beneath social pretences.

The proof is in the pudding.

Whatever we believe or step forward in as accepted decision, needs to be grounded in reality to be free of self-deceits that always conflict, and which manipulate our 'reality' to 'get rid of' the conflict. I suggest the problem is not in the symbols, so much as what purpose they are serving or being used for. The purpose that we are accepting and embodying or expressing is always our own responsibility, yet we are trained to old patterns of reaction that run subconscious– in our place! If true awareness was not already the presence of life, we could never release errors of thought to re-cognise truth. There would be no escape from destructive sel-illusion - made real in the minds of its believers. Ideas of God can be seen as reflecting a development of consciousness. The release of an external imposition on life opens the way for acceptance of Inherence in place of a mis-taken or false inheritance. But passes through an existential meaninglessness masking in hollow manipulations. 'Bottoming out' for the Prodigal Son?

The attempt to escape the Mind of which we are is undone at its inception. Like the 'virus' of hack and hijack, its only reality is what we gave it from the mind that wanted it to be true.

 

 #2

in response to the themes in:

https://viroliegy.com/2022/07/22/debunking-the-nonsense/comment-page-1/#comment-446

 

I didn't address your assertion directly - but the mutating of masking illusions runs Self-evasion as 'control' and indeed as 'self survival' under existential threat set in the frame of right of claim to power. Where power is defined as set apart and over the subjugated. This theme is active in primitive religion set by ancient terrors. It is active as our reptilian or primitive brain, and it can and does 'possess' our mind as both compelling and ingenious in its strategy as in its masking defences. By identifying against the 'Other' you lose your own freedom to the notion you must fight for it rather than side with it. You could say IT did this to you as an evil power, but then you are lost to being 'right' but cursed. Is that not a signature characteristic that knows no race or religion but ABUSES them as boosters to a nurtured grievance seeking vengeance and vindication?

On the fear or belief in contagion

in response to the themes in:

https://sebastienpowell.substack.com/p/on-infectious-diseases-and-contagion/

 

Glad to see GNM given a mention.
Searching anything with GNM will currently bring some associated information.

I note Szasz records cases of 'malingering' not just as skiving or work evasion, but as a strategy of escaping an unbearable or intolerable situation. Note that in A Course in Miracles it states 'sickness is a defence against the truth' - before dismissing this, consider that fear of truth underlies a demonising projection of fear onto awareness, such as to seek and find ways to limit, distance, mask and attack the messengers of truth - that are perceived as 'threats' to a temporary sense of security that requires constant boosters of social masking reinforcement.

Another angle arises from my experience of Family Constellation therapy. The Family (or systemic) Field is a relational integrity that holds a record of trauma, exclusions, denials, or abuses that are taken on my children - who have no capacity to differentiate their own boundaries and 'take on' conflicts that belong to other living or dead members, such as to 'share their fate'. This can and does include sickness and death.
Information uncovered in constellation work can be deep in terms of emotional intensity, but also open perspectives for realigning responsibility, releasing what does not belong to us and coming back into 'right place'.

You also didn't mention 'mass hysteria' - I don't like the name! - but many accounts exist that document what can also be seen as a mass nocebo effect - in which a fear is given authority to run unchecked.
Likewise hypnotists have enabled the expectation of a burn (using a cold object) to bring up a blister. Placebo is also shown to operate biological effects.

The realm of mind-control is extremely disturbing to look at as it includes deliberately breaking the minds of children - even through generations. But such is the 'mass psychosis' of our times that the intention to induce disease condition in the susceptible IS being actively effected using the techniques garnered from breaking the minds of 'insurgents', prisoners, or other targets.
The bottom line is that fear is contagious, as is demonstrable by the setting of memes and astroturfed PR to go viral. But fear is only give such power by denial that dissociates, masks over, and projects OUT to others, world or body - that is ANYWHERE ELSE - but intolerable conflict or overwhelm.

Toxic industrial by products are also the effects of 'normalised' social conflict that becomes profit or progress for its own sake.

Realigning in wholeness of being allows releasing of conflicted identity running 'protected' as a mindset of control set against fear or pain of loss (that reiterates conflict by the very attempt to defend against it, fix it, eradicate it or repackage and sell it to the manipulatable).

Thanks for the article!

The Right to Abide Silent is Also Freedom of Speech

 in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2022/07/14/dismantling-the-constitution-police-no-longer-have-to-honor-the-right-to-remain-silent/#respond

 

 

The legal recognition of the right to remain silent is a state recognition of such a right. The right is yours to live and accept your consequences.

Discernment of true context is key.

The mind can be tricked, and tricked minds can be tooled to operate against true interests by asserting and imposing a false or masking over of attempt to distort true interests so as to save a private agenda set in fear and division.

Give unto Caesar what is due unto Caesar and give unto God what is due unto God.

The tricked mind makes 'god' of power in a world of conflict and division.

God - taken in vanity will be an image of our own making. But this image has only the life WE give it - such as to reveal itself an idol of a phished mind.

Law of life is upstream to any capacity of mind to effect and so cannot BE broken.

The rules and filters of a conditioned mind set and hold the conditions for the world that we made - as overlay to what truly or simply Is. Caesar can be interpreted as the illusion of power in minds & world set in division and conflict, but there is a place for holding order within a current state of perceived chaos as the conditions in which to ask and receive answer or guidance as to what the true needs are and serving their fulfilment.

The laws of man are not the law of love, but hold stepping stones toward the opening of a direct recognition of another as your self, for at the most intimate level of our being, an attack on our Self had to result in the denial and projection of the denied - both victim and victimiser.

I haven't read the article. I see what is being taken to its tipping point. the 'victory' of the ego is of death over life, but what we are is upstream or prior to what we make of it in love or fear and division set as if a bodily autonomy controlled by a feared and yet asserted 'separation' from life - that if true could not Be.

Mercenaries, mind-controlled or trained thugs are surely set to replace a professional force both incrementally by cultural undermining, and suddenly by the import or recruitment & training of those without bonds of allegiance to the people or nation as a culturally living spirit.

To recognise value or worth and embody or give witness to it opens alignment with others who also resonate and recognise worthiness. This is a creative and largely unselfconscious attribute or our being that we have to relearn, as a result of having learned to mask in symbolic and ideological derivatives of such direct intimacies of being.

To be lost or trapped within a masking reality can be set as a world of lies at war with truth, but only a split allegiance can project its own division out and WANT to believe it real as a means to mitigate or manage fear or pain of loss that accompanies self-doubt of being, such as to assert atempts at making a mind of dissociation 'certain'.

Relationship IS Commuication, with or without words. Declining a false offer to contract in weaponised FORMS of communication may be itself take many forms. One of which is to hear nonsense as nonsense. But if anything real is offered or invited, let it be honoured for that, regardless the complex of masking defences set against it.

How is this different from holding unified and clear purpose amidst apparent chaos such as to navigate and serve the whole situation? The attempt to predictive control seeks the 'intelligence' by which to forfend or mitigate its own fear of destruction, but it costs too much when there is no time to think. While that cost is masked over by the indulgence of thinking we have all the time in the world...

The True Matrix of Life

https://viroliegy.com/2022/06/27/the-exosome-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-3718

Clarifire:

On what the mainstream calls “exosomes,” I haven’t reached a final verdict but it certainly looks like they were just a rescue device for virology and I’m not motivated to prioritize looking more into the idea by anything I’ve seen so far.

This doesn’t mean I write off the concept of intercellular communication; in fact I rather suspect it happens abundantly.

The mainstream terminology is almost always really messed up. Are any of the things they call “exosomes” something worth studying? Maybe, but I bet if so a cleanup of the semantics is warranted, because it seems very likely that plenty of what they call “exosomes” are just dead cell debris, and as far as debunking virology that’s probably going to be the central point.

Yes.
I noticed two points that I reflect or expand on.
That 'cells' cooperate or share unifying functional attributes with a whole far in excess of a sum of seeming parts (that can be assigned or imagined  BY current theories of function), is "life, Jim, but not as we (think to) know it".
So communication is the true matrix of life (and physics) as synchrony of field effects, that express as energy exchange that includes chemical and kinetic elements.
An object model (rising from a self-imaged 'thing-ness' or separateness) taken out of its psychic and spiritual context, is the leaned capacity to perceive a world of broken relationship as the resource or indeed compulsion to 'put together again'.
If we march to the drum of All the king’s horses and all the king’s men, we will be out of synch with a prior or Given wholeness, but entrained to an off-centric or segregative attempt to maintain a split purpose, such as to generate protected dissonance as a tax or toxic burden to the individuation of the Infinite we call a life - yet is never really just a thing in and of itself.

So the other point that came up is of the term, 'just dead cell debris'.
The spotlight of our mind hides more that it reveals, so relative to what we give value and focus to the label may somewhat apply, but biology doesn't just recycle, but does so within a greater intelligence than a blind watchmaker, so that the nature of our current discards may hold more value as our understanding grows.
While my sense of DNA dogma/theory is unsettled, the term junk DNA was later recognized key to 'epigenetics'. I have a sense that bio-computing is vastly richer than binary, such as to be unhackable by its product. But we have always had a freedom to get in our own way AND to assign the dissonance away from a separated sense or rather concept of self.

While we (in my view) cannot edit or manipulate our true being, we can come into a resonant alignment or coherence to a wholeness that heals, but never a thing alone, because there never was such a thing so much as a contract to reaction.

The Ego in the Science

The Ego in the Science

 

in response to the themes in RobRob:

http://viroliegy.com/2022/06/27/the-exosome-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-3687

Also, off topic but why do Kaufman and Cowan believe in the structured water making pictures experiment? It hasn’t been verified by others, just like virology. They also think that a special wand somehow can cause the water to be more structured. Ok, cool. So do an experiment with a regular stirrer as control.
Nope… Not going to happen.
It’s just annoying that they do not apply the same scrutiny to alternative things as they do to mainstream things….

I can join in noticing that Kaufman & Cowan - each in their own style - bring critical reasoning to bear on what they then make an identity of reaction and resistance - or fight against. Identity will be defended as self-reinforcement and so is where a presumption to being right over wrong or good over evil, filters, distorts or block awareness.
There is a reason J said 'resist ye not evil!'.
To turn from such temptation to make a self to a wholeness of being, is the basis from which to recognise, real questions and receive real answers.

Any claim to define or arrive at truth should be absent from the tool of science, except as a distilling of truly workable and helpful models of understanding to who we are currently accepting ourselves and our world to be.This living context is fundamental, for conscious purposes can be recognised as framing the focus, while masked or unconscious purposes operate covert agenda by definition.

I am not seeking to frame blame as a tool for arriving at outcomes, but identify where responsibility or indeed faith is misplaced by a mindset or frame of assumed authority rather than extending true witness to a reality we do not create.

The realm of consciousness mattering or the matter of consciousness as we mind it is not at the end of our instruments, and so we learn to recognise what we are putting in as the parameters or predicates for what we are receiving as our result. Garbage in; garbage out - infers that that nature of logic is blind to its creative definitions. That is where I hold for spiritual responsibility or unified purpose - which also translates to workability. For conflicted purpose can only be said to work against function - as if to gain a private result.

It is possible to identify when we are in the realm of a freedom to look at anything from many angles as part of opening new perspectives on what we thought we understood or had 'explained'. This can coincide with chance observations arising from 'mistakes' that show up anomalies that an established ego of 'science' will look away from, dismiss or attack.
The spontaneous structuring of ionised matter in fluid states (or temporarily fluid states) is known and its interaction in water is the basis of life as we know it. The liability of any new perspective is its stuffing into the old wine paradigm of possession and control - or marketising and weaponising. We short circuit an expansion or abort our unfolding fulfilment. I sometimes call it the Herod effect, because an established order cannot restructure itself but that it persists its predicates.

I extended way past your point. But much as I appreciate their willingness to speak into the lockdown of mind under covid, I have not found resonance with the roles they are now taking up or taken in by. Nor am I surprised that as the terrain changes, so does the focus.
I appreciate where the questioning of what is found questionably unfounded extends - such as on this site - rather than ritually running over and over a song for a choir of believers.
It isn't that I seek to sow doubt and disinfo to a THEM that 'lie to us' as a matter of course, but a desire to prepare the way for the movement of a true recognition. I don't hold post-truth to mean anything real - though it carries connotations of a crucifixion.
Are scientists guided by the higher faculties of thought?
Is truth a Self-revealing to the willingness for removing or releasing blocks to our awareness?

Looking At the False as False Opens the True.

in response to the themes in:

Traversing the Land of Fanatics, Part I

https://khmezek.substack.com/p/traversing-the-land-of-fanatics-part/ 

Yes. Well said.
The 'hidden hand' of a self & world set in sacrifice of truth for what each can get (or 'get away' from), for a 'self' set apart from others, such that shifting alliances operate a temporary 'security' masking and distancing over conflict avoided so as to buy 'time' to delay the 'inevitable' where truth is assigned to death instead of this very moment of truly being that we are.

The foundation or entrance to such a world is through the willingness to justify and invest in hate as 'self-protection' and thus as love - for we are love and love is Self-extension as relational being.
The form of hate doesn't matter but will shape our personality as a split mind - for who can attack, deny or hate their self in others and world to be whole and know and share it?

I see the 'satanic or luciferian' agenda as a self-image under gaslight - but that an acceptance of false self is always my own underlying 'gaslighting' - even under relationships (sic) of deceit and coercion - however suavely masked or starkly threatened.

Walking out of or releasing a false, fruitless or meaningless and thus destructive 'relationship' or complex of thought and emotions that will inevitably manifest in our relationships - is the gift of our Spirit - of the truth that can be masked over and lost sight of but that remains ours to live FROM or extend - and thus remember, appreciate and re-inetgrate or heal to a quality that can share in or call forth and honour the true with-ness in others who are never the masking we give them or they present as.

Acknowledging the blocks to communication, without making them the focus of a 'corrective' blaming judgement, allows giving focus wholly to what we truly want and are - in place of to what we are trained by fear to NOT want, as if to get our self in opposition to an 'evil' or threat of fear of pain of loss.

For recognising who we are NOT is already the basis for acting out of an integrity of being we claim by acting from. To be truly moved is not really 'trying to be', but whole in being.
Life is a movement of embodiment that breaks the illusions of attempt to possess and control it. But any destructive intent is entirely our making given co-creative reinforcement. Finding the balance points within the tides and timing of an always changing is the discernment within our being integral to life - not set under or over by judgements set by grievance.

Life is not of our making, yet we are free to make of it to share in as our experience.
This is what we get backwards when we bamboozle ourself but blame it on our world.