Isolation ad absurdum?

Accept a part of an opponents argument but then extend it to extremes such as to effectively render it impractical, useless or unusable?

 

http://viroliegy.com/2022/08/08/rabies-the-virus-of-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-5082

Nike: It is more than obvious that so-called viruses have never been isolated, purified and visualized three-dimensionally either in decaying tissues or outside the living organism. But neither the so-called proteins together with their components nor the so-called nucleotides with their components have ever been isolated, purified and visualized three-dimensionally. And yet, including Lanka, Cowan and Kaufman still blindly believe in the existence of amino acids, proteins, enzymes, antibodies, nucleotides and DNA chains.

 

Are you taking the isolation argument to extremes that become defacto absurd?

My response is not to you personally but to the themes that I pick up on when I read you.

That our mental modelling in image, concept and word, finds a resonant match with reality as we can behold it, is a mark of a language and identity of self-significance and relational honesty. For an image can never become the reality that it represents. That we identify in image set against reality is where we become identified in and by our tool. Mind as a freedom to self-reference runs a circular reinforcement of denial by mutual reinforcement of a signal set in filtered distortions, WANTED true.

I agree that the models of science are grossly simplified narratives that are further distorted by their sharing through media - including textbooks and training. Our psychic-emotional terrain shapes what can be said or what is expected to find support if being said. This is also structuring financial decisions. This then feeds a resonance loop.

The letter A has not been isolated because it shares lines and even angles with V? All lines are extensions of a point - so what is the point? The point is extended in infinite possibility of relations at and between all angles and dimensions. (Though letters & glyphs are essentially a 2D plane or screen of symbolic derivatives). The expression of one through many is the integrity of coherent expression or indeed the tensegrity of being. There is a sense in which the human imagination runs an in vitro exploration of isolation from living context, such as to set the Living Whole as 'dead' while taking dead letter of concepts set in symbol as 'survival' set over 'death'.

In doing this we always project our own denial out and away from self, such as to experience it at the hand of another. And by this, justify our self as attack, withholding and withdrawal, to a protected grievance or exclusion zone that is in blind relationship or entanglement relative to a point of mutually conflicting self interest, set against wholeness.

How much of our 'reality' is a fudge of 'continuity support' for a masking intent set into polarised reaction? Yet none of which can even seem to be - without an underlying Matrix of Communication of shared or common properties, qualities & characteristics.
Dissociation must first know a relationship to dissociate from or deny, so denials of truth really deny awareness of truth, as a mind of filters and rules seeking external support and reinforcement by which to justify not looking within the living moment, or movement of being.