The Ego in the Science

The Ego in the Science

 

in response to the themes in RobRob:

http://viroliegy.com/2022/06/27/the-exosome-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-3687

Also, off topic but why do Kaufman and Cowan believe in the structured water making pictures experiment? It hasn’t been verified by others, just like virology. They also think that a special wand somehow can cause the water to be more structured. Ok, cool. So do an experiment with a regular stirrer as control.
Nope… Not going to happen.
It’s just annoying that they do not apply the same scrutiny to alternative things as they do to mainstream things….

I can join in noticing that Kaufman & Cowan - each in their own style - bring critical reasoning to bear on what they then make an identity of reaction and resistance - or fight against. Identity will be defended as self-reinforcement and so is where a presumption to being right over wrong or good over evil, filters, distorts or block awareness.
There is a reason J said 'resist ye not evil!'.
To turn from such temptation to make a self to a wholeness of being, is the basis from which to recognise, real questions and receive real answers.

Any claim to define or arrive at truth should be absent from the tool of science, except as a distilling of truly workable and helpful models of understanding to who we are currently accepting ourselves and our world to be.This living context is fundamental, for conscious purposes can be recognised as framing the focus, while masked or unconscious purposes operate covert agenda by definition.

I am not seeking to frame blame as a tool for arriving at outcomes, but identify where responsibility or indeed faith is misplaced by a mindset or frame of assumed authority rather than extending true witness to a reality we do not create.

The realm of consciousness mattering or the matter of consciousness as we mind it is not at the end of our instruments, and so we learn to recognise what we are putting in as the parameters or predicates for what we are receiving as our result. Garbage in; garbage out - infers that that nature of logic is blind to its creative definitions. That is where I hold for spiritual responsibility or unified purpose - which also translates to workability. For conflicted purpose can only be said to work against function - as if to gain a private result.

It is possible to identify when we are in the realm of a freedom to look at anything from many angles as part of opening new perspectives on what we thought we understood or had 'explained'. This can coincide with chance observations arising from 'mistakes' that show up anomalies that an established ego of 'science' will look away from, dismiss or attack.
The spontaneous structuring of ionised matter in fluid states (or temporarily fluid states) is known and its interaction in water is the basis of life as we know it. The liability of any new perspective is its stuffing into the old wine paradigm of possession and control - or marketising and weaponising. We short circuit an expansion or abort our unfolding fulfilment. I sometimes call it the Herod effect, because an established order cannot restructure itself but that it persists its predicates.

I extended way past your point. But much as I appreciate their willingness to speak into the lockdown of mind under covid, I have not found resonance with the roles they are now taking up or taken in by. Nor am I surprised that as the terrain changes, so does the focus.
I appreciate where the questioning of what is found questionably unfounded extends - such as on this site - rather than ritually running over and over a song for a choir of believers.
It isn't that I seek to sow doubt and disinfo to a THEM that 'lie to us' as a matter of course, but a desire to prepare the way for the movement of a true recognition. I don't hold post-truth to mean anything real - though it carries connotations of a crucifixion.
Are scientists guided by the higher faculties of thought?
Is truth a Self-revealing to the willingness for removing or releasing blocks to our awareness?