Robot Love

 

 

in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2024/11/23/robot-love/

 

 If there is no 'dead' matter but all is a vehicle of embodied expression, then the Life is not IN things and agency is not IN things.
That Mind can phish itself in its own thought, allows the projection of thought to a 'thinging' - while its underlying 'thinking' is 'backgrounded' to give the focus to the engaging of an experience.
The backgrounding is the rendering unconscious or subconscious of the whole from which the selective focus of the part is being played out.
Intelligence can be thus seen as split between the 'back-end' and the 'front-end' of interactive reflections and resonance of significance and value.
Mind is Creative, but when creativity is given to mythic construct, the created is no longer alive BUT for being given meaning or power that then frames or dictates 'choices' that are no longer creative though they may remain ingenious.
What we make is in that sense a machine, device or prop by which to persist in story while ignoring or masking out a true or whole relational awareness. Narcissus 'loves' empathy.

For, we are 'normalised' are we not? to perceive external agents as 'causes' or to perceive Cause as external - as being done to - if not unfairly treated, denied and deprived - at least somewhere within a story that we are sticking do - til death do us part... or perhaps that is also a prop to maintain the tension that frames the whole of who and what we are -in death or afterlife or as the agent of destruction if not damnation!

The reflection of the robotic dictate as technocratic systems – as much as robotic 'agents' or mechanoidal functions runs convergent with a robotification of 'humans' - that is of 'humans' framed and operated in image or screen replacement as 'running in movie mode' as a narrative over-rule of ideological 'social' survival.

The programming of robotic presentations as ingenious defence strategies against fear of pain of loss, is a machine defence. I may use the term ego for a self-imaged projection to which we are all partial - or as The Cat said to Alice, "We wouldn't come here".

But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here.
~ Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland

But to wind this up so as to move on in my day, the True Unconsciousness is God, or if you prefer Unselfconscious Joy in Being. Not all the discarded, suppressed, demonised, hated and feared self-denial that may be pushed out of a surface awareness but remains in the mind that thought it.
For thoughts do not leave the mind that thinks them - but in concept.


Last night we watched "Previously Saved Version'. Very much on the theme of Todd's reflections. I wont say anything about it except it contributed to the cultural reflection on machined humans and the 'ghost in the machine'.

Projection casts out.
Everything in the dream is cast from the mind of the dreamer.
Healing unto wholeness is where the script serves Reintegration and renewal.

 

 

 

Our Deep State

A deep state of dissociated fragmentation 'looks out' to see it own reflection.
The quality of free awareness is unified purpose - that All the king’s horses and all the king’s men can only seek to mimic in polarising attempts to 'push the big muddy'. Whence does a true, grounded and direct awareness arise?
Come on - its not difficult to acknowledge truth of being!
But deep habits are allowed to run unchecked.
Speaking to the robot is futile.
It cannot 'hear for you' only you can accept reality as it is - by putting the robot aside.
God is true Unconscious, yet can as well be called Superconscious.
The suppression of fears and hated material masks over the face of God - which is Holiness that cannot be found or imagined within a world set on guilting.
The projection of 'sins' (of error, conflict &confusion) runs a-tempt to get rid of THOUGHT outside itself and thus makes a world - not in truth but as a way of perceiving in different lights.
Jesus actually didn't 'forgive' but yielded judgement to the Father's Will - hence "Forgive them Father" or "Neither do I condemn thee". If we keep vengeance for our selves we think to resist evil as the arbiter of 'holy guilt' which is the root of all contradiction or double think set in 'loving to hate'.
By pausing reaction, we can call on what I call the Holy Spirit of a true discernment, for truth to reveal the situation to us - ie wisdom, as we can recognise, accept and embody.

Coming from a different place (from an uncarved block) is not polarised by reaction. Is not a manufactured or manipulated outcome and is not of the mindset of possession and control.

A blind eye becomes a habit.
The notion of an 'unconscious' is a framework by which which to categorise and articulate something of our thought-process in concept.

 

Mind forged manacles are bought+sold as 'freedom'.

They are not entirely imposed on 'victims'.

Some of this is of a collective will to engage in a 'self-will' running on false pretences that carry inherent 'overheads'

The true nature of a free will was exemplified by Jesus, but while he is made special as the crowning of a God demanding 'sacrifice', his teaching demonstration is subverted to a 'Care System' for virtue credits under systemic 'moral dictates.

There is a fundamental reversal in our current thought system that 'sees' all things awry and yet defends against messengers perceived threatening to its identifications of face and control.

Accepting healing for our own errors releases others and world from distorting projections, and release from conflicts otherwise deeply hidden.

That there is a collective arising from the choice to live in a 'dolls house' is inseparable from my subscription to its service - which runs on the conviction in its reality or necessity as survival in its terms.

Willingness to question reality has to rise from being itself - else it is not areal question but a statement of concept framed as a question.

To release claim to knowledge as a movement of life stirring within us, opens to receiving of or from That Which Knows. Not 'about' as a predictive controlling set of mapping definitions', but to know as to be one with - as a knowing field and not a parcelled off staked of claim in exploiting a 'commodity' or resource for private agenda set in mutually reinforcing contractual entanglements.

To be still and know - does not predefine or predictively shape the 'knowing' for such would not be the unconflicted willingness that only truth be true.