China Shanghied by Bio Fear?

 in response to the themes in:

 https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/putting-the-shanghai-lockdown-into/

 

Gain of Function is popularly assigned to weaponised 'viruses' rather than weaponised 'solutions' to naturally occurring biological processes false flagged to such agents.
So the genetic technology is a vector. However gene theory set a narrative for vast global investments that did not pay off in terms of hyped or projected cures. What to do? Keep it going as cancer therapy where iatrogenesis is hidden within results of 'standard of care', while reinventing it as a function for a new form of fast track 'vaccination' run from defined & patented genetic licences.
Viruses never were actually discovered in life, nor proven to be the vector of what is interpreted as infectious diseases. But genetics came to the rescue as a means by which to no longer require looking - along with a shift from clinical empirical science to modelling via biomarkers assigned as (adjustable) data points to the process of management of sickness (healthcare). The idea of inserting genetic material into a living cell is the very replication of the idea of the 'virus theory', and various methods have been developed to effectively rape or violate a cell - including the use of nanotechnology - which is a vast realm of global investment with vast promise for a huge range of applications including 'medical' - including biological testing and 'drug delivery'. While the PR for the Graphene and biotech industry reads and can be seen as science fiction written into living creatures, this is essentially the public face and particularly for fellow scientists or investors. Again its principles emulate the theory of the virus as an exogenous hacking of bio-function but go further in maintaining this as effected by signalling that is reciprocal - that is an Internet of Bodies.
What can be firmly verified on empirical principles rather than within appeals to authority operating out of a black box of effectively spun out defence projects to the corporate sector is a work in progress, but it is well to note that if the target BELIEVES the threat real, their reactions can be frames so as to induce them to self-destructive behaviours.
Covid should prove this point beyond any doubt unless still struggling within the identity conflict it sets its target in. Once identity is heavily invested in a course of defence, recognising and releasing the error becomes a path at odds with an active self-defence - and so can only occur when the error becomes completely inescapable against a reality that can no longer be 'framed' as an ongoing 'battle'.
The Military Industrial Complex in all its broad spectrum dominance of social institutions depends on 'ongoing battle' no less than its branch of 'Medical Industrial monopoly'.

Ways to hack biology: starve it, poison it, and diagnose the result as authoritative nocebo - ie : now you have irrevocable gene damage/incurable disease etc.
For cells you cannot nocebo - but the cloaking of toxic or foreign protein in hydrogel (cell water is gel water) employs electrochemical principles for breaking through the cell's integral condition so as to insert a trojan intent - regardless whether well intentioned or malicious. The story is the same archetypal pattern as goes back to our mythic representation of 'Fall' to a conflicted and alienated state of driven behaviours set in lack,   shame, masking attack and irrevocable guilt.