Supernova

Michael Clarage: Supernova | Thunderbolts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQ7dmt5HrYo

A supernova begins as a star then undergoes a very rapid transformation which, for an instant, puts out as much energy as the entire galaxy where it lives. This brief, all encompassing flash is called “supernova”.

#1

TK 421:

Not sure if the star / human comparison helps or detracts the from the cosmological narrative.

Function, yes, but projection on the human / spiritual level, no - unless you are trying to use stars as an example for humans. It is a positive message. Love the channel and very nice presentation.

A narrative is a human myth or meaning or model. The function of meaning cast out in image and form is in reflection and creative expression or unfolding of experience.

The realm of energy as information in living terms is pure experience, inseparable from all and any expression within experience. This can be represented to thought as all pervading Field tangible in its perturbations, but the representation is never the Reality. Infinity is neither great or small, but the singular function of all relational scales or levels of communication as a whole in all its parts. Our current model of Human is limiting to the nature of the thinking we look with and predicate upon. Limitation can be used to generate a focus within a specific set of rules, filters and parameters, such as to experience from a locked down, distanced and masked presumption of self and reality - operating as normal in terms of a currency of exchange within its own bounded domain.

Thinking has masking attributes of perceived reality that belie the thinking of the mind of accepted and current focus in definitions be-lived - within a mind that is itself compartmentalised or split to many functions. How Vast are you? Or where is the limit of your recognition and resonant embrace?

You are a Universe - but never only unto your self.

The self-differentiation of a specific point of experience is through a mind of subject-object definition. Within the seeming of such a mind is an adaptation and development of consciousness in time and over a period of unfolding perceptions, experience, learning and integration. When a founding idea  and its model or narrative no longer serve, a period of disintegration and negative limitation as conflict and depletion brings forth the re-cognition of the unconflicted substratum or Infinity point and field of which all appearances are rendered tangible. It is this re-alignment to what always is, that replaces the limited and limiting patterns of self-struggle with a greater capacity of embrace, no longer exclusively locked or limited into the image and form a a material representative of mind as body apart from All That Is.

My reflection here is a result of joining with what the pebble of your dropped comment resonated in the field of my awareness. If we seek and find inhuman 'meanings' we seek and find an agenda alien to all that is meaningful or coherent. So while the projection of pet wishes is a folly to identify in place of reality, the self-denial that can result from the attempt to eradicate our desire or thought from a 'received or uncovered purity' can itself project and reflect a 'universe' that self reinforces a blind lockstep to a logic set from the predicate of such denial.

#2

#41337:

this sort of thing undermines the credibility of what is really a core of hard science speculation and testable theory

Computer modelled (math) science undermines relational honesty. Your life, heart and mind and body are an instrument that can be extended by technology. How hard do you want it? Hard science speculation is contradiction.

Because you cannot imagine a way of testing for a living coherent Universe, you must protect a hard adaptation set in a dead and ultimately deathly conditionality such as to allow nothing to undermine the model or system that you regard as a temporary defence against pain and loss and death. That a model or mind and body can be an Instrument of Universal Appreciation will not flow through your current 'circuitry'. But nothing is ultimately hardwired or locked down so much as your willingness to lockstep in its dictate.

Where is the example of science that epitomised what you DO hold worthy, inspirational and congruent as thought, model and active coherence?