Experimental refutation of a Virological Tenet

Commenting into to the German full video page comments at:

https://odysee.com/@DeansDanes:1/brennpunkt04:6

An English subtitled highlight is at

https://www.bitchute.com/video/cRT95DpkQece/

There is a dubbed version of this highlight somewhere that I have seen.

The control tests, which Dr. Stefan Lanka commissioned in a laboratory, confirm that the claimed cytopatic effect, which is regarded by all virologists as evidence for SARS-CoV-2, is refuted.

The laboratory confirmed that this effect is not VIRUS-SPECIFIC and therefore cannot and must not be claimed as evidence of a disease-causing virus.

The central effect, the death of tissue cells in the test tube, is achieved in the same way without any infected material."

@RamonaMedicks

Thank you for these wonderful talks and all the educational work including experiments ect. I am touched again and again in my heart as it only happens through the truth. I would also like to hear from the confidence of Dr. Let Stefan Lankas infected that we are about to "burst the balloon *, but my previous experience of honor is unfortunately somewhat different. It is true that there are always people who really want to understand and then" personal responsibility and health ", ( For me it is related), choose. However, this is mostly a minority. For many people illness fulfills a purpose, namely to satisfy an inner emptiness and the need for attention

In the work A Course in Miracles is the statement, 'Sickness is a defence against the truth'.

This aligns with your comment but offers illumination beneath the 'persona' level of judged appearances.

That the mind can 'hijack' and replicate a false sense of self is not to say it has done so, but that the belief it has done so operates as if an alien or usurping will.

Thanks for your comment.

@kirsten

Hello Stefan to us! Thanks for this wonderful video! The sun is shining even brighter now! Still a question about the "vaccinations". Contact with vaccinated persons may in any way pose problems for the unvaccinated. Eg are the nano-particles or other substances transferred via excretions (sweat, breath, faeces, semen)?

Yes, we (many of us) are looking here. The ego of a manipulative intent will always lead us to discover deeper connection. The principles of nanoparticulates include the electrical conditions for their forms of expression.

The idea that fear has concretised to something out there that is attacking us is an archetype of fear itself. The  ability of Life to hold and extend wholeness is innate as distinct from our learned or conditioned sense of self and life. Responsibility for thought and belief is being Called Home. For the invested illusion, its fears and denials are 'coming home' as in barbarians at the gate, or opening the Gates of hell.

GNM or Universal Biology has perspective. Toxic conflict, like toxic debt, is only masked over unless truly released. The Terrain is to be adapted to, but if we take only our model of the terrain, we are not Feeling into Life. If genetic shedding hits you in the place where viral fear hit the pathologically captured, the same pattern operates in different guise, because the fear of weaponised life is still running in our mind and stored in our body. The program triggers, but do we want to reset another cycle of denial, distance, lockdown and masking?

Is the ultimate Substance Spirit? or the alignment of Mattering within the experience of polarities set in charge relational expression?

That many may reactively choose to express the idea of bioweapon-guilt does not mean a Higher Court will not throw out the premise on which it operates. But we all have a learned capacity to weaponise language or mask in the appearances of love and life in order to get something (or get away from something that we believe we lack or believe we must get rid of).

@Sonntag

If there are no viruses, how do AIDS, Ebola or SARS spread? AIDS, for example, is transmitted through blood transmission or unprotected sex. So what is it that is in semen and blood that transmits this disease from one person to another?

First, look at your presumptions and check that the belief that this is so is proven fact, rather than heavily invested narrative belief.

The information you seek is not hard to find, but refining our question can release us from looking where a false or partial set of beliefs misdirect us. Willingness to ask real questions is the critical part.