Virus theory undone - Shedding fears - (added to)

#1

Dr Stefan Lanka has just performed lab tests of the procedures use to confirm viral infection - but using a control of no 'infected' or disease sample.

This control has never knowingly been done - or published. Those who seek to understand to basis by which viruses are believed to operate will already know that the sample from a sick patient is added to prepared cell-culture, whose preparation includes starving and poisoning before adding the 'infected material'. So Stefan did not add such material, but shows the exactly same cytopathic effect (cell death) as is claimed to prove viral infection.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/cRT95DpkQece/

(An very readable book as a general background to what is behind the scenes as virology is 'Fear of the Invisible' by Janine Roberts).

With regard to exosomal (extracellular) communication, such as has been observed in some instances, there may be other guiding and aligning organising fields at work that embody both memory and functional adaptation, that can hardly be assigned to a packet of protein wrapped cell detritus. But that Communication is the FACT, is to me demonstrated by the result of rules, masks and filters that shape our perception and experience.

The links to 'shedding' indicate that toxicity can communicate physically. I also add that fear communicates atmospherically, or energetically. Much of what we call our life and world is limited to a surface appearance, socially reinforced, that is masked over what runs beneath and set to protect the mask against such fear. I add that the masking defence sets the fear that it is premised or promising to protect.

https://twitter.com/onemindinmany/status/1387515659790262273?s=20

By reaction can we make our fear real.

So the idea and fear of shedding of vaxxed GM viral contagion needs to be paused from permission to run in our heart and mind as true - else already invested fear of virus as contagion, combines with fear of GM evils, and malign or mad agenda, to operate a reiteration of the core program of sickness as defence against truth of Life, feared.

The uncovering of a true appreciation, requires a release of the false. But the capacity of our mind to invest in fear as a false basis from which to distance or dissociate, lockdown or deny and mask over as both hiding from AND masking In substitution for a true relationship, runs almost automatically as a learned adaptation to a world set in thought reversal. Such as to not be able to reach those who have in a sense taken the bait and are running with it for their very lives!

Uncovering lies and deceit can be disturbing, sometimes extremely so, for we are part of this world as it is part of us. So the willingness to research, ask and find answer, needs to be rooted in a desire for healing, peace, or reintegration of conflicting elements to a greater embrace. Else we think 'waking' is into ever deeper nightmare come true as the drama that feeds and validates a peaking of 'must DO or else', which then troughs to 'passive subjection' under narrative dictates as 'judgements set irrevocable' - also called 'the world'.

A Course in Miracles is not for getting a better handle on the 'world', but speaks to the devices, tricks and deceits of the mind that makes a masking 'reality' over a an Innocence of being that is timeless, boundless, and never truly absent, broken, crucified or denied - save that the Creative, given to fear, makes un-reality as division and rule, set in a Separation trauma that compounds itself in the attempt to escape, overcome or regain what was lost.

If we are afraid, regardless rational arguments against its premise, then there are active beliefs to uncover, rather than override, that are part of a complex of fears that then effectively program our reactions. Many are getting GM-vaxxed for fear of loss of social mobility, family access, employer compliance, social belonging etc. This is revealing the fears that are very strongly held.

A while back I strangely allowed by car radio to access BBC R4! Expecting to turn it back to the Aux setting immediately, I remained because its content felt very apt to real commentary on what is going on covidly, then it transpired it was the author answering questions on his book 'Never Let Me Go'. So I then bought and read it as an intuitive sketch of something parallel or like to a seeming world... that isn't as it seems - and yet is normalised. No spoilers here.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000qxm4

I don't think a mindcontrol health warning is needed for this one - though I came in part way through...

Stepping beyond fear-defences is both a grace and a process of willingness over time.

I see the Reintegrative Spirit as the undoing of the mind that thought its own thought had separated or been separated from the heart of God. We may not all use the term 'God' but we all recognise gratitude at heart.

Fears are being revealed that were hidden, and will seem to reiterate or reenact their basis for reaction.

The willingness to choose to not listen or consent, is part of letting in Perspective the fear automatically denies.

Even if that willingness seems small against something overwhelming. Challenging a boundary condition is knocking on the door of a Greater Relationship, rather than the ego breaking free of its (self-imposed) limitations. Our Intuition of Life is as loud as our willingness to hear and give embodiment. But re-assembling fragments of sampled insight to generate an insilico modelling of a 'whole' to then sell"! to a starved and poisoned world, persists the same addictive pattern with the potentials for healing. Life is always already whole and so attempt to sell or push an answer wehaven't really accepted and integrated can mask in virtues it has not let in, or accepted for itself, and so must assert to mask over doubts kept hidden by lack of love - whatever form it takes.

#2

https://principia-scientific.com/opposing-views-on-covid19-dr-mercola-versus-dr-kamil/#comment-49445

Opposing Views On COVID19: Dr. Mercola Versus Dr. Kamil

They share the view of pathogenic causation.

Good cop or bad cop? (narrative capture).

Have a quick look at Lanka's control study on the process by which a virus is 'proved' - ie Cytopathic effect.

The 'sampled' matter presumed to be infected/contagious is added to cell culture that has first been starved, and then toxified. The cell death/aberrations are then 'proof' of infection (!). The control study has never been published or know to have been done in which NOTHING is added to such 'prepared' cell culture - until now.

Though Lanka also ran a sample where RNA from a lab quality yeast was added.

Guess the result?

Or give a few minutes to find out.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/cRT95DpkQece/

Invested identity in fear and its 'defences and solutions' is never willing to question its own premise. Love of truth aligns truly because it is recognised and appreciated true,. Conflicted identity seeks to make truth support its attempt to prevail over sense of pathologically feared, hated and denied self-projections. Hence truth is the first 'casualty' of war - by usurpation and denial - not IN truth.

Whatever has been assigned to 'flu' and presumed to be virally caused/transmitted happened again under novel diagnosis and unfit for purpose testing  - both of which are essentially modelled and variable in their parameters.

But Communication - is the Nature of Existence and Being, and so the idea of contagion belongs in the psychic emotional expression of 'pathogenic intent'. Fear is not only the surface attention but part of the boundary structure of a sense of self individuation, taken out or denied its Self sustenance and direction.

Psychopathy in this sense is a dissociative reaction to fear of death of self as pain of loss.

This gives identity set over and against a terrain of threat, such as to seek independent autonomy. Terrain theory shares symbiotic function and belonging as the Field of which we are - rather than as an oppositional mind set in conflicting views.