Saturday 13 March 2021

Weaponisation of language is the masking defence against exposure to lack of substance

 https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2021/03/13/what-is-an-anti-vaxxer/


Weaponisation of language is the masking defence against fear of loss of face, of disclosure to shame or lack of substance.

The characteristic is of accusing and attacking our sins in 'others' and indeed in the 'Othered' or scapegoated by assignment as a legitimate hate target - hence an invitation to signal 'moral stature' (sic) by Joining in hate against.


Until we see our own mind in act and release it, we continue to almost exclusive focus 'out there' for blame as a means to validate ourself upon evils assigned to others that we WANT there, and regardless whether there is any valid criticism, it becomes 'personal' and engages the narrative distortions of wanting to be right or wanting to show the other as being wrong - rather than any desire for truth that actually heals or corrects errors.


Protected narratives - where open public discourse of questioning or revision of facts are NOT officially allowed on pain of significant penalty - such as being 'cancelled' and excluded or 'unpersoned' - are the revealing of masked or hidden tyranny.

We have our own individual and group identity versions or where NOT to go, and neither to address openly that you are NOT to go there. These are communicated by induction and example.

So a mask isn't just a passive set of filters or a magic prop against magic particles with magic powers, it is a cover story for an attack on truth from a 'protected narrative identity that must not be openly named - for exposure is threat and is thus targeted for attack.


This is a device or pattern that feeds the so called 'conspiracy theorist' (another weaponised put-down) of a masked agenda running under a cover story that does not fully disclose conflicts of interest. The vacca or pharmed cow herd become the means of support after the shock tactic has induced them to change their habit and normalise it. Everyone seeks and finds self-justifications after the fact.


The resort to lies and denial of truth is a deep self-betrayal that is associated with self abhorrence and disgust that are intolerable - and so the self-hating are driven to lid over and dump it out on others in ways that generate a like reaction of disgust. But fear can so dispossess the mind as to essentially override all else - as in covid monomania, and when not in our right mind we really are as Jesus put it - 'them who know not what they do'. In the moment we act for survival from where we are identified, the moment after a red rage may reveals a dreadful sense of guilt or horror. the imposition of order as the attempt to eradicate drives the true causes deeper by piling more 'solutions' on top. 


I wrote a piece called:

I am not an Anti-Lifer but I understand how a mind polarises in hate, fear and guilt

at:

https://willingness-to-listen.blogspot.com/2020/12/i-am-not-anti-lifer-but-i-understand.html


But the key point is do not accept an offer to be framed in negative terms as if it is on you to defend or refute. Will anyone give a definition of what they mean when they use these terms - rather than restating put-downs of smear by association.


Show me the evidence - not the collective impressions of manipulated fears and wishful beliefs!

I see much evidence that does not support official narratives. That is why they need official support.


Where would all of the current shenanigans be if the Banking/Finance system did NOT support it? Weaponised narratives are woven like complex financial instruments by which to offer toxic debt as IF an appreciable asset or hedge against pain of loss. That 'Truth will Out!' is inevitable and so associated with death or total loss, and evaded at all and any cost by all and any means, until the willingness to sacrifice life to self-illusions simply cant find traction to persist.


There is the curious fact that those who are denigrated often take on their terms of denigration as a shared identity. The whole thing is about lost or broken identity in search of a boost or reinforcement within a sense of nakedness or lack of defence against a hostile world.

But the Bible says" And WHO told you you were naked?"

This represents our innate capacity to question mistaken beliefs and assumptions from which we compounded a mistake to a world of lies and nightmare.


#2


Bob Williams
All fields of science have evolved over the years, those who don’t get or understand it shouldn’t be involved in it.

All derivatives of the technological marketising and weaponising of science for corp and gov application have evolved ever more complex means to protect their fields and funding.

One way is to 'evolve' such arcane modes of obfuscation that no one else CAN participate unless mind-trained to see as the invested Model directs.


In general terms science is being replaced by computer modelling, under 'scientifically set predicates and parameters to tell Reality what it has to be - and then generate funding to search for the dark fudge or eradicate the bugs that the system generates for the war on bugs.


Over specialisation takes on a 'dalek's eye view' of life.


Turning and turning in the widening gyre

The falcon cannot hear the falconer;

Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;

Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,

The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere

The ceremony of innocence is drowned;

The best lack all conviction, while the worst

Are full of passionate intensity.

Surely some revelation is at hand;

Surely the Second Coming is at hand....


If you want a secret cult, go for it - but do not expect your private agenda to be validated by a democratic acceptance or empirical data.

We stand on the shoulders of giant... mistakes.


#3


Glynn

Hi Doc. Can I join your cult please.


Why not grow and share a culture by meeting in a tangible and substantial appreciation of worth or value.

The cultic MUST bolster its identity as over and against them.

If we have a bankrupt culture, attracting parasitic scavengers running a death cult, then restore focus to who we are and what we love, rather than taking a cheap definition from what we are not (at least publicly) willing to be seen in or as.


It s ok Glynn I know you were sharing a lighthearted moment ;-)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comment. If your comment does not show - it is probably waiting moderation - which is when I notice the email notification!