Living Law and contractual legal fictions

https://off-guardian.org/2021/03/30/covid-vaccine-nonsense/#comment-346668 

-CO

Reply to  Peter

That’s precisely why we need to restore the Common LAW and a common LAW court system that actually works for We the people in place of the current corrupt legal system which is a corporation and a money making racket. It’s true lawyers won’t save us under the present legal system it’s far too corrupt and true justice will never be served because it was never designed for that purpose in the first place. Consider joining the COMMON LAW COURT – strength in numbers.

Yes, but as I understand, Common Law is being ignored. So while the corruptions of the Law by legal fictions given consent operates as a hidden contract set in darkness and deceit, the need is to re-establish welcome and alignment with Living Law in our heart and mind as one.

At the level of what I call spirituality, is self-honesty or transparency to being in which thought word and deed align. Masking in social codes of mutually agreed self (conflict) evasion, becomes systemic capture to our own attempts to protect what we take as our self, from exposure to what runs beneath (conflict).

Mutually agreed definitions and beliefs operate perceptual framing of rules and filters that have all the life we give them and none of their own.

Learning the Law (Natural, God's or Common), is not just an outer means by which to compete with a systemic manipulation set in fear and rule-based controls. We have to step forth or 'come out' to stand in it, and this is the power of true witness, or lawful authority, rather than attempt to use Law for private leverage.

I don't see any strength in numbers, if not of free willing alignment of true founded purpose. The leverage of fear is to seek 'unity in numbers' over and against fear and threat. This can be used to leverage attention and condition reaction, but to coercions and narrative deceits that  seem moral or necessary only while such narratives can be supported or protected from a true account.

From my view, we are not suddenly deceived by viruses and lockstepped reaction under global banking, but have been deceived all along and to such an extent that nothing we are normalised to believe is wholly true.

In terms of living physics, unlawful is not possible. for the actuality of what is, is never our modelling of and predictive investments about it. Yet our focus of attention is generally dissociated to the model, or imaging of reality and not to presence, and so can and does operate as a psychic overlay that can become divorced from its referents and context such as to obstruct and seem to attack truth. When actually attacking our awareness of truth, for the sake of protecting narrative investments that run as subconscious or conditioned habit harking back to primitive fear and separation conflicts that are effectively masked over by complex defence of fictions given identity and believe for what they serve to deny and keep hidden, including the act of hidden denial.

The attempt to bring light to a mind set in darkness and deceit, becomes the entanglement in and sacrificial feeding of its frame - which is false, but set in active defence against light of exposure. Even as light seeks to correct, the forms of the solution become marketised and weaponised by the masking denial.

And so the true release of self-conflicted entanglement is to let the darkness be brought to light - to awareness, by no longer protecting it in the compliance to masking 'agreements' that generally run invisible as a structuring of our thought - by which thought is dictated, rather than freely associated lawfully.

Unless we recognise where we 'sell or deny ourselves for fear - as a dead sense of control in exchange for mutually agreed fictions or fallacies, that substitute for love of truth, then we persist a love of lies. But what is not really there cannot receive and reflect, exchange and share your Presence or Creation, and so a parody of life rendered hollow runs as the 'normal' of a socially or mutually conditioned 'reality'.

When such 'reality' breaks down or disintegrates it is revealed as a masking, distancing denial. But the investment in masked over conflicts is the attempt to reset itself as 'guide and protector' by narrative definitions give authority and legal protection. True Authorship is never in question, but self-doubt and division sets a sense of lack and fear, as a basis from which to question and doubt our existence as the basis from which to set ourselves in fictions seeking to become Real. But "WHO told you  you were naked?" offers the root symbol for the right and freedom to question all that is truly questionable in appeal to a Higher Court of a true discernment. False convictions are annulled or rendered void, as are false premised from which they are invoked.

But living this is not a 'thinking' to apply to an externalised 'world'.

"All I give is given to myself. The Help I need to understand this is true is with me now." ~ ACIM

Giving and receiving are two facets of one.

Think you that you can escape the Law?

Or truly WANT to lose its protection?

The mind of dissociative thinking has been 'normalised'. It is not a Golden Age, but a sense of life and love lost - and grasped at in longing and in grievance both.

But giving is the measure of our receiving, not the grasp of 'getting' driven by fear set in lack, driven by compulsion and masked in virtues set into rituals of authority.

The virus as a narrative depicts the sense of nakedness and susceptibility to external and invisible threat - as if in no way related or connected to our thought, or giving of acceptance and intention. Yet the 'enemy' can in an instant shift to 'faulty genes' or uncompliant thought and behaviour to social masking 'protections', extreme weather framed as catastrophe, and really anything and anyone that offers a path for the repackaging of guilt and toxic consequence away from the currently invested 'self-reality'.

Human laws can obviously be out of accord with Law as a result of seeking to use truth as a weapon. That must run off with a private version of 'truth' set in conflicted thinking, masked as virtue and necessity by setting against a hate and grievance cherished.

Do we set law as vengeance?

Or as correction of error by which to restore and grow our lives in the recognition of Law as just?

The corruption of human Law to regulatory frameworks of denial represent a deep self hatred - given collective power to exact vengeance on what we have made of life - for the 'self-hating human' is the undercurrent to a pseudo religion based on guilt as irrevocably distanced, locked down and lockstepped to systemic compliance. Fear set in guilt usurps love's awareness, as a nightmare - made real and inescapable excepting by dissociation or death. But no matter how far we stray or how complex our defences, we are never more than a step away from love's awareness now, but it is not a step we can take alone and apart.

The 'alone and apart' has to be left unchosen for free willingness to move.