Brain-dead dissociation; wilful or unwitting?

https://lockdownsceptics.org/2021/02/15/latest-news-286/#comments

When I see such a brain-dead dissociation, I ask is it wilful or unwitting?

Laura Perrin's earliest insight was that the degree to which one is identified in the establishment, is the degree to which such invested identity is protected against threat of change in fear of pain of loss.

This includes anti-establishment identity, for an anti identity takes its reality from that which it denies of opposes, having nothing truly original while masking as freedom from.

Questioning narratives is questioning their predicates, but taking or making an identity within it, is an expression of support and allegiance for it. Even if picking some areas of it as evils to be attacked, overturned or resisted.

A modern term for deceit is psyop. They are nothing new.

They operate within the target mind in exactly the way the posited 'virus' is said to work.

A communication or complex net of conditions in which coded messaging and triggering  finds receptive replication that undermines and destroys from within, like a Trojan horse but as a chain reaction of weaponised 'communication' that goes viral. To serve the purpose of the maker of the code while targeting the profile of the host such as to by pass defences and be taken in as a source of information, resource, or protection.

How would we know if we were 'infected'?

This is actually very simple.

Peace is the condition of unconflicted being.

If we are unwilling and thus unable to locate and align with our peace, we are running fear-thinking as if to resolve conflicts externally.

Unless we yield such thinking to a centred and grounded presence, it persists in our name as if our true will and desire, and yet as we release it, we become aware of the nature or patterns of thought and emotion that run, rather than being run by them. This is the waking from reaction to an awareness in which observation, enquiry and revealing or discovery occur as a process of re-integration or realigning integrity.

While the idea may make perfect sense, the practice meets invested identity or attachments that set rules and filtering distortion that obstructs or usurps a willingness to know. So playing the ideas always generates new masks by which to seem to be active while actually blocking or diverting awareness.

All of the above is to a curiosity and willingness to know. Not to the weaponising and marketising of information - or its denial - though such are freedoms by which to deny and limit and distort or pervert the fulfilment of what we are free to be the unfolding of.

#2

Yes but the key is starting from where we (each) are, now.

This step taken as a good step, will lead to a direction and orientation that becomes a strength of character and inner resource that is not IN the seemingly locked down bubble-self but through us to our relationships (world). So in a sense doing what is in our sphere of current willingness and capacity, realigns us with a 'Field of Support' that is hidden from a 'control mentality'.

If anything inspires us, it resonates something within us that we can welcome, align with and be the expression of. The mind is expert at framing us in 'complexity, difficulty, and impossibility, such as to either give up before we start or set up to fail. The intuition of life knows there is a way, and the mind is a set of brakes unless 'in control'. So some willingness to feel our way in whatever way gets us moving.

I am not speaking to solving the problems of the world here, (directly), but to uncovering a sense of integrity or peace of being from which to live.

Curiosity of being is as simple and 'ask and it shall be given'. If you look at a lot of our questions, they are actually statements in the form of a question, for at first we only want in our own terms and conditions.

This reminds me of the innocence of a child that can simply see or ask what the complex adult has covered over. There is this child within us, but we 'know too much!

Thanks for the touch,