Beliefs, Illusion and Reality

 https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/06/the-mainstream-bubble/#comment-317434

Frank G L

I just want to point this out (religious or atheist alike).

Since many people like to speak for God, say things like  I don t believe in God & I was wondering what would happen if I speak for/as God and replied  More importantly, God doesn t believe in you .

I don’t assign ‘belief’ to God - but I can accept that God does not see us as we think we are - and so is no respecter of persons or indeed of personas or masking.

Reality is not participating in our illusions.

But the Sun shines on the just and the unjust alike.

Even the word see relates to perception resulting from conception.

So God knows God through ‘All That is’, as it Is, and behold it is very Good.

Scientifically this can be assigned to perfect resonance.

In human terms is the Gift of the Holy Spirit or discernment of truth as the undoing or resolving of conflicted illusions.

The use of words and the adulteration and dilution to meanings that contradict, is the result of our own Word, and not of the Word that Created us Creative.

That we hide our Word by doubt, fear, division and denial, is our consent for powers and conditions to ‘take the blame’.

The use of naming magic to redefine our reality experience operates a masking off of a bubble mind to a private reality.  “Here try this fruit, and see everything in a way that God does NOT”. Its a new agenda

Welcome to the split mind set against itself.

Yet illusions battle only with themselves.

Your true mind is held in trust while you dally with your own projections.

Unconditional love is the support for our freedom to give and receive as is our will.

Hence believing or not believing is not needed to exist. But what we give acceptance to, and align in, as our word, thought and deed will frame all the meaning, or the meaninglessness, of our life.

Aligning in integrity of being, knows the act in which it lives.

Aligning in disintegrity will not know what it does, for disintegrity hides or masks its truth, to pass off as something else.

Wherever we derive identity from is as a god to us.

Worship or give worth, accordingly.

But a false love or false religion cannot and does not heal or make whole.

Frank G L

My overall view of the  world  is like this, the masks, all of the crap is symbolic of a sort of collective imbalance of psyche. And apparently the psyche is currently dominated by Qlippoth.

The closest mental construct I can think of in terms of what  God  is, is to say  God demands schizophrenia .

Symbols point to something but are not the think they point to. A broken and fragmented psyche can be symbolised as a 'world'.

Looking at the symbol as a symbol is no longer living the fear or conflict that it represents. You true mind is unchanged by the projections and experience of conflicted thoughts that can SEEM to dominate or trap a limited attention.

Mental constructs are in Mind or Mind are have no existence outside Mind.

But if you choose to look through them you shall experience in their framing.

The Idea of God as the Extension of Self (love) being Creation Itself, is not a construct.

But the projection of conflicted Self-illusion can experience a split mind as IF at the hand of an OTHER. Unlike self-extension as the recognition of self in other, the project of illusion  OTHERS  or alienates the Self by believing it has become something other than it is. That is the function of illusion   to pass off as real.

A mind of fear can only imagine a god of fear, but as above the split of mind to fear is a result of conflicting self-illusion. A god of fear demands and coerces, for illusions must be protected. God as love, simply Is and cannot Be threatened, but our awareness of love can be lost to a masking over of fear in coercion and deceit, presented and defended as  virtue .

Centering our mind to our heart is allowing the masking mind to fall off by itself. Whatever works to get past or drop through the  thinking  to  simply Is.

Frank G L

Regarding "The Idea of God as the Extension of Self (love) being Creation Itself, is not a construct".

I refuse to bring life to a dying world, especially when the dying world will abuse that life.

I missed this one earlier. This is a perfect representation of self-damnation. The 'other' is always perceived THROUGH your self.

When truly recognised you love your Brother as Yourself. This is the Love God Is - regardless anything we can judge and give love to instead.

You are right though. It is not yours to give or withhold, but the wish to have that power for yourself, denies your capacity to recognise the love you both have, are and share. If you killed yourself you would still not prevent the life you have shared from being the love that it is, and it will wait your acceptance as part of you.

Jesus said 'let the dead bury the dead' as the release of dead concept and structure for bringing attention wholly to the living. It takes one to know one. Life is here and now. But holding the image of grievance can set life as victim and avenger. There is no freedom under hate. So pain and hate serve as the means to hide it, cover it over and substitute some kind of 'holy war' to keep it there.

Frank G L

Like binary logic from the collective psyche s dialectic.

In societal/institutional hierarchy, there s like a dualism between mob ego (essentially the racketeers) and the ego mob (the collective would be racketeers, serfs who align ideals with the mob ego).

Obviously it tries to reaffirm itself, and when when an aspect of it dissociates, there's heavy denial involved typically.

Essentially I m saying mob ego is just the concentrated manifestation, or an extreme of the disparate, confused, though somewhat homogenous elements.

Which is to say, I think people are doomed.

Well do you think that, or is it just a manifestation of disparate, confused, though somewhat homogenous elements of your sense of self and world - as currently accepted?

If thinking can cast a spell of doom on a man, then there must be something already there that is triggered -  such as points within you, of collapse of self to dispiriting situations. When that is not being triggered, you may feel other potentials to your existence.

You can say that birth is a fatal condition, but we do not live as if we are doomed. Yet it is a temporary condition. Maybe the idea of survival as a meat object is not the horse to back here!

Frank G L

I have never backed survival as a meat object and I don t believe in unconditional love or just being. And when you say  not a meat object , you had rather not be referring to technocrat horseshit.

Dear Frank G L I perceive you are parsing every ‘incoming’ for threat to your person.

I respect your personal freedoms but speak to the issues.

If you want to focus in the personae, it will mask, filter and censor the underlying issues. persona means mask.

I used ‘ meat object’ for the mortal body taken as a thing in and of itself (which it isn’t, but can be used as symbol for disconnection, to a limited or locked down sense of ‘self’  that is then limited to or imprisoned in such a body and such a mind.

You say people are doomed.

You also say you do not believe in survival.

But whatever we say, will be an expression of who we are accepting our self to be, and therefore teaching others as well as learning from ourselves.

I tune in very intimately to the words I choose or accept for what I mean -  but I don’t tell anyone what to choose to learn!

Survival as an object or body  - including body of thinking, is the desire to persist in its idea and experience - for our own reasons.

Continuity in a movie is a way of stringing otherwise unrelated pieces into a story or themes of expression and illumination.

I think your technocratic reference points to bio-tech ’meat’.

This is part of the WEF ‘dispossession to happiness’ currently on offer; that is - to become a dream incapable of moving will - or a nightmare that cant even scream.

We set the measure of our own receipts but do not recognise our feedback as reward . Factory farmed humans is a logical outcome of using the bodies of others to gratify and support the enacting of personal fantasy. 

Give as you would in truth receive. And discern the truth of all that you receive so as to address and own what is yours, and therefore be free to release what is not back to its rightful owner.

Technocracy is a conflict management system, running externally in attempt to reverse engineer and replace life, as the modelling of systems on quantified definitions.

the lockdown mindset is a defence - against Everything! And therefore effects a self-alienation FROM Everything (and everyone) to a fear bubble. Then ‘joining in hate’ works as group reinforcement for the refusal to communicate (in any way BUT as the defence dictates to be  safe).

I write to the whole Theme and you are included to take whatever you want - or leave it on the plate.