Setting Life in Impossible and unsolvable problem

https://lockdownsceptics.org/2021/01/29/latest-news-269/#comments

 "The saddest part is they still think they can “control” the virus."

I could be 'sad' that the writer takes the bait of such a narrative leverage of the public mind. The control is being contractually set out by government and entered into by the public under legal fictions.

'Controlling the virus' can mean anything and nothing - as 'in the naming and definition of the virus' can all else be framed and subordinated.

As long as you swallow the virus narrative or meme, you are mind captured to the frame of reaction and response - which can be argued, shifted, turned on and off and set in tiers until Kingdom or Biotech security state comes online.

The WANTING to believe in the virus narrative is exactly as mad to see as the WANTING to believe in lockdowns. It is believed to offer salvation from fear - or indeed from fear of fear that mounts to terror.

Without belief, the religion built on the viral pathogen theory is undone, because it is not true. The interpreting of the process of human rebalancing and regeneration that is health of immune function through our own psychic projections, becomes a model to which all else must be sacrificed so that the system 'survives'. The investment in an established system of belief is a currency of control. People may think that they do not want to be managed, but free to exercise responsibility for their own discernment of life, relationship and shared endeavour. But they 'think' in the frame of a managed mind that is already operating on 'locked down' meanings - as a locked down mind!

Science follows the evidence, as a willingness to uncover the truth in, on and from which to relate truly. Institutional ego, seeks only from a frame of self-reinforcement.

Invested identities are defended against truth and evidences of honest enquiry that undo fear, superstition and control, to a true basis from which to live. Attacking such identities is no less mad than believing them. They are investments of defended belief set against disclosure. Withdrawing invested support and allegiance to beliefs that make no sense or undermine all sense is the recognition of a contract that you do not have to consent to, or enact as your own currency of thought, speech and behaviour. But until you accept your own responsibility for your own experience you will always align in thought that seems to offer an escape clause, that then frames you and your world in terms that cannot be escaped.

Yes, something is happening. But the structure of our interpretation and belief is what we each and together derive our experience from. The intent to control our experience of reality by redefining, masking out, false flagging and diversionary conflict is all part of an unwillingness to re-evaluate our foundations, under a sense of conflicted and corrupted investments deemed 'too big to fail'. Hence everyone and everything ELSE must take the fail, and the collective expression of this game of musical chairs is self-destructive contraction and degradation to fit the demands of 'control' set against fear of Disclosure.

Limiting life and consciousness so as to be able to persist the face of control over a fear of life and love masked in humiliation, death and terror. A 'lockdown and distancing' from who and what Life Is being as 'salvation' assigned to control. That Life is already a quality of self-organising, healing, balancing and reintegrating intelligence, is unrecognisable or inconceivable to a fearfully dissociated and split off mind set against Its Self and its World.