Presumptions of threat made real by reaction

https://lockdownsceptics.org/2021/01/26/latest-news-266 

Quoted from one of the articles on the page linked above.

These uncontentious assumptions are:

1. COVID-19 is a serious new human disease, caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, that can kill people. The disease ‘jumped species’ in Wuhan Province, China and spread globally from there. 

2. Doing nothing in the face of this new disease and the resulting pandemic was not an option because, despite some pre-existing immunity to the disease, in the UK a large proportion of the population was naïve to the infection and as a result even a modest infection fatality rate could have resulted in a significant number of deaths.

Such assumptions as 1 are still awaiting proof of substance - while such reactions from 2 have run amok.

COVID-19 is a new umbrella DIAGNOSIS for a range of already existing disease conditions with the possible exception of the specific post complications sometimes called covid pneumonia - which may be severe or fatal as a result of any number of potential causes including iatrogenic treatments, vitamin and essential mineral deficiency, toxic exposures and collective stress such as to undermine immune function - including that associated with end of life scenarios.

'Doing nothing' is used as an insinuation of lack of care and concern, when it can mean doing only as an ongoing assessment of established facts so as to leverage 'doing the provided solution', which may be opportunistic as leveraging the fears and sympathies of a misguided public as a result of mistaken, misguided or malicious distortion of information.

The attempts at 'damage limitation' and disinformation into the consciousness of those seeking to separate fact from fiction or indeed faction, are as much the top down directives of narrative control, as of those who cannot look on the fact of such a disturbing reality and seek to retain what they assume to be 'rationality'.

The use of rational means to gaslight or deny worth and right to a voice is well known. Rationality can be merely a masking strategy over a fear of exposure in the posture of control. Reason itself is synonymous with sanity. No stretch of imagination can rationalise destroying our global life support network and systems as the basis to save us from a 'disease' almost exclusively generated by the genetic definitions, tests and treatment protocols - including social isolating and fear programming.

The resort to computer modelling is increasingly used as a 'scientific' substitute for empirical science, clinical and professional perspectives and last but not least common sense. No expertise was required to spot the loony in this case, but a normalisation to corporately funded management under 'experts', deferred to 'authority' under the spell of a presumption that as they are all in lockstep they MUST know and cant be questioned.