Induced or incited fear of scarcity is the means of control

 #1
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/oh-no-were-down-to-our-last-ten-million-years-of-fossil-fuels/

Abiotic oil is accepted in Russia for decades and enables them to locate oil where such science predicts. This must therefore be insider knowledge but not mainstream acceptance.

Induced or incited fear of scarcity is the means of control.

If not for private profits being protected against true account by externalising or dumping costs - including toxic consequence, we would not have a trillion dollar 'market' that has grown to address the disease thereof under cover story that evades responsibility not only to avoid penalty but as a basis for marketing the sick while persisting in crime, for such it is.

And when knowing given priority, so as to set a 'model' above empiric fact, such as to actively attack and undermine true witness, it is 'sin' - which has a lot in common with 'cognitive dissonance' for truth is so feared as to drive an addictive illusion into self-reinforcing destruction.

Oil and other carbon fuels can have their technologies of extraction and use refined to minimise pollution, and the cost is then proportional to its true account. The CO2 is not pollution, and yet there is significant toxicity in both its use as fuel and the derivatives such as plastics and pharmaceuticals. There is also HUGE investment in what I would call negative economies that extract short term profits to become long term debts, deficits and disease and distortion of communication. I also sense that oil plays a role in the Earth of which we know so little - partly because we only want to know what serves 'getting' in terms of marketising and weaponising a private advantage.

I have no doubt there are much better and cleaner energy sources that are already known but suppressed.

It isn't private profit that is responsible, but the masking of the private in seeming public good, that becomes a hidden and predatory agenda, accepted as insider currency of thought, normalised by mutual reinforcement as the right to use others without any regard or recognition for the life of which we are Of - even if we think to be set apart and over life.


If as I hold, giving sets the measure of our receiving then our experience of conflicts, deceits and subjugation to illusions of control are valid feedback.


True decisions are willingly aligned in and do not require coercive controls (Which always demand more and more sacrifice to maintain).


Science as a corporate and reputational investment has become captured by its own Model. This is not just true in medical fields, but in all fields.

Internalised structures become unquestionable 'reality' by which to deny true witness.

But none of such is workable, and so an insider knowledge or compartmentalised technologism has to run in secret which requires 'control' of official narrative.


Most of the 'conspiracy' operates as self censor from an internalised conditioning.


#2
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/oh-no-were-down-to-our-last-ten-million-years-of-fossil-fuels/#comment-5172582023


Carbon units are the 'problem' from the mindset of a controller caste. Also regarded as viruses on the planet. These two combine in the narrative identity of 'carbon guilt - as the export of corporate guilt (as the Green insinuation of human self hatred), and that of innate sinners to others as 'infection vectors'. Fear and guilt are induced as the basis for selling Protection as an ongoing payment in return for 'morally mitigating masking identity' set in self and other-denying sacrifice.

The use of the would-be pious as 'sin-eaters' is not a new idea.
But the concept is a magic trick by which perhaps to buy time to persist in sinning under some kind of narrative justification.
I'm aware that sin is a degraded term muich abused and little understood, but the attack on life and truth from a priority set in self-illusion is the defence of a mistaken identity, persisted in, as irrevocably set over fear and guilt from which there can be no escape.
Errors set outside the possibility of correction are thus 'too big to fail' and so everything and everyone ELSE has to fail in order to protect a complex masking from disclosure.