Tuesday 1 December 2020

2 Tier vaccines?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsDGPOYuDkg

MP Tells Government To Take Vaccine First Before UK Public

(Sir Desmond Swayne)

 

Dr Bhakdi and Dr Reiss in 'Corona False Alarm - facts and figures' page 114
In the contexts of Swine Flu 2009-2010:
Quote:
A nationwide vaccination with the hastily produced and barely tested H1N1 vaccine was recommended. 60 million doses of adjuvanted vaccine weer purchase for theGerman population. Non adjuvanted vaccine was obtained only for high members of the government.

German Spiegel article:
https://www.blauzungenimpfung.ch/doc/Spiegel3.pdf

I ran this through a translator.

Adjuvants are usually a form of aluminium or mercury that is toxic - and generrates the defensive 'immune response' that then makes antibodies relative to other ingredients in the shock zone such as attenuated or passaged virus matters.

The H1N1 adjuvant was legally found to cause narcolepsy in a very small percentage resulting in radically and negatively changed lives along with millions in legal payouts.

However the reason I posted this is the hitherto only suspected belief that there is a 2 tier system of vaccinations and that part of the deal for being on board the driving of such agenda may be the privilege of being assigned a special 'passport'.

I realise that the new 'biotech immunisations' are a completely novel attempt to break into a cell and hack it so as to make specified antibodies under the definition of antibodies as 'immunity'.
But the principle of an effective placebo for the privileged remains an indicator of 'do as we say, not as we do'.
The lust for the establishment of a biotech 'revolution' takes the destruction of checks and balances against the inherited order to a new level.
Breaking boundaries is for the gods, who set bounds on their assets as to permission to associate, speak, move or access the needs for survival.
Some contracts are easier to enter than escape, and these are the most loaded with 'incentives' to sign up first and pay later.

But there is a basis for declaring a false contract null and void but this does not escape the consequences, so much as face them to truly own what is yours and release what never truly was you.
This is outside the scope of strategic thinking - that is intent in escaping or masking over and denying conflict by attacking it in others - or selling toxic debt (conflict) to others under false premises.



No comments:

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comment. If your comment does not show - it is probably waiting moderation - which is when I notice the email notification!