I find the concept of herd immunity flawed

 https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/09/21/more-covid19-news-from-sweden/#comment-200695 

Personally I find the concept of herd immunity flawed.

Fitting life and understanding into false frames can be the fundamental error from which even the best intentions lead to compounding the error.

But once a story is in the mind it is a 'normal' in which, from which and as which we all think and therefore perceive and react.

If one has to accommodate to ignorances, then some clarity can be gained by clearing as much as possible within the thinking available.

This means stripping back to exactly what we mean and being consistent.

Scientists or even reasoned consideration can do this, but invested identity is already set in its action and reaction as an attempt to maintain defences against feared outcomes in personal terms.

Investment in a pathogenic model shows itself as the dedication to WANT a deadly threat to be active and ongoing as the basis to persist in the reactions that are in FACT deadly threat, but are subjectively masking over deeper conflicts.

This is evident in the persistence in test-based 'cases' as disease, and in asymptomatic transmission as a superstitious contagion - for there is no substance to it. But there must be a psychological 'fit' for the fear of being a source of evil that will kill loved ones and must therefore separate to protect. There must be a 'fit' for seeing others as a source of evil that must be separated from and suppressed, denied or cast out, so as to save yourself.

If there were no such 'fit' the ideas would be too absurd to contemplate. The 'virus' of such a fear would find no host or such a limited reception as not not be able to run as behaviour and replicate the belief.

So many presumptions and wilful ignorance in the covid reaction - in corporates, governments and the public. 

In terms of seasonal respiratory disease, I suggest that nothing will prevent the communication from taking place, excepting to address it as an environmental response. The resilience of life to toxic challenge and adaptive change has to take everything into account.

But just to pull one tiny strand in common for most is that inadequate vitamin D levels prevent the T cell response of a more primary health response than antibodies. There are innumerable others.

The covid event is not fundamentally medical, or really political, its is a psychic aberration that is expressing as a political and medical insanity - though of course you can ignore the elephant in the room and focus on some limited and limiting details within the vast narrative bandwagon that is actively effecting the largest transfer of wealth and control in all known history.

I expect that the 'virus' will live up to its word - for it told us from the start and periodically updates it stated intentions. It is a curious form of mass hypnosis at many levels, such as to call me to question all narrative assumptions down to the bone - so to speak.

The pressure on Sweden will be huge. If you are not aware of this element, you may need not to know. How much do we really want to know?