Wednesday, 18 November 2020

Stamping out is cancel culture

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/11/17/stamping-on-the-anti-vaxxers-a-very-stupid-idea/

#1

Well said Malcolm.

If you should be defrocked, or retire from doing as much and as little as possible for the patient, you could do worse than "A History of Medical Beliefs and Practices - perhaps subtitled 'Toward the Discovery of Medicine'.


The evil that knows not what it does brings about what it does not expect.

So at another level altogether from the Fat Controllers, I see a reset from a society of suppressed symptoms to a realignment within life from a fresh appreciation of who and what we are.


I rightly or wrongly sense a desperation in the collapse into last resort.

But the nature of the beast is to accuse its very act in others.

The boil comes to the surface to burst, but more importantly to release its underlying conflict of hurt and hate set in rage, masked under suppression, that feeds the thing it purports to protect from.


There are opportunistic manipulations associated with destructive processes, but there is also a blind irrational and self-destructive hatred, that is like an iceberg, pre-verbal, masked over and deeply inhibited from open expression, because it is itself hellishly hateful to feel directly, and elicits the reaction to suppress and cast out by all and any means as an overriding priority.


Instead of mandating the hating of designated 'haters' (the new cancel culture underlying narrative dictatorship that includes and extends beyond covidity), we would do well to own that we are not only loving caring and compassionate, but carry pain that is encapsulated but nonetheless active in our frame of thought, perception and response.

'Unconscious bias' - yes - but blaming guilt of mind-leverage? No.

'Common Purpose' - yes - but by coercion and deceit? - No.

That freedom of communication can align in healing outcomes is the measure of trust and faith extended to it. No one wants communication to open their 'Room 101' and so without any overt conspiracy, everyone sells out on the truth that heals to evade their greatest fears - which Orwell chose his own picture for dramatic effect.

The truth that heals is the revealing of perspective that  a genuine willingness to communicate, relate, enquire and listen, uncovers through such willingness.

The idea of codifying this onto or into tablets and global biosecurity systems, is the result of the attempt to control life rather than share the gift of living it.

To a controlled and managed sense of 'security' LIFE itself is Threat - excepting in very specific conditionalities. 

I am told that one who is on a ventilator - having breath manually managed and taken from their own responsibility, cannot just be unhooked, but has to be weaned back into accepting and taking up responsibility. Perhaps not everyone wants to live if their conditions cannot be met. But conditioning can operate a lockdown in any mind unable or unwilling to question its own conditioning. Old dogs with old tricks may not want to survive a 'New World' in which our bodies, our children, reproductive, social and economic choices and biological environment - are all corporately owned and 'controlled'.

But while I am alive, I choose to embrace life - including the hate-sickness of a collective insanity that seeks to 'cancel' life under the guise of weaponised 'feelings' that usurp and block our very capacity to feel and know and share in living. 


I also note that there is the politics of outrageous demands that operates a kind of terrorism of the mind, so as to unsettle the 'rival' or 'target' and enable the 'deal' that is eventually consented to - within the framing fear of terrible loss, to an outcome set by the bully, than would never have been arrived at by open and honouring negotiation. This 'post truth politic' is increasingly the  signature characteristic of the bollocks being purveyed under pain of stick or lust for carrots (that may simply defer  or mitigate the stick and offer no carrot at all).

There is no 'way out' of a 'devil's pact' but simple repentance or release of our investment now - come what may. The words I chose don't matter. Their meaning is in the active willingness of a true re-evaluation rather than persisting in self-conflicted illusion as if there is and can be nothing else BUT as MY Terms and Conditions dictate.

Therefore everything in the mind's emotional reinforcement and physical experience is set against such disclosure. And cannot and will not hear or see what its function is to 'make you safe' from re-living. A change of heart is a new context, and not the projections of the old onto the new.

If we fight our own defences - they become auto-immune disease in the body politic.

The attempt to stamp out, seeds another cycle. The idea of stamping out from a template is a Newtonian version of creation, and hacking DNA is the attempt to mess with our own source code AS IF a separate leverage set apart from and over an unworthy life that does not meet our conditions. Who will 'win' such a war but a reset to persist the same futility over and over until something truly moves us to be recognised, accepted and lived, rather than being stamped on.


#2


"That policy seems to have worked quite well. I for one am glad that the anti-vaccinationists weren’t listened to and a terrible disease has been eradicated. Am I wrong?"



'Seems' is the truth of what you wrote.

Are you wrong to believe as you do?

No - you have been told by trusted authorities what seems easy to accept.


History as a justification for an ongoing set of belief that supports a current directive, is more than hindsight by which to exonerate or validate the victors.


It is evident to me that many will accept anything to mask out their fears even when such devices become the very agency of what they fear. You can follow your own question and evaluate your findings for yourself. But if you will only look at the mainstreamed account, you will only look for reassurance of what you do not want to really look at yet.


The history of Leicester's successful revolt against mandatory smallpox vaccines is a very relevant and unsung example of courage for our own times.

Everything is backwards.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comment. If your comment does not show - it is probably waiting moderation - which is when I notice the email notification!