Psychopathogenic thinking and germ theory

 https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/14/watch-the-parallels-between-9-11-and-covid19/#comment-258665 

I responded to your association of 'fake virus theory' with crackpot disinfo fed to 'normies'. I wasn't implying you 'needed' anything. I feel there is a paradigm-shifting opportunity in 'terrain theory' as the expansion and embrace of 'psycho-pathogenic' 'feary' within a living and connected perspective.

'Distancing' to psychopathogenic thinking is survival or salvation - and attacking the whole (divide and rule) is its predicate OF which it has no recognition BUT which it projects onto its world and in specific, projects to scapegoat or false flag in order to attack it there, or divert attention and funding accordingly.

I have never been invested in the pharma model, nor in the kind of reductionist science that spawned it. So I have had very little interaction with it though out my adult life. But nor did I seek to understand why. It wasn't a focus of interest.

Changes in life brought me to re-evaluate or investigate some of the scientific narratives that underpin our social and political world, and with this came a willingness to look into areas that I assumed were settled science, such as the cancer industry, polio and AIDS. In the course or uncovering the actual history became clear that the narrative for contagious threat was used to hide toxic damage, while providing a new basis upon which to generate 'healthcare measures'.

Terrain theory does not deny what we see as viral particles to exist - where they can in fact be observed (though there are some who say that electron microscopy inherently generates artefacts), but it does not regard them as the agency of causation.

As for the coronavirus. It was immediately recognisable as another iteration of an ongoing leverage - as is more widely known in swine flu but less perhaps in other precedents (mentioned). But also shouts its signature in all that it provokes and baits to reaction. If you recognise the pattern, it wont make any difference what the format is. So I chose not to engage with the proffered baiting until it became obvious that for whatever reasons the reaction to this one was globally orchestrated or 'incentivised' and had deep traction in terms of lockstepping all institutional authorities or services to compliance.

Then I looked for such facts as were claimed or asserted or assumed and followed the dots. But I was already aware of a substantial body of research and evidence that calls the medical monopoly or indeed a medical mafia, into question.

So the claim of hoax or fake can be misleading because disease 'clusters' are sought out, virologists (not toxicologists) are paid to investigate, media are fed narratives that run along with ritual theatre that can be seen through, (they don't try to make it foolproof and can be said to let you know that they are props for narratives - if you care to actually see) - and all kinds of heavy reactions are implemented some of which do harm of kill.

A detective sifts through the stories and evidences to establish what can be known and what can be a false lead or pet belief.

Discernment of truth is not a divide and rule, but a recognition of the whole in expression - through apparent divisions, conflicts and assertive denials.

I don't seek believers or converted 'normals' but to grow in the willingness to discern or notice dissonance of incoherency within what we are framed or normalised to think from.

There are many facets or levels to our experience in the world and the psychopathic alien imposition, or hijacking, is one way of looking at it. But one that gives power away as if to escape its responsibility... or guilt.

Setting up a foreign agent as the cause of our own conflict, relives us of addressing it where it truly is - especially is fear interprets exposure as total loss of face (self) or as damnation.

Narrative self justification on which your life depends is held onto against all odds and at any cost. Questioning the narrative opens a choice to NOT be driven BY it. But direct attack will meet deep and active defence.