Code viruses replicate in their receptive host

 https://lockdownsceptics.org/2020/09/03/latest-news-123/#comment-113533 

There is a similarity that is NOT recognised. A virus has no agency or ability to DO anything and must be 'received' and must fing the conditions to 'run' - including the conditions to 'replicate' or 'mutate' a variant replication. YOU are the operating system on which it runs.

Vaccination allows the introduction of 'potential hacks' or the presence of foreign antibodies or immune suppressing conditions that show up in the process of a normal respiratory disease episode.

If you have a better 'real meaning' for bits of RNA code in a protein wrapper that encapsulates and fits to receptor cells, then Make sure it isn't just a grim fairy story before presuming it to be true.

The term virus is equated with pathogenic causation and assigned roles that are actually in living cells interacting with such 'information' packets.

Biologists are not limited to pathological witch-hunts and gold rushes and so have studied a symbiotic cellular intra and extra-cellular functions that are inherent to life function. Extracellular 'viruses' are called exosomes and are indistinguishable from presumed 'pathogenic' cellular debris or code-entities - that can be seen under the conditions of electron microscopy - that may well introduce artefacts as a result of its process.

No claim of causation was made by the study that 'discovered' a novel virus. This was explicitly stated. Firemen are also often found at the scene of fires. Eradicating firemen is not the answer to fires (or defunding the police).

But insofar as we have recognised various viruses that are associated with infection in 'susceptible' terrains, Stewart is spot on in saying we could be searching for and finding a range or viruses that are normally found in healthy people in some - oten time quantity - but nonetheless picked up by RT-PCR testing if you set the testing rameters to bring the results that are 'consensually' deemed to mean something significant.

Likewise funding to research climate need not be confined to the carbon dioxide as global warming hypothesis, But there is an underlying control agenda that sets the narrative and thus the frame of thought, funding and reaction. It is more than 'political' bias - but uses political identities to mask in. I see an existential fear in the 'ruling establishment' that uses immense resources to predict or control outcomes well in advance, and actions them in disciplined ways. But do they SEE us?

The abilty to define the code, and the testing and diagnostic parameters as well as regulate treatments as required standard of care, is all opaque and in this case apparently patented and protected. A computer software company can indeed ensure that all sorts of 'back doors' are open by design to 'viruses' or hidden code execution as part of its back end - while fronting itself as the road or tool to every kind of extended ability.

Inducing us to open new 'powers' that then entangle us in ways we are not adapted or in a position to counteract - because they own the systems we depend on and run them as a process of market capture (mindshare) and control rather than as a relational service.

If we do not want to be treated as lab rats we have to uncover what it is to be truly human. For the most part we are predictable, controllable conditioned-responses, being systemed by the reverse engineering or our own psychology. Polarised identities operate from a set of rules and conditions or programs.

And what's behind the use of 'bedwetting' for an active agenda aimed at undermining civilisation as we knew it, operating through the mind-captured? Is that not also masking in virtue as a put-down of weakness seen in others? If they are weak - why not extend strength of solidarity in knowing the choices we are making, so as to be more able to make better ones?

When the Tower of Babel fell, no one could understand each other. Shaming and intimidating will not help. There may be no possibility of reaching another with information associated with deep fear and masking defence, but that doesn't mean we cannot find some human commonality.

The willingness to extend love is the only means to hold the awareness of love in our consciousness. Masking in the forms of love is a sure way to generate a hollow sense of lack that is then open or susceptible to every kind of 'hijacking' thought, because what we react from, is accepted true and made real BY REACTION.

Reaching someone IN reaction is difficult as they are fully engaged in emotionally invested drama that de-prioritises all else as irrelevant or obstructive to their sense of survival.

Crying wolf is a metaphor for how a community defence can be activated on a false basis. These people have done this more than three times and its still 'works' because each time they bring in more regulatory capture, more conditioning to the drills of lockstep, more conditioned acceptance of doublespeak and media obfuscations. (Less critical awareness).