Imposition of systemic controls to 'make us safe'

https://www.anhinternational.org/news/news-alerts-week-32-2020/

Thanks for 'coming out' more and more clearly in witness for the human spirit against a backdrop of the active and systemic intent to undermine life in favour of systemic controls to 'make us safe'.

I started responding to what came up on reading the 'news' you share - but chose to put it on a link - rather than fill your page!

- - -

The core pattern here is the active willingness of those in positions of trust and authority to use 'untruth' as leverage for agenda ostensibly to force outcomes deemed necessary or desirable such as to justify overriding truth for 'a good cause'.

Exactly what the 'good cause' is becomes unfathomable as the masking of such causes in a leveraging of untruth can and does become anything that can be used to protect the 'good cause' from  transparency and accountability.

And so 'making us safe' is effected against our will and as a systemic undermining and denial of our living will under the pretence of 'consent' and 'trust' that has no basis in relational experience but simply uses terms that once held Meaning as the means to deny it.

Individuality is a unique expression of a Relational Field of which it is integral. But the mind-set of the breakdown of such a felt context to a private thinking bubble, seeks armouring and weaponising or strategic masking against perceived threat in the 'other' and the wholeness of which both or all expressions are truly belonging.

The lockdown and masking of Mind to the image and forms of a world of 'meanings' whose primary function is to reinforce the separateness and distancing of a bubble mind set as private agenda of possession and control.

But in experience, as a survivor of trauma that must be walled out, masked over and denied reliving.

The way the ego, as mind-set of defence, set in fear and separation, subverts and uses insights - that in their moment are valid - works to repurpose all attempt at communication into reinforced armouring and defence against communication, relationship or trust. Because to any captured mind, trust is given to fear for protection, and fear gives its 'meanings' to the forms of anything and everything that it perceives, is offered it or comes to its attention.

This is a communication breakdown.

Offering advice or ‘help’ where there is no shared willingness is our own liability to leverage our outcome in our terms without first checking in. Checking into the relational field is not complex or difficult - because our true being is the most natural response we have - but under adaptation to a world of ‘communication breakdown’ and masking strategies of social and personal survival, or invested indentity can take the place of our natural wellbeing, and demand the overriding of our innate communication or life support and its sacrifice - to a driven need for control set against fears that cannot be allowed into awareness.

I hold truth to be relational resonance, recognition and extension rather than a fixed constellation to be protected against change - or an Ideal to be restored over a world of change seen unfit and unworthy of its perfection, and yet I recognise the mind of judgement in myself as a mis-taken identity that generates and is the idea of conflicted being set over a true but masked over relational communication.

To gain a world but lose the felt awareness of our living Context, from false profits set upon false premises. The idea of releasing and reconciling debts is of allowing a renewal of capacity to express and embody as life lived. But the idea of a ‘global reset’ seeks to repackage toxic debt into a systemic control in which individual, family and cultural unfoldment of Meaning is denied the right to be truly moved. However, the process that is underway is not really ‘control’ of life so much as the worship and sacrifice of life to the idea of control. Once invested in the belief we have it, any releasing is seen as a feared chaos to be walled out. We wall ourselves into the conflict our masking thinks to escape and rule over, systemically neutralize or cancel out. I don't believe the choice for hell is final - but it runs under the conviction of finality, irrevocability and unforgivable grievance.