one virus causing one disease?

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/09/scientists-have-utterly-failed-to-prove-that-the-coronavirus-fulfills-kochs-postulates/

I felt to sketch out some of the background to the presumption of one virus causing one disease (or contagious non disease) as a pandemic.

The search for and identification of a cluster of clinical cases. (Wuhan has some of the worst air pollution in the world).

The assignment of virologists to seek for toxicology and compromised immunity? - No to seek for a new virus.

The discovery of a 'new' virus. (small print - discoverers did not claim causality).

The use of the study to launch an unprecedented and unending lockstep media blitz to make a handful of cases the basis for a declared pandemic, by which to assign as deadly cause to almost all deaths and to mutate the story so as to spread fear and confusion, as the not contagious original is changed to very contagious and very deadly condition against which we were all supposedly lacking defences.

The reliance on arbitrarily exaggerated computer models as fact, and to prime everyone to expect to lose their loved ones.

Imposing lockdown and economic shutdown and the withdrawal of civil liberties.

Meanwhile the discovered virus - which has not been strictly isolated, or uniquely identified or proved causal, but which has been genetically profiled from very few samples of fragments of protein and genetic material - recomposed and set as a genetic definition by which PCR tests can test for supposedly unique signature fragments that as tests are completely unfit as a diagnostic tool and are run under varying protocols that give different results accordingly - but which as a test has never been tested blind to ascertain that tested positives actually align with clinical cases.

But test based 'infection' (as with HIV, for which no virus was ever proven) generates more and more 'asymptomatic' cases - IE healthy people without disease who if tested for a range of viral fragments would generally show the presence of a few or many besides various coronaviruses.

To assign a match as a positive required a percentage of matching RNA - perhaps 80%

In other words a fuzzy match that would include a watch as a match as a patch as 80% of the letters are identical?

Report of the mutating of the virus - as more definitions to become tested for, and more symptoms to be added.

The developing of testing for antibodies as a surrogate marker for the presumed reactions to having or having had the 'disease' which can be invisible and no interruption to health in perhaps half of the tested positive. But these - if actually uniquely specific to ONLY a cv19 'infection' may indicate you have it or had it. Or if not specific mean you had some stress event that may have been any number of things.

So we have a mutating moving invisible redefinable target that is found in almost everyone if running the PCR test enough times or setting the antibody test broadly and lacking electron microscopy of a specific form identifiable from other similar size cell debris or endogenous exosomes and other viruses.

We also have a global pharma cartel monopoly that is aligned with other global agenda as an overwhelming influence over not just its own regulators (sic) but in every vector of social influence. And a biotech industry poised to inaugurate eugenetic processes and interventions by implementing systems of coercion and compliance under narratives of a better world, a safer world, feeding the world which mean no compliance invokes social exclusion, loss of protected or supported status, and degradation.

It should be obvious that following the evidence is denied by dictates of manipulative masking in science as dogma - as pretext for conditioning a tyranny-hesitant population to a new normal. But in practice the many have no mind by which to question or challenge what they are told is expert scientific advice - even when it is revealed not to be, or that more cautious advices were in fact ignored and overridden.

I didn't include the cross reaction of flu vax antibodies with the corona antibodies. and a number of other factors - but wanted to give some sense of the lack of proven science in the realm of the virus hunters or even openness to dialogue. It's not about health and safety but about control. Infectious risk to others is the new sin for existing - along with carbon guilt - which has regulatory structures in place globally and locally.

I also read this article of a willingness to question the scientific dogma immediately after writing another related comment

https://willingness-to-listen.blogspot.com/2020/06/virus-as-global-racket.html

in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/09/scientists-have-utterly-failed-to-prove-that-the-coronavirus-fulfills-kochs-postulates/#comment-189092

Hi Blue Pilgrim

I happened to have just read the quote below when I 'came here' and read and followed your comment to then see it was to a mainstream orthodoxy.

(Not to dismiss this entirely but I must have hoped for something more).

"One of the most spiteful and most unhealing properties of scientific models is their capability to strike down truth and take its place," warns Erwin Chargaff, long? time professor at Columbia University's Biochemical Institute in New York. "And often, these models serve as blinkers, by limiting attention to an excessively narrow area. The exaggerated trust in models has contributed much to the affected and ingenuine character of large parts of current natural research.

Erwin Chargaff is not talking of computer generated modelling here but underlying beliefs - which are in this field revealed in such language as 'invading virus' or a virus 'hijacking' a cell, as if the virus is an active agent or pathogen  specifically as originally defined by Koch's postulates - but which life does not really fit when studied closely.

A similar pattern can be seen in those who by model and funding are directed to study Climate ONLY through the 'politicised imperative' of combating a demonised CO2' element.

Curiously I note that Chargaff gives agency to the model and not to the mind that chooses to accept it. That is a pointer to the mind's capacity to define itself as the hapless victim or tooled slave of circumstance and be-live it.

I read the above quote in

Virus Mania

Avian Flu (HSN1), Cervical Cancer (HPV), SARS, BSE,

Hepatitis C, AI OS, Polio

How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics, Making Billion-Dollar Profits At Our Expense

https://www.torstenengelbrecht.com/en/virus-mania/