Maps and Models from Presumed Foundations

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/09/scientists-have-utterly-failed-to-prove-that-the-coronavirus-fulfills-kochs-postulates/#comment-189350
in response to the themes above:

If I respond to you in some particulars I also respond to the themes as a whole - so no personal attack or expectation of response.
Perhaps cherry picking - including lockstepped groupthink is part of the structure of human thought and conscious construct.

You clearly resonate with you choose to accept. As do I with what I accept.

I must however state my total disagreement with your assertions.

The nobel winning inventor of the RT-PCR test stated it was being abused by the HIV lobby as a diagnostic tool. But - what did he know of biology (sic).

The fact that we can map out a model and use it as a basis from which to map out some more, is also the ability to generate treatments that may suppress symptoms, but generate disease that is then assigned by the model to the disease instead of to the treatment. I regard iatrogenic disease as the most prevalent means of sickness and death in the developed world - though heart disease and cancer are officially keeping it in third place in UK/US and no doubt similar in other developed countries. I wonder if anyone has ever officially died from chemotherapy, radiation or surgery when treating cancer?

The wonder of technological progress is its capacity to become a psychopathic force - not least because of investing all ills to its panacea. And so all the conflicts seeking technological or pharmaceutical solutions - that are actually conflicts of the human heart and mind - feed into technologism that in perfect cognitive dissonance that now inaugurates a 4th Reich under global bio-technocratic tyranny.

You are wilfully or un-mindfully deceived about smallpox and polio unless you are referring to the science of sanitation and nutrition. I'm all for science - but not for lockstepping dogma that remakes history to allow only supports for its own agenda. Also I didn't say mainstream media, I said mainstream science. There are institutional constraints that become structural ossification or systemic death over time. This is not just scientific institutions.

The Biome is what it is, and does what it does. And our belief will operate a self reinforcing loop on a system that is fundamentally supporting and enabling physical consciousness - or better stated - consciousness of a physical experience. Therefore look always to the foundation, because all else MUST unfold or derive from there.

The accepting of a fight-flight response as the foundation of our consciousness is the framing of all experience as conflict or war.

Even to the extent of projecting fear of threat onto our life support and attacking it as an anti-biotic intent. There is no future in it and a dwindling conscious awareness of any residual presence, but the eradication of the past in exchange for fantasy identities played out within a shrinking support system. Our surface consciousness is an effect trying to be a cause, as a result of attachment and identification in effects. What goes around, comes around.

Disease isn't in itself nasty - but we have developed such meanings in giving and receiving lovelessness. The eradication of 'nasty' does not work. No matter how much globally 'righteous' nastiness is brought to bear in achieving its new world order. Nastiness doesn't cancel out nastiness. But a recognition of our own gift coming home can cause a change of heart and a renewing of our mind.

We are 'progressing' to our starting place; the fear that drove technologism as a control mentality, instead of a servant called at need.