Kaufman - Not just in the information, but in the demeanour of sharing it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll__gWch99E 

Dr. Andrew Kaufman: Philosophy and Science in Crisis with Elisha Celeste  

The teaching you share is not just in the information, but in the demeanour of your sharing it.

You are therefore 'teaching' a living context for communication and exchange.

In this sense we can all be agencies for 'open field awareness' that embraces and over time, replaces a polarised emotionally reactive opacity - or masking agenda.

Transparency to truth is then a willingness to give expression or embodiment as we are truly moved - and so learning is not merely gaining insights or better models by which to manage our lives, but a participance by which to learn what is ours or given us to be, and what is not.

The releasing of what we are not is the corollary to accepting what and who we are - and the defended masking persona is a learned or acquired strategy rooted in conflicts that are broadly 'separation trauma'. None of us are 'open for communication when triggered into fear-defined identities that must seek protection, reinforcement and control as primary survival objectives - but we can SEEM to be presented in ways that can pass off as present - and all of us can participate in social masking evasions that are ritually set habits, conditionings and therefore belief, perception and reaction to 'conditions' that are often a filtered, distorted and therefore destructive or self-limiting use of mind. It is as if an augmented reality model has developed from our past that literally covers over our direct experience and appreciation for being - and for the innate or innocent qualities of being.

A significant factor in any healing is the willingness tor receive, accept and share in it. Any conviction of guilt stands as a block to worthiness, which the mind can translate into narrative justifications, stances and armouring that sets up dissonances in the field of relations. The 'externalisation' of Life as both Creator and Creation is the inner recoil of a dissociating fragmentation - that we are humanly adapted, fitted and identified to as our 'normal' - or habitual focus and patterns of response. All the king’s horses and all the king’s men, not only cannot put Humpty together again, but can only reinforce the belief in lack as the drive to regain what was lost in external terms. This is what we see as a cognitive dissonance rooted in communication breakdown - but asserting and defending as structural investments - that stricture and choke life by the attempt to manage and control it. There is a place of inhibitory responses within a re-integrative willingness because without recognising willingness we suffer our reality and relations as coercive. But this is within the context of healing and not as war on symptoms operating in substitution for love and life - as some sort of masking in apparent virtue as a result of signalling good intentions. Until we release struggle within our condition, we cannot open an embracing and expanded perspective from which what it seemed to be (or seemed to compel and define us to be) is no longer active.

I am writing in part as a gesture of companioning - as when two or more gather in shared purpose a living context attracts alignment - in our own timings and synchronicities.

A key implication of the 'fragmentation of mind' is that self-isolation or dissociation and displacement are cast out as belief given power, but that we never truly leave the MInd - and so remain within a greater relational 'Field' of energy, information and exchange, of which we are an integral expression - no matter how complex the patterning of defences that define us otherwise.

The idea 'everything is connected' has a qualitative meaning as synchronicity, and the nature of Communication as a whole in all its parts, is where cause and event are one. Living from wholeness is a willingness to listen for the will of a true desire, instead of masking in reactive substitution from a sense of self-lack.

The belief humans are conditioned responses it itself a conditioned response or fear as control operating as an inertial fulcrum - offcentre to the balanced 'disequilibrium' of an order that rises from 'chaos' as distinct from the imposition of coercive 'order' over feared and denied 'chaos'.

So our healing is in our willingness to discern the basis through which to abide the apparent chaos - that would otherwise trigger recoil and reaction to 'mind' that displaces to world, others and body.

But our experience of self-protective impulse can be not on very intense, it can completely gap or dissociate our presence, while the threat of triggering conditions remains current as our mindset. Separating narrative identity of habituated response, from truly appreciated presence, is NOT something we can DO from a mind of judgement, but is something that is gifted through us in the willingness to pause judgement. But here is no less of an invested identity than perhaps we see in the too big to fail banking, medical or military structures. Yet the willingness to see it, is already a differentiation from its automatic control in our name. And so indeed curiosity is the movement of being that simply asks, of a quality of being that also simply answers. Answers from life are recognisable resonance in the heart of shared being - while the mind would weaponise or marketise insight such as to use the forms of association to buy more credit, fuel or time for control-mentality - which at root is a self-evasive manoeuvre of psychic survival of a private or unshared reality. regardless how many join or lockstep bubbled realities - their commonality operates fear of Intimacy of being, as masking substitution for knowing and being known truly - which extends to the ordinary moment of our relations and world.

The 'covid' command operated from within. If your 'name' was called, your mind was already captured, or invested in structures of conditioning that are fundamentally characterised by 'control' set over life - as distinct from a balanced relational discernment within life. The nature of the 'big lie' is the capacity to repeat it and weave derivative or supporting narratives to persistently saturate anyone who gives emotional investment by reaction. The power to do this is tacitly recognisable as a terror  and a tyranny whose narrative offers an identity of ritual compliance as a deferment or mitigation of fear, of pain, of loss.

All of us are intuitive, but few are consciously or directly awake there - and so we have feelers that simply recognise where the conflict and pain lies, and where the evasion or (temporary) escape lies. In the same way, false assertions structure funding and career opportunities that most simply flow along as 'the world they have to survive and perhaps thrive in'.

Whatever the 'ego' of fear and control, seems to say or do, the voice for the healing or reintegration for wholeness undoes or translates to terms of love - including all sense of betrayed or denied and broken love - over which an armouring is invoked to limit against Total Loss.