Coronic Illegations - Because it doesn't make sense

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/06/26/covid-the-strange-the-inexplicable-and-the-weird/

#1

David Crowe is one voice among a few who do not automatically take the bait and run with it.

The means by which a 'virus' is 'defined' is in the realm of splicing of genetic code fragments presumed to have been 'isolated; from all other such matters. What could possibly go right?

It has been said that if god didnt exist man would have to invent 'him'.

I note that for the industries that feed on sickness and war, if an enemy doesn't exist, it is necessary to invent one. This has been done over and over. (Virusmania being a worthy tome to read how). Don't let truth get in the way of a profitable story - especially one that covers over toxic accountability.

It is clear enough that the condition in which truth will out, are contagion to the bubble set in lockstep to a different drum.

#2

It is already a known fact that flu vaccines increase other vectors of respiratory disease  including coronaviruses. I believe there are accounts of immune disregulation that can result from antibodies of the flu vaccine and the coronavirus in the wild. I have read that canine coronaviral matter is in (some?) flu vaccines, (as a result of being passaged through canine subjects or cells), and this could be a cause of cytokine storms etc.

I have also read of the attempts to trial coronavirus vaccines, in otters  where all subjects showed excellent antibody response after vaccination, and all subjects died on exposure to corona in the wild. I think another trial on humans was not as catastrophic but criminal proceedings in the Philippines are ongoing.

I suggest that if globalism cannot achieve its takeover, then there will be a true Reset, because the systemic corruptions in medical and other sciences and professions are at breaking point.

I also believe that such levels of control as are being implemented, can NOT work as a form of governance. It will kill the goose that lays the golden egg  though it thinks to switch to bio-tech and robotics. But it does not really think so much as strategize evasion.

#3

'Cases' are the measures that Witty and co can adjust as the 'tested' or assigned cases - that have no clinical relevance.

The idea being weaponised is of latent infection as an ongoing 'threat' to the 'collective' who are represented as 'others' to whom natural rights and freedoms are being denied or sacrificed.

The science being followed is the application of behavioural psychology to shape the 'new normal' of a top down dictate operating in the guise of social protection.

The 'rules' are to 'condition' the fearful nature of the 'threat' regardless the lack of actual threat - such that the real threat is penalty for non compliance with 'health and safety' regulations that choke life - not unlike a bit and halter. And so the correct reading of this whole exercise is an assertion of claim to power through capture of our fundamental institutions.

#4

When political expedience trumps scientific veracity any agenda that pushes the global Crash is fastracked, and then the next day Europa is back at war with Ocaeana (Orwell ref). But most of us are effectively immune anyway.

But while you made a point the risk of transmission outside is limited to the nocebo effect.

Studies on transmission haven t conclusively proven it excepting to find samples of virus on surfaces or in droplets or aerosols. Not everyone gets pregnant after sex. A lot of things have to line up to  catch a baby .

The cognitive dissonance is disturbing  perhaps one of the most disturbing things in the whole business. Are we living on parallel planet Earths now? Is there a sorting going on?

The invested belief in the hoax is very real. If you strongly but wrongly believed I was trying to murder your children you would be murderous toward me. And in fact I have met such hatred from some who align with Bill Gates in seeing those who choose not to vaccinate as baby killers - and a threat to the lives of others. Bill sells the belief in immunisations without scientific or legal accountability.