Sunday 31 May 2020

The Necessary Lie as the mask against a feared truth.

https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/31/its-all-bullsht-3-leaks-that-sink-the-covid-narrative/

'The Necessary Lie'  is the mask against a damning reality - or more accurately - the mask against a feared truth.

Feared truth is ultimately an oxymoron or self-contradiction. The masking of the inner from the outer is the action or event of self differentiation - from within which chicken and egg, or cause and effect each generate each other.

The pattern of Self-evasion masks as one of discovery and dominion - running as possession and control. We are all in this apart-ness, as the very sense of self in threat of lack-driven needs.

The lockdown  has a quality that I associate with the ego - in telling reality to do what it is already doing.
In that I mean that the fraud of a corrupted Economy is in any case crashing - but the manual or narrative management of this is the intent to control its contraction to the maintaining of the controllers - who are insiders to the corruptions that spread through the whole by design.

I hold that Resets are part of the way life works - as periods of compression in which contradictory elements can no longer be held and choices have to be made. I argue that simplifying to qualities of life would address what we truly share the need for being. Felt qualities of life are primary needs that rational quantifications rule out, and render as systemic data - such as healthcare service provision - (sic). However fear of pain of loss is lockdown and masked off from all higher conscious function and can only sacrifice or limit and contract towards 'survival' as FEAR-defined controls.

There is no love in it - and this simply means it is unworkable and destructive to life - no matter what masking of fear as 'authoritative'.

How then to address the fear that HAS been invoked or summoned from the deep of ancient conditionings? This is what is ongoing as the masking of the self-evasion in 'new' clothes as everything shifts to overt and authoritatively sanctioned fear - and guilt - as our biological predicate - against which a new manually overriding bio-tech god must draw off our remaining funds, resources and allegiances to 'protect us'?

The pretext is a virus, but the predicate is fear.
Anyone researching virus or germ theory will discover that it represents a leverage of fear that vested interests were unwilling to yield to a true account - and this includes the many who WANT their condition to be assigned to invisible magical panacea - so as not to have to feel and address the true cause or causes where they are. Which drives the panacea pedlar to take on the profits AND the psychic emotional energetic of those they think to be 'saving' or 'salving' or slaving to a market model that seems to run on a law of Nature. "The ignorant demand Unconsciousness" (masking from truth in narrative reality bubbles).

My sense is that buying into selling ignorance - ie purveying mainstreamed deceit - is itself a self-blinding deceit. And while I would LIKE there to be some sign of Intelligence at the Heart in some part of the 'Powers that be' or Principalities of this world, I find no love or joy in their visions - which are fakery by which to sell the consolidation of control as a systemic blind obedience. This puts them in the role of Satan relative to Job - that is as the provision of every kind of temptation to obey and succumb to the FORMS of meanings as denial of Life and its Source. As if forms and images have built in meanings  - which of course under fear - THEY DO.

So thanks for a clear article on revealing the lack of factual basis or substance in the pretext for a globally orchestrated shift to a new control centre - new in the sense of overtly claiming power rather than the leverages and corrupting influences that have built up within the host over a century and more.

The issue of Fear-defined power and the Power in Life is within our identity - and therefore repackaged and exported to our relations and our world. We have to live this 'territory' to be found in who we truly are - and we hate it. But if we give our identity to hate we are not delivered from it - but pile up more debt in pain in exchange for momentary self-satisfactions.

I want a life in which we have freedom to come out and play - in ways that can be serious fun, as well as lighthearted gaiety. This is absolutely ruled out by ruled correctnesses of guilt or victim based virtue signalling. I am open to supporting each other in moving through identified fears. I am not moved to set those fears as a cage of loveless denials upon everyone else - in the name of 'care and concern'.

If a lie is masking as another's protective prop - do I need attack them for it?
No - I need align in transparency to truth - as I can discern in the moment at hand.
If another seeks to rule or deny me by the lie and the father of it - I need give to Caesar only what is due unto Caesar, so as to give to God all that is due to God. These two SEEM to be in conflict - but does truth battle with lies - or do lies battle only within themselves? In other words a version of truth is made in image, symbol and concept to set against the judged or denied 'evil'. Each is derived from the other as an expression OF conflicted Self - which I often refer to as a split mind - and which Jesus referred to as a 'house divided'.

A house divided cannot stand and yet the polarised identification flip into each other - never recognising a common error that conceals a unified source.

It doesn't work to pretend away our fear, or to covid it over with figmented regulations masking shame of self-lack into an isolating suit of armouring controls. But an intensely defended mask has all the power we give it - regardless that truth gives freedom to know and be our life.
How do we get to give acceptance to lies that have no real place in our hearts?
Is it not in the frame of the necessary evil by which to avert a greater or more terrible outcome?
Is that a patterning for the unconscious or plausibly deniable 'creations' of the mind as 'cock up', victim of circumstance or 'following trusted orders'?

Pattern recognition is implicit to consciousness. But templates can operate a lockdown in a mask of seeming to think, choose or react - when nothing relational has actually occurred. Howbeit our past repeats itself. There is an intuitive pathway to save time such as to recognise a deceit as a deceit and not take the bait. To emotionally react is to invest identity and be effectively phished by identity theft.
One invested, we protect our investments as our self - until and unless we are willing to revisit and hold to a true or just accounting - which rarely happens under attack.

Once we collapsed into shock - I felt to look into the structure of its patterns. It is easier to get into trouble than out of it. Not because illusions actually become true, but because we become more invested against their exposure and defend them as a blanket or blind self-protection.

For most who read here the shock is primarily associated with force majeure by institutionalised coercions and deceits rather than novel invisible threat of contagion. (Either of which can mask an 'act of God')

NOTE - I checked for spelling force majeure - and found this interesting covid legal related link
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-06/when-god-appears-in-contracts-that-s-force-majeure-quicktake

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comment. If your comment does not show - it is probably waiting moderation - which is when I notice the email notification!